全球供應鏈:十年混亂的教訓(英)-2024.3_第1頁
全球供應鏈:十年混亂的教訓(英)-2024.3_第2頁
全球供應鏈:十年混亂的教訓(英)-2024.3_第3頁
全球供應鏈:十年混亂的教訓(英)-2024.3_第4頁
全球供應鏈:十年混亂的教訓(英)-2024.3_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩46頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

04MARCH2024

ISSUE04/2024

WORKINGPAPER

GLOBALSUPPLYCHAINS:

LESSONSFROMADECADE

OFDISRUPTION

LUCALéRYMOFFATANDNICLASFREDERICPOITIERS

Thispaperexploresboththecharacterandimpactofthreerecentshockstoglobalsupplychains:theCOVID-19pandemic,theRussianinvasionofUkraineandtheUS-China

tradewar.Thesewerelargeshockswhichhavehadsignificantimpactsondomesticand

internationalsupplychains,buttheseimpactshavedifferedintheirlongevity,economic

impactandpolicyresponses.Weshowthatsupplychainswereremarkablyresilientagainstshocksofsuchmagnitude.However,thisresiliencewasalsoachievedthankstotheequallyremarkablesizeandscopeofpolicyresponsesandglobalsupplychainreorganisation.

Werecommendthatpre-emptivepoliciesmaybejustifiedtoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromfutureshocks.Giventheentanglednatureoftheseshocksandthattheireffectscontinuetoreverberate,weemphasisetheneedforextensivefutureresearchtounderstandthenatureoftheseshocksandtheeffectivenessofpolicyresponses.

LucaLéryMoffat(luca.moffat@)isaResearchAnalystatBruegelNiclasPoitiers(niclas.poitiers@)isaResearchFellowatBruegel

Recommendedcitation:

LéryMoffat,L.andN.Poitiers(2024)‘Globalsupplychains:lessonsfromadecadeofdisruption’,WorkingPaper04/2024,Bruegel

1

Contents

1Introduction 2

2COVID-19 2

2.1Timelineofeconomice?ects 3

2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages 6

2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath 7

3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine 8

3.1Energyshock 8

3.2Agriculture 12

3.3Inperspective:theshockandtheresponse 17

4TheChina-UStradewar 18

4.1TheTrump-Bidentradewars 18

4.2Thechipwars 19

4.3Theimpact 20

5Policylessonsfromadecadeoftradeshocks 22

References 23

2

1Introduction

Afterdecadesofrapidexpansionofglobalsupplychains,thelastdecadehasseenaseriesofmajorshocksthatdisruptedtheirfunctioning.TheChina-UStradewar,COVID-19andtheRussianinvasionofUkrainehavealldisrupted?owsofgoodsacrossborders,leadingbusinessleadersandpolicymakerstoquestionthewisdomofrelyingontheglobalnetworkofsupplychains.Asaresult,variouspolicieshavebeenenactedwiththeexplicitgoalofreshapingvaluechains,diversifyingoroutrightreshoringsupplychains.However,fundamentalquestionsaboutthenatureoftheseshocksremain.

Thispaperrevisitsthee?ectsofthreeshocksonthefunctioningofglobalsupplychains.We?rstlookatthedisruptionoftheCOVID-19pandemic,theninvestigatetheimpactoftheRussianinvasionof

Ukraine,beforediscussingtheUS-Chinatradedisputeandtheensuing‘technologicalcoldwar’.The

aimistoidentifylessonsabouthowpoliciescanadapttopreventdisruptionandtomitigatethee?ectoffutureshocks.Weareinterestedbothinthemagnitudeofshocksaswellastheirlastinge?ects.InthecasesofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkraine,themagnitudeoftheshockwasveryhigh,butdissipatedrelativelyquickly.Ontheotherhand,theUS-Chinatradewarhasbeenaprotractedshiftinglobaltrade,withenormousrami?cationsforsupplychainsandcitizens.Whilethelengthofashockdetermineswhethertheeconomicdamageisenduring,evenashortshockcancreate

signi?cantpolitical-economyproblems.Thismeans,thateveniflong-termgrowthtrendsarenotdisruptedforextendedperiods,theupheavalcausedbysuddenlargeshockmightstillwarrantthecostsofmitigationmeasures.

Meanwhile,themechanismsthroughwhichmarketsreactedwerequitedi?erentacrosssectors.Boththepandemicandthewarincreasedscarcityinmanymarkets.Whilethiswasoftendescribedas

‘shortages’,itwasnotalwaysashortageinthenarroweconomicde?nition.Economistsonlydescribesomethingasashortageifthepricemechanismbreaksdownandagoodbecomesunavailable,evenforthosewillingtopayahighprice.Highpricesre?ectingscarcityleadtoeconomicallye?cient

allocationofresourcesandsetincentivesfornewproducerstoentermarkets.Butthismechanismcanalsohavepoliticallyandeconomicallyundesirablee?ects.Forinstance,agovernmentmightwanttoprotectconsumersfrompricespikesinheatingcoststhatcouldpriceoutvulnerableconsumers.

Meanwhile,businessesthatfacehighpricevolatilitycouldstruggletoful?lcontractswith?xedpricesandriskreputationaldamageiftheytransmitpricespikestoconsumers.

ThispaperispartoftheReThinkGSCproject,whichstudieshowsupplychainsareadaptingtoaneweraofmorecontentiousglobalpolitics,climatechangeandthegrowingimportanceofservicesfortrade.

2COVID-19

TheCOVID-19pandemicwasamajorshocktotheworldeconomy.Inresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemic,countriesclosedtheirborders,andgovernmentsforcedfactoriesandpersonal-servicesproviderstoceaseoperation,andimposedlockdownsontheirpopulations.Amidlargeuncertainty,

3

companiesadaptedtheirsupplystrategiesandconsumersshiftedconsumptionpatterns.Meanwhile,governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedmajoreconomicstimulusprogrammestosupporttheireconomiesandmitigatetheeconomicimpactofthepandemic.Thiscocktailofeconomicshiftshadmajorglobalimplicationsandcreatedunexpectedcircumstancesforcompaniesengagedinglobal

valuechains.

Oncethepandemiceased,therewasamajordiscussiononwhethersupplychainshavebecometoofragile.Wearguethatsupplychainsprovedremarkablyresilientinthefaceofashockofsuch

magnitude.WhiletheoverlappingofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkrainemakea?nalassessmentdi?cult,thesupply-chainrelatede?ectsofthepandemicseemtohavedissipatedwithinonlyafewyears.Whilethemagnitudeoftheshockwaslarge,itwasrelativelyshort-lived.

2.1Timelineofeconomiceffects

InJanuaryandFebruary2020,countriesclosedtheirborderstoforeigntravellersinresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemicinChinaandtheglobalspreadthatfollowed.Asdomesticcasesgrew

exponentiallyregardless,countriesimposeddomesticlockdowns.BytheendofMarch2020over100countrieshadresortedtolockdownmeasures

1

,signi?cantlyimpactingtheabilityofthelocal

economytofunction.Evenwheremovementwasnotentirelycurtailed,householdsrestrictedtheirmovementsandbusinessesresortedtoworkingfromhome

2

.

Theensuingsupply-chaindisruptionsandnegativedemandshockmanifesteddi?erentlyacross

sectors.IntheEU,sectorsrequiringphysicalproximity,suchasthecreativeandhospitalityindustries,

wereimpactedseverely,whereasthepharmaceuticalanddigitalsectorssawrelativelysmallcontractions(DeVetetal,2021).Butoverall,the?rstwavesawsigni?cantincreasesin

unemploymentandreductionsinoutputfromimportantindustries

3

.

Governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedhugestimulusprogrammestosupporthouseholdsandindustry.Thesecameindi?erentvarieties.IntheEU,manygovernmentsfocusedonsustaining

existingworkrelationshipsbyimplementingjob-retentionschemes(ArnoldandKammer,2021).EUcountriesalsodisbursedstateaidtocompaniesofvariouskindstohelpthemsurvivetheeconomicdownturn.TheUS,ontopofothermeasures,disbursed$293billionincashhandoutstotaxpayersaspartofthe$2.3trillionCARESAct

4

.IntheEU,additionalspendingbymemberstatesin2020was

estimatedat3.3percentofGDP

5

.

1SeeBBC,‘Coronavirus:Theworldinlockdowninmapsandcharts’,BBCNews,6April2020,availableat

/news/world-52103747.

2ThiswasdocumentedforalargenumberofcountriesbytheGoogleMobilityReports,whichusedsmartphonedatatomeasurewherepeoplespendtheirtimeduringthepandemic.Availableat

/covid19/mobility/.

3ForasummaryontheEUduringtheearlypandemic,seeMarcusetal(2021).

4IMFCOVID-19policytracker,availableat

/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.

5SeeEuropeanCommissionmemoof3March2021,‘Questionsandanswers:Communicationon?scalpolicyresponsetocoronaviruspandemic’,

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_885.

4

2018-Q1

2018-Q2

2018-Q3

2018-Q4

2019-Q1

2019-Q2

2019-Q3

2019-Q4

2020-Q1

2020-Q2

2020-Q3

2020-Q4

2021-Q1

2021-Q2

2021-Q3

2021-Q4

2022-Q1

2022-Q2

2022-Q3

2022-Q4

2023-Q1

2023-Q2

2023-Q3

25

20

15

10

5

0

Ineconomicterms,thepandemicmeantasimultaneoussupplyandademandshock.Demand

decreasedbecauseofuncertaintyamongstconsumersandbusinesses,whichledtodecreased

investmentandconsumptionexpenditureoverall.However,thepicturewasmixed.Thesimpleinabilitytoacquirecertainin-personservicesdestroyedcertaintypesofconsumption,whereastheshiftto

remoteworkboosteddemandforICTgoodsthatenabledthedigitalisationofworkprocesses.Paralleltothenegativedemandshock,thecombinationofhighlevelsofuncertaintyregardingfutureincome,thesuppressionofconsumerspendingopportunitiesandincomeoremploymentsupportprovidedbygovernmentsledtoanaccumulationoflargesavings

(Figure1)

(Attinasietal,2021).Intheeuroarea,highersavingsweremostlydrivenbylowerconsumption(Dosscheetal,2021).

Figure1:Pandemic-periodhouseholdsavingsrate(%)

30

—EuropeanUnion-27countries(from2020)

—Euroarea–20countries(from2023)

Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetnasq_10_ki.

Thesupplyshockresultedfromdi?cultyinproducinggoodsariginsfromfactoryclosuresand

logisticalhurdlesinshippinggoodsacrossborders.Certaingoodsbecamedi?culttoprocure,as

demandforthemsurgedorbecausecrucialstepsofthesupplychainbecamedisrupted.Theinabilitytoacquirepersonalservicesledtoashiftofconsumptioninfavourofgoods

.Figure2a

showsthelargedropinconsumptionofboth(non-food)goodsandservicesresultingfromdomesticandforeign

disruption.Italsoshowsthequickrecoverymadebygoodsrelativetoservices.

5

2019-01

2019-05

2019-09

2020-01

2020-05

2020-09

2021-01

2021-05

2021-09

2022-01

2022-05

2022-09

2023-01

2023-05

2023-09

2015-01

2015-08

2016-03

2016-10

2017-05

2017-12

2018-07

2019-02

2019-09

2020-04

2020-11

2021-06

2022-01

2022-08

2023-03

2023-10

Figure2:Pandemicretailturnoverofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)andservicesintheEU27

140

130

120

110

100

90

80

70

(a)Retailsaleofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

(b)Serviceactivities

Accommodation

Foodandbeverageserviceactivities

Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetsSTS_TRTU_MandSTS_SETU_M.Note:Index(2015=100),Monthlydata,calendarandseasonallyadjusted.

Theincreaseindemandforgoodstogetherwithlogisticaldi?cultiesledtoasurgeinratesforfreight(UNCTAD,2021).Forexample,inLosAngeles,thesurgeindemandfortradedgoodstogetherwithhighnumbersofsickworkersduringthepandemicledtolongwaitingperiodsforshipsintheport

6

.Similarproblemswereexperiencedaroundtheworldandweredirectlyre?ectedinthecostsofshipping.

Figure3

showsthefreightratesfortheshippingofastandard40-footcontainerfromShanghaito

RotterdamandtoLosAngeles.TheshippingratesfromChinatoEuropeincreasedfromaround$2000tomorethan$14000,aseven-foldincreaseinthecost.

6AndrewO’Reilly,‘Stalledships,stressedcrews:CovidbuyingboomoverwhelmsLAports’,TheGuardian,11March2021,

/us-news/2021/mar/11/la-ports-stalled-ships-stressed-crews-covid-buying-boom.

6

16000

14000

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

Figure3:Freightrates($)

—WCIShanghaitoRotterdamper40footbox(USD)

—WCIShanghaitoLosAngeles

per40footbox(USD)

Source:Bloomberg.

2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages

Theincreaseinscarcityandhighercostsofgoodsproductionanddistributionweremanifestedinbothconsumerpricesandtheavailabilityofgoodstoconsumers.Aremarkableexampleofhowthese

phenomenamaterialisedwasinthemarketsfornewandusedcars.Anticipatinglowerdemandandthedi?cultyofprocuringparts,manymanufacturersdisinvestedtheirinventoriesandcancelledordersforinputssuchassemiconductors(Burkackyetal,2022).Butincontrasttoexpectations,consumerdemandforcarssurgedandcarcompaniescouldnotkeepupwithdemand,resultinginanapparent

‘shortage’ofchipsforcarmakers.Inthecaseofnewcars,thisledtolongwaitingperiodstoreceivenewcars,whilepricesremainedrelativelysimilar.Companiesdecidednottousemarketpricinginordertomanagetheirinventories,andinsteadoptedtoincreasewaitingperiodsforconsumers.Meanwhile,thesecond-handcarmarketdidnothaveanysuchrestrictions.Inthismarket,pricessurgeduntilmarkets

cleared.Figure4

showspriceindicesfornewandusedcars.Whiletherewasagradualincreaseinthepricesofnewcarsby19percent,pricesforusedcarssurgedrapidlyby57percent.

7

Figure4:UsedversusnewcarsCPI,UnitedStates

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

01/01/2016

01/05/2016

01/09/2016

01/01/2017

01/05/2017

01/09/2017

01/01/2018

01/05/2018

01/09/2018

01/01/2019

01/05/2019

01/09/2019

____Used

01/01/2020

01/05/2020

01/09/2020

01/01/2021

01/05/2021

01/09/2021

01/01/2022

01/05/2022

01/09/2022

01/01/2023

01/05/2023

01/09/2023

____New

Source:BruegelbasedonFRED.

Thispointstoaninterestingdynamic,withsomemarketsabletoreacttosupplyordemandshocks

throughpricing,whileothersareless?exible.Inmanycases,commoditypricessimplyincreased,

leadingtopricevolatilitybutnotshortages.However,whentherearepre-negotiatedpricesincontractsorreputationalrisksassociatedwithmassivepriceincreases(asisthecaseforcarmanufacturers),anincreaseinscarcitycanleadtoactualshortagesandlongerwaittimesfortheful?lmentofcontracts.

2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath

Pandemic-inducedpoliciesplayedamajorroleincreatingthemarketdistortionsexperiencedduringthepandemic.Closedbordercrossings,factoryclosuresand?scalstimulusplayedimportantrolesintheeconomicimpactofthepandemic,andtheimpactonsupplychainsspeci?cally.Therewasalsoanincreaseinexportrestrictions,inparticularformedicalgoods(Evenett,2022).Atthesametime,thereweree?ectivepolicyinterventionstomitigatethee?ectsofthepandemiconconsumersand

producers.Afterthebriefimplementationofaninternalexportrestriction,EuropeanUnion

policymakersshiftedquicklytocommonpolicieswhenitcametopandemic-relatedtrademeasures(Marcusetal,2021).IntheEU,‘greenlanes’wereestablishedthatenabledgoodsto?owacross

otherwiseclosedborders.

Whiletheshockwashuge,thepandemicisyettoleavealastingmarkintheglobaltradeindicators.

Tradeingoodsrevertedquicklytoitspre-pandemictrend,despitetheinitiallargedropinretailtradeandthepricespikesintheinternationalanddomesticcostsofshipping.Mostpandemic-inducedpricespikeshavecomedownandnormalised.In?ationhasnotreturnedtoitspre-pandemictrendineithertheEUortheUS,butthisispartlydrivenbythee?ectsofthewarinUkraine.

8

However,thepandemichasledtoarethinkingamongpolicymakers.IntheEU,thesinglemarket

emergencyinstrument(beingadoptedattimeofwritingastheInternalMarketEmergencyand

ResilienceAct,IMERA

7

)isintendedtoprovideasustainedlegalbasisforthetypeofmeasuresused

duringthepandemic.Itisintendedtomitigatetheimpactifanothershockofasimilarkindwereto

appear.Industrial-policyinitiativesliketheEuropeanChipsAct(Regulation(EU)2023/1781)are

directlymotivatedbytheshortagesexperiencedduringthepandemic,andtheperceivedrisksoflongvaluechainshaveincreased.Thepandemicexperiencehasalsocontributedtothenewwaveof

industrial-policyinitiatives,asgovernmentshavebecomemoreworriedaboutsupplychainsandtrytoreshoreproduction.LawsincludingtheIn?ationReductionActintheUSandtheEuropeanreactiontoit(undertheTemporaryCrisisandTransitionFramework,seeTagliapietraetal,2023)attempttolocalisemanufacturingofgoodsconsideredcritical,whichispartiallyjusti?edbytheneedforeconomic

resilience.Suchpolicyshiftsasaresultofthepandemicwilllikelyleadtoalastingchangeinglobalsupplychains,especiallygiventhefurtherimpetustosuchpoliciesstemmingfromRussia’sinvasionofUkraine.

3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine

Russia’sfull-scaleinvasionofUkrainestartingon24February2022cameduringaperiodofelevatedcommoditypricesandcausedrecordpricespikesincommoditymarketsforenergyandagriculturalgoods.However,theeconomicfallouthadunevene?ectsacrosscountries.Thosewithlarge

dependenciesonRussianorUkrainiancommoditiesandwithfewreadilyavailablesubstitutes

experiencedlargershocksthanthosewithmorediversi?edsupplychains.Thiswasparticularly

notableforinfrastructurallyconcentratedsupplychains,suchaspipelinegastotheEU.Theinvasionexposedthesemajorsupplychainrisksandhasbeeninstrumentalincausingashiftoftoneinthepolicydebatearoundtheriskstoglobalsupplychains,compoundingsimilarbutnascentrhetoric

duringthepandemic.Thisincludestrepidationaboutotherpotentialchokepointsinglobalsupplychains,tradediversi?cationandinfrastructuralinvestment,andageneral?urryofdiscourseandpolicyrelatedtotheideaofstrategicautonomy.

Inthissection,weexplorehowtheshockplayedoutinregionsthatwereexposedduetohigh-risk

supplychains.Wearguethattheinvasionwasalocalshock,sinceshockswerenotsointenseinareaswithmorediversi?edsupplychains.Wealsoanalysetheensuingpolicyresponse.

3.1Energyshock

Priortotheinvasion,EuropewasdependentonRussiaforasigni?cantproportionofitsenergyneeds.In2021,importsofRussiangasaccountedforalmost40percentoftheEU’stotalgasconsumption

8

.

7SeeCounciloftheEUpressreleaseof1February2024,‘SMEI/IMERA:CouncilandParliamentstrikeaprovisionaldealoncrisispreparedness’,

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/01/single-market-emergency-

instrument-council-and-parliament-strike-a-provisional-deal-on-crisis-preparedness/.

8SeeIEApressreleaseof3March2022,‘HowEuropecancutnaturalgasimportsfromRussiasigni?cantlywithinayear-

News’,InternationalEnergyAgency

,/news/how-europe-can-cut-natural-gas-imports-from-russia-

signi?cantly-within-a-year.

9

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

AlmostalloftheEU’sgaswasdeliveredthroughonlyfourpipelinesfromRussia:NordStream,UkraineTransit,YamalandTurkstream(Zachmannetal,2024).Thisrepresentedasigni?cantstakeintheEU’senergyinfrastructure,whichprovedtobeanmajorsystemicrisk.

Priortotheinvasion,theEUwasalreadyexperiencinganenergycrisisinthesecondhalfof2021

becauseofincreasedgasdemandfollowingthere-openingofeconomiespost-COVID-19

9

.TheRussianaggressionseverelycompoundedthecrisis,causingrecordenergyprices.Naturalgaspricesreachedhistorichighs

(Figure5)

inthesummerof2022becauseofthereductioninsupplyfromRussia,fearsofshortages,generaluncertaintyandlowoutputfromhydroandnuclearelectricityoutputinthe

summer(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).ThisledtoincreasedwholesaleelectricitypricesintheEU,passedthroughtohouseholdsandindustry,sincethemostexpensivetechnologydeterminestheelectricityprice(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).

Figure5:LastpriceTTFfutures(€/MWh)

Source:Bloomberg.

Incontrast,theUSsawlesspricevolatility(Figure6).LargeUSdomesticgasproductionandfewtiestoRussiaandUkrainegenerallymeantthattheUSwasinitiallyshieldedfromtheshock.TheHenryHubprice,theUSnaturalgasbenchmarkprice,eventuallyincreasedduetotheglobalgasmarkets,butnottothesamedegreeasinEurope.IntheabsenceofasystemicrisktotheUS’senergyinfrastructure,

thekindsofpoliciesthattheEUhaspursuedsincetheinvasionhavenotbeennecessaryintheUS.

9SeeCounciloftheEU,‘Energypricesandsecurityofsupply’,

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/energy-prices-

and-security-of-supply/.

10

Figure6:EuropeanvsUSnaturalgasprices(€/MWh)

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

20/07/201820/07/2019

20/07/202020/07/202120/07/2022

TTFHenryHub

20/07/2023

Source:Bloomberg.

Thereweresubstantialpolicyreactionstothisshock,inparticularintheEU.Thisincluded?scal

supporttoaidconsumersandindustryfacingelevatedprices,aswellastradediversi?cationand

investmentinenergyinfrastructuretodiversifyfromRussianenergy.Manyofthesepolicieswereofenormousmagnitude,showcasingtheproportionateresponseneededtoashockinahighriskand

essentialsupplychain.IntheEU,theimmediateresponsewastoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromthehighenergycosts.TotalenergysubsidiesintheEUincreasedfrom€216billionin2021to€390

billionin2022throughatleast230measurestoeasetheburdenofhighandvolatilepricesacross

economicsectors.Householdsandindustryreceivedthemajority

(Figure7)

(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidiesweredesignedtolowerthecostofenergytofacilitatedemandviataxmeasures,

incomeorpricesupportanddirecttransfers(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidieswerealsousedtocombattheenergycrisisthroughsupportingenergye?ciencyandsupportinginfrastructure,whichreceived250percentmoreinsubsidiesin2022thanin2021(EuropeanCommission,2023).

11

Figure7:EnergysubsidiesbyeconomicsectorintheEU27,€billions(2022prices),2015–2022

450

390

400

350

300

250

216

193195200

200

177174179

150

100

50

0

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2015

Crosssector

Others

Agriculture

Households

Industry

Transport

EnergyIndustry

Source:EuropeanCommission(2023).

TheEUhasalsopursuedmedium-andlonger-termstrategiestoreducetherisktoenergysupplies.

Sgaravattietal(2022)groupedtheEU’smulti-prongedapproachtotheenergycrisisintoenergydeals,infrastructure,energysubstitution,demandreductionandthedevelopmentofrenewables.TheEU

succeededinreplacingRussiangassupplythroughnewdeals,whichbytheendof2022,hadresultedinagreementsamountingto10.8billioncubicmetres(bcm)ofnewgassupplyin2023and47bcm

lateron,notincludingthe50bcmLNGimportvolumeplansfromtheUS.

NewinfrastructureinvestmentincludedexpandedLNGcapacity,theBalticpipelinebetweenNorwayandPoland,gasinterconnectorsand?oatingstorageandregasi?cationunits.Also,interestin

alternativesupplychainsbypassingRussianterritoryhasincreased.TheEuropeanBankfor

ReconstructionandDevelopmentannounceda$100millioninvestmentintheKazakhrailwaysystemtosupportthemiddlecorridor,analternativerouteavoidingthetrans-Siberianrailwaytotransport

goodsfromChina(Eldem,2022).

Thecombinationofpoliciesdescribedabovehasbeenbroadlysuccessful.Whilstitistoosoontofullyevaluatethesuccessofenergysubsidiesincombatinghistoricallyelevatedenergyprices,therearesignsoftheircontributiontotheEU’sresilienceduringthecrisis.EvidencesuggeststhatsubsidiestohouseholdswerewelltargetedintheEU,shieldingthemost-vulnerableconsumersfromthepass

throughofelevatedenergycosts(seeArreguietal,2022).Furthermore,industryoverallincreasedoutputandemploymentin2022

(Figure8)

.Ontheotherhand,industriesforwhichenergyinput

representsalargerproportionofproductioncosts,suchasthechemicalsindustry,experienceda

contractioninoutputinthethirdquarterof2022relativetothethirdquarterof2021(Sgaravattietal,

12

40%

2023).Finally,thedevelopmentofnewinfrastructuretoaccommodatenewsourcesofenergycontributedtolowergasprices,andhassecuredalow-riskanddiversi?edenergysupplyforthefuture.

Figure8:ChangeinEUindustrialoutput:Q32022vsQ32021

.

2.0%

0.0%

-2.0%

-4.0%

-6.0%

-8.0%

IndustrytotalManufacturingPaperChemicalsNon-metallicBasicmetals

minerals

OutputEmploymentHoursworked

Source:Sgaravattietal(2023).

TheEUexperiencedahugeshockrequiringanequallyhuge?scal,infrastructureandtraderesponse.

Thesepolicieswerelargelysuccessful,demonstratingtheEU’smulti-facetedresiliencetotheshock.Itshouldbeemphasisedthatthisresiliencecamewithalargepricetagthatitwouldbeundesirabletorepeat.

3.2Agriculture

AtthepointRussiainvadedUkraine,thetwocountries,alongwithKazakhstan,wereresponsiblefor25percentofglobalcerealexports,andRussiaandUkrainealonewereresponsiblefor12percentofallcaloriestraded(Zachmannetal,2022;Glauberetal,2022).RussiaandUkraineaccountedfor20

percentand10percentofglobalwheatexports,respectively,andarecrucialsuppliersofbarley,sun?oweroil,maizeandrapeseedtoglobalmarkets(OECDandFAO,2022).

Ukraineexported96percentofitsagriculturalproductsviatherobustnetworkofBlackSeaports

(USDA,2023).Russia’sinvasioninitiallyblockedallofUkraine’sportsforaperiodofalmostsixmonthsfromFebruarytoJuly2022.MajorportsincludingMykolayiv,MariupolandKhersonwereeither

a?ectedbythe?ghtingordestroyed(Zachmannetal,2022).

Likeenergyexports,agriculturalcommoditieswerealreadyatrelativelyhighpricesin2021andearly2022,asaresultofpass-throughofhighinputprices.Followingtheinvasion,globalfearsabout

Ukraine’sabilitytoharvestandexportagriculturalcommoditiescompoundedthesealreadyelevated

13

Eurospertonne

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

prices,leadingtorecordprices(De

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論