版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndexPensionreforminchallengingtimesMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021iiContentsMercerpreface1CFAInstitutepreface201/Executivesummary302/BackgroundtotheIndex903/Changesfrom2020to20211404/Genderdifferencesinpensionoutcomes1705/Abriefreviewofeachsystem2606/Theadequacysub-index5007/Thesustainabilitysub-index6108/Theintegritysub-index72Referencesandattachments82MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex20211MercerprefaceTheimpactoftheCOVID-19pandemiccontinuestoa?ectthewell-beingofmillionsofindividualsaroundtheworld.Itse?ects,however,arenotcon?nedtothehealthsystemsorthosewhocontractthevirus.Therearebroadereconomice?ectswithhighergovernmentdebtandrestrictedeconomicactivityinmanycountries.Whileitwouldbeeasyforgovernmentstoconcentrateontheseshorttermchallenges,itwouldbeamistaketodoso.Withageingpopulations,lowornegativeinterestratesforlonger,anduncertaininvestmentreturnsinthefuture,thefinancialwellbeingofourfutureretireescannotbelefttochance.Itmustbeconsiderednow,leadingtoourrecommendationsforurgentlong-termpensionreforminthesechallengingtimes.Manyofthechallengesaresimilararoundtheworld,irrespectiveofsocial,political,historicaloreconomicinfluences.Further,thepolicyreformsneededtorespondtothesechallengesarealsosimilar.Theyrelateto:?????benefitlevelspensioncoverageThe2021MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndexcompares43retirementincomesystemsfromaroundtheworldandcompareseachsysteminrespectofadequacy,sustainabilityandintegrity.Or,toputitanotherway:retirementagesencouragingpeopletoworkalittlelongerincreasingtheleveloffundingsetasideforretirement??Whatbenefitsarefutureretireeslikelytoreceive???benefitdesigntoreduceleakagebeforeretirementandCantheexistingsystemscontinuetodeliver,notwithstandingthedemographicandeconomicpressures?thedevelopmentofappropriateretirementincomeproducts,particularlywiththegrowingimportanceofdefinedcontributionarrangements.?Arethesystemswellgovernedtoencouragelong-termcommunityconfidence?However,thesenecessaryreformsarenotalwaysstraightforwardandsomemayrequirelongtransitionperiods.FournewsystemshavebeenaddedtotheIndexthisyear,namelyIceland,ChinaTaiwan,UAEandUruguay.InitsfirstappearanceintheIndex,IcelandhasjustpippedtheNetherlandstoreceivethehighestindexvalue.SowhatarethefeaturesoftheIcelandicsystemthatgeneratesthisresult?Theyinclude:IamdelightedtorecognisetheCFAInstituteasourmajorsponsorandsincerelythankthemfortheirenthusiasmandparticipation.TheIndexisarealpartnershipbetweentworespectedglobalorganisations.??Arelativelygenerousstatepension;IwouldalsoliketothanktheMonashCentreforFinancialStudieswithinMonashUniversityfortheircontinuedinvolvement,particularlyinestablishinganAdvisoryBoardofseniorandexperiencedpensionexpertswhohaveprovidedinsightfulcomments.Aprivatepensionsystemthatcoversallemployeeswithahighcontributionratethatleadstosignificantassetsbeingsetasideforthefuture;and?Awell-governedandregulatedprivatepensionsystemthathasgooddesignfeatures.Finally,weareverygratefultotheMercerconsultantsaroundtheworldwhohavebeeninvaluableinprovidinginformationinrespectoftheirretirementincomesystemsandcheckingourinterpretationofthedata.WealsoappreciatethesupportoftheFinnishCentreforPensionsandtheIcelandicPensionFundsAssociation.Thisyear’sreportalsoconsidersthegenderdifferencesinpensionoutcomesthatexistineveryretirementincomesystem.Thecausesaremanyandvariedandtheimpactsdifferconsiderablybetweensystems.Neverthelessitisclearthattheaveragefemalepensionislower,andinsomesituationsmuchlower,thantheaveragemalepension.Suchanoutcomeisnotfairandmustbeaddressed.Thereportmakesseveralrecommendationsforemployers,thepensionindustryandgovernmentstoconsiderwiththegoalofreducingthegenderpensiongapinthefuture.Wehopeyouenjoyreadingthisreportandthatitcontinuestoencouragepensionreformtoimprovetheprovisionoffinancialsecurityforallretirees.Theprimaryobjectiveoftheresearchcoveredbythisreportistobenchmarkeachretirementincomesystemusingmorethan50indicators.Animportantsecondarypurposeistohighlightsomeshortcomingsineachsystemandtosuggestpossibleareasofreformthatwouldprovidemoreadequateretirementbenefits,increasedsustainabilityandagreatercommunitytrustinthepensionsystem.DrDavidKnoxSeniorPartnerMercerMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex20212CFAInstituteprefaceCFAInstituteishonoredtosponsortheMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndexandtoagaincollaboratewithMercerandtheMonashCentreforFinancialStudiestocontinuetheimportantworkofdevelopmentanddistributionofthisresearch.AtCFAInstitute,ourmissionistoleadtheinvestmentprofessiongloballybypromotingthehigheststandardsofethics,education,andprofessionalexcellencefortheultimatebenefitofsociety.Inparticular,theclosingwords–“theultimatebenefitofsociety”–speakdirectlytoourdesiretoincreasethepositivereal-worldimpactofinvestmentmanagement.Retirementsystemsthatmeettheadequacy,sustainability,andintegritystandardsoftheindexcontributetothehealthofthefinancialsystem.Pensionplansfaceextraordinarychallengesduetohistoricallylowinterestratesandinsomecasesnegativeyields.Akaleidoscopeofassetclasseswillberequiredtoaddresstheseconcernsinordertoultimatelydeliverreturnsfortheendbeneficiaries.Wemust,asinvestmentprofessionals,leadtheeffortforgreaterretirementsecurityforindividuals.Wemustworktogetherwithpublicauthoritiestoevaluatethestatusofpensionplansintheirjurisdictions,challengethestatusquowherenecessary,andrebuildtrustinpensionsacrosstheglobethroughthebettermentofthesesystems.WeatCFAInstituteseektoshapethefutureoftheinvestmentindustryandtheprofession,whichincludesadvocatingforthestructuralresilienceofcapitalmarkets.Pensionsystemsandretirementplansareimportantbuildingblocksofmarketresilienceacrosstheglobe.WeextendourdeepgratitudetoDr.DavidKnoxofMercerandtheentireMercerteamwhohavededicatedtimeandresourcestothisimportantresearch,aswellastheMonashCentreforFinancialStudiesfortheiroversight,whichensurestheintegrityoftheIndexeachyear.Pensionfundreformwillbeanongoingsocietalchallenge,andweareconfidentthattheMercerCFAInstitutePensionFundIndexwillhelptocatalyzeimportantconversationsandactioninthemonthsandyearstocome.Thisyear’sindexincludesanadditionalfocusonatimelyandrelevantissue:thegenderpensionspaygap.Thisgaprepresentsacriticalchallengethatwemustworkquicklytoaddresssincewomenaremorelikelytofacetheirretirementyearswithfewerbenefitsthantheirmalecounterparts.Theinclusionofwomenintheretirementdiscussioncannotandshouldnotbeoverlooked.Analysisandunderstandingofdataandtrends,andinformedrecommendationsbaseduponthosefindings,willshapehowtheleadersofeachpensionsystemincludedintheindexcanimprovetheeffectivenessandsustainabilityoftheirindividualsystem.Thisinformationwillfosterimportantdialogueabouthowpensionsystemscompare,andwaystoimplementfindingsfromonepensionsystemtoimproveanother.MargaretFranklin,CFAPresidentandCEOCFAInstituteMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|301/ExecutiveSummaryTheprovisionof?nancialDuring2020and2021,manyoftheseissueswereaccentuatedbytheCOVID-19pandemic.But,itisnotonlyageingpopulationsandtheeffectsofthecoronavirusthatrepresentchallengesforpensionsystemsaroundtheworld.Thecurrenteconomicenvironmentwithreducedwagegrowth,historicallylowinterestratesandreducedinvestmentreturnsinmanyassetclasses,areplacingadditionalfinancialpressuresonexistingretirementincomesystems.securityinretirementiscriticalforbothindividualsandsocietiesasmostcountriesarenowgrapplingwiththesocial,economicand?nanciale?ectsofageingpopulations.Now,morethaneverbefore,itisimportanttounderstandthefeaturesofthebetterpensionsystems.Yet,acomparisonofthedifferentpensionsystemsaroundtheworldisnotstraightforward.AstheOECD(2019a)comments:“Retirement-incomeregimesarediverseandofteninvolveanumberofdifferentprogrammes.”11OECD(2019a),p132.MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|4Anycomparisonofsystemsislikelytobecontroversialaseachsystemhasevolvedfromparticulareconomic,social,cultural,politicalandhistoricalcircumstances.Thismeansthereisnosinglesystemthatcanbetransplantedfromonecountryandapplied,withoutchange,toanothercountry.However,therearecertainfeaturesandcharacteristicsacrosstherangeofsystemsthatarelikelytoleadtoimprovedfinancialbenefitsfortheoldermembersofsociety,anincreasedlikelihoodoffuturesustainabilityofthesystem,andagreaterlevelofcommunitytrustandconfidence.Withthesedesirableoutcomesinmind,theMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex(theIndex)usesthreesub-indices–adequacy,sustainabilityandintegrity–tomeasureeachretirementincomesystemagainstmorethan50indicators.Thefollowingdiagramhighlightssomeofthetopicscoveredineachsub-index.Figure1:CalculatingtheMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndexCalculatingtheMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex`
Benefits`
Pensioncoverage`
Totalassets`
Regulation`
Systemdesign`
Savings`
Governance`
Protection`
Demography`
Governmentsupport`
Homeownership`
Growthassets`
Publicexpenditure`
Governmentdebt`
Economicgrowth`
Communication`
OperatingcostsAdequacySustainabilityIntegrity40%35%25%MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndexTheoverallindexvalueforeachsystemrepresentstheweightedaverageofthethreesub-indices.Theweightingsusedare40percentfortheadequacysub-index,35percentforthesustainabilitysub-indexand25percentfortheintegritysub-index,allofwhichhaveremainedunchangedsincethefirstIndexin2009.thatthecurrentsystemisabletoprovidebenefitsinthefuture.Theintegritysub-indexincludesmanylegislativerequirementsthatinfluencetheoverallgovernanceandoperationsofthesystemwhichaffectthelevelofconfidencethatcitizenshaveintheirsystem.Thisstudyof43retirementincomesystems,representingmorethan65percentoftheworld’spopulation,showsthereisgreatdiversitybetweenthesystemsaroundtheworldwithscoresrangingfrom40.6forThailandto84.2forIceland.Thedifferentweightingsareusedtoreflecttheprimaryimportanceoftheadequacysub-indexwhichrepresentsthebenefitsthatarebeingprovidedtogetherwithsomeimportantsystemdesignfeatures.Thesustainabilitysub-indexhasafocusonthefutureandmeasuresvariousindicatorswhichwillinfluencethelikelihoodMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|5Thisyear'sresultsThisstudyshowsthatIceland,theNetherlandsandDenmarkhavethebestsystems,eachreceivinganA-gradein2021.NoneofthesesystemshasanE-gradesystem,whichwouldberepresentedbyanindexvaluebelow35.Ascorebetween35and50,representingaD-gradesystem,indicatesasystemthathassomesoundfeaturesbuttherealsoexistmajoromissionsorweaknesses.AD-gradeclassificationmayalsooccurintherelativelyearlystagesofthedevelopmentofaparticularretirementincomesystem.Table1:Sumaryof2021resultsGradeIndexValueSystemsDescriptionA>80IcelandNetherlandsDenmarkAfirstclassandrobustretirementincomesystemthatdeliversgoodbenefits,issustainableandhasahighlevelofintegrity.B+75-8065-75IsraelNorwayAustraliaFinlandSwedenUKAsystemthathasasoundstructure,withmanygoodfeatures,buthassomeareasforimprovementthatdifferentiatesitfromanA-gradesystem.SingaporeSwitzerlandCanadaIrelandGermanyNewZealandChileC+C60–6550–60BelgiumHongKongSARUSAUruguayFranceUAEMalaysiaSpainAsystemthathassomegoodfeatures,butalsohasmajorrisksand/orshortcomingsthatshouldbeaddressed.Withouttheseimprovements,itsefficacyand/orlong-termsustainabilitycanbequestioned.ColombiaSaudiArabiaPolandChina(seenote)PeruBrazilSouthAfricaItalyAustriaChinaTaiwanIndonesiaDE35–50JapanMexicoKorea(South)TurkeyIndiaPhilippinesArgentinaThailandAsystemthathassomedesirablefeatures,butalsohasmajorweaknessesand/oromissionsthatneedtobeaddressed.Withouttheseimprovements,itsefficacyandsustainabilityareindoubt.<35NilApoorsystemthatmaybeintheearlystagesofdevelopmentornon-existent.Note:Itshouldberecognisedthatinthisreport,ChinareferstothepensionsysteminmainlandChina.ThepensionsystemsinHongKongSARandChinaTaiwanareshownseparatelyastheyhavedifferentpensionsystems.MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|6Table2showstheoverallindexvalueforeachsystem,togetherwiththeindexvalueforeachofthethreesub-indices:adequacy,sustainabilityandintegrity.Eachindexvaluerepresentsascorebetweenzeroand100.Itshouldberecognisedthatthese2021indexvaluesdonotyetfullyrecognisethelonger-termeffectsoftheCOVID-19pandemiconfuturepensionpayments.Table2:Overallindexvalueforeachsystem,includingthethreesub-indicesSub-IndexValuesSystemOverallindexvalueAdequacySustainabilityIntegrityArgentinaAustraliaAustriaBelgiumBrazilCanadaChileChinaColombiaDenmarkFinlandFranceGermanyHongKongSARIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyJapanKoreaMalaysiaMexicoNetherlandsNewZealandNorwayPeruPhilippinesPolandSaudiArabiaSingaporeSouthAfricaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandChinaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUAEUKUruguayUSA41.575.053.064.554.769.867.055.158.482.073.360.567.961.884.243.350.468.377.153.449.848.359.649.083.567.475.255.042.755.258.170.753.658.672.970.051.840.645.859.671.660.761.452.767.465.374.971.269.057.662.662.081.171.479.179.355.182.733.544.778.073.668.252.943.450.647.382.361.881.258.838.960.961.773.544.372.967.865.440.835.247.759.773.962.160.927.775.723.536.324.165.768.843.546.283.561.541.845.451.184.641.843.647.476.121.337.552.757.554.781.662.557.444.252.541.350.959.846.528.173.767.251.940.028.650.259.849.263.643.086.374.587.471.276.779.359.469.881.493.156.881.287.786.061.069.282.183.974.961.950.076.843.887.983.290.264.135.065.662.581.578.578.380.081.369.350.066.772.684.474.459.2Average61.062.251.772.1Asnotedearlier,eachoverallindexvaluetakesintoaccountmorethan50indicators,someofwhicharebasedondatameasurementswhichcanbedifficulttocomparebetweensystems.Forthisreason,oneshouldnotbetoodefinitethatonesystemisbetterthananotherwhenthedifferenceintheoverallindexvalueislessthantwoorthreepoints.Ontheotherhand,whenthedifferenceisfiveormore,itcanbefairlyconcludedthatthehigherindexvalueindicatesabetterretirementincomesystem.MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|7Table3showsthegradeforeachsystem’ssub-indexvaluesaswellastheoverallgrade.Thisapproachindicatesthefactthatsomesystemsmayhaveaweaknessinonearea(e.g.sustainability)whilebeingmuchstrongerintheothertwoareas.Suchaweaknesshighlightsareasforfuturereforms.Table3:Overallindexgradesforeachsystem,includingthethreesub-indicesSub-IndexValuesSystemOverallindexvalueAdequacySustainabilityIntegrityArgentinaAustraliaAustriaDB+CCBEB+EDABBBelgiumBrazilC+CBDEABBCanadaChileBBBB+B+CBCBChinaCC+C+ADDAColombiaDenmarkFinlandFranceCBAABBC+DDCAC+BB+B+CCGermanyHongKongSARIcelandIndiaAC+AAAAADCEDDDB+EC+BIndonesiaIrelandDB+BBAIsraelB+CAItalyBBJapanDDCCDCC+CKoreaDCMalaysiaMexicoCB+DADADACNetherlandsNewZealandNorwayPeruABC+AC+CAB+CACDCC+DBPhilippinesPolandDCDC+C+BDCSaudiArabiaSingaporeSouthAfricaSpainCC+ABCCDBDEB+B+ACSwedenSwitzerlandChinaTaiwanThailandTurkeyBBBBBBACDDDCCBDDCDECBUAECBUKBBCAUruguayUSAC+C+C+C+DC+BCMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021Executivesummary|8OverallrecommendationsChapter5makesseveralsuggestionstoimproveeachretirementincomesystem.Althougheachsystemre?ectsauniquehistory,therearesomecommonthemesforimprovementasmanysystemsfacesimilarproblemsinthedecadesahead.???reducingtheleakagefromtheretirementsavingssystempriortoretirementtherebyensuringthatthefundssaved,oftenwithassociatedtaxationsupport,areusedfortheprovisionofretirementincomereviewingtheindexationofpublicpensionsasthemethodandfrequencyofincreasesarecriticaltoensurethattherealvalueofthepensionismaintained,balancedbyitslong-termsustainabilitySignificantpensionreformisnevereasybutanimportantstartingpointistoexpresstheobjectivesoftheoverallsystem.AsvanPoptaandSteenbeek(2021)recentlynoted:“Theobjectiveofpensionreformmustbecrystalclearandtheperspectivesofallstakeholders–consumers,employers,government,industry–mustimprovingthegovernanceofprivatepensionplansandintroducinggreatertransparencytoimprovetheconfidenceofplanmembersbeaddressed.”AstherecentreviewintoAustralia’s2TheWorldEconomicForum(2017)highlightedthreekeyareasthatwillhavethebiggestimpactontheoveralllevelof?nancialsecurityinretirement.Thesewereto:retirementincomesystemcommented:“Anagreedobjectiveisneededtoanchorthedirectionofpolicysettings,helpensurethepurposeofthesystemisunderstood,andprovideaframeworkforassessingtheperformanceofthesystem."3Therecontinuetobearangeofreformsthatcanbeimplementedtoimprovethelong-termoutcomesfromretirementincomesystems.Theseinclude:?increasingthecoverageofemployees(includingnon-standardworkers)andtheself-employedintheprivatepensionsystem,recognisingthatmanyindividualswillnotsaveforthefuturewithoutanelementofcompulsionorautomaticenrolment?providea“safetynet”pensionforall?improveeaseofaccesstowell-managedcost-effectiveretirementplans????increasingthestatepensionageand/orretirementagetoreflectincreasinglifeexpectancy,bothnowandintothefuture,therebyreducingthecostsofpublicly?supportinitiativestoincreasecontributionratesfinancedpensionbenefits4Eachofthesefactorsiscriticalandallhavebeenhighlightedwithintheadequacyorsustainabilitysub-indexes.promotinghigherlabourforceparticipationatolderages,whichwillincreasethesavingsavailableforretirementandlimitthecontinuingincreaseinthelengthofretirementAstheWorldEconomicForumreporthighlighted:“Healthypensionsystemscontributepositivelytowardscreatingastableandprosperouseconomy.”5encouraginghigherlevelsofprivatesaving,bothwithinandbeyondthepensionsystem,toreducethefuturedependenceonthepublicpensionwhilealsoadjustingtheexpectationsofmanyworkersintroducingmeasurestoreducethegenderpensiongapandthosethatexistforminoritygroupsinmanyretirementincomesystems234vanPoptaandSteenbeek(2021),TransitiontoanewpensioncontractintheNetherlands:Lessonsfromabroad,NetsparIndustrySeries,Occasional3/21,p9.AustralianGovernmenttheTreasury(2020),RetirementIncomeReview,FinalReport,p27Itshouldbenotedthatseveralsystemshavemovedinthisdirectioninrecentyears.Nevertheless,veryfewarelinkingthefuturepensionagetothelikelyongoingincreasesinlifeexpectancy.5WorldEconomicForum(2017),p9.MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021BackgroundtotheIndex|902/BackgroundtotheIndexThestructureandcharacteristicsofpensionsystemsaroundtheworldexhibitgreatdiversitywithawiderangeoffeaturesandnorms.Comparisonsarenotstraightforward.Inaddition,thelackofreadilyavailableandcomparabledatainrespectofmanysystemsprovidesadditionalchallengesforsuchacomparison.Therefore,thisreportusesawidevarietyofdatasourcesdrawingonpubliclyavailabledata,whereverpossible.MercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021BackgroundtotheIndex|10Thesechallengesofdataandbenchmarkingshouldnot,however,preventthecomparisonofretirementincomesystems.InitsinfluentialreportAvertingtheOldAgeCrisis,theWorldBank(1994)recommendedamulti-pillarsystemfortheprovisionofold-ageincomesecurity,comprising:???Pillar1:Amandatorypubliclymanagedtax-financedpublicpensionPillar2:Mandatoryprivatelymanaged,fullyfundedbenefitsWithinthecontextofourageingpopulationsandthecurrenteconomicconditions,itistooimportanttoignore.Furthermore,thereisnodoubtthatprograms,policiesandpracticesadoptedinsomeretirementincomesystemsprovidevaluablelessons,experienceorideasforthedevelopmentorreformofothersystems.Pillar3:VoluntaryprivatelymanagedfullyfundedpersonalsavingsSubsequently,theWorldBank(2008),aspartofitsPensionConceptualFramework,extendedthisthree-pillarsystemtothefollowingfive-pillarapproach:ThiseditionoftheIndexcompares43retirementincomesystems,highlightingboththeconsiderablediversityandthepositivefeaturespresentinmanysystems.Notwithstandingthesehighlights,thestudyalsoconfirmsthatnopensionsystemisperfectandthateverysystemhassomeshortcomings.InChapter5,suggestionsaremadeforimprovingtheefficacyofeachretirementincomesystem.Inthatrespect,itishopedthisstudywillactasastimulusforgovernmentsandpolicymakersaroundtheworldtoreviewretirementincomesystemssothattheoutcomesforfutureretireescanbeimproved.???ZeroPillar:Anon-contributorybasicpensionfrompublicfinancesthatmaybeuniversalormeans-testedFirstPillar:AmandatedpublicpensionplanthatispubliclymanagedwithcontributionslinkedtoearningsSecondPillar:Mandateddefinedcontribution,fullyfundedoccupationalorpersonalpensionplanswithfinancialassets??ThirdPillar:VoluntaryandfullyfundedoccupationalorpersonalpensionplanswithfinancialassetsFourthPillar:Avoluntarysystemoutsidethepensionsystemwithaccesstoarangeoffinancialandnon-financialassetsandinformalsupportsuchasfamily,healthcareandhousing.Figure2:PensionConceptualFrameworkThemulti-pillarapproachPillar0Pillar1Pillar2Pillar3Pillar4AbasicpublicpensionthatprovidesaminimallevelofprotectionApublic,mandatoryandcontributorysystemlinkedtoearningsFinancialandnon-financialsupportoutsideformalpensionarrangementsAprivate,mandatoryandfullyfundedsystemAvoluntaryandfullyfundedsystemMercerCFAInstituteGlobalPensionIndex2021BackgroundtotheIndex|11AdequacyIneffect,theoriginalfirstpillarwassplitintoaZeroPillarandamandatoryFirstPillar.AnewFourthPillarwasalsoaddedthatincludesaccesstonon-pensionassetsandinformalsupport.Theadequacyofbenefitsisperhapsthemostobviouswaytocomparedifferentsystems.Afterall,theprimaryobjectiveofanypensionsystemistoprovideadequateretirementincome.Hencethissub-indexconsidersthebase(orsafety-net)levelofincomeprovidedbyeachsystemaswellasthenetreplacementrateatincomelevelsrangingfrom50percentto150percentoftheaveragewage.Thisfive-pillarapproachprovidesagoodbasisforcomparingretirementincomesystemsaroundtheworld.Hencetherangeofindicatorsusedinthisreportconsidersfeaturesorresultsassociatedwitheachpillar.IncontrasttotheWorldBank,theOECD(2017a)adoptsathree-tiersystem,namely:Criticaltothedeliveryofadequatebenefitsisthedesignfeaturesoftheprivatepensionsystem(i.e.theSecondandThirdPillars).Althoughtherearemanyfeaturesthatcouldbeassessed,wehaveconsideredthefollowingsix,eachofwhichrepresentsafeaturethatwillimprovethelikelihoodthatadequateretirementbenefitsareprovided:??Tier1–AuniversalortargetedpensionTier2–Amandatorysavingssystem,providedbyeitherthepublicorprivatesector?Tier3–Avoluntarysavingssystemintheprivatesector?Arevoluntarymembercontributionsbyanaverage-incomeearnertoafundedpensionplantreatedmorefavourablybythetaxsystemthansimilarsavingsinabankaccount?Istheinvestmentincomeearnedbypensionplansexemptfromtaxinthepre-retirementand/orpost-retirementperiods?Thefirstquestionassesseswhetherthegovernmentprovidesanyincentivestoencourageaverage-incomeearnerstosaveforretirement.Itisrecognisedthatthetaxationtreatmentofpensionsvariesgreatlyaroundtheworldsothisquestionassesseswhetheranincentiveexistsornot,notthevalueoftheconcession.Thesecondquestionrecognisesthatthelevelofinvestmentearningsiscritical,especiallyfordefinedcontributionplans.Ataxoninvestmentincomereducesthecompoundingeffectandwillthereforereducetheadequacyoffuturebenefits.TheCentreofExcellenceinPopulationAgeingResearch(2018)suggeststhatthefirsttierisprimarilyasafetynetdesignedforthoseunabletoprovideforthemselves.Ontheotherhand,thesecondtierrepresentssomeconsumptionsmoothingfromone’sworkingyearstotheretirementyears.Thethirdtierisvoluntaryandenablessomehouseholdstosavemorethanrequiredunderthemandatorysystem.Whil
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024年耳機(jī)原材料供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量保證合同
- 2024馬鈴薯種植基地安全生產(chǎn)責(zé)任合同3篇
- 2024年股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃書(shū)
- 2024年金融科技研發(fā)與創(chuàng)新服務(wù)合同
- 2024跨國(guó)企業(yè)廣告宣傳與推廣合同
- 2024年食品企業(yè)HACCP體系認(rèn)證咨詢合同版B版
- 2024年航空公司客艙餐飲服務(wù)供應(yīng)合同
- 2024輕質(zhì)隔墻板行業(yè)規(guī)范制定與執(zhí)行監(jiān)督協(xié)議3篇
- 2024年藥品銷(xiāo)售與售后服務(wù)協(xié)議3篇
- 2024年適用餐飲行業(yè)購(gòu)銷(xiāo)協(xié)議范例版B版
- 監(jiān)理安全安全通知書(shū)(春節(jié)假期)
- 啟明星辰天鏡網(wǎng)站安全監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)用戶手冊(cè)
- 《中外資產(chǎn)評(píng)估準(zhǔn)則》課件第6章 英國(guó)評(píng)估準(zhǔn)則
- 2022年湖南省長(zhǎng)沙市中考數(shù)學(xué)試題及答案解析
- FZ∕T 63006-2019 松緊帶
- 罐區(qū)自動(dòng)化系統(tǒng)總體方案(31頁(yè))ppt課件
- 迅達(dá)電梯5400超詳細(xì)故障代碼中文版
- 招投標(biāo)法考試試題及答案
- 皮帶輸送機(jī)工程施工電氣安裝措施要點(diǎn)
- 愛(ài)人情況登記表
- 水蓄冷與冰蓄冷地比較
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論