論行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的性質(zhì)與類型

論行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的性質(zhì)與類型一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle行政協(xié)議作為公共權(quán)力與私法自治相結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物，在現(xiàn)代行政法中占有重要地位。然而，隨著社會的快速發(fā)展和行政職能的轉(zhuǎn)變，行政協(xié)議的變更解除權(quán)問題逐漸凸顯，成為理論和實(shí)踐中的熱點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)。本文旨在深入探討行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的性質(zhì)與類型，以期為相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的學(xué)術(shù)研究和實(shí)踐操作提供有益參考。Administrativeagreements,asaproductofthecombinationofpublicpowerandprivatelawautonomy,holdanimportantpositioninmodernadministrativelaw.However,withtherapiddevelopmentofsocietyandthetransformationofadministrativefunctions,theissueoftherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreementshasgraduallybecomeahotanddifficulttopicintheoryandpractice.Thisarticleaimstoexploreindepththenatureandtypesoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreementchanges,inordertoprovideusefulreferencesforacademicresearchandpracticaloperationsinrelatedfields.具體而言，本文將首先界定行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的基本概念，明確其內(nèi)涵和外延。在此基礎(chǔ)上，通過對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)性質(zhì)的剖析，揭示其與傳統(tǒng)民事合同解除權(quán)的異同，以及其在行政法中的獨(dú)特地位。緊接著，本文將對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)進(jìn)行類型化分析，根據(jù)不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和情形，將其劃分為若干類型，并對各類別的特點(diǎn)、適用條件和法律效果進(jìn)行詳細(xì)闡述。Specifically,thisarticlewillfirstdefinethebasicconceptoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreementchanges,clarifyitsconnotationandextension.Onthisbasis,byanalyzingthenatureoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreements,thispaperrevealsthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenitandthetraditionalrighttoterminatecivilcontracts,aswellasitsuniquepositioninadministrativelaw.Subsequently,thisarticlewillconductatypologicalanalysisoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreementchanges.Basedondifferentstandardsandsituations,itwillbedividedintoseveraltypes,andthecharacteristics,applicableconditions,andlegaleffectsofeachcategorywillbeelaboratedindetail.通過本文的研究，我們期望能夠?yàn)樾姓f(xié)議的規(guī)范運(yùn)作和糾紛解決提供理論支撐和實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)，推動行政協(xié)議制度的完善與發(fā)展。也希望引起學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)務(wù)界對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)問題的更多關(guān)注和思考，共同推動相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的學(xué)術(shù)繁榮和實(shí)踐進(jìn)步。Throughtheresearchinthisarticle,wehopetoprovidetheoreticalsupportandpracticalguidanceforthestandardizedoperationanddisputeresolutionofadministrativeagreements,andpromotetheimprovementanddevelopmentoftheadministrativeagreementsystem.Ialsohopetodrawmoreattentionandreflectionfromtheacademicandpracticalcommunitiesontheissueoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreements,andjointlypromoteacademicprosperityandpracticalprogressinrelatedfields.二、行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的性質(zhì)TheNatureoftheRighttoChangeandTerminateAdministrativeAgreements行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)，作為一種特定的行政權(quán)力，其性質(zhì)既體現(xiàn)了行政行為的權(quán)威性，又蘊(yùn)含著合同解除的私法屬性。這一權(quán)利在行政協(xié)議的履行過程中發(fā)揮著至關(guān)重要的作用。Therighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements,asaspecificadministrativepower,notonlyreflectstheauthorityofadministrativeactions,butalsocontainstheprivatelawattributeofcontracttermination.Thisrightplaysacrucialroleintheimplementationofadministrativeagreements.從行政法的角度來看，行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)具有行政行為的單向性、強(qiáng)制性和優(yōu)先性。行政機(jī)關(guān)在行使這一權(quán)利時(shí)，往往以行政命令或行政決定的形式出現(xiàn)，對協(xié)議的另一方當(dāng)事人產(chǎn)生直接的法律效力。這種權(quán)利的單向性表現(xiàn)在，即使另一方當(dāng)事人不同意變更或解除協(xié)議，行政機(jī)關(guān)仍有權(quán)依法單方面作出決定。同時(shí)，由于行政權(quán)的強(qiáng)制性，這種決定一旦作出，即具有法律上的強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行力，當(dāng)事人必須遵守。行政協(xié)議的變更解除權(quán)還具有優(yōu)先性，即在特定情況下，為了公共利益的需要，行政機(jī)關(guān)有權(quán)優(yōu)先變更或解除協(xié)議，而無需征得另一方當(dāng)事人的同意。Fromtheperspectiveofadministrativelaw,therighttoterminateadministrativeagreementshastheunidirectional,mandatory,andprioritynatureofadministrativeactions.Administrativeagenciesoftenexercisethisrightintheformofadministrativeordersordecisions,whichhavedirectlegaleffectontheotherpartytotheagreement.Theunidirectionalityofthisrightismanifestedinthefactthateveniftheotherpartydoesnotagreetochangeorterminatetheagreement,theadministrativeauthoritystillhastherighttomakeunilateraldecisionsinaccordancewiththelaw.Meanwhile,duetotheenforceabilityofadministrativepower,oncesuchadecisionismade,ithaslegalenforcementpowerandthepartiesmustcomplywithit.Therighttochangeorterminateanadministrativeagreementalsohaspriority,thatis,inspecificcircumstances,fortheneedsofthepublicinterest,theadministrativeauthorityhastheprioritytochangeorterminatetheagreementwithouttheneedtoobtaintheconsentoftheotherparty.然而，盡管行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)具有上述行政行為的屬性，但它同時(shí)也蘊(yùn)含著合同解除的私法屬性。在行政協(xié)議中，雙方當(dāng)事人是平等的法律主體，享有平等的權(quán)利和義務(wù)。因此，在協(xié)議變更或解除的過程中，行政機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循合同法的原則，尊重另一方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益，充分聽取其意見，協(xié)商達(dá)成一致。這種協(xié)商一致的過程，正是合同解除私法屬性的體現(xiàn)。However,althoughtherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreementshastheattributesofadministrativeactionsmentionedabove,italsocontainstheprivatelawattributesofcontracttermination.Inadministrativeagreements,bothpartiesareequallegalentitiesandenjoyequalrightsandobligations.Therefore,intheprocessofagreementmodificationortermination,administrativeauthoritiesshouldfollowtheprinciplesofContractLaw,respectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsoftheotherparty,fullylistentotheiropinions,andreachaconsensusthroughconsultation.Thisprocessofconsensusisareflectionoftheprivatelawnatureofcontracttermination.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)既具有行政行為的權(quán)威性，又蘊(yùn)含著合同解除的私法屬性。這種雙重性質(zhì)使得行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)在行政協(xié)議的履行過程中既能夠維護(hù)行政機(jī)關(guān)的權(quán)威，又能夠保障另一方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益。因此，在行使這一權(quán)利時(shí)，行政機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)充分考慮其雙重性質(zhì)，既依法行使權(quán)力，又尊重合同法的原則，以實(shí)現(xiàn)行政協(xié)議的有效履行和公共利益的最大化。Therighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreementsnotonlyhastheauthorityofadministrativeactions,butalsocontainstheprivatelawattributeofcontracttermination.Thisdualnatureenablestherighttomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreementstomaintaintheauthorityoftheadministrativeauthorityandprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsoftheotherpartyintheprocessoffulfillingadministrativeagreements.Therefore,whenexercisingthisright,administrativeagenciesshouldfullyconsideritsdualnature,exercisingpowerinaccordancewiththelawwhilerespectingtheprinciplesofcontractlaw,inordertoachievetheeffectiveperformanceofadministrativeagreementsandmaximizepublicinterests.三、行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的類型Typesofadministrativeagreementamendmentandterminationrights行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)根據(jù)不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和維度可以分為多種類型。根據(jù)解除權(quán)的來源，可以分為法定解除權(quán)和約定解除權(quán)。法定解除權(quán)是指由法律法規(guī)直接規(guī)定的，當(dāng)滿足一定條件時(shí)，行政主體或行政相對人可以行使的解除權(quán)。例如，當(dāng)行政協(xié)議違反法律法規(guī)的強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定時(shí)，任何一方都可以行使法定解除權(quán)。約定解除權(quán)則是指行政主體和行政相對人在協(xié)議中明確約定的，在特定情況下可以行使的解除權(quán)。這種解除權(quán)的行使必須嚴(yán)格遵循協(xié)議的約定，不能超越約定的范圍。Therighttoterminateadministrativeagreementscanbeclassifiedintovarioustypesbasedondifferentstandardsanddimensions.Accordingtothesourcesofterminationrights,theycanbedividedintostatutoryterminationrightsandcontractualterminationrights.Thestatutoryrightofterminationreferstotherightofterminationdirectlystipulatedbylawsandregulations,whichcanbeexercisedbytheadministrativesubjectorrelativepartywhencertainconditionsaremet.Forexample,whenanadministrativeagreementviolatesmandatoryprovisionsoflawsandregulations,eitherpartycanexercisethestatutoryrighttoterminateit.Therighttoterminateanagreementreferstotherightofterminationthattheadministrativesubjectandtheadministrativecounterparthaveexplicitlyagreeduponintheagreementandcanbeexercisedinspecificcircumstances.Theexerciseofthisrightofterminationmuststrictlyfollowtheprovisionsoftheagreementandcannotexceedthescopeoftheagreement.根據(jù)解除權(quán)的行使方式，可以分為單方解除權(quán)和協(xié)議解除權(quán)。單方解除權(quán)是指行政主體或行政相對人在滿足一定條件下，無需對方同意即可單方面行使的解除權(quán)。例如，當(dāng)行政相對人嚴(yán)重違約時(shí)，行政主體可以行使單方解除權(quán)。協(xié)議解除權(quán)則是指行政主體和行政相對人經(jīng)過協(xié)商一致，共同決定解除行政協(xié)議的權(quán)利。這種解除權(quán)的行使需要雙方達(dá)成一致意見，任何一方都不能單方面決定解除協(xié)議。Accordingtotheexercisemethodoftherightoftermination,itcanbedividedintounilateralterminationrightandagreementterminationright.Theunilateralrightofterminationreferstotherightofadministrativesubjectoradministrativecounterparttounilaterallyexercisetherightofterminationwithouttheconsentoftheotherparty,providedthatcertainconditionsaremet.Forexample,whentheadministrativecounterpartseriouslybreachesthecontract,theadministrativesubjectcanexercisetheunilateralrightoftermination.Therighttoterminateanagreementreferstotherightoftheadministrativesubjectandtheadministrativecounterparttojointlydecidetoterminatetheadministrativeagreementthroughconsultationandconsensus.Theexerciseofthisrightofterminationrequiresbothpartiestoreachaconsensus,andneitherpartycanunilaterallydecidetoterminatetheagreement.根據(jù)解除權(quán)的效果，可以分為絕對解除權(quán)和相對解除權(quán)。絕對解除權(quán)是指行政協(xié)議一旦被解除，協(xié)議關(guān)系即完全終止，雙方不再受協(xié)議約束的權(quán)利。例如，當(dāng)行政協(xié)議因違法而被解除時(shí)，協(xié)議關(guān)系即完全終止。相對解除權(quán)則是指行政協(xié)議被解除后，雙方仍然需要承擔(dān)一定的法律責(zé)任或義務(wù)的權(quán)利。例如，當(dāng)行政協(xié)議因不可抗力而被解除時(shí)，雖然協(xié)議關(guān)系終止，但雙方可能仍需要承擔(dān)因協(xié)議履行而產(chǎn)生的損失賠償責(zé)任。Accordingtotheeffectoftherightoftermination,itcanbedividedintoabsoluteterminationrightandrelativeterminationright.Theabsoluterightofterminationreferstotherightofbothpartiestoterminatetheadministrativeagreementcompletelyandnolongerbeboundbytheagreementonceitisterminated.Forexample,whenanadministrativeagreementisterminatedduetoillegality,thecontractualrelationshipiscompletelyterminated.Therelativerightofterminationreferstotherightofbothpartiestostillbearcertainlegalresponsibilitiesorobligationsaftertheadministrativeagreementisterminated.Forexample,whenanadministrativeagreementisterminatedduetoforcemajeure,althoughtheagreementrelationshipisterminated,bothpartiesmaystillbeliableforcompensationforlossesarisingfromtheperformanceoftheagreement.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的類型多種多樣，不同類型的解除權(quán)具有不同的特點(diǎn)和適用條件。在實(shí)踐中，需要根據(jù)具體情況選擇合適的解除權(quán)類型，以確保行政協(xié)議的順利履行和行政法律關(guān)系的穩(wěn)定。也需要注意在行使解除權(quán)時(shí)遵循法律法規(guī)的規(guī)定和協(xié)議的約定，保護(hù)各方當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益。Therearevarioustypesofterminationrightsforadministrativeagreementchanges,anddifferenttypesofterminationrightshavedifferentcharacteristicsandapplicableconditions.Inpractice,itisnecessarytochooseanappropriatetypeofterminationrightbasedonspecificcircumstancestoensurethesmoothperformanceofadministrativeagreementsandthestabilityofadministrativelegalrelationships.Itisalsonecessarytopayattentiontofollowingtheprovisionsoflawsandregulationsandtheagreementswhenexercisingtherighttoterminate,inordertoprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofallpartiesinvolved.四、行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使與限制ExerciseandLimitationoftheRighttoChangeandTerminateAdministrativeAgreements行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使，是行政主體在特定情況下對行政協(xié)議進(jìn)行調(diào)整或終止的重要手段。然而，這種權(quán)力的行使并非無限制，必須受到法律和程序的嚴(yán)格規(guī)制，以防止權(quán)力的濫用，保障公民、法人和其他組織的合法權(quán)益。Theexerciseoftherighttomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreementsisanimportantmeansforadministrativeentitiestoadjustorterminateadministrativeagreementsinspecificcircumstances.However,theexerciseofthispowerisnotunlimitedandmustbestrictlyregulatedbylawsandprocedurestopreventabuseofpowerandsafeguardthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofcitizens,legalpersons,andotherorganizations.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循法定原則。行政主體在行使變更解除權(quán)時(shí)，必須依據(jù)明確的法律依據(jù)，不得超越法律規(guī)定的范圍和條件。同時(shí)，行政主體應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循正當(dāng)程序，保障行政相對人的知情權(quán)、參與權(quán)和申辯權(quán)，確保行政行為的公正性和合法性。Theexerciseoftherighttomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreementsshallfollowtheprincipleoflegality.Whenexercisingthepowerofchangeandtermination,administrativeentitiesmustrelyonclearlegalbasisandshallnotexceedthescopeandconditionsstipulatedbylaw.Atthesametime,administrativeentitiesshouldfollowdueprocess,safeguardtherighttoinformation,participation,anddefenseofadministrativecounterparties,andensurethefairnessandlegalityofadministrativeactions.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)受到合理的限制。這些限制包括但不限于：一是對行使條件的限制，即行政主體只有在滿足法定條件時(shí)才能行使變更解除權(quán)；二是對行使期限的限制，即行政主體應(yīng)當(dāng)在合理的期限內(nèi)行使變更解除權(quán)，避免造成行政相對人的權(quán)益損害；三是對行使方式的限制，即行政主體應(yīng)當(dāng)按照法律規(guī)定的方式行使變更解除權(quán)，不得采取不當(dāng)手段或?yàn)E用權(quán)力。Theexerciseoftherighttomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreementsshallbesubjecttoreasonablelimitations.Theserestrictionsincludebutarenotlimitedto:firstly,restrictionsontheconditionsforexercise,thatis,administrativeentitiescanonlyexercisetherighttochangeandterminatewhenthestatutoryconditionsaremet;Thesecondisthelimitationontheexerciseperiod,whichmeansthattheadministrativesubjectshouldexercisetherighttochangeandterminatewithinareasonableperiodoftimetoavoidcausingdamagetotherightsandinterestsoftheadministrativecounterpart;Thethirdisthelimitationontheexercisemethod,thatis,theadministrativesubjectshouldexercisetherighttochangeandterminateinaccordancewiththelegalprovisions,andshallnotadoptimpropermeansorabusepower.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)接受監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)。行政主體在行使變更解除權(quán)時(shí)，應(yīng)當(dāng)接受上級行政機(jī)關(guān)、監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)和司法機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督，確保行政行為的合法性和公正性。行政相對人對于行政主體行使變更解除權(quán)的行為，有權(quán)依法提起行政訴訟或申請行政復(fù)議，維護(hù)自身合法權(quán)益。Theexerciseoftherighttomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreementsshallbesubjecttosupervisionandremedies.Whenexercisingthepowerofchangeandtermination,administrativeentitiesshouldacceptsupervisionfromhigher-leveladministrativeorgans,supervisoryorgans,andjudicialorganstoensurethelegalityandimpartialityofadministrativeactions.Theadministrativecounterparthastherighttofileanadministrativelawsuitorapplyforadministrativereconsiderationinaccordancewiththelawfortheexerciseoftherighttochangeorterminatetheadministrativesubject,inordertosafeguardtheirlegitimaterightsandinterests.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的行使與限制是行政協(xié)議制度中的重要內(nèi)容。通過明確行使條件和程序、合理限制權(quán)力范圍、接受監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)等措施，可以保障行政協(xié)議的順利履行，維護(hù)公民、法人和其他組織的合法權(quán)益，實(shí)現(xiàn)行政目標(biāo)與社會公正的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。Theexerciseandrestrictionoftherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreementsisanimportantpartoftheadministrativeagreementsystem.Byclarifyingtheconditionsandproceduresforexercise,reasonablylimitingthescopeofpower,acceptingsupervisionandremedies,andothermeasures,thesmoothimplementationofadministrativeagreementscanbeguaranteed,thelegitimaterightsandinterestsofcitizens,legalpersons,andotherorganizationscanbesafeguarded,andtheorganicunityofadministrativegoalsandsocialjusticecanbeachieved.五、行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的實(shí)踐問題與對策Thepracticalproblemsandcountermeasuresoftherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements行政協(xié)議作為一種特殊的合同形式，其實(shí)踐中涉及到的變更解除權(quán)問題，既體現(xiàn)了合同法的共性，又展現(xiàn)出行政法的特性。然而，在我國當(dāng)前的法律體系中，關(guān)于行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的規(guī)定尚不完善，導(dǎo)致在實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)了諸多問題。Asaspecialformofcontract,administrativeagreementsinvolvetheissueoftherighttochangeandterminate,whichnotonlyreflectsthecommonalityofcontractlawbutalsodemonstratesthecharacteristicsofadministrativelaw.However,inthecurrentlegalsystemofourcountry,theprovisionsontherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreementsarenotyetperfect,leadingtomanyproblemsinpractice.一方面，行政機(jī)關(guān)在行使變更解除權(quán)時(shí)，往往缺乏明確的法律依據(jù)和程序規(guī)范，導(dǎo)致權(quán)力的濫用和不當(dāng)行使。這不僅損害了行政相對人的合法權(quán)益，也影響了行政協(xié)議的穩(wěn)定性和可預(yù)期性。另一方面，由于行政協(xié)議涉及公共利益的實(shí)現(xiàn)，行政機(jī)關(guān)在行使變更解除權(quán)時(shí)，還需要平衡公共利益和個(gè)人利益之間的關(guān)系，這對行政機(jī)關(guān)的執(zhí)法能力和法律素養(yǎng)提出了更高的要求。Ontheonehand,administrativeagenciesoftenlackclearlegalbasisandproceduralnormswhenexercisingthepowerofchangeandtermination,leadingtotheabuseandimproperexerciseofpower.Thisnotonlydamagesthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofadministrativecounterparties,butalsoaffectsthestabilityandpredictabilityofadministrativeagreements.Ontheotherhand,duetothefactthatadministrativeagreementsinvolvetherealizationofpublicinterests,administrativeagenciesneedtobalancetherelationshipbetweenpublicinterestsandpersonalinterestswhenexercisingthepowerofchangeandtermination,whichputshigherdemandsontheenforcementabilityandlegalliteracyofadministrativeagencies.針對這些問題，我們需要從立法和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行對策探討。在立法層面，應(yīng)進(jìn)一步完善行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的法律規(guī)定，明確其性質(zhì)、行使條件和程序規(guī)范，防止權(quán)力的濫用和不當(dāng)行使。還應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的監(jiān)督和制約，確保權(quán)力的合法性和正當(dāng)性。在實(shí)踐層面，行政機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)提高自身的執(zhí)法能力和法律素養(yǎng)，嚴(yán)格依法行使變更解除權(quán)，保障行政協(xié)議的穩(wěn)定性和可預(yù)期性。還應(yīng)加強(qiáng)對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的宣傳和培訓(xùn)，提高行政相對人的法律意識和維權(quán)能力。Toaddresstheseissues,weneedtoexplorecountermeasuresfrombothlegislativeandpracticalperspectives.Atthelegislativelevel,itisnecessarytofurtherimprovethelegalprovisionsontherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements,clarifytheirnature,exerciseconditions,andproceduralnorms,andpreventtheabuseandimproperexerciseofpower.Weshouldalsostrengthenthesupervisionandrestraintofthepowertomodifyandterminateadministrativeagreements,ensuringthelegitimacyandlegitimacyofthepower.Atthepracticallevel,administrativeagenciesshouldimprovetheirlawenforcementcapabilitiesandlegalliteracy,strictlyexercisetherighttochangeorterminateadministrativeagreementsinaccordancewiththelaw,andensurethestabilityandpredictabilityofadministrativeagreements.Weshouldalsostrengthenpublicityandtrainingontherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements,andimprovethelegalawarenessandabilityofadministrativecounterpartiestoprotecttheirrights.行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)作為行政協(xié)議制度中的一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容，其性質(zhì)和類型的界定對于保障行政協(xié)議的穩(wěn)定性和可預(yù)期性具有重要意義。然而，在實(shí)踐中我們?nèi)孕杳鎸χT多問題和挑戰(zhàn)。因此，我們需要從立法和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行對策探討，不斷完善行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的法律規(guī)定和實(shí)踐操作，以更好地平衡公共利益和個(gè)人利益之間的關(guān)系，促進(jìn)社會的和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。Therighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements,asanimportantpartoftheadministrativeagreementsystem,isofgreatsignificanceindefiningitsnatureandtypetoensurethestabilityandpredictabilityofadministrativeagreements.However,inpractice,westillneedtofacemanyproblemsandchallenges.Therefore,weneedtoexplorecountermeasuresfrombothlegislativeandpracticalperspectives,continuouslyimprovethelegalprovisionsandpracticaloperationsoftherighttochangeandterminateadministrativeagreements,inordertobetterbalancetherelationshipbetweenpublicinterestsandpersonalinterests,andpromotetheharmoniousandstabledevelopmentofsociety.六、結(jié)論Conclusion通過對行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)的性質(zhì)與類型的深入研究，我們可以得出以下幾點(diǎn)結(jié)論。行政協(xié)議變更解除權(quán)本質(zhì)上是一種公權(quán)力，它體現(xiàn)了行政機(jī)關(guān)在行政管理過程中的主導(dǎo)地位和法定職責(zé)。這種權(quán)力的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循法律的規(guī)定，確保公共利益的實(shí)現(xiàn)和行政目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。Throughin-depthresearchonthenatureandtypesoftherighttoterminateadministrativeagreements,wecandrawthefollowingconclusions.Therighttochangeorterminateadministrativeagreementsisessentiallyapublicpower,whichreflectsthedominantpositionandlegalresponsibilitiesofadministrativeage