SCI 投稿全過(guò)程信件模板一覽

1、SCI 投稿全過(guò)程信件模板一覽 （已搜索，無(wú)重復(fù)） 已有47人參與 小木蟲(金幣+1):獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)一下，鼓勵(lì)發(fā)有價(jià)值的話題邂逅浪漫:置為普通帖 2010-10-07 12:15邂逅浪漫:本版資源帖需先申請(qǐng)，由版主設(shè)置，詳見本版置頂 2010-10-07 12:16:44一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”.

2、 No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for pub

3、lication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated (簡(jiǎn)要介紹一下論文的創(chuàng)新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A   E-mail:

4、 ××××××××2) Name B   E-mail: ××××××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please dont hesitate to con

5、tact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the ri

6、ght time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿號(hào)), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to review

7、ers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewers comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name

8、: ×××E-mail: ××××××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof.（寫上負(fù)責(zé)你文章編輯的姓名，顯得尊重，因?yàn)榈谝淮蔚耐陡宀恢谰唧w負(fù)責(zé)的編輯，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers

9、 very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿號(hào)).We have studied reviewers comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments

10、. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××

11、;××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××四、修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號(hào)). Tho

12、se comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main

13、corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewers comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (簡(jiǎn)要列出意見)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (簡(jiǎn)要列出意見)Response: ××××××。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不

14、能有遺漏針對(duì)不同的問(wèn)題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語(yǔ)可適當(dāng)用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of .We are very sorry for our incorrect writing .It is really true as Reviewer suggested thatWe have made correction according to the Reviewers comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewers suggestionAs Reviewer sugges

15、ted thatConsidering the Reviewers suggestion, we have 最后特意感謝一下這個(gè)審稿人的意見：Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述Reviewer #3:    ××××××Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “” were corrected as “”2. Line 107, “” was added 3. Line

16、129, “” was deleted    ××××××    We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript.  These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked

17、in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.五、文章接受后可以考慮感謝一下負(fù)責(zé)你文章的編輯或主編（根據(jù)需要）Dear Prof. ××××××:Thanks very much for

18、 your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ×

19、;×××××××六、詢問(wèn)校稿信件（如果文章接受后時(shí)間較長(zhǎng)）Dear ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號(hào)), since the copyright agreement for publication

20、 has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,&#

21、215;×××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××××××七、文章校稿信件Dear Mr. ×××:Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號(hào)) for publication in “Journal Na

22、me”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:1. In * should be * (Page *, Right column, line*)2. In * the “*” should be “*” (Page *, Right column, line*)Answers for “author queries”

23、:1. *.2. *3. *We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: 

24、5;××E-mail: ×××××××× Dear Editor,We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled "GDNF Acutely ModulatesNeuronal Excitability and A-type Potassium Channels in Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons",which we wish to be considered for public

25、ation in Nature Neuroscience.GDNF has long been thought to be a potent neurotrophic factor for the survival of midbraindopaminergic neurons, which are degenerated in Parkinsons disease. In this paper, wereport an unexpected, acute effect of GDNF on A-type potassium channels, leading to apotentiation

26、 of neuronal excitability, in the dopaminergic neurons in culture as well as inadult brain slices. Further, we show that GDNF regulates the K+ channels through amechanism that involves activation of MAP kinase. Thus, this study has revealed, for thefirst time, an acute modulation of ion channels by

27、GDNF. Our findings challenge theclassic view of GDNF as a long-term survival factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons,and suggest that the normal function of GDNF is to regulate neuronal excitability, andconsequently dopamine release. These results may also have implications in the treatmentof Parki

28、nsons disease.Due to a direct competition and conflict of interest, we request that Drs. XXX of HarvardUniv., and YY of Yale Univ. not be considered as reviewers. With thanks for yourconsideration, I amSincerely yours,Dear Editor,We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled "Ca2+-bi

29、nding protein frequeninmediates GDNF-induced potentiation of Ca2+ channels and transmitter release", which we wishto be considered for publication in Neuron.We believe that two aspects of this manuscript will make it interesting to general readers ofNeuron. First, we report that GDNF has a long

30、-term regulatory effect on neurotransmitterrelease at the neuromuscular synapses. This provides the first physiological evidence for a roleof this new family of neurotrophic factors in functional synaptic transmission. Second, weshow that the GDNF effect is mediated by enhancing the expression of th

31、e Ca2+-bindingprotein frequenin. Further, GDNF and frequenin facilitate synaptic transmission by enhancingCa2+ channel activity, leading to an enhancement of Ca2+ influx. Thus, this study has identified,for the first time, a molecular target that mediates the long-term, synaptic action of aneurotrop

32、hic factor. Our findings may also have general implications in the cell biology ofneurotransmitter release.Dear Editor:Enclosed are copies of a manuscript entitled "BDNF and NT-4/5 Promote the Development ofLong-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampus", which we wish to be considered for publ

33、ication inNature. As you know, there is a great deal of interest and excitement recently in understanding therole of neurotrophins in synapse development and plasticity. Our manuscript provides, for the firsttime, the physiological evidence that neurotrophins regulate long-term potentiation (LTP). T

34、hemain point of the paper is that the neurotrophins BDNF and NT-4 induce an earlier appearance ofLTP in developing hippocampus. In contrast to recent Science article by Erin Schuman's group,we (and several other LTP groups) did not see that BDNF enhance basal synaptic transmission inadullt hippo

35、campus. However, we found that in adult hippocampus, inhibition of BDNF/TrkBactivity attenuated LTP, and weak tetanus that normally cannot induce LTP produced enduringLTP. These findings may have implications in the basic mechanism for regulation of synapsedevelopment and long-term modulation of syn

36、aptic efficacy.Because of the rather competitive nature of the field and the important implication of our findings,we have not yet presented this work in any public forum. However, confidential discussion withseveral prominent neuroscientists such as 111 and 222 have generated tremendous excitement.

37、Thus, we feel that this work is of general interest and is suitable for publication in Nature. Wewould like to suggest Drs. aaa of Yale Univ., bbb of Harvard Medical School, and ccc of Univ. ofCalifornia-Berkeley, as reviewers for this manuscript. Due to a direct competition and conflict ofinterest,

38、 we request that Dr. XX and YY. not be considered as reviewers.Thank you very much for your consideration.When your paper gets rejected without reviewDear Editor,I would appreciate if you could reconsider to review our manuscript, “111." Wefeel strongly that this is an important subject that to

39、uches one of the central dogmas inneuroscience: xxx. It is also very timely, given the publication of the paper by X and Yentitled “222” in the latest issue of Nature Neuroscience. In this paper, the authorsxxx. They claimed that xxx. When a paper this provocative has been published by ahigh profile

40、 journal like Nature Neuroscience, we believe that it is worth giving abenefit of doubts. It will be helpful if there are papers that consider other alternativeinterpretations, or attempt to replicate in the same or different systems.We have observed similar xxx, but we have a completely different i

41、nterpretation.We found that 1) xxx 2) xxx; 3) xxx. Thus, our paper raises the possibility that xxxreported by X and Y were due to xxx. Specifically, we would like you to consider thefollowing two issues: First, X and Y used aaa, while we used bbb. sssssssss. Second,ccc used by X and Y may not be so specific.In addition to the drastically different opinions regarding xxx, we feel that ourfindings on xxx is also significant in yyy and will be of interests to general readers ofNature Neuroscience. We therefore did not write our paper to dire