領導學:在實踐中提升領導力(原書第10版)課件 第1章 我們所說的領導是什么_第1頁
領導學:在實踐中提升領導力(原書第10版)課件 第1章 我們所說的領導是什么_第2頁
領導學:在實踐中提升領導力(原書第10版)課件 第1章 我們所說的領導是什么_第3頁
領導學:在實踐中提升領導力(原書第10版)課件 第1章 我們所說的領導是什么_第4頁
領導學:在實踐中提升領導力(原書第10版)課件 第1章 我們所說的領導是什么_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩28頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

Chapter1WhatDoWeMeanbyLeadership?Copyright?2022McGraw-HillEducation.Allrightsreserved.NoreproductionordistributionwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofMcGraw-HillEducation.ChapterOutlineIntroductionWhatisleadership?LeadershipmythsTheinteractionalframeworkforanalyzingleadershipIllustratingtheinteractionalframework:womeninleadershiprolesThereisnosimplerecipeforeffectiveleadershipIntroductionLivesofgreatmenallremindusWecanmakeourlivessublimeand,departing,leavebehindusfootprintsonthesandsoftime.HenryWadsworthLongfellow.ProfilesinLeadershipSheikhZayedbinSultanAlNahyanBillGatesAlexanderHamiltonHarryTrumanPaulRevereLeadership1Complexphenomenoninvolvingaleader,hisorherfollowers,andasituation.Becauseofthecomplexityofleadership,leadershipresearchershavedefinedtheconceptinmanydifferentways:Processbywhichanagentinducesasubordinatetobehaveinadesiredmanner.Directingandcoordinatingtheworkofgroupmembers.Interpersonalrelationinwhichotherscomplybecausetheywantto,notbecausetheyhaveto.Leadership2Processofinfluencinganorganizedgrouptowardaccomplishingitsgoals.Actionsthatfocusresourcestocreatedesirableopportunities.Creatingconditionsforateamtobeeffective.Theabilitytoengageemployees,theabilitytobuildteams,andtheabilitytoachieveresults.Thefirsttworepresentthehowandthelatterthewhatofleadership.Acomplexformofsocialproblemsolving.DifferencebetweenSuccessfulManagersandEffectiveManagersSuccessfulmanagersThosepromotedquicklythroughtheranksSpendmoretimeinorganizationalsocializingandpoliticking.Spendlesstimeontraditionalmanagementresponsibilitiessuchasplanninganddecisionmaking.EffectivemanagersMakerealcontributionstotheirorganization’sperformance.LeadershipIsBothaScienceandanArtBass&Stogdill’sHandbookofLeadership:Theory,Research,andManagerialApplicationscitesapproximately8,000studiesonleadership.Reflectsthescopeofthescienceofleadership.Leadershipremainspartlyanartaswellasascience.Somemanagersmaybeeffectiveleaderswithouteverhavingtakenacourseortrainingprograminleadership.Somescholarsinthefieldofleadershipmayberelativelypoorleadersthemselves.Skillsinanalyzingandrespondingtosituationsvarygreatlyacrossleaders.LeadershipIsBothRationalandEmotional1Leadershipincludesactionsandinfluencesbasedon:Reasonandlogic.Inspirationandpassion.Sincepeoplearebothrationalandemotional,leadersuserationaltechniquesandemotionalappealstoinfluencefollowers.Leadersshouldweightherationalandemotionalconsequencesoftheiractions.Arousedfeelingscanbeusedeitherpositivelyornegatively,constructivelyordestructively.Someleadershavebeenabletoinspireotherstodeedsofgreatpurposeandcourage.LeadershipIsBothRationalandEmotional2Themerepresenceofagroupcancausepeopletoactdifferentlythanwhentheyarealone.Somescholarssuggestthattheveryideaofleadershipmayberootedinpeople'semotionalneeds.Romanceofleadershipmaybeaculturalmyththathasutilityonlyuntilitaffectshowpeoplecreatemeaningaboutcausaleventsincomplexsocialsystems.DistinctionsbetweenManagersandLeadersManagers:Administer.Maintain.Control.Haveashort-termview.Askhowandwhen.Imitate.Acceptthestatusquo.Leaders:Innovate.Develop.Inspire.Havealong-termview.Askwhatandwhy.Originate.Challengethestatusquo.Figure1.1:LeadershipandManagementOverlapAccessthetextalternativeforslideimages.LeadershipMyths1Goodleadershipisallcommonsense.Thetermcommonsenseisambiguous.Ifleadershipweresimplycommonsense,thentherewouldbefewerworkplaceproblems.Onechallengeofunderstandingleadershipmaybetoknowwhencommonsenseappliesandwhenitdoesnot.LeadershipMyths2Leadersareborn,notmade.Innatefactorsandformativeexperiencesinfluencebehaviorandleadership.Thereisageneticcomponenttointelligence,butaleadermightrequireadvancededucationinspecializedfieldsaswell.LeadershipMyths3Researchshowscognitiveabilitiesandpersonalitytraitsarepartiallyinnate.Naturaltalentsorcharacteristicsmayoffercertainadvantagesordisadvantagestoaleader.Differentenvironmentscannurtureorsuppressdifferentleadershipqualities.LeadershipMyths4Theonlyschoolwhereleadershipislearntfromistheschoolofhardknocks.Formalstudyandexperientiallearningcomplementeachother.Formalstudyofleadershipprovidesstudentswithavarietyofwaysofexaminingaparticularleadershipsituation.Studyingthedifferentwaysresearchershavedefinedandexaminedleadershiphelpsstudentsusethesedefinitionsandtheoriestobetterunderstandwhatisgoingoninanyleadershipsituation.Figure1.2:AnInteractionalFrameworkforAnalyzingLeadershipAccessthetextalternativeforslideimages.Source:AdaptedfromE.P.Hollander,LeadershipDynamics:APracticalGuidetoEffectiveRelationships(NewYork:FreePress,1978).TheInteractionalFrameworkforAnalyzingLeadershipStatesthatleadershipisafunctionofthreeelements—theleader,thefollowers,andthesituation.Example:In-groupsandout-groups.In-groups:Highdegreeofmutualinfluenceandattractionbetweentheleaderandafewsubordinates.Thesubordinatesfeelahighdegreeofloyalty,commitment,andtrusttowardtheleader.Othersubordinatesbelongtotheout-group.LeaderasanIndividual1Characteristicsinclude:Uniquepersonalhistory.Interests.Charactertraits.Motivation.Effectiveleadersdifferfromtheirfollowersandfromineffectiveleadersonelementssuchaspersonalitytraits,cognitiveabilities,skills,andvalues.Leadersaregenerallycalmandarenotpronetoemotionaloutbursts.LeaderasanIndividual2LeadersappointedbysuperiorsmayhavelesscredibilityandmaygetlessloyaltyLeaderselectedoremergingbyconsensusfromranksoffollowersareviewedasmoreeffective.Leader’sexperienceorhistoryinaparticularorganizationisusuallyimportanttoherorhiseffectiveness.Leader’slegitimacyisaffectedbytheextentoffollowerparticipationinaleader’sselection.Followers1Bothpractitionersandscholarsstresstherelatednessofleadershipandfollowership.Followingaspectsoffollowersaffecttheleadershipprocess:ExpectationsPersonalitytraitsMaturitylevelsLevelsofcompetenceMotivationFollowers2Workerswhosharealeader’sgoalsandvalues,andwhofeelintrinsicallyrewardedforperformingajobwellmaybemoremotivated.Followingfactorshavesignificantimplications:Numberoffollowersreportingtoaleader.Followers’trustandconfidenceintheleader.Followers3Importanceoftheleaderandfollowerrelationshiphasundergonedynamicchangeforthefollowingreasons:Increasedpressuretofunctionwithreducedresources.Trendtowardgreaterpowersharinganddecentralizedauthorityinorganizations.Increaseincomplexproblemsandrapidchangesinanorganizationcreatingthedemandformorepeopletosolvethem.Followers4Waysinwhichfollowerscantakeonnewleadershiprolesandresponsibilitiesinthefuture.Beingproactiveintheirstancetowardorganizationalproblemsbyplayinganactiveandconstructiverolecollaboratingwithleadersinsolvingproblems.Contributingtotheleadershipprocessbybecomingskilledat"influencingupward."Stayingflexibleandopentoopportunities.Alternativeapproachtounderstandingfollowership.Constructionistapproach:Viewsleadershipascombinedactsofleadingandfollowingbydifferentindividuals,whatevertheirformaltitlesorpositionsinanorganizationmaybeTheSituationLeadershipmakessenseinthecontextofhowtheleaderandfollowersinteractinagivensituation.Mostambiguousaspectoftheleadershipframework.IllustratingtheInteractionalFramework:WomeninLeadershipRoles1Womenaretakingonnewleadershiprolesingreaternumbersthaneverbefore.Problemsthatconstraintheopportunityforcapablewomentorisetothehighestleadershiprolesinorganizationsstillexist.IllustratingtheInteractionalFramework:WomeninLeadershipRoles2Findingsfromstudiesregardingproblemsthatconstrainwomenfromgainingleadershiproles.Mentorsofwomenexecutiveshadlessorganizationalinfluenceandcloutthandidthementorsoftheirmalecounterparts.Comparedtomen,women’strustineachotherdecreaseswhenworksituationsbecomemoreprofessionallyrisky.Strongmasculinestereotypeofleadershipcontinuestoexistintheworkplace.Womenareseenaslesswellsuitedtotherequirementsofleadershipthanmen.Womenareviewedasmoreapttoallowtheirdecisionsandactionstobe"controlled"bytheiremotions.IllustratingtheInteractionalFramework:WomeninLeadershipRoles3Practiceinteractiveleadership.Interactiveleadershipdevelopedbywomen’ssocializationexperiencesandcareerpaths.Factorsthatexplaintheshifttowardmorewomeninleadershiproles.Womenthemselveshavechanged.Leadershiproleshavechanged.Organizationalpracticeshavechanged.Culturehaschanged.IllustratingtheInteractionalFramework:WomeninLeadershipRoles4Glasscliff:Femalecandidatesforanexecutivepositionaremorelikelytobehiredthanequallyqualifiedmalecandidateswhenanorganization’sperformanceisdeclining.Challengeforwomeninadditiontotheglassceiling.Reflectsagreaterwillingnesstoputwomeninprecariouspositions.Thewomen’suseofinteractiveleadershiphasitsrootsinsocialization,andthewomenintervieweesbelievethatitbenefitstheirorganizations.ThingstoKeepinMindforEffectiveLeadership

1Leadershipmustalwaysbeassessedinthecontextoftheleader,thefollowers,andthesituation.Leadersmayneedtorespondto:Variousfollowersdifferentlyinthesamesituation.Samefollowersdifferentlyindifferentsituations.ThingstoKeepinMindforEffectiveLeadership

2Followersmayrespondto:Variousleadersdifferently.Eachotherdifferentlywithdifferentleaders.Twoleadersmayhavedifferentperceptionsofthesamefollowersorsituations.Conclusion:Therightbehaviorinonesituationisnotnecessarilytherightbehaviorinanothersituation.SummaryLeadershipistheprocessofinfluencinganorganizedgrouptowardachievingitsgoals.Considerableoverlapexistsbetweenleadershipandmanagement.Studyofleadershipmustalsoincludetwootherareas:thefollowersandthesituation.Goodleadershipmakesadifference,anditcanbeenhancedthroughgreaterawarenessoftheimportantfactorsinfluencingtheleadershipprocess.EndofMainContent

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論