已閱讀5頁,還剩11頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
無錫 太湖學(xué)院 畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)(論文) 外文資料翻譯 信機(jī) 系 機(jī)械工程及自動(dòng)化 專業(yè) 院 (系) : 信 機(jī) 系 專 業(yè) : 機(jī)械工程及自動(dòng)化 班 級(jí) : 機(jī)械 97 姓 名 : 陳 浩 學(xué) 號(hào) : 0923807 外文出處 : 機(jī)械專業(yè)英語教程 附 件 : 1.譯文; 2.原文; 3.評(píng)分表 2013年 5月 20日 英文原文 4.3 Flow in an Oil Injected Screw Compressor Figure 4-27 Comparison of pressure change for turbulent and laminar flow calculations The difference in the compressor flow obtained from laminar and turbulent calcu-lations is presented in Figure 4-28. The mass flows at suction and discharge are given as functions of the shaft angle. On average, 4% higher low is calculated with the turbulent model. The difference was greater at the discharge end of the compressor, both in the mean value and in the amplitude. This agrees with the re-sults obtained from the approximate calculations where turbulent transport through clearances is significant. The difference in flow obtained at the suction end is, on average, less than 3%. This shows that a compressor with a large suc-tion opening has no significant dynamical losses, although turbulence exists in the compressor low pressure domains. It is expected that the difference between the laminar and turbulent flow calculations will be smaller for higher discharge pres-sures and lower compressor speeds. Figure 4-28 Comparison of fluid flow at inlet and exit of screw compressor The integral parameters obtained from both the laminar and turbulent numerical models are presented in Table 4-2. According to these results, it can be concluded that turbulence has some influence on the screw compressor. Its effect is greater at lower pressure ratios and low compressor speeds. More detailed insights into the results obtained from the k-model of turbulence can be found in the following four figures; Figure 4-29 shows the kinetic energy of turbulence. The dissipation rate is presented in Figure 4-30, the turbulent vis-cosity in Figure 4-31 and the dimensionless distance from wall y+ is given in Figure 4-32. Figure 4-29 Kinetic energy of turbulence within the screw compressor 4.3 Flow in an Oil Injected Screw Compressor Figure 4-30 Dissipation rate within the screw compressor Figure 4-31 Turbulent viscosity within the screw compressor Figure 4-32 Dimensionless distances from the wall within the compressor The results in all these diagrams are presented in horizontal sections through the blow hole areas on the suction and discharge side of the compressor, in vertical sections through the rotor axes and in cross sections at suction and discharge. The kinetic energy of turbulence, dissipation, turbulent viscosity and y+ are all high for the lobes exposed to the suction domains. All these gradually die out towards discharge. The dissipation rate is extremely high in the clearance gaps between the rotors, as shown in Figure 4-30, while in the other domains it is significantly lower. On the other hand, y+ is small in the clearance gaps while in the main do-mains at suction it has higher values, as shown in Figure 4-32. 4.3.5 The Influence of the Mesh Size on Calculation Accuracy Most calculations in this book are presented for numerical meshes with an average number of 30 cells along one interlobe and a similar number of time steps selected for the rotor to rotate between two interlobe positions. The numerical mesh for thecompressor in this example consists of about 450,000 cells of which About 322,000 numerical cells define the rotor domains. This was a convenient numberof cells to use with a PC computer with an ATHLON 800 processor and 1GB of RAM, which was used for this study. Although the results obtained on that mesh appeared to be satisfactory and agreed well with the experimental data, an investi-gation of the influence of the mesh size on the calculation accuracy had to be con-ducted. For that reason, two additional meshes were generated for the same com-pressor. A smaller one was generated with 20 points along the rotor interlobe, which gave 190,000 cells on both rotors while the other compressor parts were mapped with almost the same number of cells as originally. The overall number of numerical cells was about 353,000. A lower number of cells on the rotors results in a geometry, which does not follow the rotor shape precisely, and the intercon-nection between rotors would possibly become inappropriate. This number of nu-merical cells is probably the lowest for which reliable results can be obtained. Thelargest numerical mesh generated for this investigation consists of 45 numerical cells along the rotor interlobe. That gave 515,520 cell on the rotors and 637,000 cells for the entire compressor domain. This was the biggest numerical mesh that could be loaded into the available computer memory without disc swapping dur-ing the solution. These three numerical meshes are presented in Figure 4-33 in the cross section perpendicular to the rotor axes. Figure 4-33 Three different mesh sizes for the same compressor The results of the calculations are presented in Figure 4-34 in the form of a pres-sure-angle diagram, and in Figure 4-36 as a discharge flow-angle diagram. The first diagram shows how the calculated working pressures for all three investi-gated mesh sizes agree with the measurements. The lowest number of cells gives the highest pressure in the working chamber and vice versa. As a result of that, the consumed power is changed slightly, from 42 kW obtained with the smallest mesh to slightly less then 41 kW for the largest mesh. The difference between the two is less then 3%. This situation is shown in Figure 4-35. The diagram shows the larg-est difference within the cycle to be in the discharge area of the compressor. Some difference is also visible in the middle area of the diagram which seems to be a consequence of the leakage flows obtained with smaller meshes between the ro-tors. In that area, the mesh is probably too coarse to capture all the oscillations which appear in the flow. Figure 4-34 P-alpha diagrams for three different mesh sizes Figure 4-35 Compressor power calculated with three different mesh sizes 4.3 Flow in an Oil Injected Screw Compressor Figure 4-36 Discharge flow rates for different mesh sizes Figure 4-37 Integral flow rate and Specific power obtained with different mesh sizes Diagrams of discharge flow as a function of rotation angle are given in Figure4-36. The coarser mesh shows less oscillation in the flow then the finer meshes. However, the mean value of the flow remained the same for all three mesh sizes, as shown in Figure 4-37. Specific power is calculated from the values obtained previously. It shows a slight fall in value as the number of computational cells is increased. The results obtained with the three different mesh sizes for the compressor in-vestigated here give the impression that the calculation conducted for the com-pressor on an average size of the mesh with 25 to 30 numerical cells along the ro-tor interlobe is sufficiently accurate. 中文譯文 4.3 噴油螺桿壓縮機(jī)的流量 圖 4-27 計(jì)算比較湍流和層流壓力變化 如圖 4-28為在計(jì)算吸氣和排氣的質(zhì)量流量功能軸角中獲得的壓縮機(jī)流從層流和湍流差異??傮w而言,湍流模型比流從層流高 4%,無論是在平均值和振幅,壓縮 機(jī)的排出端是最大的,通過計(jì)算近似結(jié)果獲得間隙顯著的湍流輸送的重。在吸入端獲得的流量差異的平均值,小于 3。這表明,具有大的吸入端的壓縮機(jī)吸氣開口沒有任何顯著的動(dòng)力損失,雖然在壓縮機(jī)低壓域存在湍流。這是預(yù)期的層流和湍流之間的差異計(jì)算將提高排氣壓力和減小壓縮機(jī)速度。 圖 4-28 根據(jù)流體的流動(dòng)比較螺桿式壓縮機(jī)的入口和出口 從層流和湍流數(shù)值模型的積分獲得的參數(shù),如表 4-2中。根據(jù)這些結(jié)果,可以得出結(jié)論,在湍流的螺桿式壓縮機(jī)上有一定的影響。其效果是在壓力越小,流速越大。從第 k湍流模型獲得的結(jié)果的更詳細(xì)的分析,可以 發(fā)現(xiàn)在以下四個(gè)數(shù)字,如圖 4-29的湍流的動(dòng)能。圖 4-30,圖 4-31動(dòng)蕩對(duì)粘度和無量綱距離墻 Y +耗散率,如圖 4-32。 圖 4-29 螺桿壓縮機(jī)內(nèi)的湍流動(dòng)能 圖 4-30 螺桿式壓縮機(jī)內(nèi)的損耗率 圖 4-31 螺桿壓縮機(jī)內(nèi)的湍流粘度 圖 4-32從墻壁內(nèi)壓縮機(jī)的量綱距離通過吸入閥和排出側(cè)的壓縮機(jī)的結(jié)果列于所有這些圖中,在通過轉(zhuǎn)子軸的吸入閥和排出的橫截面的垂直剖面上的吹孔區(qū)域的水平部分。動(dòng)蕩,耗散,湍流粘度和 y+的動(dòng)能都是高暴露在吸域葉上,所有這些逐漸消亡走向放電。耗散率非常高,轉(zhuǎn)子之間的間隙差距,如圖 4-30所示,而在其他領(lǐng)域,它是顯著較低。另一方面,如圖 4-32所示, +小的間隙中,在主電源處于吸入它具有較高的值。 4.3.5 網(wǎng)格大小對(duì)計(jì)算精度的影響 在計(jì)算這本書中的大部分平均 30個(gè)細(xì)胞的數(shù)量沿一個(gè)和類似用于轉(zhuǎn)子之間旋轉(zhuǎn)兩位置的數(shù)量的選擇步驟嚙合。在這個(gè)例子中包括約 45萬個(gè)細(xì)胞數(shù)值網(wǎng)格,其中約 322,000數(shù)字單元格定義轉(zhuǎn)子域。這是用于這項(xiàng)研究為了方便使用的細(xì)胞數(shù)量與 PC電腦的 Athlon800處理器和 1GB的 RAM,雖然網(wǎng)格上,得到的結(jié)果似乎是令人滿意的,并與實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)相同,但在康秀紅,杜強(qiáng),李殿中 ,李依依的調(diào)查中,影響網(wǎng)格尺寸的計(jì)算精度的到的結(jié)果是可靠的。本次調(diào)查由 45個(gè)數(shù)字單元格沿轉(zhuǎn)子的數(shù)值 t網(wǎng)。這給了整個(gè)壓縮機(jī) 515,520細(xì)胞轉(zhuǎn)子和 637,000細(xì)胞領(lǐng)域。這是最大的數(shù)值的網(wǎng)格,可以在裝入光盤交換過程中溶液沒有可用的計(jì)算機(jī)內(nèi)存。圖 4-33中介紹這在轉(zhuǎn)子軸垂直的截面中的三個(gè)數(shù)值的嚙合。圖 4-37獲得不同的網(wǎng)目尺寸和比功率的積分流量。圖 36中給出的是作為旋轉(zhuǎn)角度的函數(shù)的排出流,粗網(wǎng)格顯示振蕩流,但是,所有
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 湖北文理學(xué)院理工學(xué)院《金屬材料專業(yè)實(shí)驗(yàn)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 年度生命探測(cè)儀競(jìng)爭(zhēng)策略分析報(bào)告
- 湖北2025年湖北第二師范學(xué)院招聘58人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 溫州浙江溫州市公安局龍灣區(qū)分局招聘警務(wù)保障室工作人員筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 懷化2024年湖南懷化市退役軍人事務(wù)局所屬事業(yè)單位選調(diào)1人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 廣州2025年第一次廣東廣州市白云區(qū)政務(wù)服務(wù)和數(shù)據(jù)管理局政府雇員招聘筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 安徽安徽體育運(yùn)動(dòng)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院招聘任務(wù)型專任教師筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 天津2025年天津市氣象部門事業(yè)單位招聘應(yīng)屆生筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 實(shí)施紡織設(shè)備維護(hù)保養(yǎng)方案
- 2025年廣西河池市南丹國資新發(fā)展投資集團(tuán)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- GB/T 3324-2024木家具通用技術(shù)條件
- NGS二代測(cè)序培訓(xùn)
- 《材料合成與制備技術(shù)》課程教學(xué)大綱(材料化學(xué)專業(yè))
- 小紅書食用農(nóng)產(chǎn)品承諾書示例
- 釘釘OA辦公系統(tǒng)操作流程培訓(xùn)
- 新生兒科年度護(hù)理質(zhì)控總結(jié)
- GB/T 15934-2024電器附件電線組件和互連電線組件
- 《工貿(mào)企業(yè)有限空間作業(yè)安全規(guī)定》知識(shí)培訓(xùn)
- 高層次人才座談會(huì)發(fā)言稿
- 垃圾清運(yùn)公司管理制度(人員、車輛、質(zhì)量監(jiān)督、會(huì)計(jì)管理制度)
- 《建筑工程設(shè)計(jì)文件編制深度規(guī)定》(2022年版)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論