3.23gre寫作-筆記含學生改后作品

1、【講義】3.23 GRE 寫作高頻題目串講班(講義)：ht/s/1mgN0kIG：037z-筆記區(qū)-1. 筆記區(qū)Instruction：evidence, aWhether摘自 OG：mption, question & alternative explanationsYou are not being asked to discuss whether the strue or accurate.ementshe argument areYou are not being asked to agree or disagree with theition sed.You are not bein

2、g asked to express your own views on the subject beingdiscussed (as you werehe Ie task).作者結論/是否正確不知道，但是作者的論證有一些關鍵性問題，入股能夠得，就能評析作者的結論/注意新 G 與老 G 的區(qū)別到這些問題的。注意立場的變化不要糾結 結論本身對錯；不要總以增強結論為目的；GRE 的寫作語言可以問的？mption-作者的假設是否合理；aevidence- 作者的是否足夠；alternative explanations 有無考慮其他解釋或可能性。學生作文：邏輯鏈:Survey validity 本身

3、的有效性willingness = ?actionaction, (OD sales decrease?) -OD profit decrease?profit decrease=? Sale stockTIPS：第一段：作者的結論是什么；作者的理由（簡單復述）； 作者的論證存在問題（E A Q）；還需要回答什么問題（Q）問題是什么，為什么存在這個問題，問題怎么樣（+）Response 1:The authormendst Old Dairy stockholders should sell their shares and otherinvestor should not purchase

4、stockhis company. Though the author provides arecent survey which indicated the desire of respondents about theirake of low-fatproducts, the factt such aboundany food stores, and the Old Dairy products arehigh in fat and cholesterol. There severasubstantiated amptions and logical flawsin his lines o

5、f reasoning, For a better evaluation of the authors advice, we need toconsider east three critical questions. To better support his advice, we needly, We might ask whether the survey is sistically valid. Perhaps thirveysrespondents is not sufficient in size. Maybe current sle is not randomly selecte

6、d andcould not represent teral group or in other words the survey is only about spelgroup of subject while many people have been ignored.his case the survey cannot bered on to support the author.On the contrary, if additional information aboutthe survey itself can be provided to prove its validity,

7、the authorsconvincing. will beEven if we acknowledge t many people do have the desire to reduce theirake offoods containing fat and cholesterol, we do not know t how many people can put it into practice , a question t needs to be addressed. This is because consumers may alsotake o consideration othe

8、r factors, such as taste and price difference betn fatfoods and low-fat foods. Without ruling about the the abovesibility, the author couldnot make any generalaboutt teral population have a desire toreduce theirake of foods containing fats and cholesterol merely based on theselective sub-group.Respo

9、nse 2:The newsletter offers investors advicet Old Dairys stock is worthless to purchase asa result of the increasing low-fat products demand which catalyzes profits of companyt the main selling products are high in fat and cholesterol to diminish. However, wecannot determine if the authorsmendation

10、is advisable since his reasoning isbased on unattested amptions which remains us some questions to query.不用對分析表態(tài),Argument 不要舉General Electric 具體例子，就文章本身進行Before theis made, there remainseast one questiont if Old Dairysrevenue only comes from supermarkets rathern some other industries. The stockpriar

11、e determined by sophisticated factors influenced by all its products. If Old Dairy also sells some lucrative items whose prospects are full of hopes, the adviceoffered to investors would be inaccurate. On the other hand if it turns out t OldDairy is highly spelized in selling high-fat food to teral

12、public, it is morereasonable to fear t its stock price will plumb after a diminished profit.Response 3:The advice appearedhe newsletter suggestst Old Dairy stockholderl theirshares, and other investors not purchase stockhis company with the premisetthe company ire to have decreasing profits with dim

13、inishing saleshe future. Tosupport the advice, the author provides three reasons: 1) A strong desire by most of the respondents to a recent survey to reduce fat and cholesterol of food will decrease thesales otty and high- cholesterol food. 2) Low-fat products aboundany foodstores. 3) The majority o

14、f food products marketed by Old Dairy are high in fat andcholesterol. Close scrutiny to the reasons, however, revealst none of them lendcredible supports to themendation.ly, the advice claimst most of respondents to the survey have the desire of low-fat products. However, whether a strong desire can

15、 nesarily lead to an action ofabandoning fatty food is a question worth considering. Perhaps, the respondents are only aware of their over-weight and unhealthy conditions when investigating and continue their routines soon. In this caseweaken, whereas a behavior studydemonstrating t consumers will p

16、urse less high-fat food will strengthen theauthors argument. (=On the contrary, if a behavior study demonstratest consumerswill purse less high-fat food, the authors argument will be strengthened.)Besides, there may not be a diminishing of sales even if the respondents have different diets. Perhaps,

17、 they acquire some extra healthy food in everyday life without decreasing the amount otty products, which will not lead to decrease of sales. Therefore, without further explanations to these questions, it is hard to give an effective evaluation on the advice.Response 4:he newsletter above, the autho

18、rmend the investors do not purchase stock inOld Dairy Industries whose food are high in fat and cholesterol, due to the result of arecent surveyt 80 percent of the participants are in hope of reduce theirake of fats and cholesterol. Moreover, numerical food stores contain products of low-fatcomparin

19、g to the Old Dairy Industries. The authors sement is plausible as the glance; however, several questions, need to be answered in order to evaluate themendation because there are some unattested a reasoning.mptionshe authorsEven if we acknowledget the local residents buy foodhe food store, whether theprofit of the company will decrease is a question open to challenge. As far as is can be concerned, the profit is a functi