data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9075e/9075e9f8216e84228facf328fea76e936918e332" alt="施耐德供應(yīng)商管理流程_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b4b0/1b4b085904b14785c51329d0e07d0f0e3337d5b1" alt="施耐德供應(yīng)商管理流程_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64640/64640ac864872c332b2e92022f6dd8074d10b41c" alt="施耐德供應(yīng)商管理流程_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2feb9/2feb9462b09c6844bd15db27a694fab182dc3821" alt="施耐德供應(yīng)商管理流程_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55327/553277e9d5cbce7325634611ccb59b2f51f36ca7" alt="施耐德供應(yīng)商管理流程_第5頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
SchneiderSupplierManagementSAMSQMSPMSupplierApprovalModule(SAM)SSQMProcessforEvaluatingSuppliersSAM:ProcessFlowRequestinSSRM!!!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!Technological&designaudits
SSRM,SchneiderSupplierRelationshipManagement
SAM:SupplierAssessmentSupplierAssessmentQuestionnaireIdentifygeneralstrengths&weaknessesCommoditybasedEachlocationrequiresanewevaluationIdentifiedexperimentedpurchasingassessorsdesignedbythecommoditymanagertodoandcompleteAfterphysicalvisitatsupplierScoringbasedon‘
ObjectiveEvidence
’SpecificIF->THENscoringRecommendedornot!GlobalCompact
Sustainable
DevelopmentGlobalCompactGlobalCompact:
Global
CompactChartGlobalCompactisachartsignedbythecompaniesengagingthemtorespect10principlesGlobalCompact
SAM:FunctionalAuditsDetailedanalysisofsupplierMandatoryforquality&supplychainMadebycertifiedauditors(experience+training)ObjectiveDetermineifsupplierhastheabilitytomeetourneedsIdentifyfunctionalstrengths&weaknessesIdentifyimprovementareasIdentifyGeneralCapabilityLevelAdditionalauditsifneededTechnological,design…QualityLogisticSAM:TeamDecision“DoesSupplierhaveabilitytomeetourneeds?””AllfunctionsmustagreeEachhas??Veto??authorityNot??Consensus??votingIf““Approved”-TeamapprovesIf““Rejected”-TeamrejectsIf““ConditionalApproved”-ImprovementplanisrequiredIf““ConditionalRejected”-Improvementplanand2ndauditarerequiredGreen綠色色Yellow黃色色Orange橙色色Red紅色色DecisionforSAMcolor(Quality)SAM審核核顏顏色色確確定定(質(zhì)質(zhì)量量)Green:0reject,0condition,TotalScore>=18Original:≤2rejects,≤4conditionsTotalScore>=10Red:≥≥3rejects,≥≥5conditionsTotalScore<10Yellow:0reject,≤2conditionsTotalScore>=15SAMSAMDecisionofSAMauditRedsupplier:NotstartorstopbusinessOrangesupplier:notstartornonewbusinessgiven,improvementwithin6months.Yellowsupplier:Withinoneyear,mustmovetoGreen.IfnotmovetoorangeGreensupplier:Keysupplierarereviewedonceper1-2years(normally)CommodityManagertodecideIf““NO””-theprocessisstoppedIf““YES””:=S=tolistallweak/improvementpoints(Requestforactionplan)SuppliertofillintheactionstoRAP=S=toReview&ApprovetheRAPSuppliertoimplementtheRAPSAM:DecisiontoImproveSAM:ImprovementPlanMustbeshortterm(upto1year)SchneidermustverifyimprovementsAtSupplierlocationSuppliermustimproveOrlose“Conditional”ratingImprovementplanisdocumentedinSSRM(tobeimplemented)AfullauditisnecessarytoremoveCONDITIONALREJECTEDstatusSAM:SupplierApprovalResultsstoredelectronicallyinSSRMDatabaseSupplierAssessmentQuality&SupplyChainAuditsOtherAudits(ifany)ImprovementPlans(tobeimplemented)Resultsavailableacrossall=S=Approval->Supplierhasbeenevaluated,andshouldhavecapabilitytomeetourneeds(Foraspecificlocation/commodity)SAMSupplierQualificationModule(SQM)SSQMProcessforEvaluatingGoods&ServicesfromSuppliersTheSQMQualificationTeammustinclude(ataminimum):Engineering(ProductResponsible)QualityPurchasingManufacturing(LogisticsorIndustrial)AdditionalactorsfortheQualificationTeammayinclude:AdvancedManufacturingSupplyChainAdvancedQualityMarketingSafety,Health&EnvironmentalCorporateQualitySQM-KeyPoints:ProjectIntroduction:Descriptionofproject/activityInformationsharingRoughScheduleStartofPPEPFormThisisthefirststepintheSQMprocess->Whentherequestisinitiatedtoqualifyagoodfromasupplier.Atthisstep,theQualificationTeammeetstogethertodiscusstherequestMeetingorconferencecallReviewgeneralcharacteristicsofthegoodComplexdesign?Newtool?Samematerial?Sameprocess?OutputofthisstepisanestimateforthequalificationrequirementsandscheduleSSQM:SQMProcessFlowDetermineRequirements:AllFunctionalRequirementsMustConsider:ParttoSpecificationSupplierProcessCapabilityEnd-ProductFunctionalityInternalManufacturingProcessRecordRequirementsinPPEPFormThisisthesecondstepintheSQMprocess->ThedefinitionofthequalificationrequirementsAtthisstep,theQualificationTeamworksseperatelytodefineeachfunctionalrequirementsQualitydeterminescontrolplan,processFMEA,traceability,GaugeR&REngineeringdeterminescomponent&finishedproductfunctionaltestingManufacturingdeterminespre-productionbuildacceptancecriteriaetcTheQualificationTeamthenhasasecondmeetingtocombineallfunctionalrequirements,andlisttheserequirementsinthePPEPformSSQM:SQMProcessFlowSupplierReview:CommunicateRequirementstosupplierBeforesuppliermakessamplepartsAndbetter,beforequotationThisisthethirdstepintheSQMprocess->ReviewingthequalificationrequirementswiththesupplierItiscriticalthatthesupplierunderstandallofourfunctionalrequirementsBeforethesupplierfabricatessamples,orstartstodeveloptooling.Suppliermustknowourexpectationsbeforeanyinvestmentismade->tobecertainthatthegoodwillmeetourneedsThedeliverablesthatthesuppliermustcompletearedefinedatthismeetingFirstArticleInspectionReport,ControlPlan,etcThesuppliermustcommittoprovidingtheirdeliverablesSSQM:SQMProcessFlowCompleteActions:DOTHEWORK!ThisisthefourthstepintheSQMprocess->CompletingthequalificationrequirementsThisiswheretheSupplierandtheQualificationTeaminsurethatalloftherequirementsarecompleted,andsatisfytheacceptancecriteria.SSQM:SQMProcessFlowQualificationOK?:Question:AreallfunctionsOKwithsupply?All4‘‘considerations’’utilized?Readyforproduction?ProductioncannotbeinitiateduntilaftertheentireQualificationTeamagreesthateachrequirementhasbeensatisfiedThisdoesnotimpactpre-production->pre-productionbuildsarenecessarytovalidateseveraloftherequirementsThisdoesrequirethatbeforeapartcanbeconsidered??QUALIFIED??thatalltherequirementshavebeen??ACCEPTED??bytheQualificationTeamSSQM:SQMProcessFlowPRODUCTION:DocumentresultsinPPEPformPlaceproductionordersRetaininformationincomponentqualityrecordsatplantsPPEPFormTestResults….ProductionsignalstheendoftheSQMprocessTheQualificationTeamisdisbanded,andthequalificationprojectisclosedTheQualityManagementSystemforafacilitydeterminesthequalityoversightforthegoodSSQM:SQMProcessFlowNewPart/ProductEvaluationPlan(PPEP)SummarySheetWhatisaPPEPform?Apurchasingprojecttooltoselectallthenecessarypartfunctionalrequirements,alltheactorsinordertoqualifyasupplyandaprocess.WhentoestablishaPPEP?Atthestartofanypurchasingproject,normallybeforethesupplierchoiceandbetterbeforethequotationstep.Don’t’forgettoreadtheSAMauditsbeforechoiceasupplier.Whatisapurchaseproject?AuseofaNewSupplierARawMaterialChangeASupplierProcessChange(eg:Cr6Cr3)ASupplierLocationChangeADesignChangeAnOutsourcing<->InsourcingADifferentSchneiderManufacturingLocationAPartNon-Conformancesimprovement(likecorrectiveaction)WhoestablishaPPEPform?Thequalificationteamincludingatleastthefollowingfunctionswithavetoright:Engineering(ProductResponsible)QualityPurchasingManufacturing(LogisticsorIndustrial)WhoisresponsibletostartthePPEPprocess?TheprojectleaderWhoisresponsibleofthePPEPapplication?TheQualityDepartment.WhosignthethePPEP?Thesupplierbeforetostarttheprojectandthequalityresponsibleattheend.WhovalidatethePPEP?ThequalificationteamLinksbetweenSSQMandPMP
Selectionofsuppliersin“technologysuppliermapping”Verificationplaninclude:listofallcomponentsthatshouldbesubmittedtoverification,+PPEPselectedoperationstobeperformedforeachcomponent,+qualityspecificationsFinalcheckofqualificationaspectsduring“suppliercontractreview”SupplyQualification
ModuleQualificationreportreportofPPEPselecteditems(couldincludecomponentapproval)SupplierApprovalModulenewprojectfocussedonpartscomponentverificationSupplierPerformanceModuleSuppliercontractreviewmethods&toolsSupplierperformanceevaluationresultsSSQMSchneiderSupplierQualityManagementS.SRMapprovedsuppliersSuppliersforNewProjectDevelopmentande.designlabelCriteriaE.designcriteriaincludedifneededRequestCriticalitylevelSupplierPerformanceModule(SPM)SSQMProcessforMonitoringPerformanceofSuppliersSupplierPerformanceModuleTheSSQM-SPMSupplierevaluationprocessisacombinationofdailyandregularlyscheduledevents;Daily:Communication&resolutionofSupplierDelivery,QualityandCriticalIssuesbySupplierQualityEngineerandUpstreamFlowSupervisorMonthly:CompilemetricdataforKeySuppliersbySupplierLeaderandSupplierQualityManagementEngineerandSupplierSupplyChainManagementEngineerQuarterlyCommunicatemetricperformancevs.targettoKeySuppliersbySupplierLeadersYearlyAnnualreviewswithKeySuppliersoncurrentyearperformanceandfutureyearrequirementsbySupplierLeaderandMarketManagerTodaygloballyallthesuppliersaremonitoredwiththeSPM.ButeachCountryaremorefocusonsomecategoriesofsuppliers,suchas;TheKey&ChallengersuppliersThemainactivesuppliersThemostimpactingsuppliers...Additionally,CorporatePurchasingandOperatingDivisionPurchasingalsohastheresponsibilitytomonitor““Global”SuppliersacrossSchneider.TheCountryorganizationsmustprovideperformancedatatoCorporatePurchasingforthese“Global”SuppliersDefinitionofSupplierstobeMonitoredSupplierPerformanceModuleThereare5minimumSupplierperformancemetricsrequiredbytheSupplierQualityPolicyandSSQM;DeliveryDeliveryofProductvs.Lead-TimeQualityQualityofProductDeliveredProductivityAchievementofProductivityTargetsAdministrativeResponsetoSchneiderRequestsDevelopmentCompletionofImprovementPlansButonly3areusedtodayTheExternalSupplierServiceRate(ESSR)(Thequantityoforderlinesontime/thequantityoforderlinesexpectedinthesamemonth)*100(%)AftercommonacknowledgementbetweenthesupplierandSchneideronthedeliverydayoraccordingthestandardleadtime(Nomorethan7daysbeforeand)noonedayafterOnlyformassproductionandexcludingprototypes,samples,pilotrun,…TheDefectPartsperMillion(DPMe)FormulaandDefinitionDP1=(numberofdefectivesamples/totalnumberofsamplesinspected)*Totalnumberofpartsinthebatchorifasort,thetotalNCparts/totalquantityofthebatchx1000000DP2=numberofdefectivepartsfoundinmanufacturinglineDP3=numb
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 課題申報書多少字合適呢
- 課題申報書文獻(xiàn)引用格式
- 課程銜接課題申報書
- 高中課題研究申報書
- 小學(xué)語課題申報書怎么寫
- 咨詢個人合同范本
- Unit 3 Keep Fit section B 同步課時講練(含答案)七年級英語下冊(人教版2024)
- bt模式合同范例
- 制式房屋購買合同范本
- 出售工地叉車合同范本
- 日內(nèi)交易策略(TBQ版)
- 家校共育之道
- 部編版九年級道德與法治上冊《第二課創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展》同步測試題(附答案)
- DeepSeek入門寶典培訓(xùn)課件
- 充電樁投放合同范本
- 西安2025年陜西西安音樂學(xué)院專職輔導(dǎo)員招聘2人筆試歷年參考題庫附帶答案詳解
- 《作文中間技巧》課件
- 人教鄂教版六年級下冊科學(xué)全冊知識點(diǎn)
- 2024年湖南生物機(jī)電職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院單招職業(yè)技能測試題庫及答案解析
- (正式版)HGT 22820-2024 化工安全儀表系統(tǒng)工程設(shè)計規(guī)范
- 雙胎妊娠 PPT課件
評論
0/150
提交評論