新高考英語(yǔ)二輪復(fù)習(xí)重難題型專項(xiàng)突破考點(diǎn)2 閱讀理解之觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度（原卷版）

考點(diǎn)2閱讀理解之觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度Part1題型詳解：觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度是高考中的常考點(diǎn)。作者寫文章總有自己的觀點(diǎn)和主張，也會(huì)自然流露出對(duì)某事的態(tài)度；篇章中個(gè)別人物也會(huì)對(duì)某事表達(dá)觀點(diǎn)。做這類題時(shí)，我們一定要站在文章作者或者文章中人物的角度上看問(wèn)題，尋找相關(guān)題目中作者或者某個(gè)人物說(shuō)過(guò)的話，做過(guò)的事，從而根據(jù)所做作為判斷人物的態(tài)度。預(yù)測(cè)在2024高考中，觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度可能會(huì)在高考閱讀理解中呈現(xiàn)。Part2常見(jiàn)設(shè)問(wèn)方式：Theauthor’sattitudetowards...is_____________.Whatissb’sattitudetowards...?Whichwordbestdescribestheauthor’sattitudeto......?Regarding...,sb.is___________.Part3解題方法指導(dǎo):熟練掌握選項(xiàng)中表示觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度的形容詞，并能區(qū)分積極、消極等對(duì)立的形容詞。關(guān)注作者的主觀評(píng)論和感受，如相關(guān)的形容詞、副詞和動(dòng)詞。作者如列舉一定的事例，要理清所舉的例子與其觀點(diǎn)、態(tài)度是否一致。Part4常見(jiàn)的表示觀點(diǎn)態(tài)度的詞:envious__________irritated__________sympathetic________uneasy___________tolerant_________cautious___________responsible___________ambitious____________considerate__________indifferent__________objective__________critical___________optimistic__________concerned___________suspicious_________uncaring______positive_________negative__________doubtful__________hopeful_________relieved__________worried___________ambiguous___________unfavorable___________intolerant___________uninterested____________dismissive____________approving________unclear_________supportive___________favorable__________disapproval___________objection__________criticism__________puzzling_________neutral_____unprejudiced___________reserved__________ironic___________mixed__________Part5真題演練（三年高考）2023年北京卷英語(yǔ)真題Whatislife?Likemostgreatquestions,thisoneiseasytoaskbutdifficulttoanswer.Thereasonissimple:weknowofjustonetypeoflifeandit’schallengingtodosciencewithasamplesizeofone.Thefieldofartificiallife-calledALifeforshort—isthesystematicattempttospelloutlife’sfundamentalprinciples.Manyofthesepractitioners,so-calledALifers,thinkthatsomehowmakinglifeisthesurestwaytoreallyunderstandwhatlifeis.Sofarnoonehasconvincinglymadeartificiallife.ThistrackrecordmakesALifearipetargetforcriticism,suchasdeclarationsofthefield’sdoubtfulscientificvalue.AlanSmith,acomplexityscientist,istiredofsuchcomplaints.Askingabout“thepoint”ofALifemightbe,well,missingthepointentirely,hesays.“Theexistenceofalivingsystemisnotabouttheuseofanything.”Alansays.“Somepeopleaskme,‘Sowhat’stheworthofartificiallife?’Doyoueverthink,‘Whatistheworthofyourgrandmother?’”AsmuchasmanyALifershateemphasizingtheirresearch’sapplications,theattemptstocreateartificiallifecouldhavepracticalpayoffs.ArtificialintelligencemaybeconsideredALife’scousininthatresearchersinbothfieldsareenamoredbyaconceptcalledopen-endedevolution(演化).Thisisthecapacityforasystemtocreateessentiallyendlesscomplexity,tobeasortof“noveltygenerator”.TheonlysystemknowntoexhibitthisisEarth’sbiosphere.IfthefieldofALifemanagestoreproducelife’sendless“creativity”insomevirtualmodel,thosesameprinciplescouldgiverisetotrulyinventivemachines.ComparedwiththedevelopmentsofAl,advancesinALifearehardertorecognize.OnereasonisthatALifeisafieldinwhichthecentralconcept—lifeitself—isundefined.ThelackofagreementamongALifersdoesn’thelpeither.Theresultisadiverselineofprojectsthateachadvancealongtheiruniquepaths.Forbetterorworse,ALifemirrorstheverysubjectitstudies.Itsmuddled(混亂的)progressionisastrikingparallel(平行線)totheevolutionarystrugglesthathaveshapedEarthbiosphere.Undefinedanduncontrolled,ALifedrivesitsfollowerstorepurposeoldideasandgeneratednovelty.Itmaybe,ofcourse,thatthesecharacteristicsaren’tinanywaysurprisingorsingular.Theymayapplyuniversallytoallactsofevolution.UltimatelyALifemaybenothingspecial.Buteventhisdismissalsuggestssomething：perhaps,justlikelifeitselfthroughouttheuniverse,theriseofALifewillproveunavoidable.1．RegardingAlanSmith’sdefenceofALife,theauthoris.A．supportive B．puzzled C．unconcerned D．doubtful2023年全國(guó)甲卷英語(yǔ)真題Iwasabout13whenanunclegavemeacopyofJosteinGaarder’sSophie’sWorld.Itwasfullofideasthatwerenewtome,soIspentthesummerwithmyheadinandoutofthatbook.Itspoketomeandbroughtmeintoaworldofphilosophy(哲學(xué)).ThatloveforphilosophylasteduntilIgottocollege.NothingkillstheloveforphilosophyfasterthanpeoplewhothinktheyunderstandFoucault,Baudrillard,orConfuciusbetterthanyou—andthentrytoexplainthem.EricWeiner’sTheSocratesExpress:InSearchofLifeLessonsfromDeadPhilosophersreawakenedmyloveforphilosophy.Itisnotanexplanation,butaninvitationtothinkandexperiencephilosophy.Weinerstartseachchapterwithasceneonatrainridebetweencitiesandthenframeseachphilosopher’sworkinthecontext(背景)ofonethingtheycanhelpusdobetter.TheendresultisareadinwhichwelearntowonderlikeSocrates,seelikeThoreau,listenlikeSchopenhauer,andhavenoregretslikeNietzsche.This,morethanabookaboutunderstandingphilosophy,isabookaboutlearningtousephilosophytoimprovealife.Hemakesphilosophicalthoughtanappealingexercisethatimprovesthequalityofourexperiences,andhedoessowithplentyofhumor.Weinerentersintoconversationwithsomeofthemostimportantphilosophersinhistory,andhebecomespartofthatcrowdintheprocessbydecoding(解讀)theirmessagesandaddinghisowninterpretation.TheSocratesExpressisafun,sharpbookthatdrawsreadersinwithitsapparentsimplicityandgraduallypullsthemindeeperthoughtsondesire,loneliness,andaging.Theinvitationisclear:Weinerwantsyoutopickupacoffeeorteaandsitdownwiththisbook.Iencourageyoutotakehisoffer.It’sworthyourtime,eveniftimeissomethingwedon’thavealotof.8．WhatdoestheauthorthinkofWeiner’sbook?A．Objectiveandplain.B．Daringandambitious.C．Seriousandhardtofollow.D．Humorousandstraightforward.2023年新課標(biāo)全國(guó)Ⅰ卷英語(yǔ)真題OnMarch7,1907,theEnglishstatisticianFrancisGaltonpublishedapaperwhichillustratedwhathascometobeknownasthe“wisdomofcrowds”effect.Theexperimentofestimationheconductedshowedthatinsomecases,theaverageofalargenumberofindependentestimatescouldbequiteaccurate.Thiseffectcapitalizesonthefactthatwhenpeoplemakeerrors,thoseerrorsaren’talwaysthesame.Somepeoplewilltendtooverestimate,andsometounderestimate.Whenenoughoftheseerrorsareaveragedtogether,theycanceleachotherout,resultinginamoreaccurateestimate.Ifpeoplearesimilarandtendtomakethesameerrors,thentheirerrorswon’tcanceleachotherout.Inmoretechnicalterms,thewisdomofcrowdsrequiresthatpeople’sestimatesbeindependent.Ifforwhateverreasons,people’serrorsbecomecorrelatedordependent,theaccuracyoftheestimatewillgodown.ButanewstudyledbyJoaquinNavajasofferedaninterestingtwist(轉(zhuǎn)折)onthisclassicphenomenon.Thekeyfindingofthestudywasthatwhencrowdswerefurtherdividedintosmallergroupsthatwereallowedtohaveadiscussion,theaveragesfromthesegroupsweremoreaccuratethanthosefromanequalnumberofindependentindividuals.Forinstance,theaverageobtainedfromtheestimatesoffourdiscussiongroupsoffivewassignificantlymoreaccuratethantheaverageobtainedfrom20independentindividuals.Inafollow-upstudywith100universitystudents,theresearcherstriedtogetabettersenseofwhatthegroupmembersactuallydidintheirdiscussion.Didtheytendtogowiththosemostconfidentabouttheirestimates?Didtheyfollowthoseleastwillingtochangetheirminds?Thishappenedsomeofthetime,butitwasn’tthedominantresponse.Mostfrequently,thegroupsreportedthatthey“sharedargumentsandreasonedtogether”.Somehow,theseargumentsandreasoningresultedinaglobalreductioninerror.AlthoughthestudiesledbyNavajashavelimitationsandmanyquestionsremain,thepotentialimplicationsforgroupdiscussionanddecision-makingareenormous.12．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardNavajas’studies?A．Unclear. B．Dismissive. C．Doubtful. D．Approving.2022年北京卷英語(yǔ)真題Quantum(量子)computershavebeenonmymindalotlately.Afriendhasbeensendingmearticlesonhowquantumcomputersmighthelpsolvesomeofthebiggestchallengeswefaceashumans.I’vealsohadexchangeswithtwoquantum-computingexperts.OneiscomputerscientistChrisJohnsonwhoIseeassomeonewhohelpskeepthefieldhonest.TheotherisphysicistPhilipTaylor.Fordecades,quantumcomputinghasbeenlittlemorethanalaboratorycuriosity.Now,bigtechcompanieshaveinvestedinquantumcomputing,ashavemanysmallerones.AccordingtoBusinessWeekly,quantummachinescouldhelpus“curecancer,andeventakestepstoturnclimatechangeintheoppositedirection.”Thisisthesortofhype(炒作)thatannoysJohnson.Heworriesthatresearchersaremakingpromisestheycan’tkeep.“What’snew,”Johnsonwrote,“isthatmillionsofdollarsarenowpotentiallyavailabletoquantumcomputingresearchers.”Asquantumcomputingattractsmoreattentionandfunding,researchersmaymisleadinvestors,journalists,thepublicand,worstofall,themselvesabouttheirwork’spotential.Ifresearcherscan’tkeeptheirpromises,excitementmightgivewaytodoubt,disappointmentandanger,Johnsonwarns.Lotsofothertechnologieshavegonethroughstagesofexcitement.Butsomethingaboutquantumcomputingmakesitespeciallypronetohype,Johnsonsuggests,perhapsbecause“‘quantum’standsforsomethingcoolyoushouldn’tbeabletounderstand.”AndthatbringsmebacktoTaylor,whosuggestedthatIreadhisbookQforQuantum.AfterIreadthebook,Taylorpatientlyansweredmyquestionsaboutit.HealsoansweredmyquestionsaboutPyQuantum,thefirmheco-foundedin2016.TaylorsharesJohnson’sconcernsabouthype,buthesaysthoseconcernsdonotapplytoPyQuantum.Thecompany,hesays,iscloserthananyotherfirm“byaverylargemargin(幅度)”tobuildinga“useful”quantumcomputer,onethat“solvesanimpactfulproblemthatwewouldnothavebeenabletosolveotherwise.”Headds,“Peoplewillnaturallydiscountmyopinions,butIhavespentalotoftimequantitativelycomparingwhatwearedoingwithothers.”CouldPyQuantumreallybeleadingallthecompetition“byawidemargin”,asTaylorclaims?Idon’tknow.I’mcertainlynotgoingtoadvisemyfriendoranyoneelsetoinvestinquantumcomputers.ButItrustTaylor,justasItrustJohnson.13．RegardingJohnson’sconcerns,theauthorfeels________.A．sympathetic B．unconcerned C．doubtful D．excited2021年北京市英語(yǔ)高考真題Hundredsofscientists,writersandacademicssoundedawarningtohumanityinanopenletterpublishedlastDecember:Policymakersandtherestofusmustengageopenlywiththeriskofglobalcollapse.Researchersinmanyareashaveprojectedthewidespreadcollapseas“acrediblescenario(情景)thiscentury”.Asurveyofscientistsfoundthatextremeweatherevents,foodinsecurity,andfreshwatershortagesmightcreateglobalcollapse.Ofcourse,ifyouareanon-humanspecies,collapseiswellunderway.Thecallforpublicengagementwiththeunthinkableisespeciallygermaneinthismomentofstill-uncontrolledpandemicandeconomiccrisesintheworld'smosttechnologicallyadvancednations.Notverylongago,itwasalsounthinkablethataviruswouldshutdownnationsandthatsafetynetswouldbeprovensodisastrouslylackinginflexibility.Theinternationalscholars’warningletterdoesn'tsayexactlywhatcollapsewilllooklikeorwhenitmighthappen.Collapseology,thestudyofcollapse,ismoreconcernedwithidentifyingtrendsandwiththemthedangersofeverydaycivilization.Amongthesignatories(簽署者)ofthewarningwasBobJohnson,theoriginatorofthe“ecologicalfootprint”concept,whichmeasuresthetotalamountofenvironmentalinputneededtomaintainagivenlifestyle.Withthecurrentfootprintofhumanity,“itseemsthatglobalcollapseiscertaintohappeninsomeform,possiblywithinadecade,certainlywithinthiscentury,”Johnsonsaidinanemail.“Onlyifwediscusstheconsequencesofourbiophysicallimits,”theDecemberwarninglettersays,“canwehavethehopetoreducetheirspeed,severityandharm”.Andyetmessengersofthecomingdisturbancearelikelytobeignored.Weallwanttohopethingswillturnoutfine.Asapoetwrote,Manisavictimofdope(麻醉品)Intheincurableformofhope.Thehundredsofscholarswhosignedtheletterareintent(執(zhí)著)onquietinghopethatignorespreparedness.“Let'slookdirectlyintotheissueofcollapse,”theysay,“anddealwiththeterriblepossibilitiesofwhatweseetheretomakethebestofatroublingfuture.”18．Asforthepublicawarenessofglobalcollapse,theauthoris________.A．worriedB．puzzledC．surprisedD．scaredPart6模擬練習(xí)2024屆廣東省河源中學(xué)高三上學(xué)期一調(diào)考試英語(yǔ)試題CouldanewtreatmentdevelopedbytheUScompanyLillymean“thebeginningoftheend”ofAlzheimer’s?Couldweevencureitsomeday?Theseareheadlinesandquestionsswirling(流傳)aroundafternewsofanewdrug,calleddonanemab,showedpromisingresultsinphase-3trials.ThebrainsciencebehindAlzheimer’siscomplex,butCTandMRJscanssuggestthatpoisonouschangesoccurinthebrain,includingtheabnormalbuild-upofproteinscalledamyloidplaquesandtautangles.Thedamagestartsinthepartsofthebrainessentialforformingmemoriesbutthenspreadsthroughouttheorgan,withbraintissueshrinkingsignificantly.DevelopingtreatmentsforAlzheimer’shasbeenachallenge,withalmost20yearspassingwithnonewdrugs.Butinthelastyear,twonewoneshaveemerged:donanemabandlecanemab.Neitherarecuresormagicbulletsforthedisease,buttheydoaddresskeysymptoms.Theytargettheamyloidproteinsthatcanaccumulateinthebrainanddamageneurons,slowingdownitsprogression.Whilethisnewsisexciting,therearemajorcaveats.OneiswhetheritwilleverbecomeavailableontheNHS.Thecostisestimatedtobeabout￡20,000perpersonperyearoftreatment.Anotheristheserioussideeffects:inthestudy,brainswellingoccurredin24%ofparticipantsandbrainbleedingoccurredin31.4%onthedrugcomparedwith13.6%intheplacebo(安慰劑)group.Therewerealsothreedeathsduringthetrial.Partoftheproblemforme,asanacademic,inassessingthedrugisthatthefullresultsofthetrialhaven’tyetbeensharedpubliclyorpublishedinapeer-reviewjournal.Wecannotaccessthefulldataorexaminethetrialyet,andthereisalwaysamotivationforprivatecompaniestooverstatetheeffectivenessofnewdrugs.Trialresultsneedtobeassessedbyanindependentbodyofexperts.Whileitisunlikelytochangeclinicalpracticeuntilatleast2025,thenewsofdonanemabisagainanindicationthatscienceiscontinuingtomakeprogresswhenitcomestotreatingthemajorcausesofillnessanddeath,evenonerelatedtothehighlycomplexinnerworkingsofthebrain,So,therearecaveatsandtheneedforcaution,butthesenewdrugsareindeedthegroundsforthatrarethingthesedays:hope.4．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsthenewdrug?A．Approving. B．Doubtful. C．Unclear. D．Indifferent.2024屆湖南省永州市高三上學(xué)期第一次模擬考試英語(yǔ)試題Theblanketofpollutionresultingfromcarbondioxideemissionsfromfossilfuelsisalreadywarmingtheplanetandcausingmoreextremeweatherdisasters.Onewaytokeepclimatechangefromgettingworseistotakesomeofthosehistoricemissionsoutoftheatmosphere.Morethan200scientistshavesignedontoaletterpushingfor“responsible”researchintowaystotrapplanet-heatingcarbondioxideintheworld’soceans.Oceansalreadydothatforus,absorbingandholdingaround50timesmorecarbonthantheatmosphere.Whatifhumanscouldsuperchargethatability?That’swhatscientistswanttobetterunderstand,alongwithanysideeffectsthatmightcomewithmessingwiththechemistryofouroceans.Startupsarealreadydevelopingnewtechnologiestosequester(隔絕)moreCO2inthesea.Butthere’sstillalotwedon’tknowaboutwhatimpactthatmighthaveorwhatstrategiesmightbemostsuccessful,thelettersays.Theseareallprettyearlyefforts,andhackingthehighseasisnoreplacementforpreventinggreenhousegasemissionsfromaccumulatingintheatmospherebygettingridoffossilfuels.SomeenvironmentaladvocatesarealsoworriedaboutnewCO2-filteringtechnologiesharmingmarinelife.Thelettertodaycallsforcontrolledfieldtrialstoevaluatecarbonremovalstrategies,alongwithathird-partyreviewoftheresults.Therealsoneedtobesafetymeasuresinplacetoaddressany“unintendedorharmfulconsequences”andinclusivepoliciestoengagedifferentstakeholders(利益相關(guān)者).Somebignamesinclimateandenvironmentalscienceshavesignedon.“Ihaveseenthesemassivedeclinesinoceanhealth...Doingnothingisunethical(不道德的)essentially,”saysDébora,Ecology,Evolution,andMarineBiologydepartmentchairattheUniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara,whosignedtheletterreleasedtoday.Whenitcomestostudyingnewwaystouseoceanstotackleclimatechange,shesays,“Weneedtoatleastfigureouttherisksandthebenefits,seewhetherwecanhelpresolvetheproblemwehavecreated.”8．WhatisDébora’sattitudetowardthestudiesofnewways?A．Unclear.B．Approving.C．Dismissive.D．Doubtful.2024屆遼寧省本溪市平山區(qū)本溪市高級(jí)中學(xué)高三一模英語(yǔ)試題WhenImentionedtosomefriendsthatweallhaveaccents,mostofthemproudlyreplied,“Well,IspeakperfectEnglish/Chinese/etc.”Butthiskindofmissesthepoint.Moreoftenthannot,whatwemeanwhenwesaysomeone“hasanaccent”isthattheiraccentisdifferentfromthelocalone,orthatpronunciationsaredifferentfromourown.Butthisdefinitionofaccentsislimitingandcouldgiverisetoprejudice.Funnilyenough,intermsofthelanguagestudy,everypersonspeakswithanaccent.Itistheregulardifferencesinhowweproducesoundsthatdefineouraccents.Evenifyoudon’thearityourself,youspeakwithsomesortofaccent.Inthissense,it’spointlesstopointoutthatsomeone“hasanaccent“.Wealldo!Everypersonspeaksadialect,too.Inthefieldoflanguagestudy,adialectisaversionofalanguagethatischaracterizedbyitsvariationsofstructure,phrasesandwords.Forinstance,“Yougoteatornot?”(meaning“Haveyoueaten?”)isanacceptableandunderstoodquestioninSingaporeOralEnglish.ThefactthatthisexpressionwouldcauseastandardAmericanEnglishspeakertotakepausedoesn’tmeanthatSingaporeOralEnglishis“wrong”or“ungrammatical”.Thesentenceiswell-formedandclearlycommunicative,accordingtonativeSingaporeEnglishspeakers’solidsystemofgrammar.Whyshoulditbewrongjustbecauseit’sdifferent?Weneedtomovebeyondanarrowconceptionofaccentsanddialects—forthebenefitofeveryone.Languagedifferencesliketheseprovideinsightsintopeople’sculturalexperiencesandbackgrounds.Inaglobalage,thewayonespeaksisadistinctpartofone’sidentity.Mostpeoplewouldbehappytotalkabouttheculturesbehindtheirspeech.We’dlearnmoreabouttheworldweliveinandmakefriendsalongtheway.12．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsaccent?A．FavourableB．IntolerantC．Doubtful D．Unclear2023屆廣東省廣州市荔灣區(qū)廣州市協(xié)和中學(xué)高三下學(xué)期一模英語(yǔ)試題Althoughsocialmediacanbeenjoyableandbeneficial,onlinerelationshipssimplycannotreplacereallifeconnection.Butsimplybeinginthefleshwithsomeonedoesnotmakealasting,meaningfulrelationship,whichgotmethinking:what,exactly,does?Mysearchtoanswerthisquestiontookmebackmorethan2,000yearstoAristotle’sNichomacheanEthics.WhatIfoundcouldn’tbemoreinsightful,anditringsjustastruetodayasitmusthavethen.Aristotlewritesthattherearethreedifferentkindsoffriendship:FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONUTILITY,inwhichoneorbothofthepartiesgainsomethingasaresultofthefriendship(think:muchofthemodern“networking”enterprise,orbecomingfriendswithsomeonebecauseyouthinktheycanhelpyou).FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONPLEASURE,orthosecenteredaroundpleasantexperiences(think:peoplewithwhomyoucanhaveagood,carefreetime).FRIENDSHIPSBASEDONVIRTUE,inwhichbothindividualssharethesamevalues(think:peoplewhomyouadmireandrespect,andwithwhomyousharewhatyoufindmostimportantinlife).It’sfascinatingthat,centuriesago,Aristotleofferedthatmanyindividualoftenpursuefriendshipsprimarilyforutility.Andit’seasytoseethatsomethingsneverchange.Likewise,hewrote,“Thosewholovebecauseofwhatisgoodforthemselves,andthosewholovebecauseofpleasuredosobecauseofwhatispleasanttothemselves.Yetwhatonefindsusefulorpleasurable,isnotpermanentbutisalwayschanging;thus,whenthereasonforthefriendshipisdoneaway,thefriendshipisdissolved.”It’sOKtohavesomefriendshipsmainlyforutilityandpleasure,butit’simportanttorealizethatthesefilladifferentpurposeandarelikelytohaveashorterlifespanthanonebuiltuponsharedvirtue.Anditisthefriendshipsbasedonvirtuethatareworthprotectingandcherishing.Buttheyrequireconsiderableenergytomaintain--asAristotlewrote,“l(fā)ackofconversationhasbrokenmanyafriendship”--butwhatyougetoutofthesefriendshipseasilyoutweighswhatyouputin.13．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsAristotle’sgroupingoffriendship?A．Supportive. B．Opposed. C．Doubtful. D．Unclear.2023屆浙江省杭州市高三下學(xué)期教學(xué)質(zhì)量檢測(cè)（二模）英語(yǔ)試題ChatGPT,designedbyOpenAItocarryonconversationsjustlikehumans,hasbecomeaviralexcitement.TheAI-poweredtoolwentfromzerotoamillionusersinjustfivedays!Itsabilitytoprovidein-depthanswerstouserquestionshasevendrawntheattentionofdistinguishedtechnologycompanies.Theintelligentrobotunderstandswhattheusersaysortypesandthenrespondsinawaythatmakessense.Itsvastbodyofknowledgehasbeengatheredfromtheinternetandarchivedbooks.Itisfurthertrainedbyhumans.ThismakesChatGPTausefultoolforresearchingalmostanytopic.“Wehavealotofinformationontheinternet,butyounormallyhavetoGoogleit,thenreaditandthendosomethingwithit,”saysRicardo,chiefscienceofficerandco-founderofAIcompanyErudit.“Nowyou’llhavethisresourcethatcanprocessthewholeinternetandalloftheinformationitcontainsforyoutoansweryourquestion.”ChatGPTcannotthinkonitsown.Itdependsontheinformationthatithasbeentrainedon.Asaresult,theAItoolworkswellforthingsthathaveaccuratedataavailable.However,whenunsure,ChatGPTcangetcreativeandflowoutincorrectresponses.OpenAIcautionsuserstochecktheinformationnomatterhowlogicalitsounds.Also,ChatGPThasonlybeentrainedwithinformationtill2021.Hence,itcannotberelieduponforanythingthathappenedafterthat.ExpertsbelieveChatGPThaslimitlesspotentialtosolvereal-worldproblems.Itcantranslatelongtextsintodifferentlanguages,createcontentonalmostanytopic,andevensummarizebooks.However,ChatGPThasreceivedmixedreactionsfromeducators.Somebelieveitcouldserveasavaluabletooltohelpbuildliteracyskillsintheclassroom.Itcouldalsobeusedtoteachstudentsdifficultscienceormathconcepts.ButothereducatorsthinkChatGPTwillencouragestudentstocheat.Theyfearthiswillpreventthemfrombuildingcriticalthinkingandproblem-solvingskills.Asaresult,manydistrictsarestartingtobanitsuseinschools.20．Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardsChatGPT?A．Favorable. B．Disapproving. C．Objective. D．Intolerant.浙江省金華十校2022-2023學(xué)年下學(xué)期高三4月模擬考試（二模）預(yù)演英語(yǔ)試題Solarfarmsofferonewaytomeettheworld’sdecarbonizationtargets,buttheycouldalsobeusedtodealwithanotheroftheplanet’sbigproblems:lossofbiodiversity.Theapproachisstartingtotakeoff.ResidentsofBarnsdale,forexample,willsoonplayhosttoanewsolarfarmlinedwithgrassfieldofwildflowersandnativegrasses,whichBanksGroup,thedeveloper,sayswillpromotepollinatinginsects.Theideacomesfromthecombinationoftwolong-termtrends:decliningnumbersofpollinatinginsectsandthegrowingamountoflanddistributedtosolarfarms.AccordingtotheCenterforBiologicalDiversityinArizona,morethan40percentofinsectpollinatorsgloballyarelistedas“highlythreatened”—anissuethatcouldseriouslythreatenfoodsecurity.Meanwhile,solar-energycompetencehasbeenincreasing.MatthewO’Neal,ascientistatIowaStateUniversity,wouldliketoseemoresolardevelopersseizethisopportunity.Thebenefitsofsuchprojectsdon’tstopattheinsects.ResearchfromYale’sCenterforBusinessandtheEnvironmentindicatesthatpollinator-friendlysolarfarmscanraisecropoutputonnearbyfarmland,increasetherechargingofgroundwaterandreducesoilerosion.In2018,aUSDepartmentofEnergystudyfoundthatifallexistingandplannedsolarfacilitiesnearsoybeanandcranberrycropsincludedpollinatorhomeandincreasedoutputbyjustonepercent,annualcropvaluescouldrisebyUS$1.75million,US$4millionandUS$233,000,respectively.“Farmerscouldidentifyunprofitableareas,suchaspoor,highlyerodiblelands,ascandidatesforapollinator-friendlysolarfarm.There’sthepotentialtoincreasetheirnetincomewithpollinatormotivationprojects,”saysO’Neal.Withenoughforwardthinking,thesestudiesshow,cleanenergycanprovidenewenvironmentalopportunities.“We’reataturningpointwithenergyproductionandwe’reseeingmoreopportunitiestoprovideextrabenefitsthatwouldn’thavebeenconsideredwitholdermethodsofenergygeneration,”saysO’Neal.“Youneverheardofacoalmineplanningpollinatorconservation.”23．WhatisO’Neal’sattitudetowardsthesolarfarm?A．Supportive. B．Conservative. C．Skeptical. D．Uncertain.2023屆浙江省金華十校高三下學(xué)期二模英語(yǔ)試題Astheclimatecrisisspeedsup,Europeiswarmingfasterthananyotherregion,accordingtoanewStateofthe

ClimateinEuropereportfromtheWorldMeteorologicalOrganization.TheWMOreportcomesaheadoftheUN’sinternationalclimatesummitinEgypt,andisoneinaseriesofreportsoverthepastseveralweeksthatshowhowtheworldisoff-trackonitsclimategoals.Notonlyarecountries

missing

themarkontheireffortstoreduceplanet-warmingfossilfuelemissions(排放物),butmeasurementsshowtemperaturesarealreadyskyrocketing.Somecontinentsarefeelingthatrisemorethanothers.Wednesday’sreportshowstemperaturesinEuropehaveincreasedatmorethantwicetheglobalaverageoverthepast30year