云安全聯(lián)盟2022年SaaS安全調(diào)查報(bào)告_第1頁
云安全聯(lián)盟2022年SaaS安全調(diào)查報(bào)告_第2頁
云安全聯(lián)盟2022年SaaS安全調(diào)查報(bào)告_第3頁
云安全聯(lián)盟2022年SaaS安全調(diào)查報(bào)告_第4頁
云安全聯(lián)盟2022年SaaS安全調(diào)查報(bào)告_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩35頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

◎2022CloudSecurityAlliance-AllRightsReserved.Youmaydownload,store,displayonyourcomputer,view,print,andlinktotheCloudSecurityAllianceathttps://cloudsecurityalliance.orqsubjecttothefollowing:(a)thedraftmaybeusedsolelyforyourpersonal,informational,non-commercialuse;(b)thedraftmaynotbemodifiedoralteredinanyway;(c)thedraftmaynotberedistributed;and(d)thetrademark,copyrightorothernoticesmaynotberemoved.YoumayquoteportionsofthedraftaspermittedbytheFairUseprovisionsoftheUnitedStatesCopyrightAct,providedthatyouattributetheportionstotheCloudSecurityAlliance. 3 5 5 6 6 6 7 8 9 17 TheCloudSecurityAlliance(CSA)isanot-for-profitorganizationwithamissiontowidelypromotebestpracticesforensuringcybersecurityincloudcomputingandITtechnologies.CSAalsoeducatesvariousstakeholderswithintheseindustriesaboutsecurityconcernsinallotherformsofcomputing.CSA'smembershipisabroadcoalitionofindustrypractitioners,corporations,andprofessionalassociations.OneofCSAsprimarygoalsistoconductsurveysthatassessinformationsecuritytrends.Thesesurveysprovideinformationonorganizationsycurrentmaturity,opinions,interests,andactionsregardinginformationsecurityandtechnology.AdaptiveShieldcommissionedCSAtodevelopasurveyandreporttobetterunderstandtheindustry'sknowledge,attitudes,andopinionsregardingSaaSsecurityandrelatedmisconfigurations.AdaptiveShieldfinancedtheprojectandco-developedthequestionnairebyparticipatingwithCSAresearchanalysts.ThesurveywasconductedonlinebyCSAfromJanuarytoFebruary2022andreceived340responsesfromITandsecurityprofessionalsfromvariousorganizationsizesandlocations.CSA'sresearchteamperformedthedataanalysisandinterpretationforthisreport.ofsecuritytoolsforSaaSapplicmisconfiguration.Thisnumbercouldbeashighas63%asanotableamountwereunsureiftheirorganizationhadexperiencedasecurityincidentduetoaSaaSmisconfiguration.Thisfactisparticularlystrikingwhencomparingsimilardata20%UnsureonlaaSmisconfigurations;17%oforganizationsOrganizationsneedtoembraceautomationandcontinuousscanningfornotjustlaaSmisconfigurationsbutalsoSaaSmisconfigurations,topreventsuchsecurityincidents.Automationenablesorganizationstoremediatetheissueinreal-43%Yestime,sotheyaren'tleftvulnerable.Theleadingcausesofthesecurityincidentsaretworelatedissues:toomanydepartmentshaveaccesstotheSaaSsecuritysettings(35%)andalackofvisibilityintochangesintheSaaSsecuritysettings(34%).Thisfindingisnotsurprisingfortworeasons:1.LackofvisibilityintoSaaSsecuritysettingswasratedatopconcernwhenadoptingSaaSapplications.2.Onaverage,organizationshavemultipledepartmentswithaccesstosecuritysettings(seethesectiontitled"ResponsibleforSaaSappsecuritysettings"formoredetails).FortypercentoforganizationsreportthatdepartmentswithsecurityaccesstoSaaSappsarebusinessdepartments(e.g.legal,marketing,sales)thatarefocusedonperformingjob-relatedtasks.Oftentheylackthepropertrainingandfocusonsecuritytobemakingchangestosecuritysettings.1However,theyneedthislevelof1accesstotheSaaSapplicationtoperformtheirjob.Thismeansformultipledepartmentsandprovidethesecurityteamsinsightintosecuritysettingchanges.detect,prevent,and/orcorrectifanimproperchangehasoccurred.Overthepastyear,81%oforganizationshaveincreasedtheirinvestmentinbusiness-criticalSaaSapplications,butfewerorganizationsreportincreasingtheirinvestmentinsecuritytools(73%)andstaff(55%)forSaaSSecurity.ThischangemeansthereisanincreasingburdenontheexistingsecurityteamstomonitorSaaSsecurity.Asseeninanotherkeyfinding,theuseofautomationformonitoringSaaSsecuritycanhelptodecreasethispressure,butonly26%oforganizationsutilizethistechnology.Securityteamsarespendingmoretimemanuallyassessingsecurity,detecting,andremediatingmisconfigurations.Organizationsmustconsiderthiswheninvestinginbusiness-criticalSaaSapplicationsasthecurrentinvestmentpatternwillbeunsustainablelong-term.8◎Copyright2022,CloudSecurityAlliance.Allrightsreserved.OrganizationsthatutilizeanSSPMcandetectandremediatetheirSaaSmisconfigurationssignificantlyquicker.Mostoftheseorganizations(78%)checkedtheirSaaSsecurityconfigurationsweeklyormorefrequently.ComparethistoorganizationsnotutilizinganSSPM;only45%wereabletocheckweeklyormoreregularly.Whenresolvingthemisconfigurations,73%oforganizationsusinganSSPMresolveditwithinaday,and81%resolveditwithintheweek.Comparethistoorganizationsthatdon'tuseanSSPM;only36%resolvethemisconfigurationwithinadayand61%resolveitwithinoneweek.Takethisinformationtogether,andSSPMusersreducethetimetheirorganizationisexposedandlikelytoexperienceasecuritybreach.OrganizationshavechangedtheirinvestmentinSaaSapplicationsandsecurityoverthepastyear.However,investmentinbusiness-criticalapplicationsisoutpacinginvestmentinsecuritytoolsandstaffforSaaSapplications.Ifthistrendcontinues,organizationswillcontinuetosignificantlyoverburdenoverburdentheirsecurityteams.Organizations,onaverage,reportthatmorethantheITorsecuritydepartmentsareresponsibleforSaaSappsecuritysettings.Thetopdepartmentsresponsiblearesecurity(59%),IT(50%),andbusinessapplicationowners(40%),whichsignifiesmultipledepartmentsthatsitoutsideofsecurity.Whilebusinessapplicationownershavevalidreasonstohavethislevelofaccess,thesedepartmentslacktheproperknowledgeofsecurityandinterestinmaintainingtheapplication'ssecurity.ThisultimatelycancauseissuesforthesecurityandITdepartmentswhodo.ThebuinessepplieationownergsalesmerThemostcommonmethodformonitoringSaaSsecurityconfigurationsismanually(57%).Ofthoseorganizationsthatmonitormanually,63%performthisassessmentmanually.Thisisnotonlyatime-consumingtaskbutalsopronetohumanerror.Approximately1notmonitoringSaaSsecurityconfigurationsall.Thiscouldbeduetoamultitudeofreasons,oneofwhichmaybealackofresources(e.g.tooltoautomatemonitoring;manually).新建文本文檔.htmlsharing/storage(49%).Identityandaccessmanagement-e.g.Okta,Duo,ActiveDirectoryCommunicationandcollaboration-e.g.Slack,MicrosoftTeams,GoogleWorkspaceFilesharingandstorage-e.g.OneDrive,Dropbox,BoxVirtualmeetingplatforms-e.g.Zoom,Skype,GoToMeeting,WebexClouddataplatforms-e.g.AmazonRedshift,Snowflake,DruidCustomerrelationshipmanagement-e.g.Salesforce,HubspotEnterprisebusinessintelligence-e.g.Tableau,PowerBIElectronicsignature-e.g.DocuSign,AdobeSignTicketing-e.g.JIRA,ZendeskDaysweekly(23%).新建文本文檔htmlThetopareasofconcernfarecomplementarytheywanttoavoidacceOperationalResilience新建文本文檔htmlsameproblem.Thesecurityteamweretheabilitytodetectandauto-remediateSaaSmisconfigurations(54%)andvisibilityintopolicyviolationsinSaaSapplications(23%).reportedtheirSaaSsecurityimproved(51%),andtheysavedtimewithSaaSsecuritymanagementandmaintenanceCurren1.ProvidesecurityteamswithpropervisibilityintoSaaSappsecuritysettings,including3rdpartyappaccess,anduserpermissions.Thisvisibilityallowsmultipledepartmentstomaintaintheiraccesswithoutriskingi

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論