data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdc47/fdc478f1bfc34baaa200af3b1fe50da5ea659e9e" alt="美聯(lián)儲-債務(wù)靈活性 Debt Flexibility_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/236a2/236a2d413f270c754fd2cc370dc0a616e80fb3db" alt="美聯(lián)儲-債務(wù)靈活性 Debt Flexibility_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54db4/54db46ab4518dc7f97e3cc6022d22e584cb75c5d" alt="美聯(lián)儲-債務(wù)靈活性 Debt Flexibility_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dafa4/dafa488665097cfc193e77a8a0813d955865ca8b" alt="美聯(lián)儲-債務(wù)靈活性 Debt Flexibility_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/006d3/006d3a2b1f05a8ff6839dd3e1bcd270a88949f33" alt="美聯(lián)儲-債務(wù)靈活性 Debt Flexibility_第5頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries
FederalReserveBoard,Washington,D.C.
ISSN1936-2854(Print)
ISSN2767-3898(Online)
Debtlexibility
RhysBidder,NicolasCrouzet,MargaretM.Jacobson,MichaelSiemer
2023-076
Pleasecitethispaperas:
Bidder,Rhys,NicolasCrouzet,MargaretM.Jacobson,andMichaelSiemer(2023).“Debtlexibility,”FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries2023-076.Washington:BoardofGov-ernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,
/10.17016/FEDS.2023.076
.
NOTE:StafworkingpapersintheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(FEDS)arepreliminarymaterialscirculatedtostimulatediscussionandcriticalcomment.TheanalysisandconclusionssetfortharethoseoftheauthorsanddonotindicateconcurrencebyothermembersoftheresearchstafortheBoardofGovernors.ReferencesinpublicationstotheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(otherthanacknowledgement)shouldbeclearedwiththeauthor(s)toprotectthetentativecharacterofthesepapers.
Debtflexibility*
RhysBidder?,NicolasCrouzet?,MargaretM.Jacobson§,andMichaelSiemer?
November2023
Abstract
ThispaperdocumentsnewfactsonthemodificationofbankloansusingFRY-14QregulatorydataonC&Iloans.Wefindthatloan-levelmodificationsofkeycontractualterms,suchasinterestandmaturity,occuratleastoncefor41%ofloans.Crosssectionaldifferencesinmodificationsaresubstantialandamplifiedbyborrowerdistress.Relativetosingle-lenderloans,syndicatedloansare1.5timesmorelikelytobemodifiedandin-terestratechangesaretwiceaslikely.Ourfindingscallintoquestionwhether1)creditordispersionmakesloanmodificationsmorechallengingand2)relationshiplendingbe-tweenbanksandsmallborrowerscreatesmorescopeforflexibilitywhenborrower-levelconditionschange.
Keywords:Corporatedebt,Renegotiation,SMElending,Relationshiplending.
JELcodes:G21,G32,G33.
*ThismaterialreflectstheviewsoftheauthorsandnotthoseoftheFederalReserveBoardofGovernors.TheauthorsthankJakeScottandConnorBrennanforexcellentresearchassistance.Additionally,theauthorsthankparticipantsataseminarattheFederalReserveBoardforusefulcommentsandfeedback.
?King’sCollegeLondon,
rhys.m.bidder@kcl.ac.uk.
?NorthwesternUniversity,
n-crouzet@.
§FederalReserveBoard,
margaret.m.jacobson@.
?FederalReserveBoard,
michael.siemer@.
1
1Introduction
Theoriesrationalizingdebtasanoptimalfinancialcontractoftenemphasizetheimportanceofstate-contingentshiftsincontrolandcash-flowrightsbetweenlendersandborrowersaswaystominimizethecostsofstateverificationortostoptheborrowerfromdivertingfunds
(Townsend,
1979;
AghionandBolton,
1992;
HartandMoore,
1994,
1998)
.Consistentwiththesetheories,evidencefromrecentempiricalworkshowsthatdebtcontractsareindeedhighlystate-contingentsecurities,withpayoffsandcontrolrightsthatadjustinaflexiblemannertofirmoutcomes.Thisstate-contingencycanbepartoftheexantecontractual
design,asempiricalworkontheprevalenceofdebtcovenantshasshown(SmithJrand
Warner,
1979;
ChavaandRoberts,
2008;
Nini,SmithandSufi,
2009;
Chodorow-Reichand
Falato,
2022),butitcanalsoresultfromexpostrenegotiationoutsidethestipulationsofthe
initialcreditagreement(RobertsandSufi,
2009;
Roberts,
2015).Mostofthisevidencecomes
fromthesyndicatedloanmarketwheregroupsoflenders,oftenincludingbothbanksand
non-banks,providecredittoasingleborrowerunderacommonloanagreement.1
Whileimportantintermsofvalue,thesyndicationmarketistypicallyrestrictedtorela-tivelylargeandmaturefirmswhosecapitalneedsexceedthecapacityofanysinglelender.Bycontrast,thevastmajorityofcorporateloancontractsinvolveonebanklendingtooneborrower,particularlyforsmallerorlessmatureborrowers.Theliteratureonrelationshiplendinghaslonghypothesizedthatabenefitofsuchlendingarrangementsistheflexibility
bankscanofferborrowersasthefinancialconditionsofthelatterevolve(Boot,Greenbaum
andThakor,
1993;
BootandThakor,
2000;
Boot,
2000)
.Thisflexibilityisfacilitatedbythefactthatthereisasinglecreditorintherelationship,thuseliminatingfree-riderproblems
inherentinadjustingdebtcontractswithmultiplecreditors(BoltonandScharfstein,
1996)
.2
However,thereislittledirectempiricalevidenceonwhetherloansintheserelationshipsareactivelymodifiedorrenegotiatedafterorigination,assyndicatedloansappeartobe.
Inthispaper,weofferaunifiedperspectiveonlenderflexibilitybycomparinglargeandsmallborrowersalongwithawidevarietyofloans.Inparticular,wefillanimportantgapintheliteraturebyprovidingsomeofthefirstempiricalfactsabouttheflexibilityofsinglelenderloanstosmallerfirms.Insodoing,weshowthattherearenotablydifferentpatternsamongtheseloansthanamongthemoreheavilyresearchedsyndicatedloanpopulation.
OurevidencecomesfromtheFRY14-Q,aregulatorydatasetofcorporateloanportfolios
oflargeUSbanks.3
Forourpurposes,theFRY14-Qhastwomainadvantages.First,after
1ForanearlyanalysisoftheUSsyndicatedloanmarket,see
DennisandMullineaux
(2000).Formorerecent
evidenceonitsevolution,see
Berg,SaundersandSteffen
(2021)
.
2Indeed,
DennisandMullineaux
(2000)arguethatsyndicatedloanshavelowerrelationshipintensity,and
aregenerallymore"transaction-oriented"thansingle-lenderbankloans.
3MoreinformationontheFRY-14Q,alongwithreportingguidelinesandforms,isavailableat
https:
///publications/fr-y-14-qas/y-14-qas.htm.
2
theissuanceofaloan,thedatasettrackstheevolutionofkeyloantermsandrenegotiationeventsataquarterlyfrequency.Second,thedatasetcontainsbothsyndicatedandsingle-lenderloans,allowingustocomparetheflexibilityoftheselendingrelationships.
Wehavefivemainempiricalfindings.First,consistentwithexistingevidenceforthesyndicatedloanmarket,wedocumenthighloanmodificationratesoverall:afterorigination,41%ofallloansexperienceatleastoneexpostmodificationtoeithertheinterestrate(orspread,forfloatingrateloans)orthematurity.Aroundaquarterofloansexperiencetwoormoremodificationevents.
Second,syndicatedandsingle-lenderloansexhibitsharpdifferencesinthefrequency,type,andtimingofloanmodifications.Unconditionally,55%ofsyndicatedloansaremodi-fiedatleastonce,and37%aremodifiedmorethanonce,whiletheanalogoussharesare37%and20%,respectively,forsingle-lenderloans.Inaddition,modificationstosingle-lenderloansoverwhelminglyconsistofmaturityextensions.Thesetendtooccuronlyonce,andtypicallytowardstheendoftheinitiallycontractedmaturityperiod.Incontrast,syndicatedloanstendtoexperienceinterestrateadjustmentsoccurringthroughoutthelifeoftheloan.
Third,weshowthatmodificationratesrespondtotheonsetoffinancialdistressaslenderstendtogivefinancialslacktoborrowerswhenfinancialconditionsdeteriorate.Butthispropensitytomodifyloansinresponsetofinancialdistressissubstantiallylargerforsyn-dicatedthanforsingle-lenderloans.Forthesamechangeintheinternalratingoftheloan,andcontrollingforobservablecharacteristics,theincrementalpropensityforabankinoursampletomodifyinterestratesisapproximatelytwiceaslargeforasyndicationasforasingle-lenderloan.
Fourth,notwithstandingthehigherratesofmodificationsintimesofdistress,thelion’sshareofadjustmentsoccuroutsidesuchepisodes.Diggingdeeper,wediscusswhetherthefrequentmaturityextensionsthatoccurforsingle-lenderloansarerelatedto"evergreening",i.e.banksrollingovertroubledloanstoavoidacknowledgingrealizedlossesontheoriginalcredits.Whileloansindistressareindeedmorelikelytobeextendedthanaverage,themajorityofextensionsoccurforloansthatdonotshowsignsofdeterioration.
Finally,weexplorewhethercovenantviolationsaccountforthehighrateofloanmodifi-cationsobservedamongsyndicatedloans.Assuch,wemergethesyndicatedloansubsamplewithinformationoncovenantsfromtheSharedNationalCredit(SNC)register.Eventhoughmostcovenantviolationsrecordedinthemergedsampleleadtoaloanmodification,weshowthatmostmodificationsoccurwithoutanycovenantbeingviolated.Thus,themodifi-cationswedocumentforsyndicationsarenotalltheresultofexantecontractualprovisions.
Asimplebutpotentiallypowerfulexplanationforthefactthatsingle-lenderloansaremodifiedfarlessoftenthansyndicationsisthatexpostmodificationsinvolvecoststhatdonotscalewiththesizeoftheloan.Weshowthatthisexplanationhassomeempiricalpower,
3
inthatthereisaclearupwardslopingrelationshipbetweenloanmodificationratesandloansize,evenaftercontrollingforotherobservablecharacteristicsoftheborrower,andforlenderandsectorfixedeffects.However,wealsoshowthatthispatterndoesnotentirelyexplainwhysingle-lenderloansarelesslikelytobemodified.Therefore,factorsbeyondfixedcostsmayaffectthedegreeofflexibilitythatbanksarewillingtoprovidetheirborrowers.Wehypothesizethatforsmallbusinesslending,banksinoursampleprimarilyrelyonstan-dardizedproductsandhardinformation—astheydoinconsumercreditmarkets—whereas
syndicatedloansmakegreateruseofsoftinformationandtailoredcreditagreements.4
Thebroaderimplicationofourfindingsisthatflexibilityanddiscretionarelessfrequentlyexercisedinsingle-lenderborrowingsituationsthaninsyndications.Thatis,thesyndicatedmarketmaybebestdescribedasinvolvingaformofrelationshiplendingwithflexibility,whereasthesingle-lenderloanmarketmaybestbedescribedasinvolvingaformofarm’s-lengthlendingwithoptionstoextendtheloanuponmaturity.Thus,inthedatawestudy,theflexibilitybenefitsthatsingle-banklendingrelationshipshaveoftenbeenhypothesizedtogenerateforsmallbusinessesappeartobelimited,particularlywhencomparedtothoseaffordedtoborrowerswithsyndicatedloans.
RelationtotheliteratureWhiletherehasbeenextensivetheoreticalworkonfactorsthat
facilitaterenegotiationanditsimpactsonexanteincentives(BerlinandMester,
1992;
Bolton
andScharfstein,
1996;
KiyotakiandMoore,
1997;
DiamondandRajan,
2001;
Garleanuand
Zwiebel,
2009;
Zhong,
2021;
GlodeandOpp,
2023),empiricalevidenceontheincidence
ofloanflexibilityismorescarceandrestrictedtocertaintypesofdebtcontracts,either
bonds(Asquith,GertnerandScharfstein,
1994)orsyndicatedloans(RobertsandSufi,
2009)
.Thepaperclosesttoourworkis
Roberts
(2015),whichusesasampleofcreditagreements
collectedfrompublicfilingsofsyndicatedlenderstotraceouttheevolutionofcontractualtermswithinindividualloans.
Relativetothisliteratureontheflexibilityofdebtcontracts,wemakeseveralcontribu-tions.First,weprovidesystematicevidenceonthenatureandfrequencyofloanmodifica-tionsforalargecross-sectionofborrowers,notlimitedsimplytoparticipantsinthesyndi-catedloanmarket.Ourextensionbeyondthesyndicatedmarketisimportant,asweshowthatsyndicationsseemtoprovidemoreflexibilitytoborrowersthansingle-lenderloans.Thissuggeststhatcreditordispersionmaynotnecessarilyimplyalowerlikelihoodofsuc-cesswhenattemptingtomodifyloans.Furthermore,thenatureofadjustmentstoloansalsodiffersbetweensyndicatedandsinglelenderfacilities.
Inaddition,wedemonstratethatflexibilityismanifestedinabroadervarietyandawider
4Consistentwiththishypothesis,weconfirmthatinternalratingsaremoreresponsivetochangesinfinancialinformationaboutborrowersforSDthanforSLloans.
4
setofcontingenciesthanhithertoconsidered.Ourworkrevealsahierarchyofflexibility:
modificationsthatdonotrequiretheexecutionofanewcreditagreementversusthosethatdo.Inbothcases,asubstantialfractionofflexibilityoccurswithoutreferencetocovenantviolationsandcanthereforeberegardedasexpostrenegotiationorincompletenessintheoriginalcontract.Furthermore,loanmodificationsinourdataarenotnecessarilycompelledbyfinancialdistressandtypicallydonotoccurintimesofbankruptcyorwherebankruptcyconcernsarehigh(unsurprisingly,theyaremorecommoninsuchsituations).
Wecontributetotheimportant—andrecentlyactive—literatureoncovenantsindebtcontractsbyshowingthatloanmodificationsareacommonoccurrenceevenoutsideepisodes
wherecovenantsare(orlikelytobe)triggered.Analysesofcovenantsinclude(SmithJrand
Warner,
1979;
BeneishandPress,
1993;
ChavaandRoberts,
2008;
Nini,SmithandSufi,
2009,
2012;
Murfin,
2012;
BradleyandRoberts,
2015)andarecentreinvigorationby
Chodorow-
ReichandFalato
(2022).Thisextantworkhasshownthatcovenantviolations,orthethreat
thereof,arecommoneventsoverthelifeofsyndicatedloansandoftenleadtomodificationsintheloan’scontractualtermsthatinturnhaveconsequencesforbothfinancialandrealborroweroutcomes.Theprevalenceofmodificationsamongsingle-lenderloans,whicharelesslikelytobegovernedbycomplexcreditarrangementssuchascovenants,alsosuggeststhatthecovenantchannel,whileimportant,isnotthefinalword.
Furthermore,wedemonstratethatforlargesyndications,themagnitudesofadjustmentstoloantermsinmodificationsoutsidecovenantviolationsaresubstantialandcomparabletothoseimplementedaroundthetimeofviolations.Thus,totheextentthatcovenantsareregardedasimportantsourcesofadjustmentsinloanterms—asemphasizedby
Chodorow-
ReichandFalato
(2022)—theadditionalsourcesofflexibilityweidentifyarealsoworthyof
notesinceloanmodificationsarealsomorefrequentthancovenantviolations.Together,thisevidenceoncovenantsimpliesalowerboundonthestate-contingencyofloans.
Finally,wecontributetotheliteratureonrelationshiplending(LelandandPyle,
1977;
Diamond,
1984,
1991;
Boot,GreenbaumandThakor,
1993;
BergerandUdell,
1995,
1998;
Boot
andThakor,
2000;
BergerandUdell,
2002,
2006;
Boltonetal.,
2016;
Papoutsi,
2021;
Faria-e
Castro,PaulandSánchez,
2021)
.Ourcontributionistochallengethenotionthatexpostdiscretionisanimportantbenefitofrelationshiplendingcontractsforsmallbusinesses,whodisproportionatelyarerepresentedinoursingle-lenderloandata.Ifanything,ourevidencesuggeststhatsingle-lenderrelationshiplendingislessconducivetoexpostdiscretionthanlendingthroughorganizedsyndicates.Inthisrespect,thepapersclosesttooursare
Cole,
GoldbergandWhite
(2004)and
Bergeretal.
(2005),whichbothhighlighttheorganizational
difficultiesthatlargebanksfaceinscalinguptraditionalrelationshiplendingmodels,andwhichmayresultinreducedflexibilityforborrowers.
5
2Dataconstruction
SourcesOurmainsourceistheFederalReserve’sFRY-14Q,whichcontainsdetailedquar-terlydataontheloanportfoliosofbankholdingcompanies,savingsandloanscompanies,andintermediateholdingcompanies.Becausethesedataarecollectedprimarilyforstress-testing,onlyinstitutionswith$100billionormoreintotalconsolidatedassetsarerequiredtoreporttheFRY-14Qschedules.Thus,ouranalysisspeakstolendingbylargebanks.
WeuseScheduleH.1whichcontainsfacility-leveldataoncorporateloansandleases.Thepopulationislimitedtoloanswithacommittedbalancehigherthan$1millionasofthe
reportingquarter.5
Ourbasicunitofobservationisaloan-quarter.Weobserveinformationoncommittedexposure,interestrate(orspread),collateral,maturitydate,andwhetherthecreditagreementwasrenewedorrestatedintheprecedingquarter.Additionally,summariesofborrowerfinancialinformationandinternalloanratingsareavailable.MoreinformationonkeyvariablesinScheduleH.1isreportedinAppendix
A.1.1.
Weusetwoadditionaldatasources,whichwemergewiththeFRY-14QH.1:dataonthepopulationofchapter11andchapter7bankruptciesintheUS;anddataoncovenantsandcovenantviolationsforthesubsampleofsyndicatedloanswithinoursample,fromtheSharedNationalCredit(SNC)program.MoreinformationonthesedatasourcesandourmergewithScheduleH.1arereportedinAppendices
A.1.2
and
A.1.3.
Otherdatasourceshavebeenusedtostudyhowloansaremodifiedafterorigination,particularlyinthewakeofcovenantviolations.
ThesesourcesincludeDealscan(Roberts
andSufi,
2009),hand-collecteddatafromSECfilings(Roberts,
2015),andtheSNCdata
(Chodorow-ReichandFalato,
2022)
.Relativetothesesources,theFRY-14Qhastwomainadvantagesforstudyingloanmodifications:itcoversawiderswathofthefirmpopulation(includingnon-syndicatedborrowers)anditallowresearcherstotrackloantermscontinu-ouslyafterorigination,makingitstraightforwardtoobservemodificationstokeyloantermsthroughthelifeoftheloan.OnedrawbacktotheFRY-14Qisthatitcontainsnoinformationoncovenants.However,bymergingtheFRY-14QwiththecovenantreviewsubsampleoftheSNCdata,weobservecovenantsdirectlyforasubsetofsyndicatedloans.Asdiscussedin
Chodorow-ReichandFalato
(2022),loansinthissubsetareaccompaniedbyadditional
informationoncovenantcomplianceandbankresponsestoanyviolations.
SampleselectionandloanclassificationOurloan-quarterleveldatasetrunsfrom2012:Q3to2022:Q1.Weapplyanumberofselectioncriteriatotherawdata.Inparticular,wedrop
5ReportinginScheduleH.1isaggregatedatthecreditfacilitylevel,definedasacreditextensionunderaparticularcreditagreement.Acreditfacilitymaybedrawnorundrawn,itmayconsistofatermloanoracreditline,itmaybesecuredorunsecured,andsoon.Whenthesamefacilityprovidesformultipleextensionsofcredit(forinstance,creditlineswithdifferentinterestratesthatmaybedrawnatdifferentdates),thesemultipleextensionsareaggregated.Anobligormayhavemultiplefacilitieswiththesamebank.
6
anyloanstoborrowersinthefinancialandrealestate,construction,andutilitiessectors;
loanscarriedoff-balancesheetbyreportingbanks;loansforwhichthereisagapinthesequencebetweenthefirstandlastobservations;andloanswithmissingordifficulttointer-
pretinformationonkeyloanterms.6
Thefinalsamplecontains3.3mobservationsfor337kloansto136kdistinctborrowers.AppendixTable
A-1
describessampleselectionstepsindetailandreportsborrower-levelsummarystatisticsinthefinalsample.
Inwhatfollows,wewillfrequentlycontrasttwogroupsofloans:single-lender(SL)loans,inwhichasinglebankisprovidingcredittoaborrower,andsyndicated(SD)loans,inwhichagroupoflenders,oftenincludingbothbanksandnon-bankinstitutions,providecredittoaborrowerunderacommonloanagreement.ScheduleH.1asksbankstoreportwhethertheloanisaparticipationinasyndicatedfacility,andweusethisflagtopartitionourloans
intothesetwogroups.7
Becausedifferenttranchesofthesamesyndicatedfacility(say,creditlineandtermloan)mayhavedifferentcontractualterms,weincludetranchesasseparate
observationsinoursample.8
Wenotethatourdatawillgenerallynotcontaininformationonalltranchesofagivensyndication,sincetheymaybeheldbyinstitutionsnotsubjecttotheFRY-14Qreportingrequirement.Appendix
A.1.1.3
providesadditionaldetails.
SummarystatisticsPanelAofTable
1
reportssummarystatisticsontheloansinoursam-pleatthetimeoftheirorigination,forallloansjointly,andforSLandSDloansseparately.SLloansmakeupabout74%ofthetotalnumberofloansinoursample,thoughasof2019:Q4,theyonlyaccountedforabouttwo-thirdsoftotalcommittedexposurebyvalue.
PanelAofTable
1
showsthreemaindifferencesincontractualtermsbetweenSLandSDloans.First,SLloansaresmaller:themedianSLloanhasacommittedexposureatoriginationapproximatelyone-ninthofthemedianSDloan.Second,SLloansaremorelikelytobesecured,thoughthemajority(72%)ofSDloansarebackedbysomecollateral.Third,39%ofSLloansarefixed-rate,whileonly6%ofSDloansare.
WealsonotethattheaveragematurityatoriginationishigherforSLloans.Here,thesummarystatisticsreportedinTable
1
masksubstantialvariationbetweenthetwoloangroups.AppendixFigure
A-2
showsthatthedistributionofloanmaturityatoriginationhasalargemassatfiveyearsforSDloans.Incontrast,forSLloans,short-term(one-year)creditlinesareveryprevalent,asaretermloanswithmaturitybeyondfiveyearsatorigination.Wewilltakethisheterogeneityintoaccountinouranalysisbycomparingoutcomesofloans
6Forinstance,aloanforwhichinformationonmaturityisalwaysmissing,orforwhichtheoriginationdatedeclinesacrosstwoconsecutivereportingperiods.
7Specifically,weusetheFRY-14QvariableparticipationflagtoclassifyaloanassyndicatedifitslastobservationintheFRY-14Qisnot“No,notparticipatedorsyndicated".Weexcludeloansthatneverexitthesyndicationpipeline.Appendix
A.1.1.3
providesmoredetails.
8However,wehaveconductedrobustnesschecksthatrestrictthesyndicatedsampletotranchesidentifiedinScheduleH.1asbeingheldbytheagentorleadbankofthesyndication.
7
ofsimilarmaturitiesatorigination.
Finally,AppendixTable
A-2
reportssummarystatisticsattheborrowerlevel,andcom-paresthesesummarystatisticswiththeirequivalentinCompustatdataforthesubsampleofpublicborrowersinourdataset.LoansofCompustatborrowersare,onaverage,morelikelytobesyndicated,creditlines,floatingrate,unsecured,andhavemorefavorablefinancingtermsthanloansofnon-Compustatborrowers.
3Empiricalfindings
Thissectiondescribesourmainempiricalfindings.Westartwithunconditionalfactsaboutloanmodifications.Wethendiscusshowmodificationsrelatetoborrowerfinancialdistress.
3.1Unconditionalfactsonloanmodifications
DefinitionWedefinealoanmodificationasachangeintheloan’sreportedmaturitydate,ortheloan’sinterestrate,orboth,fromreportingquartert?1toreportingquartert.
Twothingsareworthnotingaboutthisdefinition.First,oursamplecontainsbothfloating-rateandfixed-rateloans.Forfloatingrateloans,theinterestratespreadisreported
explicitlywhichallowsustodetectinterestratemodifications.9
Forfixedrateloans,weusechangesintheoverallreportedinterestrate,asopposedtoachangeinthespreadmeasurereportedinTable
1.
Second,ourdefinitionofloanmodificationsonlyinvolvestwoofthefourkeyloantermsthatareobservableinthedata(interestrate,maturity,collateral,andcommitment).Thisisbecausechangesincommitmentorcollateralarerareandgenerallyoccuralongsidechangesineitherinterestrateormaturity,aswedocumentbelow.Focusingoninterestrateormaturitychangeshelpsstreamlinethediscussion.
Ourdefinitionofloanmodificationsisbasedonchangesinloantermsoverthelifeoftheloan.However,notallofthesechangesarenecessarilyassociatedwithamajoramend-menttotheexistingcreditagreement.Majoramendmentstoexistingcreditagreementsare
flaggedbyreportingbanks.10
Werefertotheseeventsasre-originationsanddiscusstheirrelationshiptoloanmodificationsinSection
4.1.2.
ModificationfrequencyOurfirstsetoffindings,onthefrequencyofloanmodifications,isreportedinPanelBofTable
1.Thistableisconstructedusingthedatacollapsedtotheloan
levelandreportsthedistributionofthenumberofmodificationsperloan.
9Incaseswheretheinterestrateonafloatingrateloan–––thesumofthebaseplusthespread–––issubjecttoaceilingorfloor,wedonotcountanadjustmentofthespreadinordertomeetthefloorasamodification.
10Bankswillexplicitlyupdatetheinitiallyreportedoriginationdateoftheloaninthesecases,acknowledgingthesubstantivenatureofthechange.
8
TherearetwomainpointstonoteinPanelBofTable
1.
First,unconditionally,41%ofloansexperienceamodification–––achangeineithermaturitydateorinterestrate–––overthecourseoftheirlife.Themostcommonpatternisfortheloantobemodifiedonlyonce
afterorigination.11
Second,SDloansareapproximately1.5timesmorelikelytobemodifiedthanSLloans,at55%and37%,respectively.Table
1
alsoshowsthatthebulkofthedifferenceisaccountedforbyloansthatundergoseveralmodifications:26%ofSDloansundergothreeormoremodifications,whileonly13%ofSLloansdo.
AppendixFigure
A-1
reportsatime-seriescorrespondingtoPanelBofTable
1.Here,we
usethefullloan-quartersampleandcomputethefractionofloansundergoingamodifica-tionineachreportingquarter.ConsistentwithTable
1,inanygivenquarter,thefractionof
SDloansundergoingamodificationissubstantiallyhigher(about20%,onaverage)thanthe
fractionofSDloansundergoingamodification(about10%,onaverage).12
Thesemodifica-tionratesarestableoveroursampleperiod,exceptforaspikeinmodificationratesin2020,
particularlyforSDloans,whichwasfollowedbyaslightincreasesincethen.13
Thus,overall,modificationsinkeytermsafteroriginationisaverycommonoccurrence.Moreover,relativetoSLloans,SDloansaremorelikelytoexperiencemodifications—andrepeatedmodi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 企業(yè)集資合同范本
- 合同范本甲方名字過長
- 農(nóng)村澆地用電合同范本
- 合伙辦鞋廠合同范本
- 合同范本橫豎
- 中介臨時勞動合同范例
- 協(xié)議購車合同范本
- 專業(yè)監(jiān)理安裝合同范本
- 吉利采購合同范本
- 廠房賃合同范本
- reaxys使用介紹課件
- 工程建設(shè)項目管理培訓(xùn)教材課件
- 2023年全國高中化學(xué)競賽預(yù)賽試題(山東省)
- 11-化學(xué)動力學(xué)基礎(chǔ)-2-考研試題資料系列
- 《簡愛》課本劇劇本
- 社區(qū)獲得性肺炎臨床路徑
- 產(chǎn)品品質(zhì)檢驗流程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)范模板()
- GB∕T 7260.40-2020 不間斷電源系統(tǒng) UPS 第4部分:環(huán)境 要求及報告
- 安全文明施工管理(EHS)方案(24頁)
- 水廠項目基于BIM技術(shù)全生命周期解決方案-城市智慧水務(wù)講座課件
- 幼兒園繪本:《閃閃的紅星》 紅色故事
評論
0/150
提交評論