英語(yǔ)考試閱讀題原文_第1頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試閱讀題原文_第2頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試閱讀題原文_第3頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試閱讀題原文_第4頁(yè)
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、第 第 頁(yè)英語(yǔ)考試閱讀題原文Well, no gain without pain, they say. But what about painwithout gain? Everywhere you go inAmerica, you hear tales ofcorporate revival. What is harder to establish is whether theproductivity revolution that businessmen assume they are presiding overis for real.The official statistics a

2、re mildly discouraging. They showthat, if you lump manufacturing and services together, productivity hasgrown on average by 1.2% since 1987. That is somewhat faster than the averageduring the previous decade. And since 1991, productivity has increased by about2% a year, which is more than twice the

3、1978-1987 average. Thetrouble is that part of the recent acceleration is due to the usual reboundthat occurs at this point in a business cycle, and so is not conclusive evidenceof a revival in the underlying trend. There is, as Robert Rubin, the treasurysecretary, says, a disjunction between the mas

4、s ofbusiness anecdote that points to a leap in productivity and the picturereflected by the statistics.Some of this can be easily e*plained. New ways of organizing theworkplace all that re-engineering and downsizing are only one contributionto the overall productivity of an economy, which is driven

5、by many otherfactors such as joint investment in equipment and machinery, new technology,and investment in education and training. Moreover, most of the changesthat companies make are intended to keep them profitable, and this need notalways mean increasing productivity: switching to new markets or

6、improvingquality can matter just as much.Two other e*planations are more speculative. First, some of thebusiness restructuring of recent years may have been ineptly done.Second, even if it was well done, it may have spread much less widely thanpeople suppose.Leonard Schlesinger, a Harvard academic a

7、nd former chiefe*ecutive of Au Bong Pain, a rapidly growing chain of bakery cafes, says thatmuch re-engineering has been crude. In many cases, he believes, theloss of revenue has been greater than the reductions in cost. Hiscolleague, Michael Beer, says that far too many companies have appliedre-eng

8、ineering in a mechanistic fashion, chopping out costs without givingsufficient thought to long-term profitability. BBDOs AlRosenshine is blunter. He dismisses a lot of the work of re-engineering consultantsas mere rubbish the worst sortof ambulance-chasing.55. According tothe author, the American ec

9、onomic situation is _.A not as good as it seemsB at its turning pointC much better than it seemsD near to complete recovery56. The officialstatistics on productivity growth _.A e*clude the usual rebound in a business cycleB fall short of businessmens anticipationC meet the e*pectation of business pe

10、opleD fail to reflect the true state of economy57. The authorraises the question what about pain without gain? because _.A he questions the truth of no gain without painB he does not think the productivity revolution worksC he wonders if the official statistics are misleadingD he has conclusive evidence for the revival of businesses58. Which of thefollowing statements is NOT mentioned in the passage?A Radical reforms are essential for the increase ofproductivity.B New ways of organizing w

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論