居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價

1、居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價    居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價 Landscape Simulation and Evalution of Residential Garden 【中文摘要】 園林綠地景觀模擬評價可評價園林景觀設計方案的質量,提高園林綠地設計的合理性,對于城市景觀建設具有十分重要的意義。本文以居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀為例,從居住區(qū)景觀模擬評價媒介的構建方法、景觀模擬評價媒介的真實性比較、景觀模擬評價手段的有效性分析及SD法在景觀模擬評價中的應用等方面開展了對居住區(qū)未建成景觀的模擬評價研究,建立了居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價的方法。主要研究結果如下:

2、(1)研究了應用計算機技術構建居住區(qū)景觀靜態(tài)模擬媒介和動態(tài)模擬媒介的方法,結果表明:3D靜態(tài)圖像和VRML動態(tài)圖像可作為景觀方案設計的有效表達形式。從制作的難易程度上看,3D靜態(tài)圖像制作簡易,VRML動態(tài)圖像制作較難,與編程的方法相比經3D軟件轉化而來的VRML動態(tài)圖像清晰度更高。(2)應用實驗室評價與網(wǎng)絡調查作為評價手段,比較了評價媒介的真實性與評價手段的有效性。結果顯示,3D靜態(tài)圖像、VRML動態(tài)圖像與VRML靜態(tài)圖像的真實度差異顯著,3D靜態(tài)圖像與VRML動態(tài)圖像的真實性差異不顯著。3D靜態(tài)圖像與VRML動態(tài)圖像的真實度較高,二者均可以清晰地表達設計方案的設計意圖,VRML靜態(tài)圖像真實度

3、較低。實驗室評價與網(wǎng)絡調查的媒介真實度差異較小,網(wǎng)絡調查可作為實驗室評價的有益補充。(3)研究了應用SD法進行居住區(qū)景觀模擬評價時不同評價媒介以及不同評價手段對評價結果的影響。應用SD法對居住區(qū)景觀質量進行量化,經單因素方差分析結果表明:以3D靜態(tài)圖像與VRML動態(tài)圖像作為媒介的方案評價結果相似,以VRML靜態(tài)圖像為媒介的方案評價結果上與前二者在三維的、二維的,清晰放映設計、模糊反映設計的形容詞對得分上差異顯著。以實驗室評價與網(wǎng)絡調查評價為手段的方案評價結果相似,二者均可作為基于SD法的景觀模擬評價媒介。(4)研究了SD法作為居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價方法的有效性。景觀模擬評價中,SD法形容詞

4、對的有效設置,可以反映目標方案的景觀評價構成因素。選取合適的形容詞對,利用3D靜態(tài)圖像和VRML動態(tài)圖像兩種評價媒介與實驗室評價與網(wǎng)絡調查兩種評價手段對居住區(qū)景觀進行模擬評價,評價結果顯示在實驗室評價與網(wǎng)絡調查中大部分形容詞對的得分差異不顯著,形容詞對可以被評判者清晰的認知,表明SD法具有較高的可靠性,可以作為居住區(qū)景觀模擬評價的有效方法。 【英文摘要】 Simulation evaluation of green landscape can evaluate the quality of landscape design, enhance the reasonableness of the

5、urban landscape construction is of great significance.Based on residential areas green landscape garden as an example,from the residential area evaluation of the media landscape simulation approach to building,landscape simulation evaluation of the authenticity of the media,the visual simulation eva

6、luation of the effectiveness of means and SD in landscape simulation evaluation of the areas In the residential area of uncompleted visual simulation evaluation studies,the establishment of a residential area garden green landscape simulation evaluation methods.The main result are as follows:(1) On

7、the application of computer technology to build residential area landscape static simulation of the media and the media dynamic simulation.It was concluded 3D and VRML static images and dynamic image as a landscape design can be an effective form of expression.It is easy to production images by 3D s

8、tatic images and VRML dynamic image production more difficult,. Compared with programming methods,3D and VRML software has quality image when imageto -digital conversion(2) Assessment and application of the laboratory network surveys as evaluation tools to compare authenticity of evaluation media an

9、d authenticity of evaluation means.The results showed that,There was difference of among 3D images,VRML dynamic image,VRML static images and the original image.There is little difference between 3D image and VRML dynamic image.3D static images and VRML dynamic image have high quality,both of which c

10、an clearly express design intent,VRML static images has poor quality.There is little difference of quality of laboratory evaluation and investigation of the media network,the network survey can be used as a useful supplement laboratory evaluation.(3) On the application of SD method in landscape simu

11、lation to evaluate different media and different evaluation tools to evaluate the impact of evaluation results.Choice of the three simulated landscape perspective,the application of the SD method residential areas to quantify the quality of landscape,the single factor analysis of variance results sh

12、owed that:3D static images and VRML dynamic image as a media programme evaluation results similar.VRML static images for the media evaluation of the programme with the results in the three-dimensional,two-dimensional and designed to reflect clear and ambiguous response to the design of the adjective

13、 scored significantly.To the laboratory evaluation and network survey as a means of evaluation of the programme similar to the results,as they are based on the SD method landscape simulation evaluation tools.(4) On the SD method as a residential garden landscape simulation evaluation of the effectiv

14、eness of the method.Evaluation of simulated landscape,SD Adjectives in SD method on the effective settings,to reflect the objectives of the programme evaluation of the landscape components. Select the appropriate right adjectives,using 3D static images and VRML dynamic image of two evaluation and la

15、boratory evaluation of the media and network investigation as evaluation tools in residential garden landscape simulation evaluation,evaluation results show that in the laboratory evaluation and network survey are most adjectives score difference was not significant,the adjectives can be the judge o

16、f a clear understanding and the SD method is a high reliability,can be used as residential landscape simulation evaluation of the effective ways.  【中文關鍵詞】 景觀模擬評價; 居住區(qū); SD法 【英文關鍵詞】 Landscape Simulation and Evaluation; Residential; SD method 【畢業(yè)論文目錄】  居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 1 緒論 9

17、-14     1.1 課題背景 9     1.2 景觀模擬評價的研究現(xiàn)狀 9-12         1.2.1 景觀模擬的研究 9-10         1.2.2 景觀模擬評價的研究 10-12         1.2.3 居住區(qū)園林綠地設計應注意的問題及發(fā)展趨勢 12     1.3 居住區(qū)

18、園林綠地景觀模擬評價的目的及意義 12-13         1.3.1 居住區(qū)景觀模擬評價的目的 12-13         1.3.2 居住區(qū)景觀模擬評價的意義 13     1.4 研究的內容 13-14 2 景觀模擬評價的理論基礎及方法 14-27     2.1 景觀評價的由來 14     2.2 景觀評價的學派 14-16   

19、60;     2.2.1 專家學派 14-15         2.2.2 心理物理學派 15         2.2.3 認知學派 15         2.2.4 經驗學派 15-16     2.3 景觀評價在設計方案評價中的應用 16     2.4 景觀模擬 16-20

20、60;       2.4.1 景觀模擬原則 16-17         2.4.2 景觀模擬媒介 17-18         2.4.3 計算機構建數(shù)字圖像的技術支持與方法 18-20     2.5 景觀模擬評價 20-26         2.5.1 景觀模擬評價的研究過程 20  

21、       2.5.2 景觀模擬評價的方法及實例 20-25         2.5.3 景觀模擬評價的調查手段與人群的選擇 25-26     2.6 本章小結 26-27 3 居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬評價媒介的構建 27-35     3.1 研究對象 27     3.2 居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬媒介的構建方法 27-32     &

22、#160;   3.2.1 居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀靜態(tài)模擬媒介的構建方法 27-31         3.2.2 居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬自主漫游媒介的構建方法 31-32     3.3 討論 32-33     3.4 本章小結 33-35 4 居住區(qū)園林綠地景觀模擬媒介與評價手段的有效性分析 35-43     4.1 研究方法 35-39       &#

23、160; 4.1.1 景觀模擬媒介的選取 35-39         4.1.2 實驗室評價 39         4.1.3 網(wǎng)絡調查 39         4.1.4 數(shù)據(jù)分析方法 39     4.2 結果與分析 39-42         4.2.1 評價媒介真實性比較分析 39-41         4.2.2