經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護英文辯論賽

1、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展與環(huán)境保護英文辯論賽which should receive priority in china, economic growth or environmental protection？ theoretical clich 正方一辯：從人類發(fā)展的終極目標看，我們要徹底地解決環(huán)境問題，必須要標本 兼治。要治本，必須優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，從根本上優(yōu)化經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)堵住產(chǎn)生環(huán)境問 題的源頭，要治標，同樣要優(yōu)先發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，為解決眼前的環(huán)境問題提供技術(shù)、 資金等支持，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發(fā)展提供環(huán)境保障。honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and

2、 gentlemen. from the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly. to effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to bl

3、ock the source of the environment problems；to take temporary solution， we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems. only in this way can environment protection be provided for human surv

4、ival and development. 反方一辯：經(jīng)濟發(fā)展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質(zhì)生活,環(huán)境 保護則是采取一定的政策措施來保護生態(tài)平衡。經(jīng)濟要發(fā)展意味著企業(yè)需要 更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應(yīng)那便存在一個問題：自然分給人 類的土地與原材料是有限,經(jīng)濟優(yōu)先發(fā)展就一定會侵占原本不屬于人類的自 然資源。honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen .the economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to

5、 improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance. economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goodsthen there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to h

6、uman is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human. 二辯盤問 two debate questioned 反方二辯：請問對方一辯，經(jīng)濟是一時之事，環(huán)境是萬代之事，哪個重要？經(jīng)濟 發(fā)展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環(huán)境沒了，還能生存嗎？ my fellow debaters ，please allow me to ask. the economy is the temporary matter, but the e

7、nvironment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? when economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environment. 正方一辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優(yōu)先權(quán)。并不是說經(jīng) 濟優(yōu)先就不搞環(huán)保了，只是環(huán)保處于較次的位置，跟中國現(xiàn)狀一樣，政策雖 然說要重視環(huán)保，但一般縣區(qū)還是經(jīng)濟發(fā)展優(yōu)先的，也就有資本的大城市才 比較重視搞環(huán)保，相信大

8、家心知肚明 sorry, im afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority. economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position .just like the present china, although the policy attach great importanc

9、e to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart. 反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發(fā)展經(jīng)濟優(yōu)先的話，很可能造成環(huán)境成本大于經(jīng) 濟效益的情況，這樣的經(jīng)濟是發(fā)展還是倒退？ excuse me, my fellow deb

10、aters. if economic development receives priority then it is likely the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up? 正方三辯： 這種情況確實有存在， 但并不是每時每刻都存在。 各個行業(yè)情況不同， 我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經(jīng)濟效益是負的，那我們改 行環(huán)境保護優(yōu)先，就能轉(zhuǎn)虧為盈？我不這么覺得。 to cause this kind of situation is

11、 there truly, but not every moment. the situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part. but according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? i dont think so. 正方二辯： 我們知道環(huán)境的保護是預防

12、為主，防治結(jié)合，而預防和治理都要依 靠技術(shù)的發(fā)展，那請問對方一辯，如果沒有強有力的經(jīng)濟基礎(chǔ)支持科學技術(shù) 發(fā)展，那么以科技為支撐的環(huán)保從何談起呢？ we know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is

13、 no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then dont mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology. 反方一辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發(fā)展無止盡，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展也沒盡頭，什么 時候算得上是“強有力”呢？但是環(huán)境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。 your question is a little abstract. science and technology develops endlessly,

14、so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong? but environmental protection is imminent, which cant afford to delay. 正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內(nèi)容，包括衣食 住行娛樂，這難道不是現(xiàn)在社會上人們的普遍愿望嗎？ excuse me, my fellow debaters. the responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a r

15、ich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isnt it now the peoples universal desire? 反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向于在一個既 能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環(huán)境中生存。 peoples expectation is not necessarily that good. i believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, s

16、urvive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment 二辯小結(jié)反方二辯：對方辯友請從事實出發(fā)，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展不是你我能定的，是自然環(huán)境定的, 我們必須堅持可持續(xù)發(fā)展，我們發(fā)展經(jīng)濟的同時。我們必須高度重視在經(jīng)濟發(fā)展過程中的自然環(huán)境的保護。我們已經(jīng)為我們的環(huán)境付出了很多代價。opposite party debates, please to start from the fact, the economic development is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment,

17、 we have to insist we on sustainable development while developing economy. we must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic development. we pay muchforour environment.正方二辯：我們承認我們的國家已經(jīng)支付了很多錢，甚至犧牲利潤的環(huán)境，但我們還是應(yīng)該采取經(jīng)濟建設(shè)作為中心任務(wù)。經(jīng)濟發(fā)展必然會付出代價，我們已經(jīng)在努力 使代價降到

18、最低。we admit our country has paid a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .but we should still take economic construction as the central task. the economic development will definitely pay the price; we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.自由辯論 正方一辯： 請問對方辯友， 原始社會的人類祖先

19、們環(huán)境保護工作做得可謂好了吧， 而他們 經(jīng)濟發(fā)展很落后，所所以才一直過著鉆木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的 意思我們應(yīng)該回歸這種生活嗎？ excuse me, my fellow friends .in the primitive society, human ancestors environmental protection work is good, but to them economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should we return

20、 to this kind of life according to your meaning? 反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，污染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發(fā)展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是 經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的泄漏帶來了環(huán)境的極度惡化，請問 你怎么看？ human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the forests, pollute the river, making food and clothing are no longer gua

21、ranteed in this process, im afraid it cannot develop any longer. what i want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it? 正方二辯：首先，我方并沒有

22、承諾經(jīng)濟發(fā)展就一定會破壞到環(huán)境；其次，對方所 說的情況只是鳳毛麟角；第三，核電站泄漏是科技不力，而經(jīng)濟是科學研究 的基礎(chǔ)。 first, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy the environment; second, the situation you said is only rare; third, nuclear power station leakage because the technology is not strong. but economy is the f

23、oundation of scientific research. 反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么辦？沒有了這 些，我們的生活怎么辦？你愿意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之 間？ but the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? without land and water, how does our life manage? would you like to live nearby the n

24、uclear power station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries? 正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活 用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產(chǎn)可以興起，環(huán)境總會有 辦法彌補，我也想問，你愿意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之 處？ please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy millions of peoples living power. with the el

25、ectricity, our machine can be operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment. i also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop electricity or a place with abundant power. 反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環(huán)境然后再去彌補。為什么要先污染后治理？為什 么要兜這么大一個圈子呢？而且我國的經(jīng)濟建設(shè)里程已經(jīng)證明

26、， 先污染后治 理是錯的，行不通的。 you mean to make up for the environment after destroying it. why management after pollution? why to pocket so big a circle? and the economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it wont work. 正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站泄漏了，嚴重污染 了環(huán)

27、境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內(nèi)的很多工 業(yè)廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經(jīng)濟的同時，并沒有放棄環(huán)境的保護。 i can not but say that we are really undeserved. it is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved. and in fact, including nuclear

28、power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment. 反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎？再怎么注意也無法保證無污染，這樣日積 月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環(huán)境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴 抓，才能從根本上阻止環(huán)境的惡化。 but only does not give up possible? howe

29、ver do we pay attention to the environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution. as time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation. so we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environ

30、ment from worsening fundamentally. 四辯總結(jié) 反方四辯：過去的發(fā)展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式，結(jié)果呢，環(huán)境問題突 出，局部地區(qū)已經(jīng)到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先污染后治理的模式不但成 本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處于一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開 始防止污染，也就是發(fā)展過程首先考慮對環(huán)境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望 在將來解決環(huán)境問題。 the past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival; furthermore, management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is inefficient, sometimes in a p