學(xué)術(shù)英語(yǔ)論文

1、A Survey of Architect Professionals Attitudes Toward Architect Drawing A student from the Academic English class of 2014 Abstract The rapid development of the computer design for construction technique has brought the revelutionary change.Unfortunately,the traditional Architect Drawing techniques ha

2、ve gradually replaced.Architect Professionalsattitude towards Architect Drawing is important building industries development.The paper attempts to find which confines Architect Professionals to take Architect Drawing ability seriously and whether they are willing to regain Architect drawing ability

3、or not.A survey was conducted in a total of 200 person with different building working experiences to ChangSha University of Science and Technology .The result shows that there is a great difference between the attidutes toward Architect Drawing of Architect Professionals with different working expe

4、riences.It also suggest that the Architect Drawing depression is associated with school education and requirement of building industries which are two factors affecting Architect Professionals attitude.Not only that,but time is also a factor which influences Architect Professionalswillingness to pra

5、ctice Architect Drawing.Key words:Architect Professionals,Architect Drawing,attitude1. Introduction Although many Architect Professionals may know Architect drawing is important for their design,scarcely Architect Professionals are willing to spend time practicing it.There have been many studies on

6、current situation of Architect Drawing.Peng(2006)showed that young generation,especially young students of architect ,excessively depend on computer design, to pursue high efficiency.And then their Architect drawing falls into disuse.A study in NanHua University by chen (2009) showed that Architect

7、students approve Architect Drawing only 30% of them and very few people put it into practice.Designer and Architecture University starts to with draw from traditional Architect drawing(Li,2012).A study in Architecture University by Shi(2013) indicated that Chinese Architect Drawing lessons were igno

8、red.The Architect Professionals attitudes toward Architect Drawing may influence the development of Architect Drawing and building industries development .Therefore, having a better understanding of Architect Drawing to Architect Professionals is important.But few studies deliberate why Architect st

9、udents are tired of Architect Drawing.According to Chen(2009) demand of Hand Drawing sharply declined in society.Learning Architect Drawings enthusiasm reduced the Lowest point.Hand-painted really into the preclicament ?If are there people willing to spend time learning Architect Drawing?Is therebet

10、ter advantage between design by computer and Architect Drawing?The study reported here attempted to explore this issue and answer some of these questions by conducting a survey in University of Science and Technology of ChangSha.The paper is organized as follows:first the methodology is describde,es

11、pecially the content of the questionnaire:then the results obtained and their significance and discussed:finally,the conclusion is drawn.2.MethodologyA survey was conducted in October,2014 in ChangSha University of Science and Technology with the help of my friends and teachers.Questionnaires were a

12、dministered to Architect Professionals of different working experience .SampleThe overall sample(N=200),randomly chosen and consisting of an almost equal number of female and male Architect Professionals,completed the questionnaires.Then the respondents were divided into two groups as working experi

13、ence.Group Aconsisted of the Architect students who nearly have not working experience while Group B are the teachers most having abundantly working experience. Group A(N=160) Male FemaleHaving workingexperienceHaving not workingexperience45%(72)55%(88)44%（70）56%（90） Group B(N=40) MaleFemale Having

14、workingexperienceHaving not workingexperience55%(22)45%(18)25%(10)75%(30) Questionnaire There are a total of 7 question in the Questionnaire, which are classified into three parts according to their content. 1)In order to explore the correlation between the working experience of Architect and attitu

15、de toward Architect Drawing ,two question(Q1 and Q2) were used to test responents education of Architect Drawing in school. If the “ture or false” question item was answered correctly, the respondent would be given one point. Otherwise the respondent would be given no point.Q3 an was used to evaluat

16、e Architect Professionals liking of Architect Drawing.which are found to be crucial for the development of Architect Drawing.Q4 is aimed to explore whether Architect Drawing may has effect on Architects ability.These two questions were rated on a two-point scale ranging from 1(agree) and 2(disagree)

17、.2)Q5 to Q6 were used to ascertain whether Architect Professionals are willing to practicing Architect Drawing or not,though the computer design has widly used in contemporary.Participant were asked to choose two kinds of method to drawing building, one is hand-painted and the other is designed by c

18、omputer .In Q6,if you useyour design sketch with hand-painted,you can earn more money than in peacetime,compared with designed by computer.3)The last question gauged the Architect Professionals willingness to practice Architect Drawing.I first asked whether they would be willing to practice Architec

19、t Drawing if you may spend 4 hours to complete it.If the answer was no,we would proceed with the question as towhether they would be willing to practice Architect Drawingif you may spend 2 hours to complete it.If the respondents further responded with no,we would ask at what time duration they would

20、 accept to practice Architect Drawing.Table1 Total results The questions M S.DThe seriousness of school(Q1-Q2) 1.56 0.025Liking(Q3) 1.60 0.023Architect Ability(Q4) 1.52 0.015Hand-painted and designed by computer which better(Q5) 1.58 0.012Hand-painted and designed by computer which better if earn mo

21、re money by using hand- painted(Q6) 1.78 0.022(M=Means;S.D.=Standard Deviations)Table2 Differences between males and females The questions Male Female S.DThe seriousness of school(Q1-Q2)1.601.560.02Liking(Q3)1.621.760.07Architect Ability(Q4)1.521.680.03Hand-painted and designed by computer which bet

22、ter(Q5) 1.571.580.005Hand-painted and designed by computer which better if earn more money by using hand- painted(Q6)1.761.780.01(S.D.=Standard Deviations)Table3 working experienceThe questionsHWE(80)HWNE(120) S.DThe seriousness of school(Q1-Q2)1.601.420.09Liking(Q3)1.681.410.185Architect Ability(Q4

23、)1.821.450.185Hand-painted and designed by computer which better(Q5) 1.581.230.125Hand-painted and designed by computer which better if earn more money by using hand- painted(Q6)1.681.850.085(HWE=Having working experience;HNWE=Having not working experience;S.D.=Standard DeviationsTable4 Willingness

24、to practice Achitect Drawing4 hours2.2%2 hours25.3%Wont waste time on it50.8%Under 2 hours21.7%3. Result As the average rating of Hand-painted and designed by computer which better was lower than Hand-painted and designed by computer if earn more money by using hand-painted which better(see Table 1)

25、, the general Architect Professionalsattitude towards Architect Drawing is negative. affects by money .The result that the lower scores in the seriousness of school(see Table1),the low rating of it indicates that the school negatively treats to Architect Drawings teaching.However, there is a sharp c

26、ontrast between the having working experience(HWE) and the having not working experience(HNWE) towards Architect Drawing.HWE regard Architect Drawing as crucial technical ability.They think Architect Drawing ability has significant meaning and impact to Architect ability(see Table3). Although on sig

27、nificant differences were found between malesand females (see Table2) in terms of their attitudes toward Architect Drawing,females universally accepted Architect Drawing and werewilling to practice it and put it into use. The result (see Table4) also suggest that the percentage of Architect Professi

28、onals who were willing to spend time to practice Architect Drawing increased from 2.2% to 25.3%,if the practicing time reduced from 4 hours to 2 hours.So the time of practing Architect Drawing significantly affects Architect Professionals acceptance of Architect Drawing. More than half of the respon

29、dents were not willing to waste time to practice Architect Drawing,even though it takes little time on it.Therefore,there maybe have other factors impress the Architect Professionals acceptance of Architect Drawing. 4.Conclusions The study provides the following findings. 1)Architect Professionals g

30、enerally have a negative attitude toward Architect Drawing. Architect Professionals who have working experience tend to think Architect Drawing higher than Architect Professionals who have not working experience.HWE believes the Architect Drawing combining with the computer design will make better r

31、esult.not only using computer. 2)The teaching lessons of Architect Drawing in school has gradually discreased,which may impacts the Architects students interest of Architect Drawing,bringing the negative leading role,generating the Architects students gradually neglects the importance of Architect D

32、rawing,and leading unhealth development of building industries. 3)Architect Professionalsattitude changed maybe influences by the rapid development of the building industries which neglected the buildings essence and fast growing economy which blindly required outstanding achievement.Demand efficiency chiefly, quality secondary. 4)Time of practicing Architect Draw