歷年MBA論說(shuō)文真題范文選題

歷年MBA論說(shuō)文真題范文選題第1篇?dú)v年MBA論說(shuō)文真題范文選題第1篇每天至少抽出2個(gè)小時(shí)的時(shí)間學(xué)習(xí)英語(yǔ)，這兩個(gè)小時(shí)包含背誦的內(nèi)容以及做題，建議大家做題在下午做，因?yàn)槲覀冇⒄Z(yǔ)這一科在下午考，逐漸找到下午做題的感覺(jué)，即考試狀態(tài)。做題的時(shí)候要掐著時(shí)間，比如閱讀每篇文章控制在15-18分鐘，作文45分鐘，翻譯30分鐘，新題型15分鐘，完型15分鐘。進(jìn)入12月份，每周要抽出一個(gè)下午做完整的一套試題，可以是真題也可以模擬題，嚴(yán)格按照考試的形式進(jìn)行，以查缺補(bǔ)漏看看自己的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)在哪里。

歷年MBA論說(shuō)文真題范文選題第2篇Itissaidthatcountriesarebecomingsimilartoeachotherbecauseoftheglobalspreadofthesameproducts,whicharenowavailableforpurchasealmostanywhere.Istronglybelievethatthismoderndevelopmentislargelydetrimentaltocultureandtraditionsworldwide.

Acountry’shistory,languageandethosareallinextricablyboundupinitsmanufacturedartefacts.Iftherelentlessadvanceofinternationalbrandsintoeverycorneroftheworldcontinues,theseblandpackagesmightonedaycompletelyoustthetraditionalobjectsofanation,whichwouldbealossofrichnessanddiversityintheworld,aswellasthesaddisappearanceofthemanifestationsofaplace’scharacter.WhatwouldaJapaneseteaceremonybewithoutitsspeciallycraftedteapot,oraFijiankavaritualwithoutitsbowlmadefromacertaintypeoftreebark?

Letusnotforgeteitherthattraditionalproducts,whetherthesebemedicines,cosmetics,toy,clothes,utensilsorfood,provideemploymentforlocalpeople.Thespreadofmultinationalproductscanoftenbringinitswakealossofjobs,aspeopleurntobuyingthenewbrand,perhapsthinkingitmoreglamorousthantheonetheyareusedto.Thiseventuallyputsold-schoolcraftspeopleoutofwork.

Finally,tourismnumbersmayalsobeaffected,astravelersbecomedisillusionedwithfindingeveryplacejustthesameastheonetheyvisitedpreviously.Toseethesameproductsinshopstheworldoverisboring,anddoesnotimpelvisitorstoopentheirwalletsinthesamewaythattrinketsorsouvenirsuniquetotheparticularareatoo.

Somemayarguethatallpeopleareentitledtohaveaccesstothesameproducts,butIsaythatlocalobjectssuitlocalconditionsbest,andthatfacelessuniformityworldwideisanunwelcomeanddrearyprospect.

假設(shè)你參加所在年級(jí)的英文寫(xiě)作比賽，請(qǐng)按下面文字中的道理完成一篇短文：

adropofwater+twodrops+manydrops=sea

atree+twotrees+manytrees=forest

oneperson+twopersons+manypersons=society

范文：thepictureshowsasimpletruth:iftoomanydropsofwaterareputtogether,theywillbecomeasea.manytreesstandingtogetherformaforestandmanypeoplemakeupasociety.itconveysamessagetous:awholeismadeupofmanysmallpartsthatarecloselyrelated.nothingornoonecouldexistalone.

thepicturesetsusthinkingdeeply:oursocietyismadeupofmanypeoplewhohavedifferentpersonalityandcharacters.ifwewanttocreateaharmonioussociety,wemustliveinharmonywithothers.ontheotherhand,sinceeverybodyisrelatedtoothers,weshouldberesponsibleforwhatwesayandwhatwedosothatwecandevelopapleasantrelationshipwithothers,whichmakesitpossibleforustoenjoylifetothefullest.

歷年MBA論說(shuō)文真題范文選題第3篇在上述材料中，以企業(yè)發(fā)生丑聞無(wú)法帶來(lái)道德進(jìn)步，進(jìn)而懷疑其存在對(duì)于社會(huì)的意義，從而推論出“只有建立有效的激勵(lì)機(jī)制，才能杜絕企業(yè)丑聞的發(fā)生”，這是值得推敲的。

首先，美國(guó)企業(yè)丑聞絕對(duì)數(shù)量多于發(fā)展中國(guó)家，但是很可能美國(guó)的企業(yè)也多于發(fā)展中國(guó)家。材料通過(guò)企業(yè)丑聞絕對(duì)數(shù)量多從而推理出經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不一定帶來(lái)道德進(jìn)步，這里的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是成問(wèn)題的。

其次，企業(yè)丑聞數(shù)量與道德進(jìn)步并不具備必然聯(lián)系。發(fā)展中國(guó)家的企業(yè)沒(méi)有丑聞曝光，不代表企業(yè)中沒(méi)有問(wèn)題或者丑聞的存在。曝光的企業(yè)丑聞多也許可以說(shuō)明信息的通暢度好，新聞的自由度高，但并不代表道德不進(jìn)步。

再次，因?yàn)榇嬖谄髽I(yè)丑聞，從而懷疑其存在對(duì)社會(huì)的意義，是有失偏頗的。企業(yè)對(duì)于社會(huì)的意義要從經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、管理、就業(yè)、產(chǎn)品、市場(chǎng)等諸多方面考量，如果企業(yè)對(duì)于社會(huì)更多的是積極作用，那么只看到消極的一面就以偏概全了。

最后，文章最后談到只有建立有效的激勵(lì)機(jī)制