




版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
AMSTARChecklist
ArticleName:
1.DidtheresearchquestionsandinclusioncriteriaforthereviewincludethecomponentsofPICO?
ForYes:
Optional(recommended)
Population
Timeframeforfollowup
Yes
No
Intervention
Comparatorgroup
Outcome
2.Didthereportofthereviewcontainanexplicitstatementthatthereviewmethodswereestablishedpriortotheconductofthereviewanddidthereportjustifyanysignificantdeviationsfromtheprotocol?
ForPartialYes:
TheauthorsstatethattheyhadawrittenprotocolorguidethatincludedALLthefollowing:
ForYes:
Asforpartialyes,plustheprotocolshouldberegisteredandshouldalsohavespecified:
reviewquestion(s)
ameta-analysis/synthesisplan,ifappropriate,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
asearchstrategy
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
inclusion/exclusioncriteria
aplanforinvestigatingcausesofheterogeneity
ariskofbiasassessment
3.Didthereviewauthorsexplaintheirselectionofthestudydesignsforinclusioninthereview?
ForYes,thereviewshouldsatisfyONEofthefollowing:
ExplanationforincludingonlyRCTs
Yes
No
ORExplanationforincludingonlyNRSI
ORExplanationforincludingbothRCTsandNRSI
4.Didthereviewauthorsuseacomprehensiveliteraturesearchstrategy?
ForPartialYes(allthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohave(allthefollowing):
searchedatleast2databases(relevanttoresearchquestion)
searchedthereferencelists/bibliographiesofincludedstudies
Yes
PartialYes
No
providedkeywordand/orsearchstrategy
searchedtrial/studyregistries
justifiedpublicationrestrictions(e.g.language)
included/consultedcontentexpertsinthefield
whererelevant,searchedforgreyliterature
conductedsearchwithin24monthsofcompletionofthereview
5.Didthereviewauthorsperformstudyselectioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersindependentlyagreedonselectionofeligiblestudiesandachievedconsensusonwhichstudiestoinclude
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersselectedasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderselectedbyonereviewer.
6.Didthereviewauthorsperformdataextractioninduplicate?
ForYes,eitherONEofthefollowing:
atleasttworeviewersachievedconsensusonwhichdatatoextractfromincludedstudies
Yes
No
ORtworeviewersextracteddatafromasampleofeligiblestudiesandachievedgoodagreement(atleast80percent),withtheremainderextractedbyonereviewer.
7.Didthereviewauthorsprovidealistofexcludedstudiesandjustifytheexclusions?
ForPartialYes:
ForYes,mustalsohave:
providedalistofallpotentiallyrelevantstudiesthatwerereadinfull-textformbutexcludedfromthereview
Justifiedtheexclusionfromthereviewofeachpotentiallyrelevantstudy
Yes
PartialYes
No
8.Didthereviewauthorsdescribetheincludedstudiesinadequatedetail?
ForPartialYes(ALLthefollowing):
ForYes,shouldalsohaveALLthefollowing:
describedpopulations
describedpopulationindetail
Yes
PartialYes
No
describedinterventions
describedinterventionindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedcomparators
describedcomparatorindetail(includingdoseswhererelevant)
describedoutcomes
describedstudy’ssetting
describedresearchdesigns
timeframeforfollow-up
9.Didthereviewauthorsuseasatisfactorytechniqueforassessingtheriskofbias(RoB)inindividualstudiesthatwereincludedinthereview?
RCTs
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoBfrom
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoBfrom:
unconcealedallocation,and
allocationsequencethatwasnottrulyrandom,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyNRSI
lackofblindingofpatientsandassessorswhenassessingoutcomes(unnecessaryforobjectiveoutcomessuchasall-causemortality)
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
NRSI
ForPartialYes,musthaveassessedRoB:
ForYes,mustalsohaveassessedRoB:
fromconfounding,and
methodsusedtoascertainexposuresandoutcomes,and
Yes
PartialYes
No
IncludesonlyRCTs
fromselectionbias
selectionofthereportedresultfromamongmultiplemeasurementsoranalysesofaspecifiedoutcome
10.Didthereviewauthorsreportonthesourcesoffundingforthestudiesincludedinthereview?
ForYes
Musthavereportedonthesourcesoffundingforindividualstudiesincludedinthereview.Note:Reportingthatthereviewerslookedforthisinformationbutitwasnotreportedbystudyauthorsalsoqualifies
Yes
No
11.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformeddidthereviewauthorsuseappropriatemethodsforstatisticalcombinationofresults?
RCTs
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresultsandadjustedforheterogeneityifpresent.
ANDinvestigatedthecausesofanyheterogeneity
ForNRSI
ForYes:
Theauthorsjustifiedcombiningthedatainameta-analysis
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
ANDtheyusedanappropriateweightedtechniquetocombinestudyresults,adjustingforheterogeneityifpresent
ANDtheystatisticallycombinedeffectestimatesfromNRSIthatwereadjustedforconfounding,ratherthancombiningrawdata,orjustifiedcombiningrawdatawhenadjustedeffectestimateswerenotavailable
ANDtheyreportedseparatesummaryestimatesforRCTsandNRSIseparatelywhenbothwereincludedinthereview
12.Ifmeta-analysiswasperformed,didthereviewauthorsassessthepotentialimpactofRoBinindividualstudiesontheresultsofthemeta-analysisorotherevidencesynthesis?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
Nometa-analysisconducted
OR,ifthepooledestimatewasbasedonRCTsand/orNRSIatvariableRoB,theauthorsperformedanalysestoinvestigatepossibleimpactofRoBonsummaryestimatesofeffect.
13.DidthereviewauthorsaccountforRoBinindividualstudieswheninterpreting/discussingtheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
includedonlylowriskofbiasRCTs
Yes
No
OR,ifRCTswithmoderateorhighRoB,orNRSIwereincludedthereviewprovidedadiscussionofthelikelyimpactofRoBontheresults
14.Didthereviewauthorsprovideasatisfactoryexplanationfor,anddiscussionof,anyheterogeneityobservedintheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
Therewasnosignificantheterogeneityintheresults
Yes
No
ORifheterogeneitywaspresenttheauthorsperformedaninvestigationofsourcesofanyheterogeneityintheresultsanddiscussedtheimpactofthisontheresultsofthereview
15.Iftheyperformedquantitativesynthesisdidthereviewauthorscarryoutanadequateinvestigationofpublicationbias(smallstudybias)anddiscussitslikelyimpactontheresultsofthereview?
ForYes:
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 行政管理與組織優(yōu)化策略試題及答案
- 2024年項目管理資格的考試技巧與策略試題及答案
- 證券從業(yè)資格證考試考試經驗總結試題及答案
- 2025年國際金融理財師資格考試的準備計劃和策略試題及答案
- 充分準備2025年證券從業(yè)資格證考試試題及答案
- 2024年項目管理流程分析試題及答案
- 2025年注會考試的法律知識重要性及試題及答案
- 2024園藝師考試模擬測試試題及答案
- 注冊會計師的職業(yè)發(fā)展方向試題及答案
- 2024年項目管理專業(yè)人士資格認證試題及答案概述
- 貿易安全培訓
- 中級消控證的試題及答案
- Unit 5 Everyone is special!(教學設計)-2024-2025學年人教版PEP(一起)(2024)英語一年級下冊
- 2025年河南焦作市孟州市開創(chuàng)人才服務有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 2025年湖南永州恒通電力(集團)有限責任公司招聘筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 2024新版人教PEP英語(2025春)七年級下冊教學課件:Unit4 A 2a-2e
- 中醫(yī)理療技術
- 婦科護理人文關懷課件
- 《汽車專業(yè)英語》2024年課程標準(含課程思政設計)
- 小學數(shù)學二年級第二學期口算計算共3031道題
- 網絡安全知識基礎培訓課件
評論
0/150
提交評論