ly研究方法老師課件_第1頁
ly研究方法老師課件_第2頁
ly研究方法老師課件_第3頁
ly研究方法老師課件_第4頁
ly研究方法老師課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩18頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

IntraclasscorrelationcoefficientsReliabilityandmore…AlexaRomberg710DiscussionSection2/11/09REVISED2/18/092*Sources*Shrout&Fleiss(1979)PsychBulletin(oncoursewebsite)McGraw&Wong(1996)PsychMethods(wille-mail,N.B.hassomecorrectionsthatwerepublishedlaterthatyear)(directlytranslatestoSPSS)3ICC’svs.Pearson’srPearson’srmeasuresinterclasscorrelationsVariablesarefromdifferent“classes”,theymeasuredifferentconstructs:e.g.,IQandGPA;heightandweight;celebritypopularityandnumberofmarriagesICC’s(therearemanyofthem)measurecorrelationswithina“class”Variablesaredifferentmeasurementsofthesamething/constructTheycouldberepeatedmeasuresonthesameparticipant,suchasforreliabilityOrtheycouldbemeasuresonmultiplepeoplewithinthesamegroup,e.g.,twins,studentsinaclassroom4ICC’sGeneralgoalistodeterminetheproportionofvariationinameasurethatisduetobeingamemberofaparticulargroupForexample,considerastudyof5families,eachofwhichhas3children,inwhichyoumeasuretheIQandageofeachchildIfyouareinterestedinhowfamilymembershipandIQarerelated,youwoulduseanICCIfyouareinterestedinhowageandIQarerelated,youwouldusePearson’sr5ManydifferentkindsofICC’sSomehavenamesyoumayrecognize:Cronbach’salphaHeritabilitycoefficientsKish’srateofhomogeneityOthersdon’tappeartohavenamesotherthansomewhatconfusingindices:ICC(C,1),ICC(1)6ExamplesofdatalayoutforICCWhattypeofanalysisdothesetablescalltomind?7CalculatinganICCStep1:PartitionthevariancebyenteringdataintoanappropriateANOVAmodelStep2:EntertherelevantMeanSquaresintotheformulafortheICCofinterestThiscanbedone(opaquely)inSPSSunder:Analyze->Scale->ReliabilityAnalysis->Model(Alpha)->Statistics8CalculatinganICC(reliabilityframework)ThisboilsdowntounderstandingthesourcesofsystematicvarianceintheratingsNeedtoconsider:1)howwereyourratersdetermined(i.e.,howareyouinterestedingeneralizingfromthem?)2)isvariabilityintheratingsduetospecificratersimportanttoyouornot?3)areyouinterestedinthereliabilityofindividualratersorinthereliabilityofthemeanofagroupofraters?9Consideration1:TheratersAreratersdrawn“randomly”fromalargerpool?E.g.,Doyouhave5RA’sallworkingonalargestudybutonly2rateeachparticipant?Or,doallratersrateallparticipants?(e.g.,youhave2RA’sworkingforyouandtheyratealloftheparticipants)Thedifferencehereisaquestionofgeneralization-doyouwanttogeneralizefromtheratingsonwhichyouarecalculatinganICC?10Consideration1:TheratersIfyoudowanttogeneralize(i.e.,theratersaredrawnfromapool)didthesamesubsetofratersrateallparticipants,ordiddifferentsubsetsofratersrateeachparticipant?Notsamesubset:Youhave5RA’sworkingonaprojectandeachtargetisratedbyarandomsubsetof2ofthem.Samesubset:Youhave5RA’sworkingonaproject,butthedataonwhichyouarecalculatingtheICCisfromthesame2raters.11Consideration2:VariabilityduetoindividualratersThisisanalogoustoaskingwhetheryouthinkthatvariabilitybetweencolumnsinyourtableisrelevanttotheratingsWhenyouhaveratersgivingsubjectiveratingsonascale(say,1-10),differentraterswillusedifferentpartsofthatscale.ImaginethatRater1rateseveryonehigh(i.e.,uses#’s5-10onthescale)andRater2rateseveryonelow(i.e.,uses#’51-5onthescale).Withthisconsideration,youaresayingwhetheryoucareaboutthedifferenceinabsolutevaluebetweentheseratersorwhetheryouonlycarethattheratersrankedthetargetsinthesameway(i.e.,thesametargetgota10fromRater1anda5fromRater2).12Consideration2:VariabilityduetoindividualratersYouroptionsforwhetherindividualratervariabilityisimportanttoyou:NOTIMPORTANT,thenyouarebasicallytestingwhethereachraterrankedeachtargetinasimilarway(referredtoasconsistency)ISIMPORTANT,thenyouaretestingwhethereachratergaveeachtargetexactlythesamescore(referredtoasabsoluteagreement)Completelyirrelevant:whenyouhavedifferentsubsetsofratersratingeachparticipant,youareunabletopartitionvarianceduetoindividualratersandthischoicedoesnotapply13ICCModelDecisionTree(Consideration1:Raters)Wereratersdrawnfromlargerpool?Didthesamesubsetofratersrateeachtarget?Two-waymixedNoYesOne-wayRandomTwo-wayrandomNoYesFortwo-waymodelsyoumustchooseTYPEaswell(Consideration2:Individualratervariability):

consistency(interestedinwhethertargetsrankedthesame)

absoluteagreement(interestedinwhethertargetsgotexactsamescores)14Consideration3:Whattypeofscore?Areyouinterestedinthereliabilityofanindividualraterorthereliabilityofthemeanofallraters?Typically,ifyouhavemorethanonerating,youwouldaveragethemforyouranalyses,sincetheaveragewillalwaysbeamorereliablemeasure.SPSSgivesyouboth,allthetime.SingleMeasureIntraclassCorrelation=reliabilityofanindividualraterAverageMeasureIntraclassCorrelation=reliabilityofthemeanoftheraters15ChooseyourICC:Scenario1Aresearcherhas10RA’sdoingratingsoutattheprison.MaryandSuerateprisoner1,SueandChrisrateprisoner2,KathyandPeterateprisoner3,etc.Theresearcherwillusethemeanoftheratingsinhisanalysisandwantstoknowthereliabilityofthatmean.WhichANOVAmodel?WhichTYPE?WhichMEASURE?One-wayRandom(notype-onlyconsistency)AVERAGEMeasure16ChooseyourICC:Scenario2Aresearcherhas10RA’sdoingratingsoutattheprison.Totestthereliabilityofthispoolof10RA’s,theresearcherhas3raters,Mary,SueandPete,ratethesame5prisoners.Theresearcherwantstoknowhowreliablethemeansofthe3ratersare.WhichANOVAmodel?WhichTYPE?WhichMEASURE?Two-WayRandomConsistencyorAbsoluteAgreementAverageMeasure17ChooseyourICC:Scenario3Ourresearcherhashadhisfundingcut,andnowcanonlyafford3RA’s,whowillbedoingalltheworkforhisstudy.HesendstheRA’stotheprison,wheretheyeachratethesame5prisoners.Theresearcherwantstoknowhowreliableanyindividualraterisandisconcernedthattheymaybeusingdifferentanchorpointsintheirratings.WhichANOVAmodel?WhichTYPE?WhichMEASURE?Two-WayMIXEDAbsoluteAgreementSINGLEMeasure18Bonusfunfact!TheICCsappropriateinScenarios2and3(thetwo-wayrandomandmixed)actuallygiveyouTHESAMECORRELATION.Thedifferencecome

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論