On the 'What is philosophy' - Heidegger's philosophy of deconstruction and response

1、 On the What is philosophy - Heideggers philosophy of deconstruction and response Abstract: Heideggers Existential philosophy from the traditional to the contemporary Western philosophy, metaphysics, with great shock and impact. Why should he deconstruction of traditional philosophy, but also how to

2、 survive into the philosophy of the road for? Paper points out, Heideggers adoption of What is the philosophy of questioning to explore the source of this question and to comprehend a problem in itself is a way ; turn into this road to listen to discourse, namely to respond to the existence of being

3、s! therefore, indicate that out of an idea, it went beyond the rational and irrational than the difference, thus demonstrating philosophy of the future development of a new direction. At the same time, this road is also a reflection of Heideggers thoughts and feelings in the course. 1955 Nian 8 Yue

4、Normandy in France made by Heideggers What is philosophy? Speech, he used questions with Wasistdas - diephilosphie? (Literally - What is this philosophy? See Sun Zhou Xing Selected Heideggers anthology roll life reading & Products Shanghai Joint Publishing 1996, p. 588 Note (2), and stre

5、ssed the issue of study and reflection should be Greek. He said: Our problem into the philosophy of the goals are, stay in philosophy, philosophical approach to the activities, that is a philosophical reflection (philosophieren). 1 Heideggers emphasis on the discussion of this issue because he was a

6、 very broad, that is the subject of an open, it must be noted that one will enable us to put forward and the road to solve the problem. Otherwise, When we asked what is philosophy of the occasion, we are on (櫣 ber) philosophical discussion. In this way to ask, and we obviously stand above philosophy

7、, that stood outside of philosophy. 2 Heideggers view, Heraclitus, Parmenides later, since Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, through Descartes, Kant, Hegel to Marx, Nietzsche, that in Heideggers philosophy throughout the West before the What is the philosophy of the problem, regardless of their manner of

8、questioning, or on its content so far, have not really into the philosophy of stay in the philosophy of , or that have never been able to cut into the problem itself. Why is this so revert to Heideggers philosophy - What is this? This problem? How did he ask for? He says make sense? Under lie? In sh

9、ort, the philosophy in his vision of what What is it all about? 1, ( What is philosophy?) Is itself a way! 3 different from traditional metaphysics, Heidegger stressed that What is the philosophy?This is not an awareness of a target with its own problems (the philosophy of philosophy). This issue is

10、 not a commitment to understanding the so-called philosophy in the history of the origin and development issues. 4 but rather on the decision of the West - in European history of this in the (Dasein) of this historic issue is the fate of an issue. And the various science (discipline) is different fr

11、om the understanding of philosophy is not about things, but things their own movement. Hegel said, philosophy and even its own targets, they know themselves, in Heideggers philosophy seems to be difficult to grasp the true meaning. Heidegger an anti-traditional philosophy is what questions in ways h

12、e was straight to the point that we ask what is philosophy, the question itself is a way. 5 so much, we asked what is philosophy? Rather say that we are into the philosophy, the road in the philosophy ( ) on the road. Heidegger oppose to philosophy as an abuse of the name used to use, but its origin

13、s Department to listen to philosophy is the word, that it is: . Philosophy ( ) The Greek word as the Greek word Naishi a road, 6 Indeed, asked what is philosophy? Is walking on this road, this road only in front of us again our behind. I say it in front of us is due to as a road of the Greek words (

14、philosophy) has long been first to speak to us, and further stated that, when we look for in terms of the philosophy of asking what is the word itself is already ahead of us had. I say it is behind, it is because we always have to listen to and say this word of philosophy, even before we say that ph

15、ilosophy, we also hear of the word itself. View of this, so much is that we ask what is philosophy, might as well be said that philosophy in asking us, (philosophy) this road constantly torture us: whether or gone astray? Whether marched in the bright avenue? Or, philosophy and through our (the phil

16、osophy of animal) continuously inquiring of their own kind in order to manifest themselves. Thus, Heidegger says, a word tells us that philosophy is a certain first determines the survival of the Greek thing. Does not stop there - also decided to forward to us the West - European history, the most b

17、asic features of the inner. 7 is not a possession of Greek philosophy, not the West - the Europeans took possession of philosophy, is not that we took possession of philosophy. But on the contrary, is the first possession of the Greek philosophy, took possession of the West - Europe, took possession

18、 of our philosophy in the What is the philosophy is pressed, expand its own way and let us march on them, so that it can start its own. Heidegger by philosophy of the Greek word The Origin, through the dumping of Gods own philosophy, focused, looking out of a listen to philosophical discourse of a r

19、oad, or rather, this Greece , philosophy means the discovery itself is a road leading to the philosophy itself for us from above or outside of philosophy into the philosophy, stay in philosophy, cleared the road. Here, we can not help but ask ourselves, when we follow this path as shown in Heidegger

20、 entered into philosophy, stay in the philosophy to listen to words, we would like the historical (historisch), as committed to on understanding the origin and development of philosophy, or, as in physics, as will be seen as a philosophy is that we have objects outside the so-called objective certai

21、nty, or, like psychology, philosophy research, as will be seen as a subjective awareness of mental activity ? obviously not, at least, we will not longer on the What is the philosophy of questioning the vision placed in subject-object dichotomy in the way that traditional metaphysics or practices ta

22、ken for granted things. Because we believe that the problem itself is a way! 2, there may be an idea, it went beyond the rational and irrational than the difference. 8 Since we are on the what is philosophy and ask their problems in itself for us to open a road, then we discuss the road must have a

23、certain way and direction, a step further, philosophy to explore things with our own related to involvement in, touch the (noustouche) us, but deep in our nature touched us. 9 Heideggers philosophy of opposition to the kind of lofty, far from peoples lives, away from the real world, then the philoso

24、phy has turned into a small number of experts in the patent to make it free of the ideological source of abstraction, in his view, should be our own, from the real lives to grasp what is the philosophy of the problem. But Would not this become a philosophical feelings, emotions, emotional aspects of

25、 a thing Mody? Heidegger ask ourselves. Philosophy can not escape the irrational things, but not to the provisions of a non-rational philosophy, because no matter who wants to philosophy and the provisions of a non-rational, and he is as a rational delimitation of the scale, and that he called the r

26、ational is assumed to be self-evident what the . 10 Heideggers critique of irrationalism was very to the point, he said, non-rationalist rationalism is only apparent weakness and total failure, which itself is one such rationalism. Irrationalism escaped from the rationalism of a way, this way does n

27、ot lead free. 11 rationalism powerless thing, in the non-rationalism of the shelters also can not find a solution, non-rationalist sang rationalism opposing views. 12 It is in this sense, the Heidegger pointed out that emotions, even the most exquisite feelings have no place in philosophy is the. Be

28、cause, emotion is something irrational things. 13 Heidegger does not deny the Western rationalist tradition in philosophys status and role. However, in Heideggers view, whether rationalism or irrationalism not actually touch philosophy is what is the essence of the problem, are unable to answer and

29、resolve this issue. He said: blind rationalism to be something irrational in terms of nothing but ogle Gu Bale. 14 refers to Heidegger drops for the rationalism rooted in a deep concern of his, in his view, if the person is seen as animalrationale (rational biological), with a fixed and rigid ration

30、ality concepts, to treat the world, history and society, will be destroyed, interruption caused by the existence of life itself, and the like forgetting the end result of people homeless status, and ultimately lose in the world. For this reason, rationalism of Western philosophy in the process of ex

31、panding, not only failed to enter What is the philosophythis path being of mankind be able to find a spiritual home in which the place to settle down, but the thought become a philosophy, but philosophy of knowledge itself into a knowledge into the activities of the College and the College of things

32、 . . in the event of such a philosophy of understanding the process of knowledge generation, and thought had disappeared. 16 resulting from the technical things, representation, and logical, rational thing flooding the market, this rational, representations, and computational thinking will be inunda

33、ted philosophy, submerged truth, this really does exist submerged . For this reason, in Heideggers vision of future thinking is no longer a philosophy of is no longer a traditional metaphysics, and will no longer be like give up, as Hegel called love-chi is the name of The knowledge that has turned

34、itself into an absolute form of wisdom. 17 Since, in Rationalism and irrationalism of the traditional metaphysics of vision, the right philosophy is what the answer to this question, for the human spirit to find their homes and can only feel powerless and frustrated. Therefore, we must undertake a s

35、erious of deconstruction (Destruktion) work. Through this arduous deconstruction , we can expect a return or to find beyond a rationalist battle with non-rationalist thought, Maybe there is such an idea, it goes beyond the rational and irrational than the difference than the more sober science and t

36、echnology must therefore also able to make a sober look on, it does not have any effect, but still has its own necessity. 18 shows that Heideggers good intentions cherished, he wanted to traditional active and effective philosophy of deconstruction , or even through the anti-philosophy , but eventua

37、lly into the open and aboveboard way of philosophy, for the human quest for spiritual home. In this process, people will no longer be external to the existence of its own stubborn, but will correct its mistake in the philosophy of philosophy will no longer be above or outside the arbitrary. 3, philo

38、sophy is to respond to the existence of beings 19 Heideggers What is the philosophy of questions, both in its form and substance, both in its anti-traditional one. However, on the other hand, Heidegger is more metaphysical than the traditional traditional. He believes that philosophy is the Greek se

39、nse of . Therefore, only when we maintain and philosophical traditions Wei delivery (ie released) to us that things dialogue, we enter the response, that is to obtain answers to our questions. 20 As mentioned above, Greek that a road, then, when we ask what is , there must be into this rule, in this

40、 way, through the Roads and philosophical tradition of continuity, running in the philosophical traditions in transmission, and to face and accept the traditional life of energy release. In this way, we can maintain the tradition and philosophy to deliver things to us that dialogue, we enter the res

41、ponse in order to obtain the answer to our questioning. Furthermore, this road for our response to the question, not to abandon history, and history is not a fault, but rather of what was handed down there and conversion. This kind of history is that we, according to a so-called deconstruction (Dest

42、ruktion) meaning . Heideggers deconstruction of so much talking about the destruction, damage, as it is removed and purification. Through the deconstruction is to remove, eliminate and to set aside those relating to the history of philosophy of history solely on the statements. Deconstruction is int

43、ended ignorant: Open our ears to listen to the traditional Jingxin as beings of the deposit to us to persuade things. By listening to such persuasion (Zuspruch), we will be able to respond to a . 21 Deconstruction is to clear the way to purify our hearts, thinking, let us concentrate on listening, l

44、istening with their ears to go through the traditional extension of the road from the exists by the existence of persuasion to us , in response to the existence of beings. Greek word philosophy from s, which created about Heraclitus, a p loved of people, namely, to logos approach to speak, that is,

45、response to logos. This response is coordinated with the . According to Heideggers interpretation, said was E , namely, a (is) all, where all means: ¢ Chi , namely, the existence of the whole person, generally. Ev, that is one, meaning: one, the only, unity of all persons. But all beings ar

46、e in the presence of the uniform. This is that: in the presence of all existence. More specifically: the existence of (ist) beings. At this point, yes as a transitive verb to use, its meaning as aggregation (Versammelt). Existence of all beings to come together, so that there are as beings. - There

47、is a gathering that is s (logos) 22, in Heideggers view Heraclitus to Ev (ie, the existence of beings) known as the logos ( s), namely, the existence of beings, logos ( s) The proposal represents the Heraclitus in the presence of insight into the gathering and the reunification of the sheltered natu

48、re of the . Namely the existence of those who responded in existence. Heraclitus the unity of all one and logos, to respond to the presence of those who maintain the existence of the entire Western worlds fate. Reposted elsewhere in the paper for free download philosophy is to respond to the existen

49、ce of beings, such a response of course is our home, but it is only occasionally became a special way for us to accept self-start the state. Heidegger, Heraclitus and Parmenides later, right curtain v, right Ev ¢ v a (is) all, the existence of the existence of those who desire, it becomes a

50、 Such a problem: the existence of persons, there were what? rather than on the existence of beings, asking that (so) there is the presence of those who exist together. Thus forgotten existence. This degenerated into philosophical thought, Now, thinking of it as philosophy of 23. Platos and Aristotle

51、s v P (reality), Kants transcendental apperception, Hegels absolute knowledge, Husserls sense of subjectivity, Nietzsches will to power and so on, are in fact the presence of the existence of beings. However, traditional metaphysics, until Husserl had no questioning the existence of the existence of

52、 (Seinvalssein), which did not ask how there could be the presence of such an issue in itself. Therefore, lead to a thought into a philosophy , but into a philosophy of knowledge itself into a knowledge and activities in the College of things . . occurrence, philosophy had, knowledge development, an

53、d thought was gone! Although we enter the response homes have been preserved, but it is always in lock state. Now we ask what is philosophy, is to open the lock by traditional metaphysics, cover accommodation, it is no longer just occasionally it to conduct its own for us to accept. Furthermore, is

54、to open the existence of beings, so that there is self-demasking. In this way, we have made into the response, into the philosophy ( ) this road, listening to discourse. philosophy is to respond to the presence of beings, but only in its self-initiated and launched the expansion forward to this occa

55、sion, philosophy is such a response. At this point,to respond to means: the existence of those who come from there is the requirement that the etredispos Qin Dis-pos Qin literal meaning is broken down, been clarified, and thus those who have been placed in association with the existence of in. 24 ph

56、ilosophy of existence of those responding in the presence of their way to Tao (Sagen) Hezhe in the existence of beings. In the speech in response to the existence of beings, listen to the existence of persuasion, and co-ordinated in the existence of beings. Response inevitably and always the respons

57、e is a Hezhe. 25 What is Hezhe? Heidegger used by Plato, Aristotle, philosophers praise for the unique emotional surprised to note Hezhe. In Heideggers view, Plato, Aristotle stressed that philosophy originated in surprised, are surprised at the existence of their persons, surprised at the existence of what is affected by this surprise drive began his philosophical activities. Surprising bearing