2013年考研英語二真題及答案_第1頁
2013年考研英語二真題及答案_第2頁
2013年考研英語二真題及答案_第3頁
2013年考研英語二真題及答案_第4頁
2013年考研英語二真題及答案_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩18頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

英語二完型Giventheadvantageofelectronicmoney,youmightthinkthatweshouldmovequicklytothecashlesssocietyinwhichallpaymentsaremadeelectronically_1,atruecashlesssocietyisprobablynotaroundthecorner.Indeed,predictionshavebeen2_fortwodecadesbuthavenotyetcometofruition.Forexample,BusinessWeekpredictedin1975thatelectronicmeansofpaymentwouldsoon“revolutionizethevery3_ofmoneyitself”,onlyto4_itselfseveralyearslater.Whyhasthemovementtocashlesssocietybeenso5_incoming?1.AmoreoverBhoweverCthereforeDotherwise2.AoffBbackCoverDaround3.ApowerBhistoryCconceptDsole4.AreverseBresistCresumeDreward5.AsilentBslowCsuddenDsteady英語二閱讀原文及出處:Text1Inanessay,entitled“MakingItinAmerica,”inthelatestissueofTheAtlantic,theauthorAdamDavidsonrelatesajokefromcottoncountryaboutjusthowmuchamoderntextilemillhasbeenautomated:Theaveragemillhasonlytwoemployeestoday,“amanandadog.Themanistheretofeedthedog,andthedogisthereto1keepthemanawayfromthemachines。”Davidson’sarticleisoneofanumberofpiecesthathaverecentlyappearedmakingthepointthatthereasonwehavesuchstubbornlyhighunemploymentandsaggingmiddle-classincomestodayislargelybecauseofthebigdropindemandbecauseoftheGreatRecession,butitisalsobecauseofthequantumadvancesinbothglobalizationandtheinformationtechnologyrevolution,whicharemorerapidlythaneverreplacinglaborwithmachinesorforeignworkers。Inthepast,workerswithaverageskills,doinganaveragejob,couldearnanaveragelifestyle.But,today,averageisofficiallyover.Beingaveragejustwon?tearnyouwhatitusedto.Itcan?twhensomanymoreemployershavesomuchmoreaccesstosomuchmoreaboveaveragecheapforeignlabor,cheaprobotics,cheapsoftware,cheapautomationandcheapgenius.Therefore,everyoneneedstofindtheirextra—theiruniquevaluecontributionthatmakesthemstandoutinwhateveristheirfieldofemployment.Averageisover。Yes,newtechnologyhasbeeneatingjobsforever,andalwayswill.Astheysay,ifhorsescouldhavevoted,thereneverwouldhavebeencars.Butthere?sbeenanacceleration.AsDavidsonnotes,“Inthe10yearsendingin2009,[U.S.]factoriesshedworkerssofastthattheyerasedalmostallthegainsoftheprevious70years;roughlyone2outofeverythreemanufacturingjobs—about6millionintotal—disappeared。”Andyouain’tseennothin’yet.LastApril,AnnieLowreyofSlatewroteaboutastart-upcalled“ElaCarte”thatisouttoshrinktheneedforwaitersandwaitresses:Thecompany“hasproducedakindofsouped-upiPadthatletsyouorderandpayrightatyourtable.ThebrainchildofabunchofM.I.T.engineers,theniftyinvention,knownasthePresto,mightbefoundatarestaurantnearyousoon....Youselectwhatyouwanttoeatandadditemstoacart.Dependingontherestaurant?spreferences,theconsolecouldshowyounutritionalinformation,ingredientslistsandphotographs.Youcanmakespecialrequests,like?dressingontheside?or?quintuplebacon.?Whenyou?redone,theorderzingsovertothekitchen,andthePrestotellsyouhowlongitwilltakeforyouritemstocomeout....Boredwithyourcompanions?Playgamesonthemachine.Whenyou?rethroughwithyourmeal,youpayontheconsole,splittingthebillitembyitemifyouwishandpayinghoweveryouwant.Andyoucanhaveyourreceipte-mailedtoyou....Eachconsolegoesfor$100permonth.Ifarestaurantservesmealseighthoursaday,sevendaysaweek,itworksoutto42centsperhourpertable—makingthePrestocheaperthaneventheverycheapestwaiter?!?WhattheiPadwon’tdoinanaboveaveragewayaChineseworkerwill.ConsiderthisparagraphfromSunday?sterrificarticleinTheTimesbyCharlesDuhiggandKeithBradsheraboutwhyAppledoessomuchofitsmanufacturinginChina:“ApplehadredesignedtheiPhone?sscreenatthelastminute,forcinganassembly-lineoverhaul.Newscreensbeganarrivingatthe[Chinese]plantnearmidnight.Aforemanimmediatelyroused8,000workersinsidethecompany?sdormitories,accordingtotheexecutive.Eachemployeewasgivenabiscuitandacupoftea,guidedtoaworkstationandwithinhalfanhourstarteda12-hourshiftfittingglassscreensintobeveledframes.Within96hours,theplantwasproducingover10,000iPhonesaday.?Thespeedandflexibilityisbreathtaking,?theexecutivesaid.?There?snoAmericanplantthatcanmatchthat.?”Andautomationisnotjustcomingtomanufacturing,explainsCurtisCarlson,thechiefexecutiveofSRIInternational,aSiliconValleyidealabthatinventedtheAppleiPhoneprogramknownasSiri,thedigitalpersonalassistant.“Siriisthebeginningofahugetransformationinhowweinteractwithbanks,insurancecompanies,retailstores,healthcareproviders,informationretrievalservicesandproductservices?!?Therewillalwaysbechange—newjobs,newproducts,newservices.ButtheonethingweknowforsureisthatwitheachadvanceinglobalizationandtheI.T.revolution,thebestjobswillrequireworkerstohavemoreandbettereducationtomakethemselvesaboveaverage.HerearethelatestunemploymentratesfromtheBureauofLaborStatisticsforAmericansover25yearsold:thosewithlessthanahighschooldegree,13.8percent;thosewithahighschooldegreeandnocollege,8.7percent;thosewithsomecollegeorassociatedegree,7.7percent;andthosewithbachelor?sdegreeorhigher,4.1percent。Inaworldwhereaverageisofficiallyover,therearemanythingsweneedtodotobuttressemployment,butnothingwouldbemoreimportantthanpassingsomekindofG.I.Billforthe21stcenturythatensuresthateveryAmericanhasaccesstopost-highschooleducation。亞當?戴維森(AdamDavidson)《在美國制造》一文中提到南部種棉地區(qū)的一個笑話,內(nèi)容涉及現(xiàn)代紡織廠自動化的程度:只有兩個雇員,“一個人外加一條狗。人是負責(zé)喂狗的,狗是讓人不要靠近機器的?!比缃竦钠胀üS5我們的失業(yè)率為何居高不下、分是由于大衰退造成的需求大幅下降。革命巨大進步的推動:中產(chǎn)階級收入為何下降,其實大部這其中也有全球化和信息科技機器或者外國工人取代勞力的速度空前。最近有大量文章都在討論這些,戴維森的文章只是其中一篇而已。過去,只要有個一般的手藝,做份普通的工作,工人生活就過得還湊合。但如今,擁有一般水平不行了。不出眾就沒法像過去一樣活著了。因為現(xiàn)在越來越多的雇主有大把的機會接觸到不錯的外國廉價勞動力、便宜的機器人、廉價的軟件、低廉的自動化設(shè)備和要價低的異于常人的獨特價值能夠讓人才。因此,人人都需要有另外的價值:他們在各自的雇傭市場上脫穎而出??科接咕湍苓^日子的時代結(jié)束了。是的,新技術(shù)一直就在吞噬我們的工作,將來還會繼續(xù)吞噬。那就永遠不會有小轎而且吞噬的速度在加快。俗話說,如果馬會投票,車了。如戴維森所言,“2009年之前的十年內(nèi),美國工廠裁撤工人速70年新增的工人數(shù)量;大概每三個工作崗度之快,基本上等于過去位就有一個崗位消失了,總共約有600萬之多?!边€有好戲呢。去年四月,Slate雜志的安妮?洛瑞(AnnieLowrey)寫了一篇初創(chuàng)公司ElaCarte的文章,其目標是減少對服務(wù)生的需6要:這家公司“已經(jīng)生產(chǎn)出了一種增強版的iPad,它可以讓您在桌邊點菜和買單。也許很快在身邊的餐館里你就會見到這個麻省理工工程師們的杰作、時髦的發(fā)明放進小推車里。Presto了。你可以選擇你想吃的,把它根據(jù)餐館的選擇,控制設(shè)備會顯示營養(yǎng)信息、成分清單和圖片等。你也可以有具體的需求,比如說‘調(diào)料放在邊上’或者‘五倍的熏肉’。你都決定好之后,訂單立馬會傳到廚房,告訴你所點的東西花多長時間可以出來。Presto會...與同伴等得不耐煩了?你可以在控制設(shè)備上付款,那就再iPad上玩玩游戲吧。吃完飯之后,如果你愿意,你可以一個菜一個菜地分割賬單付款,款方式。你還可以要求將收據(jù)發(fā)郵件給你。你也可以選擇付...使用每個控制設(shè)備每8小時,每周營業(yè)月需要100美金。如果一家餐館每天營業(yè)7天,那么每張餐桌每小時的成本只有42美分:因此Presto比最廉價的服務(wù)員都便宜?!眎Pad不能以超常方式做的,中國工人都可以做。來看看查爾斯?杜赫(CharlesDuhigg)和基斯?布拉德舍(KeithBradsher)在周日在本報(《紐約時報》)上的一篇美文吧,文中有一段講述了蘋果公司為什么將那么多的生產(chǎn)環(huán)節(jié)放在中國:“最后一刻,蘋果公司重新設(shè)計了iPhone的屏幕,因此裝配線需要全部調(diào)整。午夜時分左右,新屏幕開始到達中國工廠。根據(jù)這位執(zhí)行官的敘述,司宿舍的8000名工人。每人領(lǐng)了一份餅干和一杯茶后,就被帶到一個車間,半小時內(nèi),他們就開始了12小時的輪班,將玻璃屏幕裝到一名領(lǐng)班立即叫醒了公7斜面框架中。96小時之后,這家工廠每天就能生產(chǎn)1萬臺iPhone.’這位執(zhí)行官說,‘在美國找不到‘這種速度和靈活性令人目瞪口呆。這樣的工廠?!弊詣踊膊粌H僅發(fā)生在生產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域,硅谷科技公司孵化器斯坦福國際研究院(SRIInternational)的首席執(zhí)行官柯蒂斯?卡爾森(CurtisCarlson)說。該公司發(fā)明了蘋果iPhone的個人數(shù)字助理服務(wù)Siri程序?!霸诟淖兾覀兣c銀行、保險公司、零售商店、醫(yī)療保健提供商、信息檢索服務(wù)公司和產(chǎn)品生產(chǎn)公司的關(guān)系方面,Siri只是這個轉(zhuǎn)變的開始。”變化總是會存在的,確信無疑的是,新工作、新產(chǎn)品和新服務(wù)都會出現(xiàn)。但我們?nèi)蚧涂茖W(xué)技術(shù)每前進一步,最好的工作都會要求工人接收過更多的更優(yōu)質(zhì)的教育,國勞工局對美國這樣他們才會超于常人。下面是美25歲以上人群的最新失業(yè)率統(tǒng)計:高中學(xué)歷都沒有的失業(yè)率為13.8%;有高中學(xué)歷,但沒大學(xué)學(xué)歷的為7.7%;有學(xué)士甚至更高學(xué)位的只有8.7%;有大學(xué)4.1%。或大專學(xué)歷的為在一個平庸者已經(jīng)無法生存的時代,情有很多,但沒有哪個比通過像我們需要做的促進就業(yè)的事《退伍軍人權(quán)利法案》之類的法案來得重要。只有這樣,才能保證的教育。21世紀的每個美國都能接受高中之后8Text2ImagineanewimmigrationpolicyAcenturyago,theimmigrantsfromacrosstheAtlanticincludedsettlersandsojourners.AlongwiththemanyfolkslookingtomakeapermanenthomeintheUnitedStatescamethosewhohadnointentiontostay,andwhowouldmakesomemoneyandthengohome.Between1908and1915,about7millionpeoplearrivedwhileabout2milliondeparted.AboutaquarterofallItalianimmigrants,forexample,eventuallyreturnedtoItalyforgood.Theyevenhadanaffectionatenickname,"uccellidipassaggio,"birdsofpassage。Today,wearemuchmorerigidaboutimmigrants.Wedividenewcomersintotwocategories:legalorillegal,goodorbad.WehailthemasAmericansinthemaking,orbrandthemasaliensfitfordeportation.Thatframeworkhascontributedmightilytoourbrokenimmigrationsystemandthelongpoliticalparalysisoverhowtofixit。Wedon''tneedmorecategories,butweneedtochangetheway9wethinkaboutcategories.Weneedtolookbeyondstrictdefinitionsoflegalandillegal.Tostart,wecanrecognizethenewbirdsofpassage,thoselivingandthrivinginthegrayareas.Wemightthenbegintosolveourimmigrationchallenges。Croppickers,violinists,constructionworkers,entrepreneurs,engineers,homehealth-careaidesandparticlephysicistsareamongtoday''sbirdsofpassage.Theyareenergeticparticipantsinaglobaleconomydrivenbytheflowofwork,moneyandideas.Theyprefertocomeandgoasopportunitycallsthem.Theycanmanagetohaveajobinoneplaceandafamilyinanother。Withorwithoutpermission,theystraddlelaws,jurisdictionsandidentitieswithease.WeneedthemtoimaginetheUnitedStatesasaplacewheretheycanbeproductiveforawhilewithoutcommittingthemselvestostayingforever.Weneedthemtofeelthathomecanbebothhereandthereandthattheycanbelongtotwonationshonorably。Imaginelifewitharadicallydifferentimmigrationpolicy:TheJamaicanwomanwhocameasavisitorandwaslookingafteryourauntuntilshediedcouldtrylivinginCanadaforawhile.Youcould10eventuallyaskhertocomebacktocareforyourmother。TheIndiansoftwaredevelopercouldtakesomeofhisSiliconValleyearningshometojoinfriendsinalittlestart-up,knowingthathecouldalwaysworkinCaliforniaagain.OrtheMexicanlaborerwhobustshisbackonaWisconsindairyfarmforwagesthatkeepmilkcheapwouldcomeandgoasneededbecausehecoulddecidewhichdairytoworkfor,andabi-nationalbankprogramwashelpinghimsavemoneytobuildabetterlifeforhiskidsinMexico。Accommodatingthisnewworldofpeopleinmotionwillrequirenewattitudesonbothsidesoftheimmigrationbattle.Lookingbeyondtheculturewarlogicofrightorwrongmeansopeningupthemiddlegroundandunderstandingthatmanagingimmigrationtodayrequiresmultiplepathsandmultipleoutcomes,includingsomethatarenoteasytoaccomplishlegallyintheexistingsystem。Anewsystemthatencouragesbothsojournersandsettlerswouldnotonlyhelpensurethatoursocietyreceivesthehumanresourcesitwillneedinthefuture,italsocouldhaveanaddedbenefit:Changingtherigidframeworkmighthelpusresolvethestatusoftheestimated11millionunauthorizedmigrantswhoareour11sharedlegacyofpolicyfailures。Currently,wedonotdograyzoneswell.Hundredsofthousandsofpeopleslosharoundinindeterminatestatusbecausethey''recaughtinbureaucraticlimboorbecausetheyhavebeengrantedtemporarystaysthatarerepeatedlyextended.PresidentBarackObamacreatedapalershadeofgraythissummerbyexercisingprosecutorialdiscretionnottodeportsomeyoungpeoplewhowerebroughttothiscountryillegallyaschildren.Buttheseareexceptions,notrules。Thebasicmechanismforlegalimmigrationtoday,apartfromthespecialcategoryofrefugee,isthelegalpermanentresidentvisa,orgreencard.MostrecipientsarepeoplesponsoredbycloserelativeswholiveintheUnitedStates.Asthenameimplies,thismechanismisdesignedforimmigrantswhoaresettlingdown.Thevisacanberevokediftheholderdoesnotshow"intenttoremain"bynotmaintainingaU.S.address,goingabroadtoworkfulltimeorjusttravelingindefinitely.LegalresidentsareassumedtobeontheirwaytobecomingAmericans,physically,culturallyandlegally.Afterfiveyearsoflivinghere,theybecomeeligibleforcitizenshipandachancetogainvotingrightsandfullaccesstothesocialsafetynet。12Thisisafinewaytodealwithpeoplewhoarrivewithdeepconnectionstothecountryandwhoresolvetostay.Thatcanandshouldbemostimmigrants.Butthismechanismhastwoproblems:Thenationisnotpreparedtooffercitizenshiptoeverymigrantwhoisofferedajob.Andnoteveryonewhocomesherewantstostayforever。Itmayhaveoncemadesensetothinkofimmigrantsassodbusterswhowerecomingtosettleemptyspaces.Butthatantiquereasoningdoesnotapplywhenthecountryislookingatalong,steepracetoremaincompetitiveintheworldeconomy,particularlynotwheninnovationandentrepreneurshiparesupposedtobeourcomparativeadvantage.Tosucceed,weneedmodernbirdsofpassage。Thechallengesdifferdependingonwhetheryouarelookingatthehighendoftheskillsspectrum,theinformationworkersoratlow-skilledlaborers。Afrequentproposalforhighlyskilledworkerscomeswiththeslogan,"Stapleagreencardtothediploma."Thatissupposedtoensurethatagreatershareofbrainyinternationalstudentsremainin13theUnitedStatesafterearningdegreesinscienceandtechnology.Butwhatiftheyarenotreadyforalong-termcommitment?Noonewouldsuggestthatinvestmentcapitalordesignprocessesneedtoresidepermanentlyinonenation.Talenttodayyearnstobeequallymobile.Ratherthantrytoobligesmartyoungpeoplefromabroadtostayhere,weshouldallowthemtothinkoftheUnitedStatesasaplacewheretheycanalwaysreturn,aplacewheretheywillspendpart,notall,oftheirlives,oneofseveralplaceswheretheycanliveandworkandinvest。Temporary-workerprogramsareaconventionalapproachtomeetinglow-skilledlaborneedswithoutillegalimmigration.That''swhatPresidentGeorgeW.Bushproposedin2004,sayingthegovernmentshould"matchwillingforeignworkerswithwillingAmericanemployers."Animmigrantcomestodoaparticularjobforalimitedperiodoftimeandthengoeshome.Butsuchprogramsriskreplacingonekindofrigiditywithanother.Therelativelysmallprogramscurrentlyinplacedon''tmanagethematchmakingverywell。Competingdomesticworkersneedtobeprotected,asdothe14migrantworkers,andtheprocessmustbenimbleenoughtomeetlabormarketdemand.Nobodyreallyhaspulledthatoff,andthereisnoreasontobelieveitcanbedoneonagrandscale.Ratherthantryingtolinkspecificmigrantstospecificjobs,differenttypesoftemporaryworkvisascouldbepeggedtoindustries,toplacesortotimeperiods.Youcouldgetanengineeringvisa,notonlyavisatoworkatIntel。Bothshort-termvisasandpermanentresidenceneedtobepartofthemix,buttheyarenotthewholeanswer.Anothervaluabletoolistheprovisionalvisa,whichAustraliausesasakindofintermediarystageinwhichtemporaryimmigrantsspendseveralyearsbeforebecomingeligibleforpermanentresidency.TheU.S.systempracticallyobligesvisitorstospendtimeherewithoutauthorizationwhenthey''vemarriedacitizen,gottenajobordonesomethingelsethatqualifiesthemtostaylegally。WealsocouldborrowfromEuropeandcreatelong-termpermissiontoresideforcertainmigrantsthatiscontingentonsimplybeingemployed,notonhavingaspecificjob.And,legislationcouldloosenthedefinitionsofpermanentresidencysothatmigrantscouldgainalifetimerighttoliveandworkintheUnitedStateswithout15havingtobehere(andpaytaxeshere)moreorlesscontinuously。Theideathatnewcomersareeithersaintsorsinnersisnotwrittenindeliblyeitherinourheartsorinourlaws.Asthesizeoftheunauthorizedpopulationhasgrownoverthepast20yearsorso,thepoliticalresponsehasdictatedseeingimmigrationpolicythroughthestarklensoflawenforcement:Whomdowelockup,kickout,fenceoff?Prominentpoliticiansofbothparties,includingbothpresidentialcandidates,haveengagedinmachoone-upmanshipwhenitcomestoimmigration.So,PresidentObamabrokerecordsfordeportations.MittRomney,meanwhile,vowstobreakrecordsforbordersecurity。Breakingoutoftheeither/ormentalityopensupmanyavenuesformanagingfutureimmigration.Itcouldalsohelpbreakthestalemateoverthecurrentpopulationofunauthorizedmigrants.NoelectionresultwillproduceaCongressthatoffersapathtocitizenshipforeverybody,butthereisnosupportfortotaldeportation,either。Ifweacceptthattherearespacesbetweenlegalandillegal,thenoptionsmultiply。16Citizenshipcouldbeaneventualoutcomeformost,notall,peoplehereillegally,buteveryonewouldgetsomekindofpapers,andwecanengineerawayforpeopletoworktheirwayfromonestatustoanother.Thenewlyarrivedandleastattachedcouldbegrantedstatusforalimitedtimeandreceivehelpwithreturningtotheirhomecountries.Othersmightbeofferedlife-longprivilegestoliveandworkhere,butnotcitizenship.We''dgivethefullestwelcometothosewithhomes,childrenorlongtimejobs。ByinsistingthatimmigrantsareeitherAmericansoraliens,wemakeitharderforsomegoodfolkstocomeandweobligeotherstostayforthewrongreasons.Worse,weensurethattherewillalwaysbepeoplelivingamonguswhoareoutsidethelaw,andthatisnotgoodforthemorus。Text3BeyondtheBlinkWhentheSupremeCourtannounceditsdecisionontheAffordableCareActlastmonth,themediawentwild.Therushtojudgmenttookseconds.CNNandFoxNewsinitiallydescribedthedecisionincorrectly,sayingfivejusticeshadstruckdownthelaw.Evenaftercorrections,thesnapanalysisthatfollowedwasn?tvery17helpful.Themultipartdecisioniscomplex,anditsramificationswilltakemonthsorevenyearstounderstand。Theblinkresponsetothiscaseisonlythelatestexampleofatroublingincreaseinthespeedofourreactions.E-mail,socialmediaandthe24-hournewscycleareinformationalamphetamines,acocktailofpillsthatwepopatanincreasinglyfastpace—andthatleadustomakemistakensplit-seconddecisions.Economistslabeltheproblem“presentbias”:wearevulnerabletofast,salientstimulation。Fortunately,thereisanantidote:theconsciouspause.Scientistshavefoundthatalthoughwearepronetosnapoverreactions,ifwetakeamomentandthinkabouthowwearelikelytoreact,wecanreduceoreveneliminatethenegativeeffectsofourquick,hard-wiredresponses。Forexample,countlessstudieshaveshownthatphysicians’immediate,unconsciousreactionstoracialminoritiesleadthemtoundertreatblackpatients.InonestudypublishedintheJournalofGeneralInternalMedicinein2007,researchersaskedseveralhundreddoctorsaboutahypothetical50-year-oldmalepatientwho18showedupwithchestpain.Theresearchersgavethedoctorsaphotographoftheman,randomlyvaryinghisrace.Halfsawhimaswhite;halfsawhimasblack。Sureenough,althoughthedoctorsinsistedtheywerenotraciallybiased,theyweremorelikelytoprescribethrombolysis,ananti-blood-clottingprocedure,forthewhitepatient,whilegivingtheblackpatientaless-aggressiveprescription.Thedoctorsdidn?tappearracist,yettheirunconscioussnapreactionsledthemtotreatblacksdifferently—theverydefinitionofracism。However,aboutoneinfourofthedoctorsguessedthatthestudywasdesignedtotestracialbias.Theystoppedforamomentandconsideredhowtheymightreactdifferentlydependingonrace.Theresearchersfoundthatthis“aware”subgroupdidnottreatpatientsdifferently.Oncetheypausedtoconsiderwhetherracewasanissue,racewasnolongeranissue。Snapdecisionscanbeimportantdefensemechanisms;ifwearejudgingwhethersomeoneisdangerous,ourbrainsandbodiesarehard-wiredtoreactveryquickly,withinmilliseconds.Butweneedmoretimetoassessotherfactors.Toaccuratelytellwhethersomeone19issociable,studiesshow,weneedatleastaminute,preferablyfive.Ittakesawhiletojudgecomplexaspectsofpersonality,likeneuroticismoropen-mindedness.Ifweneedtounderstandhowninejusticesresolvedadifficultlegalissue,weneedevenmoretime。Butsnapdecisionsinreactiontorapid,evensubliminalstimuliaren’texclusivetotheinterpersonalrealm.SanfordDeVoeandChen-BoZhong,psychologistsattheUniversityofToronto,foundthatviewingafast-foodlogoforjustafewmillisecondsprimesustoread20percentfaster,eventhoughreadinghaslittletodowitheating.Weunconsciouslyassociatefastfoodwithspeedandimpatienceandcarrythoseimpulsesintowhateverelsewe?redoing.Subjectsexposedtofast-foodflashesalsotendtothinkamusicalpiecelaststoolong。Yetwecanreversesuchinfluences.Ifweknowwewilloverreacttoconsumerproductsorhousingoptionswhenweseeahappyface(onereasongoodsalesrepresentativesandrealestateagentsarealwayssmiling),wecantakeamomentbeforebuying.Ifweknowfemalejobscreenersaremorelikelytorejectattractivefemaleapplicants,asastudybytheeconomistsBradleyRuffleandZe?evShtudinershows,wecanhelpscreenersunderstandtheirbiases—20orhireoutsidescreeners。JohnGottman,themarriagegurumadefamousinMalcolmGladwell’sbest-sellingbook“Blink,”explainsthatwequickly“thinslice”informationreliablyonlyafterwegroundsuchsnapreact

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論