新城市主義2006.ppt_第1頁
新城市主義2006.ppt_第2頁
新城市主義2006.ppt_第3頁
新城市主義2006.ppt_第4頁
新城市主義2006.ppt_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩32頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

,IntroducingNewUrbanism,新城市主義,TheHistoryofNewUrbanism新城市主義的歷史,TheIntellectualrootsofNewUrbanismgobacktotheurbanreformmovementsofthe19thcentury新城市主義的理論根源可追溯到19世紀的城市改革運動。,TheHistoryofNewUrbanism新城市主義的歷史,ThemovementformedinreactiontourbansprawlthatbegantospreadintheUSinthe1950sandcontinuestoday運動的形成直接針對于美國從50年代開始的都市擴張。,TheHistoryofNewUrbanism新城市主義的歷史,ThefirstresponsetosprawlwastorevivethedesignofthetraditionalAmericansmalltown,earningthemovementthenameofNeo-traditionalistnewtraditionaltownplanning對擴張的第一反應(yīng)是復(fù)興傳統(tǒng)的美國小城鎮(zhèn)的設(shè)計,開始的名稱是“新傳統(tǒng)城鎮(zhèn)規(guī)劃”。,CityofNewHaven,,TheHistoryofNewUrbanism新城市主義的歷史,Inthemid-1990s,themovementadoptedthemoreexcitingnameofNewUrbanismandbegantoexpanditsideasfromnewtownstourbanredevelopment,andfromtheUStoothercountries90年代中期,運動更名為“新城市主義”,主張從新城鎮(zhèn)擴展到了都市發(fā)展,從美國擴展到其它國家。,EastgateMallRedevelopment,,,,TheIntellectualOrigins新城市主義的理論基礎(chǔ),IndustrialcompanytownsEbeneiserHoward,GardenCitiesofTomorrow,1900JaneJacobs,TheDeathandLifeofGreatAmericanCities,1962WilliamWhite,TheSocialLifeofSmallUrbanSpaces,1980霍華德,明天的花園城市,1900雅克比,美國大城市的死與生,1962懷特,小城市空間的社會生活,1980,,ThePurposeoftheNewUrbanism新城市主義的目的,“TheCongressfortheNewUrbanismviewsdisinvestmentincentralcities,thespreadofplacelesssprawl,increasingseparationbyraceandincome,environmentaldeterioration,lossofagriculturallandsandwilderness,andtheerosionofsocietysbuiltheritageasoneinterrelatedcommunity-buildingchallenge.”TheCharteroftheNewUrbanism*AnissueinChinaaswellastheUS*NotanissueinChina,TheFirstProjects第一批項目,NewUrbanprojectswerebeingbuiltbeforetheirwasanameforNewUrbanism在“新城市主義”得名前,就有新城市主義的項目建成了。,Seaside,1981,Kentlands,1989,,,TheFirstProjects第一批項目,State-Thomas,Dallas,Texas,byRTKL,1985,NewTownofPoundbury,Cornwall,UK,LeonKrier,1988,LagunaWest,California,byCalthorpe,1988,WhydoNewUrbanistscopyTraditionalAmericanTowns?新城市主義緣何借鑒傳統(tǒng)城鎮(zhèn),MostofAmericasurbanhistoryisthecreationofnewsettlementsTheAmericansmalltownisidealizedinAmericanculture(safe,clean,friendly,healthy,wholesome,modest,egalitarian)Itisapre-automobilesettlementform,withclosely-spacedmixeduses,meaningitisnotdesignedaroundthecarwithseparateareasfordifferentactivities,andsoshouldallowpeopletolivewithoutusingtheircarsallday美國的城市歷史大多是新居住點的建立。美國小城鎮(zhèn)體現(xiàn)理想的美國文化:安全,友好,健康,衛(wèi)生,禮讓,平等。小城鎮(zhèn)是汽車社會之前的聚居形式,有聚集的多功能的使用,人們可以不用汽車而生活很方便,它并不是為圍繞汽車的不同活動有分別區(qū)域的生活方式而設(shè)計的。,“Ourstreetsusedtobecharmingandbeautiful.”-JamesHowardKunstler,HomeFromNowhere(Simontheyrangefromboulevardsandraillinestoriversandparkways.3.Manyactivitiesofdailylivingshouldoccurwithinwalkingdistance,allowingindependencetothosewhodonotdrive,especiallytheelderlyandtheyoung.Interconnectednetworksofstreetsshouldbedesignedtoencouragewalking,reducethenumberandlengthofautomobiletrips,andconserveenergy.4.Withinneighborhoods,abroadrangeofhousingtypesandpricelevelscanbringpeopleofdiverseages,races,andincomesintodailyinteraction,strengtheningthepersonalandcivicbondsessentialtoanauthenticcommunity.5.Transitcorridors,whenproperlyplannedandcoordinated,canhelporganizemetropolitanstructureandrevitalizeurbancenters.Incontrast,highwaycorridorsshouldnotdisplaceinvestmentfromexistingcenters.6.Appropriatebuildingdensitiesandlandusesshouldbewithinwalkingdistanceoftransitstops,permittingpublictransittobecomeaviablealternativetotheautomobile.7.Concentrationsofcivic,institutional,andcommercialactivityshouldbeembeddedinneighborhoodsanddistricts,notisolatedinremote,single-usecomplexes.Schoolsshouldbesizedandlocatedtoenablechildrentowalkorbicycletothem.8.Theeconomichealthandharmoniousevolutionofneighborhoods,districts,andcorridorscanbeimprovedthroughgraphicurbandesigncodesthatserveaspredictableguidesforchange.9.Arangeofparks,fromtot-lotsandvillagegreenstoballfieldsandcommunitygardens,shouldbedistributedwithinneighborhoods.Conservationareasandopenlandsshouldbeusedtodefineandconnectdifferentneighborhoodsanddistricts.,ThePrinciples基本理念,MetropolitanRegionsandTowns1.Metropolitanregionsarefiniteplaceswithgeographicboundariesderivedfromtopography,watersheds,coastlines,farmlands,regionalparks,andriverbasins.Themetropolisismadeofmultiplecentersthatarecities,towns,andvillages,eachwithitsownidentifiablecenterandedges.2.Themetropolitanregionisafundamentaleconomicunitofthecontemporaryworld.Governmentalcooperation,publicpolicy,physicalplanning,andeconomicstrategiesmustreflectthisnewreality.3.Themetropolishasanecessaryandfragilerelationshiptoitsagrarianhinterlandandnaturallandscapes.Therelationshipisenvironmental,economic,andcultural.Farmlandandnatureareasimportanttothemetropolisasthegardenistothehouse.4.Developmentpatternsshouldnotbluroreradicatetheedgesofthemetropolis.Infilldevelopmentwithinexistingurbanareasconservesenvironmentalresources,economicinvestment,andsocialfabric,whilereclaimingmarginalandabandonedareas.Metropolitanregionsshoulddevelopstrategiestoencouragesuchinfilldevelopmentoverperipheralexpansion.5.Whereappropriate,newdevelopmentcontiguoustourbanboundariesshouldbeorganizedasneighborhoodsanddistricts,andbeintegratedwiththeexistingurbanpattern.Noncontiguousdevelopmentshouldbeorganizedastownsandvillageswiththeirownurbanedges,andplannedforajobs/housingbalance,notasbedroomsuburbs.6.Thedevelopmentandredevelopmentoftownsandcitiesshouldrespecthistoricalpatterns,precedents,andboundaries.7.Citiesandtownsshouldbringintoproximityabroadspectrumofpublicandprivateusestosupportaregionaleconomythatbenefitspeopleofallincomes.Affordablehousingshouldbedistributedthroughouttheregiontomatchjobopportunitiesandtoavoidconcentrationsofpoverty.8.Thephysicalorganizationoftheregionshouldbesupportedbyaframeworkoftransportationalternatives.Transit,pedestrian,andbicyclesystemsshouldmaximizeaccessandmobilitythroughouttheregionwhilereducingdependenceupontheautomobile.9.Revenuesandresourcescanbesharedmorecooperativelyamongthemunicipalitiesandcenterswithinregionstoavoiddestructivecompetitionfortaxbaseandtopromoterationalcoordinationoftransportation,recreation,publicservices,housing,andcommunityinstitutions.,Block,StreetandBuilding1.Aprimarytaskofallurbanarchitectureandlandscapedesignisthephysicaldefinitionofstreetsandpublicspacesasplacesofshareduse.2.Individualarchitecturalprojectsshouldbeseamlesslylinkedtotheirsurroundings.Thisissuetranscendsstyle.3.Therevitalizationofurbanplacesdependsonsafetyandsecurity.Thedesignofstreetsandbuildingsshouldreinforcesafeenvironments,butnotattheexpenseofaccessibilityandopenness.4.Inthecontemporarymetropolis,developmentmustadequatelyaccommodateautomobiles.Itshoulddosoinwaysthatrespectthepedestrianandtheformofpublicspace.5.Streetsandsquaresshouldbesafe,comfortable,andinterestingtothepedestrian.Properlyconfigured,theyencouragewalkingandenableneighborstoknoweachotherandprotecttheircommunities.6.Architectureandlandscapedesignshouldgrowfromlocalclimate,topography,history,andbuildingpractice.7.Civicbuildingsandpublicgatheringplacesrequireimportantsitestoreinforcecommunityidentityandthecultureofdemocracy.Theydeservedistinctiveform,becausetheirroleisdifferentfromthatofotherbuildingsandplacesthatconstitutethefabricofthecity.8.Allbuildingsshouldprovidetheirinhabitantswithaclearsenseoflocation,weatherandtime.Naturalmethodsofheatingandcoolingcanbemoreresource-efficientthanmechanicalsystems.Preservationandrenewalofhistoricbuildings,districts,andlandscapesaffirmthecontinuityandevolutionofurbansociety.,基本理論,TOD:交通引導(dǎo)開發(fā)(PeterCalthorpe)由步行街區(qū)發(fā)展而來,強調(diào)混合土地用途以公共交通為規(guī)劃原則,從交通站和商業(yè)組成的核心地區(qū)到社區(qū)邊界不超過600米的步行距離將居住、零售、辦公和公共空間組織在一個步行環(huán)境中,減少小汽車的使用帶來的環(huán)境污染、能源浪費、交通擁擠各TOD社區(qū)之間保留大量的綠化開敞空間,鄰里單位設(shè)計原則規(guī)模(size)邊界(boundaries)開放空間(openspace)機構(gòu)用地(institutionsites)地方商業(yè)(localshops)內(nèi)部道路系統(tǒng)(internalstreetsystem),Citiesandtownsshouldbeshapedbyphysicallydefinedanduniversallyaccessiblepublicspacesandcommunityinstitutions城市和城鎮(zhèn)應(yīng)設(shè)計有廣泛可達的公共空間和社區(qū)機構(gòu),LeonKriersPrivateandPublicSpacesoftheNeighborhood,,,TND:傳統(tǒng)鄰里開發(fā)(AndresDuany/ElizabethPlater-Zyberk)半徑400米或5分鐘步行距離街道間距70至100米鄰里內(nèi)有多類型住宅與居民土地使用多樣化公建布置在人流集散地住房的后巷作為鄰里間社交活動場所,Communitiesshouldbedesignedforthepedestrianandtransitaswellasthecar社區(qū)應(yīng)為行人、交通還有汽車服務(wù),400mand800mwalkingdistancestobusandrail,respectively,formtheradiusofaneighborhood,,Neighborhoodsshouldbediverseinuseandpopulation鄰里在使用和居住人口上應(yīng)有多樣性,MixofusesinVankeGardenCity,Neighborhoodsshouldbediverseinuseandpopulation鄰里在使用和居住人口上應(yīng)有多樣性,Goody-ClancyplanforNorthAllston,Boston,Communitiesshouldbedesignedforthepedestrianandtransitaswellasthecar社區(qū)應(yīng)為行人、交通還有汽車服務(wù),SectionsfromDuanyPlater-Zyberk,SectionsfromVankeCityGardenPlan,PlanforHilllsboroughFloridabyDuanyPlater-Zyberk,VankeGardenCityPlan,Communitiesshouldbedesignedforthepedestrianandtransitaswellasthecar社區(qū)應(yīng)為行人、交通還有汽車服務(wù),Communitiesshouldbedesignedforthepedestrianandtransitaswellasthecar社區(qū)應(yīng)為行人、交通還有汽車服務(wù),400mand800mwalkingdistancestobusandrail,respectively,formtheradiusofaneighborhood,,Citiesandtownsshouldbeshapedbyphysicallydefinedanduniversallyaccessiblepublicspacesandcommunityinstitutions城市和城鎮(zhèn)應(yīng)設(shè)計有廣泛可達的公共空間和社區(qū)機構(gòu),DuanysNewUrbanist“Transect”,ScientificAmericanMagazine,Citiesandtownsshouldbeshapedbyphysicallydefinedanduniversallyaccessiblepublicspacesandcommunityinstitutions城市和城鎮(zhèn)應(yīng)設(shè)計有廣泛可達的公共空間和社區(qū)機構(gòu),LeonKriersPrivateandPublicSpacesoftheNeighborhood,,,Urbanplacesshouldbeframedbyarchitectureandlandscapedesignthatcelebratelocalhistory,climate,ecology,andbuildingpractic

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論