3.23gre寫(xiě)作-筆記含學(xué)生改后作品_第1頁(yè)
3.23gre寫(xiě)作-筆記含學(xué)生改后作品_第2頁(yè)
免費(fèi)預(yù)覽已結(jié)束,剩余2頁(yè)可下載查看

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、【講義】3.23 GRE 寫(xiě)作高頻題目串講班(講義):ht/s/1mgN0kIG:037z-筆記區(qū)-1. 筆記區(qū)Instruction:evidence, aWhether摘自 OG:mption, question & alternative explanationsYou are not being asked to discuss whether the strue or accurate.ementshe argument areYou are not being asked to agree or disagree with theition sed.You are not bein

2、g asked to express your own views on the subject beingdiscussed (as you werehe Ie task).作者結(jié)論/是否正確不知道,但是作者的論證有一些關(guān)鍵性問(wèn)題,入股能夠得,就能評(píng)析作者的結(jié)論/注意新 G 與老 G 的區(qū)別到這些問(wèn)題的。注意立場(chǎng)的變化不要糾結(jié) 結(jié)論本身對(duì)錯(cuò);不要總以增強(qiáng)結(jié)論為目的;GRE 的寫(xiě)作語(yǔ)言可以問(wèn)的?mption-作者的假設(shè)是否合理;aevidence- 作者的是否足夠;alternative explanations 有無(wú)考慮其他解釋或可能性。學(xué)生作文:邏輯鏈:Survey validity 本身

3、的有效性willingness = ?actionaction, (OD sales decrease?) -OD profit decrease?profit decrease=? Sale stockTIPS:第一段:作者的結(jié)論是什么;作者的理由(簡(jiǎn)單復(fù)述); 作者的論證存在問(wèn)題(E A Q);還需要回答什么問(wèn)題(Q)問(wèn)題是什么,為什么存在這個(gè)問(wèn)題,問(wèn)題怎么樣(+)Response 1:The authormendst Old Dairy stockholders should sell their shares and otherinvestor should not purchase

4、stockhis company. Though the author provides arecent survey which indicated the desire of respondents about theirake of low-fatproducts, the factt such aboundany food stores, and the Old Dairy products arehigh in fat and cholesterol. There severasubstantiated amptions and logical flawsin his lines o

5、f reasoning, For a better evaluation of the authors advice, we need toconsider east three critical questions. To better support his advice, we needly, We might ask whether the survey is sistically valid. Perhaps thirveysrespondents is not sufficient in size. Maybe current sle is not randomly selecte

6、d andcould not represent teral group or in other words the survey is only about spelgroup of subject while many people have been ignored.his case the survey cannot bered on to support the author.On the contrary, if additional information aboutthe survey itself can be provided to prove its validity,

7、the authorsconvincing. will beEven if we acknowledge t many people do have the desire to reduce theirake offoods containing fat and cholesterol, we do not know t how many people can put it into practice , a question t needs to be addressed. This is because consumers may alsotake o consideration othe

8、r factors, such as taste and price difference betn fatfoods and low-fat foods. Without ruling about the the abovesibility, the author couldnot make any generalaboutt teral population have a desire toreduce theirake of foods containing fats and cholesterol merely based on theselective sub-group.Respo

9、nse 2:The newsletter offers investors advicet Old Dairys stock is worthless to purchase asa result of the increasing low-fat products demand which catalyzes profits of companyt the main selling products are high in fat and cholesterol to diminish. However, wecannot determine if the authorsmendation

10、is advisable since his reasoning isbased on unattested amptions which remains us some questions to query.不用對(duì)分析表態(tài),Argument 不要舉General Electric 具體例子,就文章本身進(jìn)行Before theis made, there remainseast one questiont if Old Dairysrevenue only comes from supermarkets rathern some other industries. The stockpriar

11、e determined by sophisticated factors influenced by all its products. If Old Dairy also sells some lucrative items whose prospects are full of hopes, the adviceoffered to investors would be inaccurate. On the other hand if it turns out t OldDairy is highly spelized in selling high-fat food to teral

12、public, it is morereasonable to fear t its stock price will plumb after a diminished profit.Response 3:The advice appearedhe newsletter suggestst Old Dairy stockholderl theirshares, and other investors not purchase stockhis company with the premisetthe company ire to have decreasing profits with dim

13、inishing saleshe future. Tosupport the advice, the author provides three reasons: 1) A strong desire by most of the respondents to a recent survey to reduce fat and cholesterol of food will decrease thesales otty and high- cholesterol food. 2) Low-fat products aboundany foodstores. 3) The majority o

14、f food products marketed by Old Dairy are high in fat andcholesterol. Close scrutiny to the reasons, however, revealst none of them lendcredible supports to themendation.ly, the advice claimst most of respondents to the survey have the desire of low-fat products. However, whether a strong desire can

15、 nesarily lead to an action ofabandoning fatty food is a question worth considering. Perhaps, the respondents are only aware of their over-weight and unhealthy conditions when investigating and continue their routines soon. In this caseweaken, whereas a behavior studydemonstrating t consumers will p

16、urse less high-fat food will strengthen theauthors argument. (=On the contrary, if a behavior study demonstratest consumerswill purse less high-fat food, the authors argument will be strengthened.)Besides, there may not be a diminishing of sales even if the respondents have different diets. Perhaps,

17、 they acquire some extra healthy food in everyday life without decreasing the amount otty products, which will not lead to decrease of sales. Therefore, without further explanations to these questions, it is hard to give an effective evaluation on the advice.Response 4:he newsletter above, the autho

18、rmend the investors do not purchase stock inOld Dairy Industries whose food are high in fat and cholesterol, due to the result of arecent surveyt 80 percent of the participants are in hope of reduce theirake of fats and cholesterol. Moreover, numerical food stores contain products of low-fatcomparin

19、g to the Old Dairy Industries. The authors sement is plausible as the glance; however, several questions, need to be answered in order to evaluate themendation because there are some unattested a reasoning.mptionshe authorsEven if we acknowledget the local residents buy foodhe food store, whether theprofit of the company will decrease is a question open to challenge. As far as is can be concerned, the profit is a functi

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論