On the Characteristics of Noun Phrases in L2 EAP Writing_第1頁
On the Characteristics of Noun Phrases in L2 EAP Writing_第2頁
On the Characteristics of Noun Phrases in L2 EAP Writing_第3頁
On the Characteristics of Noun Phrases in L2 EAP Writing_第4頁
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、On the Characteristics of Noun Phrases in L2 EAP Writing【Abstract】ThispaperwillexaminetheChineseL2learnerscharacteristicsofnounphrasesintheirEAPwriting.TheresearchrevealsthatmoreproficientstudentsproducemorecomplexNPsintheiracademicwritingandtheproportionofNPswithpre-modifiersishigherthanthatwithpos

2、t-modifiers.【Keywords】nounphrases;EAPwriting;ChineseL2learners;modifiersI.IntroductionWhenstudentsenterintouniversities,theywillencounterwithawiderangeofchallengesanddifficulties.AlargeamountoftheseobstaclesincorporatebeingawareofthelinguisticfeaturesindifferentvarietiesofEnglish,etc.Totacklethesepr

3、oblems,theyneedtointerpretcomplexdiscourseindifferentregisters,suchasconversation,fiction,newsandacademicregisterBiberetal.,1999.AsBiber2020pointsout,mostuniversitiesfocusonindividualnarrationorpersonalopinioncompositionsanddoratherlittletocultivatestudentstodealwiththesewiderangeofregisters.Thefeat

4、uresofNounPhrasesintheseregistershavebeenidentified,including:phrasalmodifiersaremorecommonlyembeddedinNPsthaninconversation;andthefrequenciesoftheuseofNPsaremuchhigherinproficientstudentsthanthoseinlessproficientstudentsParkinsonandMusgrave,2020.ThesefeaturescanalsobeobservedinChineseL2:moreprofici

5、entstudentsproducedmorecomplexNPsintheiracademicwritingandtheproportionofNPswithpre-modifiersishigherthanthatwithpost-modifiers.II.NounphraseinEAPThefeaturesofNPsinacademicwritinghavebeenidentifiedinanumberofstudiesonwrittenregisters,suchasNPsaresignificantlymorecommonandpre-modifiersaremuchmorefreq

6、uentthanpost-modifiersinwriting.Buttherearestillsomecharacteristicsclarifyingacademicregister,whicharethatthefrequencyofNPsarethehighestinallregisters,theconstructionofNPsaremoreelaborated,thenotionsofNPsaremoreabstract,themeaningofNPsaremoreexplicit,andthestructureofNPsaremorecomplexBiberandGray,20

7、20.Thus,theincreasingdensityofitsstructureandmakethemmoreeconomicalParkinsonandMusgrave,2020.Furthermore,prepositionalphrasesaspost-modifiersareextremelycommoninacademicregisterupto80%ofpost-modifiers,whicharealmost7timesthanthoseinconversation.Innewsreportage,theproportionofprepositionalphrasesissl

8、ightlylessthanthatinacademicregisterBiberetal.,1999.Forotherpost-modifiersinacademicregister,theproportionofEDclausesisabout1thousandwordspermillion,whichisthelowest;INGclausesareabout2.5thousandwordspermillion;EDclausesareabout4thousandwordspermillionalmostthesameasappositives;relativeclausesareabo

9、ut11.5thousandwordsBiberetal.,1999.Comparerelativeclausesof11.5thousandwordswithprepositionalphrasesof70thousandwordpermillion,itiseasytoconcludethatnon-clausalphrasesaremorecommonthanclausalphraseinacademicregister.However,theaboveliteratureignoresthemostvitalstructuralfeaturesofNPsinacademicregist

10、erbecauseitselaborationheavilyreliesonphrasalratherthanclausal.NPswithpre-modifiersandpost-modifiersmayelaboratealargenumberofsentencesinacademicregisterBiberandGray,2020.Thesemodifiersprovidethewriterswithmorepossibilitiesofpackingandembeddingmoreextrainformationintotheheadnouns.Inthisway,itmightma

11、ketheNPsinformationmoreelaborated,thusincreasingthereadingspeedandboostingtheefficiencyofreadersunderstanding.III.NounphrasesinEAPL2writingAsnotedabove,professionalacademicwritingfeaturesmorecomplexNPs,morecompressedstructure,andmoreexplicitmeaning.Forstudents,especiallyL2students,theirabilitiestoha

12、ndlethesefeaturesbecomeincreasinglyimportant.Onepossiblereasonforthisisthatinthelasttwocenturies,thereisadramaticincreaseofNPswithmodifiers,andtheyareincreasinglyfrequentandproductiveinacademicregisterBiberandGray,2020.AsforL2academicwriting,thereisasignificantcorrelationbetweenL2literaryproficiency

13、andfrequencyofusecomplexNPsParkinsonandMusgrave,2020.ThereisalsoatendencythatthecomplexitiesofNPsaregrowinginbothnumberandtypeswiththedevelopmentofstudentsEnglishliteracyRavidandBerman,2020.Thus,thefrequencyofcomplexNPsisoneofareliableapproachtomeasuringL2academicwrittenlevel.ThedevelopmentofL2acade

14、micwritingfeaturesthetendencyfromcomplexclausestocomplexNPsBiberetal.,2020.Accordingtotheircomparisonof28grammaticalfeaturesbetweenconversationandL2academicwriting,NPsdevelopmentalstagesareproposed.ThehypothesizeddevelopmentindexforNPcomplexityinclude5stages:atthefirststage,L2featuresfinitecomplemen

15、tclauseswithoutanyNPs;atthesecondstage,itfeaturesNPswithadjectiveaspre-modifiers;atthethirdstage,itfeaturesNPswithnounsandpossessivenounsaspre-modifiersandOFphrasesandprepositionalphrasesaspost-modifiers;atthefourthstage,itfeaturesmoreNPwithnounsandpossessivenounsaspre-modifiersandprepositionalphras

16、esaspost-modifiersratherthanOFphrasetoexpressabstractconcepts;atthefifthstage,itfeaturesappositivesandmultipleprepositionalphrasesaspost-modifiersibid.IV.NounphrasesinChineseL2EAPwritingAssuggestedabove,lesscomplexnominalsaresignificantinlowerproficiencyofL2learnersacademicwritingandhighcomplexnomin

17、alsaresignificantinhigherproficiencylearners.ThisresultimpliesthatChineseL2learnersneedtoimprovetheabilitytoconstructcomplexNPsintheiracademicwritingwhentheydeveloptoadvancedproficiencylevels,whichmaybeoneofthemainissuesforthemLU,2020.However,thecapacityofengagingcomplexNPsisagreatchallengingforChin

18、eseL2learners.OnepossibleimpactonthisabilityisthenegativetransferofL1HeandNiao,2020.Thesenegativetransfersfeaturegrammaticaldifferencesbothinlexiconandsyntaxincludingnoarticle,noprefixorsuffix,nosingularorplural,notense,noSVconcord,etc.StatisticsshowthatthegrammarmistakesofChineseL2learnersmainlyinv

19、olveintheseaspectsGuo,etal.,2020.Furthermore,ChineseL2learnersmaylikelyencounterwiththedilemmaoftransferringtheChineseNPstoEnglishNPsorviceversa.OnepossiblefactorcontributingtothisissueisthatthesetwoNPstructuresareratherdifferent:ChineseNPsfeaturethestructure“modifiers+headnounwhichmeansthatallmodif

20、iersareplacedontheleftoronlypre-modifiersareallowedintheNPs,whileEnglishNPsfeaturethestructure“Determiner+pre-modification+headnoun+post-modificationandcomplementationBiberetal.,1999whichmeansthatbothpre-modifiersandpost-modifiersareallowed.However,thestyleoftransferringtheaboveChinesephrasetoEnglis

21、hphrasemaybevariableinL2:thehigherproficient,themorecomplex,themorecompressed,themoreexplicit,viceversa.Asaresult,thedifferentNPpatternsbetweenChineseandEnglishcancausemanyproblemsinacademicwriting.Thus,howtoovercomethesenegativetransfersandboostNPcomplexityinacademicwritingmightbeoneofthemainissues

22、forChineselearners.V.ConclusionToconclude,thecharacteristicsofnounphrasesindifferentregistershavebeenidentifiedinthispaper.Bycomparingwithdifferentregisters,nounsarefoundtobemorelikelyusedasnominalpre-modifiersinwritingthaninspokenones.Moreover,thefrequenciesoftheuseofNPsaremuchhigherinproficientstu

23、dentsthanthoseinlessproficientstudents.ThesefeaturescanalsobeobservedinChineseL2:moreproficientstudentsproducedmorecomplexNPsintheiracademicwritingandtheproportionofNPswithpre-modifiersishigherthanthatwithpost-modifiers.References:【1】Biber,D.2020.Universitylanguage:Acorpus-basedstudyofspokenandwritt

24、enregisters.Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.【2】Biber,D.andGray,B.2020.ChallengingStereotypesaboutAcademicWriting:Complexity,Elaboration,Explicitness,JournalofEnglishforAcademicPurposes,91,pp.2-20.【3】Biber,D.andGray,B.2020.Grammaticalchangeinthenounphrase:theinfluenceofwrittenlanguageuse,EnglishLanguageandLinguistics,152,pp.223250.【4】Biber,D.,Gray,B.,Poonpon,K.2020.ShouldweusecharacteristicsofconversationtomeasuregrammaticalcomplexityinL2writingdevelopment?TESOLQuarterly,451,pp.535.【5】Biber,D.,Johansson,S.,Leech,G.,ConradS.and

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論