供應(yīng)商選擇工具

SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19991 SELECTION TOOL 選擇供應(yīng)商的工具選擇供應(yīng)商的工具 SUPPLIER INFORMATION 供應(yīng)商信息 Supplier name 供應(yīng)商名稱 Phone 電話 Fax 傳真 Corporate headquarters address 總部地址 Supplier web page address 網(wǎng)址 Contact name title 聯(lián)系人 Phone 電話 Fax 傳真 Contact address 聯(lián)系地址 Contact email EMAIL Other important information 其他重要信息 SQE ANALYSIS SQE 分析 Weight 比重 Supplier A 供應(yīng)商 A Supplier B 供應(yīng)商 B Supplier C 供應(yīng)商 C RTS Readiness Supplier s Outgoing Quality Level DPPM 供應(yīng)商出貨品質(zhì)水平 DPPM Supplier s Customers Line Reject Rate 供應(yīng)商客戶的廠內(nèi)不良率 Supplier s Customers Field Reject Rate 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場不良率 Forecasted LRR Customer 預(yù)估的客戶產(chǎn)線不良率 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19992 Forecasted IFIR Customer CUSTOMER 的預(yù)期初始市場不良率 Quality System 品質(zhì)系統(tǒng) Quality Resources 品質(zhì)資源 TOTAL weighted 總計總計 100 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19993 SQE WORKSHEET SQE 工作表 RTS READINESSSCORE 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing and does the compatibility of the design meet Customer s needs 說明 產(chǎn)品需要多長時間才能成功導(dǎo)入 CUSTOMER 生產(chǎn) 設(shè)計能力是否可以滿足 CUSTOMER 需求 Scoring 1Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分?jǐn)?shù) 時間及品質(zhì)具有高風(fēng)險性 配合度差 2Represents medium risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質(zhì)具有中等風(fēng)險性 配合度好 3Represents low risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質(zhì)具有低風(fēng)險性 配合度好 4No risk to schedule or quality compatible 時間及品質(zhì)無風(fēng)險性 配合度好 Comments 備注 SUPPLIER S OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL DPPMSCORE 供應(yīng)商出貨品質(zhì)等級 DPPM Detail Supplier s history 說明 供應(yīng)商的歷史狀況 Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates analyzing categorizing reasons for failures and taking appropriate corrective actions 供應(yīng)商能夠計算出不良率 分析失效原因并加以分類 并能夠剔除有效的改善對策 Scoring 1Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商無法計算出不良率 2Supplier measures DPPM rate however there is no analysis pareto or corrective action 供應(yīng)商能夠計算出不良率 但無法提供分析及改善對策 3Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis pareto however no corrective action is taken 供應(yīng)商能夠計算出不良率 能夠剔除原因分析 但是無法提供改善對策 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19994 4Supplier measures DPPM rate performs analysis pareto and has effective corrective action system 供應(yīng)商能夠計算出不良率 提供原因分析及有效的改善對策 GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION 主要的市場不良資訊 a Agree to Customer s DPPM goals Yes goals are No 是否達(dá)到 CUSTOMER 不良率目標(biāo) 是 目標(biāo)是 否 b Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals Yes plan attached Plan promised by 是否有確保達(dá)到不良率目標(biāo)的計劃 是 相關(guān)計劃 計劃確定人 Comments 備注 SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE 供應(yīng)商客戶的廠內(nèi)不良率 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail Supplier s customers history Customer s current goal 說明 供應(yīng)商的歷史狀況 CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo) Scoring 1Supplier s customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商客戶的長期不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的 2 倍 2Supplier s customers LRR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應(yīng)商客戶的長期不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 但是小于其 2 倍 3Supplier s customers LRR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商客戶的長期不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)一致 4Supplier s customers LRR is better than Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商客戶的長期不良率優(yōu)于 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19995 SUPPLIER S CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場不良率 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail Supplier s customers history Customer s current goal 說明 供應(yīng)商客戶的歷史狀況 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo) Scoring 1Supplier s customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的 2 倍 2Supplier s customers FIR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER 客戶的市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo) 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s customers FIR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致 4Supplier s customers FIR is better than Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場不良率優(yōu)于 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMERSCORE 預(yù)期的CUSTOMER產(chǎn)線不良率 分?jǐn)?shù) DETAIL SUPPLIER S FORECASTED CUSTOMER S CURRENT GOAL 說明 供應(yīng)商的預(yù)估值 CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo) Scoring 1Supplier s LRR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的 2 倍 2Supplier s LRR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率超過 CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s LRR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率基本與 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致 4Supplier s LRR is better than Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率優(yōu)于 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 FORECASTED IFIR CUSTOMERSCORE 預(yù)期的CUSTOMER早期市場不良率 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail Supplier s forecasted Customer s current goal SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1 0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19996 說明 供應(yīng)商的預(yù)估值 CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 Scoring 1Supplier s IFIR is 2 times worse than Customer s current goal 分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商的早期市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的 2 倍 2Supplier s IFIR is greater than Customer s current goal yet less than 2 times greater 供應(yīng)商的早期市場不良率超過 CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值 但低于其 2 倍 3Supplier s IFIR is approximately equal to Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商的早期市場不良率基本于 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致 4Supplier s IFIR is better than Customer s current goal 供應(yīng)商的早期市場不良率優(yōu)于 CUSTOMER 現(xiàn)行目標(biāo) QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE 品質(zhì)系統(tǒng) 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail 細(xì)則 a ISO Certification 1 Yes circle one 9001 9002 0 No a ISO 認(rèn)證 b Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges b 品質(zhì)系統(tǒng)稽核得分 0Less than 70 Not Approved 2Between 70 89 Conditionally Approved 4Between 90 100 Approved QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE 品質(zhì)資源 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail 細(xì)則 The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues Additionally Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site 供應(yīng)商應(yīng)當(dāng)建立專門的品保系統(tǒng) 足夠的品保員工參與品質(zhì)問題的解決 任命品保經(jīng)理 參與公司決策 另外供應(yīng)商還要在每個制造廠任命一名 JQE Scoring 1Inadequate resources 系統(tǒng)不健全 2Quality staff however no Quality Manager 有品保員工 但沒有專職品保經(jīng)理 3Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保員工和專職品保經(jīng)理 4Quality Department Quality Manager and willing to appoint a JQE SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR 40 PR SQ 170 REV1