![2022評估歐洲應對能源市場危機的選擇_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf4/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf41.gif)
![2022評估歐洲應對能源市場危機的選擇_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf4/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf42.gif)
![2022評估歐洲應對能源市場危機的選擇_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf4/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf43.gif)
![2022評估歐洲應對能源市場危機的選擇_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf4/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf44.gif)
![2022評估歐洲應對能源市場危機的選擇_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf4/29cd20de672cc93f82dca7740c019bf45.gif)
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
PolicyContribution
Issuen?17/22|September2022
ConallHeussaff(conall.heussaff@)isaResearchAssistantatBruegel
SimoneTagliapietra(simone.tagliapietra@)isaSeniorFellowatBruegel
GeorgZachmann(georg.zachmann@)isaSeniorFellowatBruegel
JerominZettelmeyer(jeromin.zettelmeyer@)isDirectorofBruegel
TheauthorsaregratefultoPantelisCapros,RebeccaChristie,MarekDabrowski,MariaDemertzis,NataliaFabra,AliciaGarcia-Herrero,MichaelGrubb,PéterKaderják,PawelKarbownik,DavidKleimann,MarieLeMouel,BenMcWilliams,Leonardo
Meeus,KarstenNeuhoff,JoannaMackowiakPandera,GeorgiosPetropoulosandNicolasVéronfortheircommentsonpreviousdrafts.
AnassessmentofEurope’soptionsforaddressingthecrisisinenergymarkets
ConallHeussaff,SimoneTagliapietra,GeorgZachmann,JerominZettelmeyer
Executivesummary
SinceRussia’sinvasionofUkraine,wholesalepricesforelectricityandgasintheEuropeanUnionhaverisenfivetofifteen-fold,withsevereimpactsforhouseholdsandbusinesses.Thecrisisisalsocreatingliquidityproblemsforenergycompanies,withcontagionrisksforthefinancialsector.
Inresponse,Europeangovernmentshavetakenarangeofactions.Somehaveintroducedmeasuresatretaillevel,whileothershaveintroducedwindfall-profittaxesonenergycompanies.Somecountrieshaveprovidedemergencyliquiditytoenergycompaniesfacingsoaringcollateralcosts.Someenergycompanieshaveevenbeennationalised.
Emergency-interventionproposalsshouldbeevaluatedagainstthreeprinciples.First,energysupplymustmeetdemandatpricesthatdonotcausemajordamagetotheEuropeaneconomy.Second,themostvulnerableconsumersmustbeprotected.Third,measuresshouldbeconsistentwiththecaseforinvestmentinasustainableenergysystem,inordertosafeguardEurope’sabilitytodecouplestructurallyfromfossil-fuelimports.
Gaspricecapshavebeenproposedasanemergencymeasureindifferentforms:acaponRussiangasonly,acapongasusedinelectricitygeneration,acaponallwholesalegas.Allentailsignificantrisks.ThefirstmightleadtoafullstopofRussiangasintotheEU.Thesecondmightincreasegasdemandfromtheelectricitysector.ThethirdmightraisegasdemandandalsoundermineEurope’sabilitytoattractmuch-neededgassupplies.Insteadofcappinggasprices,theEUshouldengagecollectivelywithexternalgassuppliersandnegotiatenewlong-termcontractswithprovisionstolimitpricevolatility.
ASeptember2022EuropeanCommissionproposalinvolvingelectricitydemandreduction,arevenuecaponinframarginalgeneration,solidaritypaymentsfromfossil-fuelcompaniesandconsumersupportmeasures,isbroadlypositive,notablybecauseitemphasisesdemandreduction.However,itisnotsufficient.Amorecomprehensiveplanneedstoensurethatallcountriesbringforwardeveryavailablesupply-sideflexibility,makerealeffortstoreducegasandelectricitydemand,keeptheirenergymarketsopenandpooldemandtogetabetterdealfromexternalgassuppliers.Inthelongerterm,measurestosplitthemarketsforenergygeneratedfromrenewablesandfossilfuelsshouldbeexamined.
Recommendedcitation
Heussaff,C.,S.Tagliapietra,G.ZachmannandJ.Zettelmeyer(2022)‘AnassessmentofEurope’soptionstoreduceenergyprices',PolicyContribution17/2022,Bruegel
1Introduction
Europe’senergymarketsareincrisis.Wholesalepricesforelectricityandgashaverisenfiveto15-foldsinceearly2021(Figure1).Thisisbeingfeltinretailpricesandwreakinghavoconhouseholds'disposableincomesandtheprofitsofenergy-intensivecompaniesprofitmargins,orisbeingabsorbedbyintermediaries,underminingtheirviability.Energycompaniesandtheirlendersareincreasinglyworriedbytheimplicationsofthisunprecedentedpriceshock.
Inresponse,manyEuropeangovernmentshaveintroducedmeasuresatretaillevel,includingretailpricecaps,regulatedtariffs,supportschemesforcompaniesandenergybillcredits.Somehavealsointroducedwindfalltaxesonenergycompanyprofits.Topreventdisruptionsintheenergysector,severalcountrieshaverecentlystartedtoprovidesubstantialemergencyliquiditytoenergycompanieswhichfacesoaringcollateralcosts.Somecountrieshavealsotakenstakesinenergycompanies,whileothershaveproceededwithnationalisa-tion.Thesepoliciesaredesignedtotacklespecificnegativeimpactsofhighwholesaleprices.
ActiontodirectlyinterveneinthegasandelectricitywholesalemarketsisalsobeingtakenatEuropeanUnionlevel,whichiswhatweanalyseinthisPolicyContribution.Weexaminethecausesofthecurrentveryhighwholesaleprices,highproducerrentsandpricevolatility.Wethenoutlinesomeprinciplestoguidemeasurestoreducepricesandrents.Variouspro-posalsforactionhavebeenmadeandweevaluateanumberofthese.
2Whatisbehindskyrocketingenergywholesaleprices?
TheprimarycauseforthemassiveincreaseinEUgaspricesisthatRussia,supplierofabout40percentofEUgasconsumption,hasreduceditsdeliveriestotheEUby80percent(uptoSeptember2022).Fearingthattheseflowsmightstopcompletely,countriesandcompaniesacceleratedtheirgaspurchasestoraisevolumesinstoragetosatisfactorylevelsbeforewinter2022-23.Ithasonlybeenpossibletomeetdemandforimmediateconsumptionandstoragethroughlargepurchasesofliquifiednaturalgas(LNG).WeeklyaverageLNGimportsintotheEUandtheUnitedKingdomhaverisento3.0billioncubicmetres(bcm)in20221comparedto1.8bcmin2021.Europe’sshareoftheglobalLNGmarkethasrisento30percent,upfrom20percentin2021(IGU,2022).EveryadditionalcargodrawntoEuropehasrequiredanotherLNGbuyertobeoutbid.
TherelativelyfewveryexpensivecargoesofLNGdrivethegaspriceformostofEurope.Thisisbecausenewdemand(egfromcompaniesthatneedtoreplaceRussiangas)andaddi-tionalsupplies(egfromLNG)aretradedatapricethatensuresthatalldemandmeetssupply–so-calledmarginalpricing.ShouldthewholesalegaspricebebelowthehighLNGpriceofLNG,theLNGwouldnotbesuppliedandthedemandfromconsumerswillingtopaythathighpricewouldnotbemet.
1Basedonthefirst36weeksoftheyear.
2PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
02/01/2020
02/02/2020
02/03/2020
02/04/2020
02/05/2020
02/06/2020
02/07/2020
02/08/2020
02/09/2020
02/10/2020
02/11/2020
02/12/2020
02/01/2021
02/02/2021
02/03/2021
02/04/2021
02/05/2021
02/06/2021
02/07/2021
02/08/2021
02/09/2021
02/10/2021
02/11/2021
02/12/2021
02/01/2022
02/02/2022
02/03/2022
02/04/2022
02/05/2022
02/06/2022
02/07/2022
02/08/2022
02/09/2022
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Figure1:TheEU'smaingaspricebenchmarkandGermany’sbaseloadelectricityindexhaveincreasedupto15-foldsincethefirsthalfof2021
EUR/MWh
Germanelectricitypriceindex**
Gaspricebenchmark*
Source:BloombergIntelligence.Note:*=DutchTitleTransferFacilityNaturalGasYear1Index,**=GermanBaseloadPowerYear1Index.
Therearevariousregionalshort-termmarketsinEurope.Pricedifferentialsovertimeandbetweenregionsprovideefficientsignalstotraderstostoregasorbringitwheredemandishighest.Inmanycases,thesepricesarealsopassedontoconsumers,evenforgasthathasbeencontractedformanyyears,becausemostlong-termphysicalcontractsdonotsetafixedprice,butonlyafixedvolume;thepricechangesdependingonswingsinthespotprice.Thisimpliesthatsellerswhosecontractsarelinkedtothespotpricearecurrentlymakingextremelyhighprofits(unlesstheyhavelockedinlowerpricesthroughforwardhedging).
Ontopofthislayerofphysicalcontracts,variousmarketplayers(importers/producers,traders,retailers,differenttypesofconsumers)hedgepricesonfinancialenergymarkets.Forexample,achemicalplantmighthavesolditsproductsforwardforayearatacertainprice,whilelockinginacertaingaspricethroughgasfuturescontracts2,toensureacertainmargin.
Theincreaseinelectricitywholesalepriceslikelyhastwomajorcauses.First,theincreaseinnaturalgasprices(alsocoalandlessprominentlyEUcarbonallowances)haspushedupthecostofelectricityproductionwhenthosecommoditiesareneededtomeetelectricitydemand.Anincreaseinmoreexpensivecoalandgas(34.3TWhand21TWhrespectively,seeFigure2),combinedwithadropintotalgeneration,hasmadeupthedifference(McWilliamsetal,2022).
2Whichpromisetopaythedifferencebetweenthedesiredpriceandthespotpriceatrealisation.
3PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
Figure2:ChangesinEUelectricitygenerationmixin2022vs2021*
TWh
0.0
-20.0
-40.0
-60.0
-80.0
-100.0
-120.0
-140.0
27.6
1.0
-28.2
23.1
-70.021.0
15.0
19.3
-2.0
-60.1
-3.1
NuclearHydroBiomassLigniteHardcoalOilGasWindSolarOthersTotal
Source:BruegelbasedonEnergyCharts.Note:*=firsteightmonthsofeachyear.
Insomesituations,evenincreasesincoalandgasgenerationhavenotbeenenoughtomeetdemand.Asaresult,priceshaveincreasedevenfurther,tolevelsatwhichconsumershavestoppedconsuming.Intheshort-termelectricitydemandisverypriceinelastic,sopricesareveryhighandsmallchangesinvolumecanleadtovolatilepriceswings(Box1).Spotelectricitymarketsoperateaccordingtothe‘pay-as-cleared’principle,meaningthatallsellersobtainthesamepriceirrespectiveofwhattheyoffered,andallbuyerspaythesamepriceirrespectiveoftheirbid.Pay-as-clearedimpliesthatthelastpowerplantthatisneededtomeetdemandsetsthepriceforalltransactions(marginalpricing).Ifthiswerenotthecase,marketplayersmightchoosetooffer/biddifferentlyfromtheirmarginal-cost/willing-ness-to-pay,leadingtoinefficientdispatch3.
Box1:Crisisinenergymarkets
Figure3illustratesthecrisisintheenergymarketscausedbyrapidlyincreasingwholesaleenergyprices.Theleftandcentrepanelsshowhowwholesalepricesforgasandelectricityaredeterminedbythecostofthemostexpensiveformofenergysupplythatistradedtomeetshort-rundemand(themarginalcost).Intheelectricitymarket,thisisoftenelectricityproducedbygas;inthegasmarket,itisexpensiveimportedLNG,becausehome-producedgasandgasimportedthroughpipelinesareinsufficienttosatisfydemandafterthe80per-centreductioninimportsfromRussia.
Theextremepricescausedbytheextremereductioningassupplyhavealsoledtoveryhighprofitsfortheproducersofenergyfromcheaper(‘inframarginal’)sources,suchaswindpower.Theright-handpanelshowswhypricesarebothveryhighandvolatile.Afterthesup-plycurvehasshiftedleft,demandintersectswithsupplyinanareaofthedemandcurvethatisverysteep.Asaresult,smallshiftsinthesupplycurvetotheleftorrightleadtoverylarge
3Consider,forexample,amarketinwhichsellersofferingelectricitybelowthemarket-clearingofferreceivedtheir
offerpricewhilebuyerspaytheaverageprice.Inthatcase,ownersofexpensivepowerplantscouldtrytogametheoutcomebyactingonbothsidesofthemarket:Offeringtheirpowergenerationathighpricesandatthesametimebiddingforelectricity.Theymightthenfulfilltheirdeliveryobligationbybuyingelectricityattheloweraveragepriceandsellingitatthehighofferprice.
4PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
Supplyshock
3
€/MWh
Demand
Demand
Gasprice(crisis)
Powerprice(crisis)
Super-normal
proits
Super-normal
proits
Gasprice(normal)
Powerprice(normal)
Gas
RemainingRussiangas
Non-gasgeneration
Othersupply
Exceptional
consumer
costs
Energyprice(normal)
Energyprice(crisis)
€/m
m
swingsinprices.Proposalscurrentlyunderconsiderationtoreduceexceptionalenergycostsfacedbyconsumersseektotaxorcapexcessprofitsandusetherevenuestoreduceenergybills.
Figure3:Addressingthecrisisintheenergymarkets
GasmarketsElectricitymarkets
LNG
3
MWh
p
Q
Source:Bruegel.
ElectricityspotpricesareinturnanimportantsignalfortheoptimaldispatchofpowerplantsintheEuropeanelectricitysystem;theyalsoserveasthebenchmarkforsettlingfuturescontracts.Hence,whilethecurrenthighpricesinthespotmarketaffectonlymarketpartic-ipantsthatdidnotpreviouslylock-inlowerprices4,expectedhighspotpricesnextyearhaveledtoincreasesinfuturesprices.
Itmightbearguedthatveryhighpricesandhighpricevolatilityinthewholesalegasandelectricitymarketsaretransitory,becauseelectricityandgasdemandcanbereducedoverthelongertermandmarketswillthereforesoonfindanewequilibriumatlowerprices.However,whathappensintheshorttermiscrucial.Highenergypricesdenthouseholdpurchasingpowerandindustrycompetitiveness,aswellasfosteringinflation.Thecapacityofgovernmentbudgetstosoftentheimpactonconsumersislimitedbythemagnitudeofexistingdebtandthevolumeofthepriceincreases.Ifgovernmentsweretofullycoverthecostofa€100/MWhpriceincreaseforgasanda€200/MWhpriceincreaseforelectricity,itwouldcostabout€1trillion,orabout6percentofEUGDP.Moreover,wildenergypriceswingsandpricesmuchhigherthanthoseatwhichriskmodelswerecalibratedoverpastdecadesraisefinancial-stabilityconcerns.
Policymakersmustthereforefindasolutiontotheproblemandconsequentlypreventasevererecession.IfnojointEuropeansolutioncanbefound,EUcountriesmightdecidetogobeyondmeasurestakensofarandmovetowardsmuchmoreintrusivemeasuresthatcouldunderminetheintegrityofthesinglemarket.
4BloombergdatasuggeststhatutilitiessuchasEngieandCEZsoldabout70percentoftheir2023productionalreadybeforeJuly2022(accordingtothisdata,Verbund,Austria’slargestenergyprovider,soldonly42percent).
5PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
Pricecap
onRussiangas
Short-termintervention
EuropeanCommission:inframarginalrevenuecap
Priceshockabsorber
Long-term
reform
Iberianexception:subsidyforgasgeneration
3Principlesagainstwhichtoassessproposedinterventions
Severalproposalshavebeenmadeoninterveninginmarketstomoderateprices.Anyinter-ventionshouldrespectthreeprinciples:
?First,energysupplyshouldmeetdemandatpricesthatdonotcausemajordamagetotheEuropeaneconomy.Interventionsshouldnotjeopardisesecurityofsupplybycausingamismatchbetweensupplyanddemand.Asituationinwhichsystemoperatorshavetocutconsumptionwouldbechaotic,especiallyinthetransnationalEuropeanenergysystem.
?Second,protectthemostvulnerableconsumers.Theprimaryaimistoreducetheenergycostforbuyers.Acriticalquestionishowbenefitsshouldbeallocatedtodifferenttypesofconsumers(industry,rich/poorhouseholds)indifferentcountries.Arelatedquestioniswhichsellers(Russiaorothergasexporters,Europeangascompanies,selectedtypesofelectricityproducersorcompaniesthatlockedinlowcosts),andinwhichcountries,shouldacceptlowerrevenues.
?Third,interventionshouldbeconsistentwiththecaseforinvestmentinasustainableenergysystem,tosafeguardEurope’sabilitytodecouplestructurallyfromfossil-fuelimports.Ad-hocmarketinterventioninthecashflowsofenergycompaniestodaywillbereflectedinthecap-italcostoffutureinvestment.Ifinterventionisperceivedasundulyaggressive,itwillbecomeverydifficulttomobiliseprivatecapitalatacceptablecostforthelow-carbontransition.
Ofcourse,theeffectivenessanddistributionalimpactsofanyproposaltointerveneinmarketswilldependonthespecificdetails.Forexample,thelevelofapricecap,orthetreat-mentofbalancingmarketscanalterdramaticallytheoutcomesofageneralconcept.Formostproposalsthathavebeenmade,specificdetailsarenotreadilyavailableatthisstage,andthismustbetakenintoaccountwhenevaluatingthoseproposals.
Weassesssevenproposalsforintervention,includingproposalsmadebytheEuropeanCommissionandsomenationalgovernments.Theycanbeclassifiedintermsoftheirtimingandintermsofthemarkettheyseektoinfluence(Figure4).Emergencyinterventionstoreducegasandelectricitypricesareshort-term,whileproposalstorestructuretheelectricitymarketswouldbelong-termreforms.Proposalstoreducethegaspricealsoaffectelectricitymarketsasgas-firedplantsfrequentlysetthemarginalpriceincurrentelectricitymarketdesign.
Figure4:Energymarketinterventionproposals
GasMarketElectricityMarket
Italianproposal:pricecaponallgas
Greekdualmarket/Liebreichdualmarket
Source:Bruegel.
6PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
€/MWh
Marginalprice
Gas
Coal*
Lignite
Remainingpro?t
Nuclear
Renewables
Spotprice
Revenuecap
signalpemains
*Coalisexcludedfromtherevenuecap
3.1TheEuropeanCommissionproposal
On14September2022,theEuropeanCommissionproposedaregulation“onanemergencyinterventiontoaddresshighenergyprices”(EuropeanCommission,2022).Itrestsonfourmainpillars:coordinatedelectricitydemandreduction,arevenuecapforinframarginalgeneration(withtheexceptionofcoal),a“solidaritycontribution”fromfossil-fuelcompanies,andconsumersupportmeasures.Atthecoreoftheproposalistheelectricitydemandreduc-tionplan,whichproposesamandatory5percentpeakhourelectricitydemandreduction,togetherwithacapontherevenuesnon-gasgenerators(excludingcoal)canearnintheelec-tricitymarkets.Revenuesabovethecapwouldbeusedtosupportvulnerableconsumers.Theproposedcapis€180/MWh,intendedtobalancerecoveryofexcessrevenueswiththeneedtoprovideacontinuedinvestmentcaseforrenewablegeneration.
Amajoradvantageoftheproposalisitwouldretainthepricesignalfordemandreduc-tionbecauseconsumerswouldcontinuetopaythemarginalpriceforelectricity.Signalsforefficientcross-borderexchange–preventinglocalenergyshortagesand/orlocallyextremeprices–wouldalsoremain.Policymakerswouldbefreetochoosewhichconsumerstheywouldsupport,andhowexactlytheywouldbesupported(egthroughdirectincomesupportorreductionoflevieschargedonenergybills).
Givendifferencesintheelectricitymixindifferentcountries,theadequacyofthissupportwilldependonwhetherrevenuesarecollectedanddistributedtoconsumersatnationalorEUlevel.Countrieswithlittleinframarginalproduction,suchascoalandgas-reliantPoland,willnotbeabletogeneratemuchrevenue.Therefore,toofferPolishconsumersthesameprotectionasconsumersincountrieswheresignificantrevenuescouldberaised,therewouldneedtobetransfersfromrevenue-richcountriestoconsumersinrevenue-poorcountries.
Onepotentialproblem,asshownbypreviousexperienceswithsimilarmeasures(eginItaly),isthedifficultyofcapturinginframarginalrents.Themainchallengeisdealingwithforwardcontracts,whichunderliemuchofthetransactionsinEuropeanelectricitymarkets.TheEuropeanCommissionproposalstatesthattherevenuecapshouldbeonrealisedmarketrevenuesonly.Ifcontractualobligationsrelatedtopowerpurchaseagreementsorforwardhedgesresultedinmarketrevenuesbelowthecap,theywouldnotbeaffectedbythemeasure.Asitstands,therearescantdetailsonhowthiskeyelementofthemeasuremightbeimple-mentedtechnically.Astheemergencymeasuresarefurtherdeveloped,considerationshouldthereforebegiventorelationshipbetweenspot-marketinterventionsandforwardcontracts.
Figure5:IllustrationoftheEuropeanCommissionproposal
Capturedinframarginalrentto
reduceconsumercosts
MWh
Source:Bruegel.
7PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
TheGermangovernment5hasproposedtoimplementdomesticallytheEuropeanCom-mission’sproposal(ifagreedatEUlevel)throughalevyonelectricityproducers.Adminis-tratively,thiswouldorganisedby‘inverting’theexistingrenewablessupportscheme.Therevenuesshouldhelptofinancea€65billionreliefpackagetosupportconsumersduringtheenergycrisis(which,ifaddedtopreviousmeasures,wouldbringtheGerman’sgovernmentfiscalinterventioninthisareato€120billionsinceSeptember2021).
3.2Gaspricecapproposals
Gaspricecapshavebeenintenselydebatedoverthelastmonths.Differentversionsofgaspricecapshavebeenproposed.
Oneversion,floatedbyEuropeanCommissionpresidentUrsulavonderLeyen6butnotpartoftheEuropeanCommissionproposalcoveredinsection3.1,isapricecaponRussiangasonly7.Thismeasurewouldrepresentasemi-sanctiononRussiaandwouldbeaimedatcuttingPutin’sgasrentwhileloweringthecostofRussiangassuppliestoEurope.However,sinceRussiahasalreadycutitsgassuppliestoEuropeby80percent,thismeasuremightnotbeasimpactfulasitcouldhavebeensomemonthsago.IftheNordStreampipelinewerere-openedandoverallflowsincreasedagain,themeasurewouldleadtosignificantcost
savingsforEurope.Howthosegainswouldbedistributedwoulddependonhowthepricecapisengineered.Forexample,permittingonlyaEuropeanpublicentitytobuygasfromRussiamightmakeiteasytocapturetherentanddistributeitaspoliticallydesired.
However,thecapmaynotresultinlowerwholesaleprices.IfRussiareactsbyfullycuttingsupplies,EUcountriesthatstillrelyontheflowswouldbeworseoffandthewholesalepriceinEuropemightincreasefurther.ThisiswhythoseEUcountriesopposethemeasure.
Figure6:IllustrationofapricecaponRussiangas
Demand
€/m3
Noimpactonelectricityprice
Marginalprice
Costsavings
LNG
Russiangaspricecap
Russiangas
Othersupply
m
3
Source:Bruegel.
TheseargumentsdonotimplythattheEUshouldnotattempttolowerthepriceatwhichgasissuppliedexternally.ItmakessensetoattempttopoolthemarketpowerofEUmembersbyactingasasinglebuyer(McWilliamsetal,2022).Butatthesametime,theEUneedstoengagecollabora-tivelywithfriendlyorpolitically-neutralexternalgassuppliers.WhiletheEUneedstosecuregasat
5Seethe3September2022agreementbetweenthecoalitiongovernment:
https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.
de/Content/DE/Downloads/Schlaglichter/Entlastungen/ergebnispapier-des-koalitionsausschusses.pdf?__
blob=publicationFile&v=4
.
6KateAbnett,‘EUtoproposepricecaponRussiangas,vonderLeyensays’,Reuters,7September2022,
https://www
.
/business/energy/eu-propose-price-cap-russian-gas-von-der-leyen-says-2022-09-07/
.
7MartinandWederdiMauro(2022),amongothers,havealsomadesuchproposals.
8PolicyContribution|Issuen?17/22|September2022
Electricitypricewithcap
Gaspricecap
Russiangas
Gas
Othersupply
Coal
RenewablesNuclear
3
MWh
LNG
m
areasonableprice,gassuppliersneedlong-termmarketvisibilitytobetterplantheirinvestments.TheEUmustpreparetolivewithveryloworzeroRussiansupplies,entailingthereplacementofmostofthe150bcmperyearthatRussiapreviouslyexportedtoEurope.TheEUhasachancetopoolthisdemandandtonegotiatelong-term,secureandaffordablecontractswithitsmainsup-pliers.WhileitisunlikelythatEuropewillorganisejointpurchasingofgasanytimesoon,itcouldbetheoccasiontousetheEUEnergyPlatform–establishedinApril20228–tobettercoordinateEurope’sposition(Boltzetal,2022).AfirststepistosetupadedicatedEU-Norwaytask-force9.
Asecondgaspricecapproposal,reportedlychampionedbyItaly10,wouldbetoplaceacaponallphysicalandfinancialtransactionsatEurope’sgashubs,includingtheDutchTitleTransferFacility(TTF)–Europe’sprimarygastradinghub–andonover-the-counter(OTC)tradingandexchanges(forsimilarproposals,seeNeuhoff,2022,andContiandPototschnig,2022).Suchacapwouldapplytomanylonger-termcontracts–includingthosewithGazprom–thatareindexedtotheTTF.ToensurethecapdoesnotcompromiseEurope’sabilitytoattractLNG,theproposalenvisagesacontract-for-difference(CfD)mechanismthatwouldreturntoimportersthediffer-encebetweentheinternationalpriceandthepricecap–withresourcesfromtheEUbudget.Thiswouldresultinlowerwholesalegaspricesandthuslowerelectricityprices.Moreover,lowerpricesandlowervolatilitymightreducemarginrequirementsforfuturescontracts,reducingtheliquidityneedsofenergycompanies.TaxpayerswouldhavetopayfortheCfDs,butshouldbemorethanpaidbackbylowerpricesandhencelowersubsidies.
Therearetwomainproblemswiththisproposal.Thefirstrelatestoimplementationandthesecondismorefundame
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025-2030全球工業(yè)彩色標簽打印機行業(yè)調研及趨勢分析報告
- 2025-2030全球嵌入式格柵熒光燈行業(yè)調研及趨勢分析報告
- 2025年全球及中國電腦鎮(zhèn)痛泵行業(yè)頭部企業(yè)市場占有率及排名調研報告
- 2025年全球及中國可編程玩具行業(yè)頭部企業(yè)市場占有率及排名調研報告
- 四川省宜賓市高三“二診”測試語文試題(含答案)
- 2025商場地產景區(qū)蛇年元宵節(jié)情人節(jié)發(fā)財(好巳花生主題)活動策劃方案
- 物流協(xié)議合同
- 智能環(huán)保設備研發(fā)生產合同
- 2025委托代銷合同樣本新范文
- 三方消防工程合同
- 《聚焦客戶創(chuàng)造價值》課件
- 公安校園安全工作培訓課件
- PTW-UNIDOS-E-放射劑量儀中文說明書
- 保險學(第五版)課件全套 魏華林 第0-18章 緒論、風險與保險- 保險市場監(jiān)管、附章:社會保險
- 許小年:淺析日本失去的30年-兼評“資產負債表衰退”
- 典范英語2b課文電子書
- 17~18世紀意大利歌劇探析
- β內酰胺類抗生素與合理用藥
- 何以中國:公元前2000年的中原圖景
- 第一章:公共政策理論模型
- GB/T 4513.7-2017不定形耐火材料第7部分:預制件的測定
評論
0/150
提交評論