版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
PracticalSolutionsToGlobalBusinessNegotiations克勞德?賽利奇(ClaudeCellich)蘇比哈什?C?賈殷(SubhashC.Jain)著Part2NegotiationofEnvironmentandSettingChapter2RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsChapter3SelectingYourNegotiatingStylePART2Merchantsthroughouttheworldhavethesamereligion.—HeinrichHeineCHAPTER2
RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsCultureCultureincludesalllearnedbehaviorandvaluestransmittedthroughsharedexperiencetoanindividuallivingwithinasociety.
Itiscommonlyagreedthataculturemusthavethesethreecharacteristics:1.Itislearned—thatis,peopleovertimetransmitthecultureoftheirgroupfromgenerationtogeneration.2.Itisinterrelated—thatis,onepartofthecultureisdeeplyconnectedwithanotherpart,suchasreligionwithmarriageorbusinesswithsocialstatus.3.Itisshared—thatis,mostmembersofthegroupacceptthetenetsoftheculture.CHAPTER2
RoleofCultureinCross-BorderNegotiationsCulturaldifferencescanin?uencebusinessnegotiationsinsigni?cantandunexpectedways.DefinitionofNegotiationThebasicconceptofNegotiationisinterpreteddifferentlyfromonecul-turetoanother.IntheUnitedStates,negotiationisamechanicalexerciseofoffersandcounteroffersthatleadstoadeal.InJapan,negotiationissharinginformationanddevelopingarelationshipthatmayleadtoadeal.EffectofCultureonNegotiationSelectionofNegotiatorsThecriteriaforselectingnegotiatorsvaryfromculturetoculture.Usually,thecriteriaincludeknowledgeofthesubjectmatter,seniority,familyconnections,gender,age,experience,andstatus.ProtocolCultureaffectsthedegreeofformalitythepartiesuseinnegotiations.Culturein?uencesmethodsofgreetingaswellasdresscodesEffectofCultureonNegotiationCommunicationThemanydifferentlanguagesoftheworlddonottranslateliterallyfromonetoanother,andunderstandingthesymbolicandphysicalaspectsofdifferentcultures’communicationisevenmoredif?culttoachieve.Forexample,Table
thereportintheUnitedStatesmeans“postponement”;inEngland,itmeans“bringthemattertotheforefront.”Bodylanguageisacaseofnonverbalcommunication.EffectofCultureonNegotiationTimeThemeaningandimportanceoftimevaryfromculturetoculture.InEasterncultures,timeis?uidandcircular.IntheUnitedStates,timeis?xedandvaluable.EffectofCultureonNegotiationRiskPropensityInculturesinwhichriskpropensityishigh,negotiatorsareabletocloseadealevenifcer-taininformationislackingbutthebusinessopportunityotherwiselooksattractive.Negotiatorsbelongingtorisk-averseculturesdemandadditionalinformationtoexamineallsidesofadealcarefullybeforereachinga?nalagreement.EffectofCultureonNegotiationGroupsVersusIndividualsInsomecultures,individualityishighlyvalued.Inothers,theemphasisisonthegroup.NatureofAgreementIntheUnitedStates,emphasisisplacedonlogic,formality,andlegalityoftheagreement.Intraditionalcultures,adealisstruckdependingonfamily/politicalconnections,evenwhencertainaspectsoftheagreementareweak.EffectofCultureonNegotiationThe?rststepingainingculturalunderstandingistoidentifythegrouporcommunitywhosecultureyouwanttostudy.Fornegotiators,therelevantculturalknowledgecanbedividedintotwocategories:(a)traditions,etiquette,andbehaviorofthe(b)playersandtheprocess.Inadditiontonationalcultures,negotiatorsneedtobeawareofprofessionalandcorporatecultures.UnderstandingCultureCulturaldifferencesamongmanagersbelongingtodifferenttypesofcompaniesProtocolandDeportmentCross-culturaletiquetteHall’sFrameworkRelationshipIstheculturedealfocusedorrelationshipfocused?CommunicationArecommunicationsindirectand“highcontext”ordirectand“l(fā)owcontext”?TimeIstheculturegenerallyconsideredtobe“monochronic”or“polychronic”?SpaceDopeoplepreferalotofpersonalspace,oraretheycomfortablewithless?DeeperCulturalCharacteristicsHofstede’sCulturalDimensionsPowerDistance(DistributionofPower)UncertaintyAvoidance(ToleranceforUncertainty)IndividualismVersusCollectivismMasculinity(HarmonyVersusAssertiveness)long-termorientationversusshort-termorientationDeeperCulturalCharacteristicsKeyIndividualsKeyindividualsrefertothosepeopleinsideandoutsidethecompanywhoseapprovalmustbesoughtbeforeanegotiateddealis?nalized.DecisionProcessEquallyimportantistheneedtounderstandtheroleeachindividualislikelytoplayintheapprovalprocess.InformalInfluencesManycountrieshavewebsofin?uencemorepowerfulthantheformalbossesPlayersandProcessNegotiatingGoal:ContractorRelationshipInsomecultures,negotiatorsaremoreinterestedinshort-termdeals;Inothercountries,theemphasisisonbuildinglong-termrela-tionships.TraitsforCopingWithCultureNegotiatingAttitudeThestrongerpartycantakethefollowingstepstosoftentheattitudeoftheopponent:(a)Explaintheperspectivesofthetransactionfullybecausetheotherpartymightlackthesophisticationtounderstandthenitty-grittyofthenegotiatedbusinessdeal.(b)Determinetherealinterestoftheotherpartythroughquestioning.Thismayrequirethenegotiatortounderstandtheother’shistoryandculture.(c)Amendtheproposaltosatisfytheinterestoftheotherparty.TraitsforCopingWithCulturePersonalStyle:InformalorFormalIndividuals’negotiatingstylecanbeinformalorformal.Styleherereferstothewayanegotiatortalks,usestitles,anddresses.Communication:DirectorIndirectInculturesinwhichcommunicationisdirect,suchasGermany,anegotiatorcanexpectdirectanswerstoquestions.Inculturesthatcommunicateindirectly(Japan,forinstance),itmaybedif?culttointerpretmessageseasily.TraitsforCopingWithCultureSensitivitytoTime:HighorLowSomeculturesaremorerelaxedabouttimethanothers.ForNorthAmericans,timeismoney,whichisalwaysinshortsupply.Mexicans,asanexample,aremorerelaxedabouttime.Thus,negotiationsessionsshouldbeplannedandscheduledsothatthepaceofdiscussionsrunssmoothly.TraitsforCopingWithCultureEmotions:HighorLowSomenegotiatorsaremoreemotionalthanothers.Anegotiatorshouldestablishtheemotionalbehavioroftheotherpartyandadjustnegotiationtacticsappropriatelytosatisfysuchbehavior.FormofAgreement:GeneralorSpecificCultureoftenin?uencestheformofagreementapartyrequires.Usually,NorthAmericanspreferadetailedcontractthatprovidesforalleventualities.TheChinese,however,preferacontractintheformofgeneralprinciples.TraitsforCopingWithCultureBuildinganAgreement:BottomUporTopDownSomenegotiatorsbeginwithagreementongeneralprinciplesandproceedtospeci?citems,suchasprice,deliverydate,andproductquality.Othersbeginwithagreementonspeci?cs,thesumofwhichbecomesthecontract.TeamOrganization:OneLeaderVersusConsensusInsomecultures,oneleaderhastheauthoritytomakecommitments.Inothercultures,groupconsensusmustbesoughtbeforeagreeingtoadeal.TraitsforCopingWithCultureRiskTaking:HighorLowAnegotiatormustexaminetheotherparty’sattitudeaboutrisk.Ifthenegotiatordeterminesthattheotherpartyisriskaverse,heorsheshouldfocustheattentiononproposingrules,mechanisms,andrelationshipsthatreducetheapparentrisksinthedeal.TraitsforCopingWithCultureThankYou!It’sawell-knownpropositionthatyouknowwho’sgoingtowinanegotiation:it’shewhopausesthelongest.
—RobertHolmesCHAPTER3
SelectingYourNegotiatingStyleDodgersGenerally,dodgersdonotlikefacingsituationsinwhichdecisionsmustbemadeandrisksassumed.Thedodgerisareluctantpartywhodoesnotenjoynegotiatingandwhowithdrawsfromthediscussionsorsimplyrefusestoparticipate.DreamersDreamersapproachnegotiationswithonemajorgoalinmind,thatis,topreservetherelationshipevenifitmeansgivingupunnecessaryconcessionswhilereducingtheirownexpectations.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsHagglersHagglersviewnegotiationsasagive-and-t-akegame.Hagglersbuildsuper?cialrelationshipsandaresatis?edwithsplittingthedifferencetoreacha?nalagreement.Thisstyleismoresuitableforonetimedealsindomesticmarketsituations.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsCompetitorsCompetitorsenjoycon?icts,feelcomfortablewithaggressivebehavior,andemployhardballtactics.Competitorsusewhateverpowertheyhavetowinandfullyexploittheotherparty’sweaknesses.Negotiatorsrelyingoncompetitivestrategiesandtacticsarefoundeverywhere,withagreaterconcentrationintask-orientedcultures.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsCreativeProblemSolversProblemsolversdisplaycreativityin?ndingmutuallysatisfyingagreements.
Duringthediscussions,theyemphasizecommonneedsandfrequentlysummarizewhathasbeenagreedtosofar.Theytendtohavelong-termvision,sometimesatthecostofshort-termbene?ts.Duringthediscussions,creativeproblemsolversexchangerelevantinformationandaskquestionsinacooperativeandconstructiveenvironment.StyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStrengthsandweaknessesofdifferentnegotiationstylesStyleDifferencesAmongNegotiatorsStrengthsandweaknessesofdifferentnegotiationstyles(continued)
SeeCaseF:TheRenault-NissanAllianceNegotiationsAppropriateNegotiatingStyleMaximizingjointgainsMostpeoplerelyononeormore
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年度新型能源汽車短期借用協(xié)議書4篇
- 2025年度文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展基金投資合作合同4篇
- 2025年度智能家居櫥柜定制工程協(xié)議書4篇
- 2025年度新能源車輛租賃代理合同模板3篇
- 2024版離婚協(xié)議年范本
- 2025年單梁橋式起重機項目可行性研究報告-20250102-152444
- 2025年中鹽青海昆侖堿業(yè)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 2025年四川壯禾人力資源有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 2025年中國郵政證券有限責(zé)任公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 2025年江蘇弘景建設(shè)規(guī)劃有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫含答案解析
- 漆畫漆藝 第三章
- CB/T 615-1995船底吸入格柵
- 光伏逆變器一課件
- 貨物供應(yīng)、運輸、包裝說明方案
- (完整版)英語高頻詞匯800詞
- 《基礎(chǔ)馬來語》課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(高職)
- IEC61850研討交流之四-服務(wù)影射
- 《兒科學(xué)》新生兒窒息課件
- 材料力學(xué)壓桿穩(wěn)定
- 人教版小升初英語知識點匯總
- 靜態(tài)爆破專項施工方案
評論
0/150
提交評論