ACCA-超越流行語(yǔ)-在英國(guó)各行業(yè)嵌入系統(tǒng)的EDI方法 Embedding a systemic approach to EDI across the UKs professions 2024_第1頁(yè)
ACCA-超越流行語(yǔ)-在英國(guó)各行業(yè)嵌入系統(tǒng)的EDI方法 Embedding a systemic approach to EDI across the UKs professions 2024_第2頁(yè)
ACCA-超越流行語(yǔ)-在英國(guó)各行業(yè)嵌入系統(tǒng)的EDI方法 Embedding a systemic approach to EDI across the UKs professions 2024_第3頁(yè)
ACCA-超越流行語(yǔ)-在英國(guó)各行業(yè)嵌入系統(tǒng)的EDI方法 Embedding a systemic approach to EDI across the UKs professions 2024_第4頁(yè)
ACCA-超越流行語(yǔ)-在英國(guó)各行業(yè)嵌入系統(tǒng)的EDI方法 Embedding a systemic approach to EDI across the UKs professions 2024_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩175頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport1

Beyondbuzzwords

EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDI

acrosstheUK’sprofessions

Fullreport

AliceBell,February2024

ThisresearchwasconductedbyTheYoungFoundationonbehalfofacollaborativeof12professionalmembershipandregulatorybodies.

CIPDCIPFA\

TheYoungFoundation

isanot-for-profit

organisationdrivingcommunityresearchand

socialinnovation.Webringcommunities,

organisations,andpolicymakerstogether,

shapingafairerfuturethroughcollective

actiontoimprovepeople’slives.

Author:AliceBell

WithresearchcontributionsfromFranca

Roeschert,VictoriaBoelman,RichardHarries,

YasminWhite,JemHai,PhilipMullen,Chelsea

McDonaghandCarolineYang.

Contents

Foreword

4

Executivesummary

5

Introduction

7

Part1:Theuncomfortablereality

14

Part2:Exploringapproachestodrivechange

51

A:Isprogressstalling?

52

B:Whatworks?

61

Conclusionsandrecommendations

69

References

76

Appendix1:Detailedmethodology

78

Appendix2:Suggestedactionsfrommembersandlearners94

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport4

Foreword

Moreover,asprofessionalbodieswehaveauniqueopportunitytoleverageourcollectivevoiceand

influencetodrivesystemicchangeinthewider

businesscommunity.Thatdemandscollaborationwithotherorganisations,policymakers,and

stakeholders,andadvocatingforpoliciesand

regulationsthatfosterinclusionintheworkplace.

Wearealsocommitted-includingthrough

thisresearch-topromotingresearchanddata

collectiontobetterunderstandthechallenges

andopportunitiesassociatedwithinclusion,thusinformingevidence-basedsolutions.

Inconclusion,inclusionintheworkplaceis

crucial,andprofessionalbodiesarekeyagents

ofchange.Thedatapresentedinthisreport

highlightsthebenefitsofinclusionandtheurgencyofovercomingbarriers.Alongsidecommitmentsfromtheprofessionalbodies,andcallstoaction

forpolicymakers,wehopethisreportinspiresandempowersprofessionalsacrossthebreadthof

industrieswerepresent–andbeyond–totake

boldactionstowardscreatingworkplacesthataretrulyinclusive,enablingindividualstothriveandorganisationstoexcelintheincreasinglydiverseanddynamicworldwelivein.

Co-signedby:

AlastairMcCapra,ChiefExecutive,CIPR

AnnFrancke,ChiefExecutive,CMI

BruceCartwright,ChiefExecutive,ICAS

EdAlmond,ChiefExecutive,IET

GillWhite,ActingChiefExecutive,CII

HelenBrand,ChiefExecutive,ACCA

JohnBarwick,InterimChiefExecutive,CRL

LindaHausmanis,ChiefExecutive,IWFM

NickWelby,ChiefExecutive,CIPS

PeterCheese,ChiefExecutive,CIPD

RobWhiteman,ChiefExecutive,CIPFA

VanessaHarwood-Whitcher,ChiefExecutive,IOSH

Inclusionintheworkplaceisnotapassingtrend;

itisafundamentalnecessityforthegrowth,

progress,andsuccessoforganisationsintoday’s

interconnectedanddiverseworld.Atrulydiverse

andinclusiveworkplacevaluesandempowers

individualsfromallbackgrounds,fostering

collaborationanddrivingsuccess.

Researchconsistentlydemonstratesthat

prioritisinginclusionleadstobetteroutcomes.For

example,analysisfrommanagementconsultancy

McKinsey&Company(2015;2018;2020),

consistentlyhighlightshowcompanieswithdiverse

workforcesaremorelikelytooutperformtheir

industrypeers.Inclusiveenvironmentsenhance

employeeengagement,productivity,andinnovation,

unleashingthefullpotentialofindividuals.

However,significantchallengespersist.

Discriminationandunconsciousbiaseshinder

progresstowardinclusion.Astaggering72%

oftheprofessionalssurveyedforthisreport

highlightedexperiencingdiscriminatorybehaviour

intheworkplacesince2019.Thisnotonlyharms

individualsbutalsostiflesdiversityofthought,and

hindersorganisationalperformance.

Thisreporthighlightsthecriticalrolethat

Chartered,professionalandregulatorybodiesplay

inaddressingbarrierstoinclusionintheworkplace.

Asauthoritativeorganisationsrepresentingmore

than750,000peopleworkinginawiderangeof

professionsintheUK,wehavearesponsibility

toleadbyexampleanddrivepositivechange.

Professionalbodiespossesstheinfluence,

expertise,andnetworkstoadvocateforinclusive

practices,establishguidelines,andprovidesupport

totheirmembers.

Wearecommittedtohelpingourmembersand

theiremployerscreatewelcomingandequitable

workplaces.Throughtrainingandeducation,we

canensurememberspossessthenecessaryskills

tocultivatemoreinclusivecultures–implementing

strategiestoaddressbiases,fairhiringpractices,

andmentorshipprogramsthatboostprogression

andclosegaps.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport5

Executivesummary

Drawingonresearchwithmorethan7,000

membersandlearnersof12professional

membershipandregulatorybodiesacrossthe

UK,thisreportprovidesafreshlookathow

recenteffortstopromoteequality,diversityand

inclusion(EDI)havebeenexperienced,acrossandbetweenseveralprofessions.Itservesasacalltoprofessionals,andtheirrepresentativebodies,to

reflectontheiroutlook,conductand

collectiveactions.

Buildingonthelargebodyofexistingevidence,

thisresearchreinforcestheimportanceofEDIand

itspositivebenefitsforindividuals,organisations,

professionsandtheeconomy.However,the

findingsshowthattheprogressofEDIeffortshas

stalled.Inordertomoveforwards,itsuggestsa

newapproachisnecessary.Whilehighlighting

thepivotalroleprofessionalbodiescanplayin

catalysingchange,thereportalsoaddresses

thecommitmentsrequiredfromindividual

professionals,employers,andpolicymakersto

supportsystemicaction.

Arewestuck?

EDIisontheagenda,buttheuncomfortablerealityremainsthatnegativeexperiencesarewidespreadacrosstheprofessions.

?Almostthree-quartersofprofessionals

surveyedreportexperiencingbarriers

toprogressionintheircareer(73%)or

discriminatorybehaviourintheworkplace(72%)

?Negativeexperiencesaremorecommonamongthosewithmore‘marginalised

characteristics’

Ultimately,scepticismisgrowingamong

professionalsaboutthecapacityofEDIeffortsto

enactchange,withawidespreadperceptionthat

thereislotsoftalkbutlittlemeaningfulaction.

DisillusionmentwiththepracticeofEDIcould

meanthatprogresstodateisatriskofbacksliding:aroundone-fifth(22%)ofprofessionalssurveyedbelieveEDIreceivestoomuchfocuscomparedtootherissueswithintheirprofession.

?Thetestimoniesofprofessionalsshow

howexperiencesofmarginalisationare

livedinvariableandcomplexwaysonan

everydaybasis.

Professionalmembershipandregulatorybodiessetthestandardsofwhatitmeanstobeaprofessional

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport6

Weneedtobebrave

Thestakesarehigh:overhalf(53%)of

professionalssurveyedsaytheyhaveconsidered

leavingtheirprofessionand/ororganisation

becauseofissuesrelatedtoEDI.Yet,itwillbe

achallengetoenactthemeaningfulchanges

professionalswanttoseethroughEDIinitiatives.

Fosteringa‘racetothetop’

AsstallingprogressrisksEDIeffortsbecomingadisingenuous‘racetothebottom’,wesuggestprofessionalmembershipandregulatorybodiesholdakeyleverforpositiveactionandlasting

change.Theyhavethecapacityto‘raisethebar’forwhatitmeanstobeaprofessional,inrelationtothevaluesofequality,diversityandinclusion.Wesuggestactionsandcommitmentsfor

professionalmembershipandregulatorybodiestoensurethatthey:

1.PutEDIattheheartofwhatitmeanstobeaprofessional

2.Sethigherstandardsforprofessionals3.Activelyinvolveprofessionalsinchange

4.Becomerolemodelsforgoodpractice.

Thereisno‘onesizefitsall’solutionand‘what

works’willbedependentonthewaysinwhich

numerousfactorsarenegotiated–forexample:

?Howbesttodemonstrateyourcommitment

tochangeintheshort-term,whileenacting

changethataimstohavelonger-termimpacts?

?Howbesttoinvolvethosewithlivedexperience

ofmarginalisationininitiatives,without

burdeningthemwiththeresponsibilityto

drivechange?

?Howbesttobuildcoalitionsandalliances

acrossarangeofgroups,whileappropriately

recognisingtheirdifferences?

Strikingtherightbalancerequiresbravery,anda

newapproachthatreframeshowEDIisunderstood:

?Equality,diversityandinclusionmustbe

guidingprinciplesforalldecision-making–notjustforspecificinitiatives.

?Interventionsmustfocusonchangingthesystemsthatunderpinmarginalisation.

Employersoperationalise

thesestandardsinhiring

andpromotiondecisions,

andacrossitspolicies

andpractices

Professionalsenactthese

standardstofostermore

inclusivecultures

Thisreframingwillbenefitindividuals,their

organisations,professionsandtheeconomy.

Nonetheless,notallissueshighlightedinthisresearcharewithintheinfluenceandcontrolofindividualprofessionalbodies.Everybodymustplayaroleinenablingsystemicchange.The

inconsistentpatchworkofpositiveaction,

fromsomeorganisationsandprofessionals,mustbematchedbycommitmentsfromallactorsacrossthesystem,including(localandnational)policymakers.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport7

Introduction

Thisreportgrappleswiththeessenceofwhatitmeanstobeaprofessional,inrelationtoEDI.Itservesasacalltoprofessionals,andtheirrepresentativebodies,toreflectontheiroutlook,conductandcollectiveactions.

Thisbuildsonanestablishedagendathat

highlightsthecentralroleprofessionalsplayin

shapingtheUK’seconomy,deliveringsuccessandopportunityacrosstheworkforce.Aconcerted

efforttoimprovesocialmobilitythroughthe

professionsemergedaround15yearsago,withanactionplansetoutbythePanelonFairAccesstotheProfessions,chairedbytheRtHonAlan

Milburn.Recognisingthereisnosingledefinitionof‘theprofessions’,thePanel’sfinalreport(2009:p14)characterisedthesecareersastypicallyhaving:

?recognisableentrypoints–forexample,standardqualificationrequirements

?codesofethics–forexample,thatsetoutaspectsofprofessionalresponsibility

?systemsforself-regulation–forexample,settingandregulatingstandardsfor

professionaldevelopment

?astrongsenseofvocationandprofessionaldevelopment.

The‘Milburnreport’foregroundedthepotentialrole

oftheprofessionstodriveanewwaveofsocial

mobility,byopeningupaccesstothegrowing–

butincreasinglysociallyexclusive–professional

employmentopportunitiesacrosstheUK’s

economy(ibid).Whileprogressin2012wasfound

tobea‘sporadic’and‘haphazard’‘lottery’,inthe

midstofrecoveryfromtheglobalfinancialcrisis,

risinginequalityremainedadeepsocialconcern

acrossbroadpublicandpoliticalopinion(Milburn,

2012:p.29).

Thiscontextresonateswiththecurrentdriveto

enactchangethroughtheprofessions,ledbya

collaborativegroupofprofessionalmembership

andregulatorybodies.Thiscollaborativewas

formedinresponsetotheeconomicchallenges

presentedbytheCovidpandemic,aimingtohelp

peoplegetbackintoworkandprogressintheir

professionsbyconnectinglearners,employersand

educationproviderswithopportunitiestoupskill

andretrain.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport8

Thecollaborativehassinceincreasedinnumber,representingevermoreprofessionals1anddifferenttypesofprofessionalbodies:

ACCA(theAssociationofChartered

CertifiedAccountants),agloballyrecognisedprofessionalaccountancybodyproviding

qualificationsandadvancingstandardsinaccountancyworldwide.

TheCharteredInsuranceInstitute(CII)isa

professionalbodydedicatedtobuildingpublictrustintheinsuranceandfinancialplanningprofession,withacommittmenttodriving

confidenceinthepowerofprofessional

standards:competence,integrityandcareforthecustomer.

CILExRegulation(CRL)istheindependentlegalregulatorforcharteredlegalexecutives,CILEXmembership,CILEXPractitioners

andfirms.Theyworkwiththeirregulatedcommunitytoensurethattheydeliverthebestoutcomesforclients.

TheCharteredInstituteofPersonnelandDevelopment(CIPD)istheprofessional

bodyforHRandpeopledevelopment,

championingbetterworkandworkinglivesforover100years.

TheCharteredInstituteofPublicFinanceandAccountancy(CIPFA)isaUK-basedinternationalaccountancymembershipandstandard-settingbody,theonlysuchbodygloballydedicatedtopublic

financialmanagement.

TheCharteredInstituteofPublic

Relations(CIPR)istheworld’sonlyRoyal

Charteredprofessionalbodyforpublic

relationspractitionerswithover10,000

members.Theyadvanceandpromote

professionalismandstandardsinpublic

relationsbymakingitsmembersaccountabletotheiremployersandthepublicthroughitscodeofconductaswellasthroughtraining,qualifications,andaccreditation.

TheCharteredInstituteofProcurement

andSupply(CIPS)istheglobalmembershiporganisationforprocurementandsupply,

drivingpositivechangeacrosstheprofession.

Theyprovideeducationandtoolsfor

members.Andtheyareavoiceandstandard,buildinganetworkacrosstheglobe.

TheCharteredManagementInstitute(CMI)

istheCharteredprofessionalbodyfor

managementandleadership.Theirmissionistoimprovethequalityandthenumberofprofessionallyqualifiedmanagersinordertocreatebetterledandmanagedorganisations.

TheInstituteofCharteredAccountantsofScotland(ICAS)isaglobalprofessional

membershiporganisationandbusiness

networkforCharteredAccountants.Theyarealsoaneducator,regulator,examinerandaprofessionalawardingbody.

TheInstitutionofEngineeringand

Technology(IET)inspire,informandinfluencetheglobalengineeringandtechnology

communitytoengineerabetterworld.

TheInstitutionofOccupationalSafetyandHealth(IOSH)istheCharteredbodyfor

occupationalsafetyandhealthprofessionals

worldwide;aregisteredcharitywith

internationalNGOstatus.

TheInstituteofWorkplaceandFacilities

Management(IWFM)isthebodyfor

workplaceandfacilitiesprofessionals.Theyempowerandenablememberstoexpand

theirpotentialandhaverewarding,impactfulcareersasbusinessenablerswhotransformorganisationsandenhanceexperience.

1Theprofessionalscoveredinthisresearchare:accountants,

legalexecutives,paralegals,insurancebrokers,underwriters,claims

professionals,financialplanners,paraplanners,mortgagebrokers,

humanresourcespersonnel,publicrelationsprofessionals,managers

procurementandsupplyprofessionals,engineeringandtechnology

professionals,occupationalsafetyandhealthprofessional,andworkplaceandfacilitiesprofessionals.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport9

Whilethe‘Milburnreport’narrowlyfocusedon

improvingaccesstotheprofessions,thescopeofconcernamongtheprofessionshasnowbroad-enedtoencompassthefollowingprinciples(oftenabbreviatedto‘EDI’):

?Equality–aimingtoensurefairaccess,treat-ment,andopportunityforallthoseinaprofes-sionorworkplace,regardlessofdifference

?Diversity–aimingtoensurethatawiderangeofidentities,backgrounds,experiences,circum-stancesandperspectivesarerepresentedin

theworkforce

?Inclusion–aimingtocreateenvironmentswhereeveryone’sdifferencesarerespectedandvalued,enablingeveryonetothriveandfeelincluded.

Workaroundtheseissuesalsooftenconsiders:

?Equity–beyondequality,thisrecognisesthatinordertotreateveryonethesame,youmustaccountfortheirdifferentneeds

?Belonging–beyondinclusion,thisisa

feelingofsecurity,supportandacceptance,thatresultsfromtheinclusionofdifferentindividualsandgroups

?Socialjustice–beyondisolatedeffortsinindividualorganisations,thisaimsforafairerdistributionofpowerandresourcesacrosssociety.

Awiderangeofinterventionsandinitiatives

coalescearoundtheseprinciples,withEDI

becominganindustryofitsown.Thisfollowsa

well-established‘businesscase’whichhighlightshowthesesociallydesirableoutcomesalsomakeeconomicsense.Forexample,thereisevidencetodemonstratethat,withincreaseddiversity:

Profitsgrow

Companiesamongthetop-quartileforgender

diversityonexecutiveboardsare25%morelikelytooutperformtheprofitabilityoftheirpeersin

thelowest-quartile;andthisfigurerisesto36%

betweenthemostandleastdiversecompaniesintermsofethnicity(McKinsey,2020).

Innovationimproves

Companieswithabove-averagediversity(acrosssixdimensions)intheirmanagementteamsreportinnovationrevenueswhichare19%higherthan

thosewithbelow-averagediversityamongtheirmanagement(BCG,2018).

Productivityrises

Firmscanachieveaproductivitypremiumof+3%ifmanagersaremoregenderdiverse,or+7%ifmanagersaremoreculturallydiverse(Criscuoloetal,2021).

ThesebenefitsemergebecauseEDIenables

organisationstoattractandretaintalented

individualswhocancontributeadiversityof

perspectivestoenhancedecision-making(Catalyst,2020).Italsoimprovesemployeesatisfaction,

aswellasthereputationoftheemployer(ibid).

Nonetheless,governmentresearchonthe‘businesscase’forEDIwarnedthat‘gesturescostmoney’

(BIS,2013:vi).AsrecentanalysissuggeststhecurrentglobalmarketforEDIisvaluedat$9bn,andisexpectedtogrowto$31bnby2033(Fact.MR,2023),itisimportanttoreflectonhow

thisinvestmentinEDIhasbeenperceivedand

experienced,andwhatmustbedonetomaximiseimpactfrominterventions.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport10

Abouttheresearch

Thisresearchcontributestotheexistingbodyofknowledgebyprovidingafreshlookathow

recenteffortstopromoteEDIhavebeen

experienced,acrossandbetweentheprofessionsinvolvedinthecollaborative.Drawingondata

aboutprofessionals’viewsandexperiencesindiverseworkplacesacrosstheUK,thefindingscaninterveneatthesystems-level–particularlyhighlightingtheroleofprofessionalmembershipandregulatorybodiesamonggovernment,

employerandgrassrootsaction.

Itexploreshowtheseprofessionalbodieshave

thecapacityto‘raisethebar’aboutwhatit

meanstobeaprofessional,inrelationtothe

valuesandprinciplesofequality,diversityand

inclusion,influencingactionandbehaviours

amongprofessionalsandtheiremployers.Workingtogetherasacollaborative,thesebodiesrepresentanecosystemofdifferentwhoallco-existin

workplaces,andwhosepracticesinfluenceeachother’sworkandworkingculture.Thistherefore

providesasignificantopportunitytodrivechangeacrossthediverseindustriesandsectorsthatmakeuptheUKeconomy.

Aims

Focusingontheprofessionsrepresentedinthecollaborative,theresearchaimsto:

1.understandtheexperiencesandbarriersfacedbythosewithmarginalisedcharacteristics

(Part1)

2.understandtheperceptionofEDIwithintheprofessions(Part2a)

3.exploreexistinginitiativestoimproveEDI,

identifyingwhatinterventionsareperceivedaseffectiveinordertoinformwhatactiontheprofessionsshouldtake(Part2b).

Thescopeofthisstudyisfocusedonthosemembersandlearnersof12professional

membershipandregulatorybodieswhoarecurrentlyworkingand/orstudyingintheUK.2

2Thisgroupisreferredtoas‘professionals’throughoutthereport.3Refertotheappendix1forthedetailedmethodology.

Approach

Rapidreview

Surveywithmorethan7,000professionals

Focusgroupdiscussionswithmorethan90professionals

In-depthinterviewswithsixEDIexperts

ConductedbetweenOctober2022andApril20233,

theresearchbringstogetherquantitativeand

qualitativedataabouttheviewsandexperiencesofmorethan7,000professionals.Itissupportedbyinsightsfromexistingliterature,aswellasin-depthconversationswithindividualswhohaveexpertise

inimplementingEDIinitiativesacross

theprofessions.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport11

Accountingforcomplexity

EDItouchesonsomeincrediblysensitive

andpersonalissues,andwewouldliketo

acknowledgethetime,energyandcouragesomanyprofessionalswillinglycontributedtothisresearch.Fortheresearchersinvolved,thiscomeswithgreatresponsibilitytorepresentparticipants’viewsandexperiencesappropriately.We,therefore,have

takencaretodevelopananalyticalapproachthat

aimstorecognisethecomplexityof

people’sidentities.

Severalpeoplesharedthedifficultytheyhadwithoverlysimplisticandreductivelabelswhich‘put

peopleinboxes’andcastwidespreadassertionsabouttheexperiencesofthosewithsimilar

characteristics.Thispresentsachallengeto

researcherswhonecessarilycategoriseresponsestodrawconclusionsfromdata.

Professionalstoldushowtheirlivesandidentitiesaremulti-dimensionalandcomplex.Itisclearthatarangeofdynamicsinteractandcompoundeachother,invariableways,toshapeeachperson’s

experiences.Yet,thiscanbedifficulttounpick,explainorcategorise.

Ialwayshavegreatfunwhenyou

fillintheequality,diversity,and

inclusioninformationandallthese

standardisedformsyouget.Isay

tomyself,‘WhichhatamIgoingto

weartoday?’BecauseIlookuponit

andtheinformationthatit’sasking

fromme,actually,reallydoesn’t

reflectme.

Focusgroupparticipant(IOSHmember)

Well,ifwecallthem

disadvantages,alotofbarriers,

sometimes,cutacross,soyoumayrepresentdifferentcommunities.Youmaypotentiallybepartoflotsofdifferentgroupsbecauseyou

identifywiththem.

Focusgroupparticipant(CIPRmember)

Ithinkit’samixofeverything.

Ageforone,ethnicityforanother,socioeconomicbackground

foranother,whereyoulive,justeverythingaboutyou,really.

Focusgroupparticipant(CIPSmember)

Thisgroupis

cisgender,male,

white,non-religiousorChristian,

heterosexual,

non-disabledand

neurotypical,withnomentalorphysical

healthconditions,

andcomesfroma

higherorintermediatesocioeconomic

background.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport12

Thisconceptisknownas‘intersectionality’.Inordertoforegroundthis,theanalyticalapproachtakenin

thisstudydrawstogetherseveraldifferenttypesandinterpretationsofdata.First,wehavedevelopeda

quantitativeproxyforintersectionality,whichassumesthatpeoplewithmultiplecharacteristicsthattendtobemarginalisedhaveadifferent(morechallenged)livedexperienceoftheworkplacethanthosewithnoorfewer‘marginalisedcharacteristics’.Forthepurposesofthisstudy,wehavegroupedsurveyrespondents4onthisbasis:

One‘marginalisedcharacteristic’

Two‘marginalisedcharacteristics’

No‘marginalisedcharacteristics’

Threeormore‘marginalisedcharacteristics’

n=807(16%)

n=1753(34%)

n=1717(33%)

n=877(17%)

Thisgroupreportonlyoneofthefollowingcharacteristics:

Thisgroupreportonlytwoofthefollowingcharacteristics:

Thisgroupreport

threeormore

ofthefollowing

characteristics:

?Amarginalisedgenderidentity(women,non-binarypeople,transpeople,and/orpeoplewithothermarginalisedgenderidentities)

?Aminoritisedethnicgroup,faithoridentity(Black,Asian,mixedorotherethnicitiesand/ornon-Christianreligions)

?Amarginalisedsexualorientation(lesbian,gay,bisexual,queerorothernon-heterosexualorientation)

?Aphysicaland/ormentalhealthconditionand/orneurodivergence

?Alowersocioeconomicbackground(basedonparentaloccupationage14)

Althoughwerecognisethatthisproxydoesnot

includeallthepossiblecharacteristicsthatmaybemarginalised,forthepurposesofthisreport

werefertothecharacteristicscoveredinthis

measureas‘marginalisedcharacteristics’.Wedidnotincludethe‘life-course’characteristicsofageorcaringresponsibilitiesintheproxymeasure5:thisisbecausepeopleofallagesreportbeing

disadvantagedbecauseoftheirage,andcaring

responsibilitiescutacrossotherdemographic

groups.Insomeinstances,severalcharacteristicsmaybegroupedtogetherasone‘marginalised

characteristic’–thisisduetooverlapsbetweencategories(avoiding‘doublecounting’)andthechallengesofdefiningwaysofidentifying.6

Thisisasimplisticoperationalisationof

intersectionality,thereforeweacknowledgethe

limitsofthisapproachtoteaseoutdifferences

betweencharacteristics.Readersmustbemindful

nottoassumeallcharacteristicswillhavethe

sameimpact.Thedifferentwaysmarginalised

characteristicsareexperiencedbyprofessionals

areexploredfurtherin‘deepdives’involving

qualitativeinsightsandgroup-specificquantitative

analyses.Together,thisstrivestoprovideamore

nuancedpicture.

4Thebasefortheintersectionalityproxyisallthoseansweringall

therelevantdemographicquestions,excludingallthosethatskippedor

said‘prefernottosay’or‘don’tknow’toanyoftherelevantdemographic

questions(n=5154).

5Whilstthesecharacteristicsarenotincludedintheproxymeasure,

experiencesrelatedtoageandcaringresponsibilitiesareanalysedin

otherwaysthroughoutthereport.

6Limitationsaredetailedinappendix1.

Beyondbuzzwords|EmbeddingasystemicapproachtoEDIacrosstheUK’sprofessions|Fullreport13

Anoteonterminology

Theterm‘marginalised’isusedtoreferto

th

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論