律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件論文：律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格律師執(zhí)業(yè)證書

經(jīng)典word整理文檔，僅參考，轉(zhuǎn)Word此處可刪除頁眉頁腳。本資料屬于網(wǎng)絡(luò)整理，如有侵權(quán)，請聯(lián)系刪除，謝謝！律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格律師執(zhí)業(yè)證律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件論文：書【中文摘要】律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件是制定律師制度的基礎(chǔ),律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制度的完善直接對選拔什么樣的人才進入律師隊伍產(chǎn)生直接的影響,這正是本文的最后落腳點。律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制度主要包括兩個方面的內(nèi)容,即律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格考試制度和律師執(zhí)業(yè)證書的取得制度。具備律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件是選拔律師人才的基礎(chǔ)其重要性自然就不言而喻。但是,在實踐中其重要性似乎并沒有充分表現(xiàn)出來。實踐中出現(xiàn)的對參加律師資格考試人員的選拔標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不嚴(yán)選拔標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一致,以及對于申請獲取律師執(zhí)業(yè)證書的人員疏于管理過于走形式等等都阻礙了我國,采用對比分析的方法分析了域外法律發(fā)達國家的律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制度,在剖析對比的基礎(chǔ)上,指出我國律師制度在此方面的不足之處借鑒國外在此方面的成功經(jīng)驗,從而提出一系列完善我國律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制,約2萬字,要從國籍條件、政治條件、業(yè)務(wù)條件和品行條件對我國現(xiàn)有的律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格制度一一總結(jié)和陳述通過剖析,得出我國現(xiàn)有的律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格制度的不足。第二大部分為國外律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制度的比較。律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格證書的獲取現(xiàn)狀。本部分主要包括英國、美國、德國、方法主要是從以下幾個方面闡述：現(xiàn)行的實習(xí)制度、現(xiàn)行的品行考察制度及其他相關(guān)規(guī)定總結(jié)出域外律師執(zhí)業(yè)條件制度的優(yōu)越之處。制度完善律師執(zhí)業(yè)資格考試,明確實習(xí)活動中的權(quán)利,規(guī)范律師業(yè)務(wù)實習(xí)的管理完善實習(xí)期限的規(guī)定和完善品行考察制度?！居⑽恼縇awyersconditionsarethebasisofformulatinglawyersystem,whoseimprovementdirectlydoinfluenceonwhichkindofpeoplebecomelawyer.sconditionsystemincludestwoaspects,namely,thebarexaminationsystemandthesystemforthelawyerstoobtainthecertificate.Whetherhavingtherequiredqualificationsisthekeyfactorofselectionfor’spersonnel,whoseimportanceisobvious.However,inpractice,itsimportancedoesntseemtobepaidenoughattention.Thepresentsituationinourcountryisthattheselectioncriteriaforlawyersdonotkeepinconsistenceandthereislackofmanagementonthepeoplewhoapplyforthepracticingcertificate,whichgreatlyhindersthedevelopmentoflawyersystem.ThispapermainlyanalyzestheshortagesofthepresentlawyersconditionsysteminChina.Withthecomparativeanalysismethodtheauthoranalyzestheforeigncountrieslawyersystem,onthebaseofwhichtheauthorputforwardaseriesofsuggestiontoperfectthelawyer’sconditionsysteminChina.Inadditiontoitsintroductionandpreface,atotalof25,000words,thispapermainlyincludesthreeparts,antthedetailsareasfollows:Thefirstpartisthepresentsituationofthelawyer’sconditionsysteminChina.Thissectionisdividedintotwoparts:thestatusofobtaininglawyerqualificationsandlawyerspracticecertificate.Theauthoranalyzestheshortagesofthereferredproblemsfromthenationalconditions,politicalconditions,businessconditionsandthebehaviorconditions.Thesecondpartisthecomparisonwith’sconditionsysteminforeigncountries.Thissectionisalsodividedintotwoparts:thestatusofobtaininglawyerqualificationsand’spracticecertificateinsomedevelopedcountriessuchasthepresentregulationsontheaboveproblemsintheUnitedKingdom,theUnitedStates,GermanyandFrance.Withcomparativeanalysismethod,theauthordescribestheadvantagesoftherelatedsystemsinforeigncountriesfromthefollowingaspects:thecurrenttrainingsystem,theexistinginspection