data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da07e/da07e99bf2b638dde45be234bf3754662b49171b" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學(xué)校的食品服務(wù)人員_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50bb9/50bb96ce7484cb15eb32c72366d690f1400170c9" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學(xué)校的食品服務(wù)人員_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ef31/7ef31ebbde4b595390f8593c58f13ed6fa88b1fc" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學(xué)校的食品服務(wù)人員_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f67a1/f67a1476dbfa149ee975ed7f29bd811e5ba25e04" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學(xué)校的食品服務(wù)人員_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a852/6a8525530368ab61ad562c93733a53b9d3faa261" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學(xué)校的食品服務(wù)人員_第5頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
SEPTEMBER2024
HUNGRYFORGOODJOBS:
FOODSERVICEWORKERSIN
PUBLICSCHOOLS
SARAHINKLEY
AREPORTFROMTHEUCBERKELEYLABORCENTER
Acknowledgements
ManythankstoAidaFarmandattheUCBerkeleyLaborCenterformodelingthepublicprogram
participationoffoodserviceworkers.ThisreportbenefitedgreatlyfromthefeedbackofJenniferGaddisoftheUniversityofWisconsin(aswellasheryearsofworkinthisarea)andfromconversationswith
DebbieFriedmanandEvaRingstromwiththeFoodInsightGroupandCassieManciniwiththeCaliforniaSchoolEmployeesAssociation(CSEA).Anyerrorsremainmyown.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools2
Summary
Thisreportprovidesanoverviewoftheworkingconditionsandcharacteristicsofpublicschoolfoodserviceworkers,incomparisontootherrelevantworkersinpublicschoolsandotherfoodservice
workers.Itisorganizedasfollows:
1.Policiesgoverningschoolmeals:Thebackgroundandfundingstructureofschoolmealprograms;
2.Thepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforce:Occupationalstructureofschoolfoodservicework;characteristics;
3.Incomeandeconomicwellbeing:Incomes,Accesstobenefits,familypoverty,andhouseholdincomes;
4.Differencesacrossstates:Variationsinworkingconditionsandcompensationbystate;
5.Outsourcingschoolmeals:Whatweknowaboutthedegreeofoutsourcinginschoolmealsandpossibleimpactsonthepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforce.
Wehopethisinformationisvaluabletopolicymakersandadministratorsseekingtounderstandhowtheworkingconditionsofthisworkforceaffectschools’abilitytostafftheirfoodserviceprograms,improvenutritionalstandards,andsupportfamily-sustainingjobs.
KeyFindings
?Thenumberofschoolfoodserviceworkershasdeclinedoverthepastdecade,althoughnotuniformlyacrossstates.Thisdeclinehasoccurreddespiteexpandedschoolmealprograms
supportedbypandemic-erafederalfunding.Thelong-lastingbudgetausteritysparkedby
theGreatRecession,decliningpublicschoolenrollment,adrop-offinmealconsumption,andincreasedoutsourcingcouldallbecontributingtoemploymentdecline.
?Overall,therehasbeenasteadydeclineinthenumberofschoollunchesservedoverthepasttwodecades,atrendthatresumedafterthedisruptionsofthepandemic(withtheexceptionofstatesthathavemaintainedfundingforuniversalmeals).
?Theadoptionof“scratchcooking”—preparingmealsfromscratchinsteadofpurchasingpre-mademeals—varieswidely,inpartbecauseofstaffshortages.Manyschoolslackthe
infrastructureandstafftomakescratchcookingareality,meaningthatimprovednutritionalstandardsmaybedifficulttoaccomplishunlessstaffingchallengesareresolved.
?Schoolfoodserviceworkersaresignificantlyolderthantheoverallworkforce(medianageof52comparedto28forotherfoodserviceworkers)andalmostentirelyfemale(93%).TheyaremorelikelytobeBlackorLatinothantheoverallworkforce.
?Themedianhourlywageforschoolfoodserviceworkersisjust$12.78andhasdeclinedslightly(inrealterms)since2008-12.Theyearnlessthanotherfoodserviceworkers($13.08),andwellbelowotherclassifiedworkers($16.98)andinstitutionalcafeteriaworkers($16.01).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools3
?Schoolfoodserviceworkersaremorelikelytoworkparttimethanotherpublicschoolstaff
andworkersgenerally,whichaffectsboththeirannualincomeandtheireligibilityforhealthandretirementbenefits.Whilepart-timeseasonalworkmayappealtoasmallsubsetoftheseworkers,surveyssuggestthatmanywouldliketoworkmorehoursandbeabletoqualifyforbenefits.
?Schooldistrictshavestruggledtostaffschoolnutritionpositions,alongwithotherclassified
positionsandteachers.Anagingworkforcemeansthesehiringchallengeswillonlygetworse,especiallyifschoolfoodservicejobscontinuetolagbehindsimilarworkinofferingdecentpayandbenefits.
Definitions
Withinpublicschools,thebenefitsofpublicsectorworkaredistributedunevenlyamongdifferent
workers.Theworkforceisprimarilydividedintotwogroups:“certificated”workers(teachers,
psychologists,andschoolanddistrictadministrators)whohaveaspecificeducationalcertificate
orlicense,and“classified”workers,includingbusdrivers,janitors,specialeducationsupport,and
schoolnutrition.(Classifiedworkersmayhaveotherspecializedtrainingoreducation,suchasnurses,nutritionists,accountants,andconstructionworkers.)Certificatedworkerspredominantlyhavecollegedegrees,workfulltime,andaremuchmorelikelytobewhiteincomparisontotheoverallworkforce.Classifiedworkersaremuchmorelikelytobeparttimeandmuchlesslikelytobewhite.Forpart-timeworkers,accesstobenefitsmaybeoutofreachevenasapublicemployee,andtheinaccessibilityoffull-time,year-roundworkerodesmanyofthebenefitsthatotherpublicsectorworkersenjoy.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools4
Introduction
LunchinthecafeteriahasbeenanintegralpartoftheU.S.schooldayforoveracentury.Thepoliciesthatshapepublicschoolmealprogramshavechangedsignificantlyoverthepastcentury,driven
bytrendsinnutrition,workertraining,publicfunding,theavailabilityofconveniencefoods,andthe
growthofglobalfoodservicecontractors,amongotherfactors.Whathasnotchangedisthatthe
vastmajorityofpeoplecookingandservingmealstostudentsarewomenearningsomeofthe
lowestwagesnotjustamongpublicsectorworkers,butacrossoccupationsandindustries.Foodservicejobsinpublicschoolshavethepotentialtoserveasanentryintopublicemploymentwithgoodbenefits,rewardingwork,andjobstability.Unfortunately,theseasonalandpart-timenatureofthis
work,anditspersistentlylowpay,meansthatmanyoftheseessentialworkerslackeconomicsecurityfortheirownhouseholds.
Today,nearlyallpublicschoolsofferlunch,andagrowingnumberofferabreakfastorsnack.The
availabilityofnutritiousmealshasbeenlinkedtomanypositivebenefitsforstudents,particularlyfor
themillionsofchildrenwhoarriveatschoolhungry.Federalfundingsubsidizesallorpartofthecostsforstudentsfromlow-incomehouseholds,andagrowingnumberofstateprogramsprovideadditionalfundingtoallowallstudentstoreceivemealsforfree(FoodResearch&ActionCenter2023).
Schoollunchprogramswereoriginallyorganizedbywomentoprovidefreeorlow-costmealsto
childrenfromimmigrantandpoorhouseholds,andtoensurethatstudentshadaccesstosafeand
nutritiousfood(J.E.Gaddis2019).Aswithmanyjobsthatare(orwereonce)primarilyperformed
bywomen—includingteaching,housecleaning,andchildcare—compensationandjobstructureisa
legacyoftheoutdatednotionthatwomen’swagesarenotvitaltohouseholdincome.Despitethefact
thatwomen’sincomesprovidevitalsupporttoamajorityofAmericanhouseholds,jobsperceivedas
“women’swork”continuetodrivethegenderwagegapacrosstheeconomy(SchiederandGould2016).Compoundingthis,foodserviceworkhasalwaysbeenparticularlyundervalued(Allegrettoetal.2013).
TheCOVID-19pandemicbroughtrenewedattentiontotheimportantrolethatschoolsplayinchildren’slivesoutsidetheclassroom,includingdailynutrition.Publicschoolsandtheirstaffdemonstratedtheir
capacitytoprovideaneffectivemealandnutritiondeliverysystemtostudentsandfamilieswhoneededhelptogetfoodwhileschoolswereclosed.Thepandemicsignificantlydisruptedschoolmealservices
andposedunprecedentedchallengesforfoodservicestaff.Manyschoolsshiftedtoalternatemodelsofgettingfoodtostudents(suchasbaggedmeals)oradaptedwaystoservetraditionalmealswhile
complyingwithpublichealthguidance.Districtsreceivedfederalfundingtoprovideuniversalfree
mealsfrommid-2020untilthe2022-23schoolyear,butrisingcostsleftmanycafeteriafundsdepleted.
Thepandemicalsorevealedtheprecariousnessofthestaffingsituation.Thisolderworkforcewas
typicallythefirsttoreturntoschoolbuildingsandinteractwithcoworkersandstudents,riskingtheir
healthlongbeforevaccineswereavailable(J.GaddisandRosenthal2020).Sincethepandemic,manydistrictshavefacedsignificantstaffingchallenges,alongwithintermittentfoodshortages,supplychainissues,andrisingcommodityprices(Lieberman2021).Thetightlabormarketofthepastfewyearshasmeantfewerpeoplearewillingtotakelow-wage,part-timework,includingschoolfoodserviceand
schoolbusdriving.Somedistrictshaveevenhiredstudentstoservemeals(Miranda2022).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools5
Thesearenotchallengesthatdistrictscanresolveontheirown.Asmorestateselecttocoverthecostsofcontinuinguniversalfreemeals,policymakerswillneedtounderstandandaddressissuesofstaffing,infrastructure,andfiscalsustainability.Schoolshavemadeimportantprogressinservingmorechildrennutritiousandaffordablemeals,butunlesstheworkingconditionsofthepeoplepreparingandservingthosemealsareimproved,muchofthatprogressisatriskofbeingundone.
PreviousResearch
Thisreportbuildsonandupdatesarichbodyofresearchintotheworkingconditionsofpublicschoolfoodworkers.In2010theUCBerkeleyLaborCenterpublishedareportonthisworkforce—including
participationinpublicbenefitprogramsandthepossibleimpactsofanincreasedwagefloor—using
2008ACSdata(JacobsandGraham-Squire2010).In2022theCongressionalResearchService(CRS)
publishedacomprehensivereportonthepublicK-12foodserviceworkforceusingACS2015-2019
data(CongressionalResearchService2022).TheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)has
recentlyfundedseveralresearchprojects(USDAFoodandNutritionService2024).TheSchoolNutrition
Association(SNA),aprofessionalmembershipassociationofschoolfoodservicedirectors,also
conductsregularsurveysoncompensation,benefits,andissuesfacingemployersoftheseworkersoncompensationandbenefits(SchoolNutritionAssociation2020).
WealsodrawonJenniferGaddis’richbodyofworkonthehistoryoftheschoolfoodserviceworkforceandtherelationshipofprivatecompaniestotheschoolmealprogram(J.GaddisandCoplen2018;J.E.Gaddis2019).Therehasalsobeenresearchonspecificlocalities:e.g.,NewJersey,Wisconsin(HealthySchoolMealsforAllandGaddis2023),andBaltimore(Gellesetal.2022).
Morerecentresearchhasfocusedonthechallengesposedbyvacanciesandstaffturnover,trendsthatarecompoundedbyworkingconditionswediscussinthisreport(delaCour2023;2022;Hickeyand
Cooper2022;Lieberman2021).TheFoodInsightGrouprecentlypublishedastudyonvacanciesandturnoveroffoodserviceworkersinCaliforniaschooldistrictsthatisvitalreadingforanyonestudyingthisworkforce(FoodInsightGroup2024).
DataandMethods
Toanalyzetheworkingconditionsandcharacteristicsofschoolfoodserviceworkers,weuseone-yearAmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS)samplesfromtwofive-yearperiods:2008-2012and2018-2022.Ourdemographicandwageanalysisusesfive-yearcombineddatatoensuresufficientsamplesizes,butweuseone-yeardatatolookatemploymenttrends.WealsoreferenceCurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS)
andOccupationalEmploymentStatistics(OEWS)dataforunionizationandoccupationcounts.
IdentifyingPublicSchoolFoodServiceWorkers
OuranalysisfocusesonthefoodserviceworkersdirectlyemployedbyK-12publicschooldistricts.
ToidentifytheseworkersinCensusdatasources,weselect“elementaryandsecondaryschools”as
industry(7860inthe2012CensusIndustrialClassificationSystem&NAICScode611100,asubsetofeducationalservices)andpublicsectoremployment.Wedonotincludeprivateelementary/secondary
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools6
schools,whicharenotrequiredtoparticipateinmealprograms,butcharterschoolsarereflectedinouruniverse.1WeusedthesameoccupationlistastheCongressionalResearchService(2022)intheiranalysis.
Thisuniverseexcludessomeworkerswhosupportdistrictfoodprogramsbutarenotidentifiable
assuchinthedata,forexample,cashiers,drivers,warehousemanagers,secretaries,andgeneral
administrators.Mostoftheseworkersperformmultiplefunctions,andsomemaybefundedinpartorwholebygeneralfundsratherthancafeteriafunds.Otherstudiesofschoolfoodserviceworkersusedistrictsurveystoidentifyallstaffsupportingfoodserviceprograms,leadingtolargerestimatesof
workforcesize.
Weexcludeself-employed,unemployed,andfamilyworkers.FollowingthemethodologyusedbytheCongressionalResearchService(2022),weexcludethosewhoworkedfewerthan5hoursaweekor27weeksinthepastyear;thatamountsto12.5%oftheworkforcein2018-22.Weadoptthisexclusion
toenablecomparisonwithpreviousresearchandtoexcludethosewithminimalattachmenttotheworkforce.(SeeMethodsandSourcesbelowformoredetailsonourdataandmethodology.)
ComparisonWorkerGroups
Wecomparethedemographicsandeconomicoutcomesofschoolfoodserviceworkerstoseveralothergroupsofworkers.Thesecomparisongroupsrepresentcomparablejobsinotherindustries,aswellas
otheroccupationsinpublicschools.Theyare:
?Otherclassifiedworkersinpublicschools(e.g.custodians,clerks,teacherassistants,healthassistants—excludingconstructionstaff);
?Certificatedworkersinpublicschools(teachers,librarians,counselors—excludingadministrators);2
?Otherfoodserviceworkers,i.e.,workersinthesamesetofoccupations,butemployedinthe
foodserviceindustry.Thisindustryincludesfoodservicecontractors(whomaybeservingpublicschooldistricts),butprimarilyincludesrestaurantsorotherprivateeatingestablishments;
?Otherinstitutionalcafeteriaworkers(e.g.,hospitalorgovernmentcafeterias);
?Allotherworkers,withthesameminimumhoursperweekandweeksperyear.
1Alittleunder9%ofU.S.K-12studentsattendedprivateschoolinfall2021,thelastyearforwhichthereisnationaldata.U.S.DepartmentofEducation,NationalCenterforEducationStatistics,PrivateSchoolUniverseSurvey(PSS),2011–12through2021–22.SeeDigestofEducationStatistics2023,table205.20.
2Certificatedreferstopositionsthatrequiresomeformofstatelicensingorcertification.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools7
1.PoliciesGoverningSchoolFoodService
Stateandnationalpoliciesgoverningthefundingandstructuringofschoolmealprograms,aswellasminimumwagelawsandlaborprotections,affecttheworkingconditions,outsourcing,anddemandforschoolfoodserviceworkers.Stateandfederalpoliciesthatregulatefoodpurchasingandnutritional
requirementsfortheschoolmealprogramalsoaffecttherequiredskills,demandfor,andtrainingoffoodserviceworkers.
PublicschoolmealprogramsareoverseenbytheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)andgovernedbytheRichardB.RussellNationalSchoolLunchActandtheChildNutritionAct(CNA)of
1966.ThemostrecentsignificantupdatetotheCNAwastheHealthy,Hunger-FreeKidsActof2010
(HHFKA),whichaddedtrainingrequirementsforstaff,fundingfortraining,additionalfundingformeals,andexpandedtheUSDA’sauthoritytosetnutritionstandards.
Schoolmealsarefundedprimarilythroughthefederalgovernment’sNationalSchoolLunchProgram
(NSLP)andSchoolBreakfastProgram(SBP).Mostofthatfundingisintheformofcashreimbursementspermealserved,withsomeadditionalfundingforpurchasingfederalfoodcommoditiesandpayingforadministrationcosts.WithinthecontiguousUnitedStates,theper-mealreimbursementratesdonot
varybyplace,3despitesignificantdifferencesinlaborandsupplycostsbetweenregions(J.E.Gaddis2020).
Therearethreereimbursementratesformeals,basedonstudents’incomeeligibility:free,
reduced-price,andfull-price.TheNSLPper-mealreimbursementsforthe2023-24schoolyearrange
from$0.40(forpaidlunch)to$4.50(forfreelunch).4Inadditiontothesereimbursements,districts
receivemoneyfromthestudentfeesforfull-andreduced-pricemeals,andstudentpurchasesofextraslikechips,cookies,anddrinks.A2019studyreportedthat57%ofschoolfoodservicerevenuesare
fromfederalreimbursements,20%fromstudentmealpayments,6%fromstateandlocalfunds,6%
fromdiscountedUSDAcommodities,and11%fromsalesofsnackitems(UnitedStatesDepartment
ofAgricultureandMathematicaPolicyResearch2019).Districtsalsoreceivesupportforbuyingsomefoods:theUSDApurchasescommoditiesanddistributesthemtofederalnutritionassistanceprogramsthatinturndistributethematlowornocosttoschoolmealprograms.Thereisastatecost-matchingrequirement,andsomestateselecttoprovideadditionalfundingtodistrictfoodprogramsona
per-mealbasis(CodeofFederalRegulations2023).Asofthiswriting,8stateshaveauthorizedfundingforuniversalfreemealsforallstudents(coveringthedifferencebetweentheUSDAreimbursementandactualdistrictcosts)—California,Colorado,Maine,Massachusetts,Michigan,Minnesota,NewMexico,
andVermont(FoodResearch&ActionCenter2023).Districtsalsoindirectlysubsidizeschoolmeal
programswithgeneralfunds,bypayingfortheadministrativeoverheadandoccasionalworkofstaffwhohaveotherduties,suchasfacilitiesandmaintenancestaffandfinancialclerks.
Tounderstandthefinancialincentivesdistrictsfacewhenmanagingfoodserviceprograms,itis
importanttonotethatfederalreimbursementsalonedonotcovertheactualcostofprovidingmeals.
A2019studybyUSDAfoundthattheaveragecostofproducingalunchwasbetween$0.49and$2.70morepermealthanthereimbursementrate,dependingonwhetheradministrativeoverheadisfactoredin(BillingsandCongressionalResearchService2023,21).
3AlaskaandHawaiihavehigherreimbursementrates.4
/cn/rates-reimbursement
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools8
Therearesomerestrictionsonhowfederalfundsarespent,butingeneralitisuptodistrictsto
distributefundsbetweenlaborandsupplycosts,whichcanputpressureonwageswhenfoodcostsgoup(ashappeneddramaticallyduringtherecentyearsofhighinflationandsupplyshortages),orforcedistrictstochoosebetweenfoodqualityandstaffingcosts.Federalcashreimbursementsmustgointoafundseparatefromadistrict’sgeneralfund,somostdistrictsuseacafeteriafundformealprograms.Thisaccountingstructurealignswiththecommonexpectationbydistrictleadershipandthepublicthatadistrict’sfoodprogrambeself-sufficientandnotdrawinggeneralfundsawayfromcoreeducationalservices.
Becauseschoolscansettheirownmealpricesandfederalreimbursementratesdonotcovertheactualcostofservingmeals,andbecausetherearesignificanteconomiesofscaleinfoodservice,financial
sustainabilitydependssignificantlyonthenumberofstudentseatingmeals.Laborandadministrationcosts,aswellasinvestmentsincookingequipmenttopreparefreshmeals,aremorecost-effective
whenspreadoveralargevolumeofmeals.Forthesamereasons,schoolmealcontractsaremorelucrativeinlargeurbandistrictswithhighlevelsoffree/reducedlunchparticipation.
TheUSDAalsoprovidesfundsforbreakfast,summer,andafter-schoolmeals,whichcanexpandthe
needforfull-dayandyear-roundworkers.SignificantlyfewerschoolsparticipateintheSchoolBreakfastProgramthanthelunchprogram.Summerfoodprogramsareprimarilylimitedtoruralareasorareas
withhighpercentagesoflow-incomechildren;after-schoolsnacksandmealsarefundedinareaswhereatleast50%ofthestudentsareeligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals.
ProgramParticipation
Thenumberofmealsservedinpublicschoolshasdeclinedsignificantlysince2008,ashastheshare
ofstudentspayingfullprice,bothofwhichputfiscalstrainonmealprograms.Withmanyschools
closedin2020and2021,thenumberofmealsserveddroppedprecipitously.In2022—likelybecauseofcontinueduniversalfreemeals—thatnumberrecoveredtopre-pandemiclevels,onlytodeclineagain
in2023(BillingsandCongressionalResearchService2023).Overthatsametimeperiod—2008-2022—publicschoolenrollmentgrewby1%.
ImpactsoftheCOVID-19Pandemic
Duringthe2020-21and2021-22schoolyears,schoolswerereimbursedforfreemealstoallstudentsregardlessofincomeeligibilityandwerealsoallowedtoofferpickupanddeliveryofmealswhile
schoolswereclosed(normally,schoolfoodmustbeeatenoncampus).Duringthisperiod,schools
servedasoneofthemostefficientwaystogetfoodtopeoplethatneededit;manydistrictsoperated(andsomecontinuetooperate)householdfooddistributioninadditiontoservingmealsinschool
facilities.
Despitethetemporaryinfluxoffederalfunding,districtcafeteriafundsoftendeclinedduring
thepandemic.Costsfromtheprovisionofuniversalfreemealsthatwerenotcoveredbyfederal
reimbursements,theinabilitytosellrevenue-boostingsnacks,risingfoodprices,andsupplychain
issuesalldrovemanydistrictstospenddowncafeteriafundreservesandevendrawongeneralfunds.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools9
Figure1.Schoollunchtrends(2008-2023)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
TotalLunchesServed(millions)
AverageStudent
Participation(millions)
PercentFreeorReducedPrice
5,208
31
60.1
5,186
31.3
62.6
5,278
31.8
65.3
5,274
31.8
66.6
5,215
31.7
68.2
4,866
29.7
74.4
4,867
29.6
74.1
3,210
22.4
76.9
2,155
11
98.9
4,952
4,644
30.1
95.4
28.5
70.8
Chart:SaraHinkley,UCBerkeleyLaborCenter?Source:NationalSchoolLunchProgramAnnualSummaryTables?CreatedwithDatawrapper
Whenthefederalsupportforuniversalfreemealsexpired,severalstatespickeditup;asofJune2024,California,Colorado,Maine,Massachusetts,Michigan,Minnesota,NewMexico,andVermontofferfreemealstoallstudents(coveringthegapbetweencostandfederalreimbursement).Itistooearlyyettodiscerntheeffectofthesestatepoliciesonemploymenttrendsinthosestates.
NutritionalStandardsandStaffing
Thetypeofmealsbeingpreparedandserved—andhowthatworkisdistributedacrossasupply
chain—alsodrivesthesizeandstructureofthefoodserviceworkforce.Theexpandednutritional
standardsadoptedin2010werepartofapolicytrendtowardmore“scratch”preparationofmeals,inanefforttoreducerelianceonpre-preparedheat-and-servemeals(J.GaddisandCoplen2018).This
shiftrequiresmorestaff,aswellasadditionaltrainingandequipment.Districts’accesstofundingfor
suchinfrastructurevarieswidely;onestudyhasfoundthatmanydistrictslackadequateinfrastructuretomakethisshift(CenterforCities+SchoolsandConsciousKitchen2020).
Staffingshortagesalsolimitdistricts’abilitytoprepareandservefreshfood,whichinturnmayreduce
studentparticipation,cuttingintoprogramrevenuesandmakingscratchcookingmoredifficultto
accomplish.Investmentsinscratch-cookingequipmentandfreshingredientsarenotenoughtosupportthisimportantnutritionalgoal—theremustalsobeinvestmentsinstaffdevelopmentandretention.Formanydistricts,staffingchallengesposeasignificantobstacletoservingfreshfood(FoodInsightGroup2024).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools10
2.ThePublicSchoolFoodServiceWorkforce
Thepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforcehasbeenshrinkingsteadilysince2008;in2022,therewere
208,266suchworkersaccordingtoACSdata,a22%declinefrom268,206in2008(Figure2).Wenote
thatestimatesoftheworkforcesizevarybypublicdatasource,makingitchallengingtocompare
availablestudies.TheUCBerkeleyLaborCenter2010reportcitesanestimateof420,000workersin
K12schools—350,000publicand70,000workingforprivatecontractors(JacobsandGraham-Squire
2010).TheCRS2022reportestimatesthattherewere339,000workersinfoodserviceoperationsin
elementaryandsecondaryschools,includingbothpublicandprivatesector(theyuseACSdatafrom
2015-2019).OccupationEmploymentandWageStatistics(OEWS)datashows396,480suchworkersin2009(2008isnotavailable)and312,890in2022,butOEWSincludesalljobs(whileACSreportsonlyaworker’sprimaryjob)andincludesworkersbelowourminimumthresholdforhoursandweeksworked.CurrentPopulationStudiesOutgoingRotationGroups(CPSORG)estimates298,873in2008-12and
246,164in2018-22;CPSsamplesizesaremuchsmallerthanACS.
WorkforceSizeandEmploymentTrends
Regardlessofthesedifferences,alldatasourcesconfirmasignificantdeclineinthesizeoftheworkforce:CPSORGshowsadeclineof18%,OEWS24%.Severalfactorscouldbecontributingtothisdecline:
Figure2.Publicschoolfoodserviceemployment
2008271,337
2009252,845
2010245,800
2011241,789
2012235,682
2018232,515
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 保安保潔服務(wù)合同范本
- 書籍設(shè)備租賃合同范本
- 光伏鋼結(jié)構(gòu)施工合同范本
- 勞動(dòng)培養(yǎng)合同范例
- 企業(yè)買斷合同范本
- 公園工程合同范本
- 獸醫(yī)聘請(qǐng)合同范本
- 產(chǎn)品供應(yīng)鏈投資合同范本
- 2025年自動(dòng)造型線項(xiàng)目提案報(bào)告模稿
- 2025年高純?nèi)嗽旃杌沂?xiàng)目立項(xiàng)申請(qǐng)報(bào)告模稿
- 出國實(shí)用英語口語課件
- 人教版小學(xué)勞動(dòng)教育三年級(jí)下冊(cè)第二章勞動(dòng)項(xiàng)目5《蒸蛋羹》優(yōu)質(zhì)課教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)
- 跨部門工作聯(lián)絡(luò)單
- 概率論與數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)智慧樹知到課后章節(jié)答案2023年下四川師范大學(xué)
- DataOps實(shí)踐指南(1.0)-中文版-2023.07
- Vue.js前端開發(fā)實(shí)戰(zhàn)(第2版)全套完整教學(xué)課件
- 新生兒敗血癥護(hù)理查房查房
- 2023風(fēng)力發(fā)電機(jī)組延壽評(píng)估技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 鞋業(yè)-品質(zhì)培訓(xùn)
- 中級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)實(shí)務(wù)所得稅課件
- 起重指揮人員安全操作規(guī)程
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論