![全球員工滿意度市場調研和分析報告(英文版)-2024年1月上傳培訓課件_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view3/M02/17/3B/wKhkFmYoY1aAWaTNAAGFnRRVFzg350.jpg)
![全球員工滿意度市場調研和分析報告(英文版)-2024年1月上傳培訓課件_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view3/M02/17/3B/wKhkFmYoY1aAWaTNAAGFnRRVFzg3502.jpg)
![全球員工滿意度市場調研和分析報告(英文版)-2024年1月上傳培訓課件_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view3/M02/17/3B/wKhkFmYoY1aAWaTNAAGFnRRVFzg3503.jpg)
![全球員工滿意度市場調研和分析報告(英文版)-2024年1月上傳培訓課件_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view3/M02/17/3B/wKhkFmYoY1aAWaTNAAGFnRRVFzg3504.jpg)
![全球員工滿意度市場調研和分析報告(英文版)-2024年1月上傳培訓課件_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view3/M02/17/3B/wKhkFmYoY1aAWaTNAAGFnRRVFzg3505.jpg)
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
POLITICS
&
SOCIETYEmployee
satisfactionworldwideOverview
report
on
employee
satisfaction
with
their
employer
worldwideEmployee
satisfaction
is
the
key
to
a
successful
modern
companyExecutive
summaryThecompetition
fortalentbetween
employers
hasaccelerated
inrecent
years.
Low
?
Theaverage
worldwide
NPSis16
percent,
meaning
thatthere
isanetmajority
ofunemployment
hascharacterized
labormarkets
sincetheinitialeconomicdownturn
of
COVID-19,
givingemployees
agreater
degree
of
bargaining
powerthan
usual.Even
without
these
recent
developments,
however,
modern
employersarestriving
tocreate
awelcoming,
inclusive,andfriendly
workplace.
Theemployer-employee
relationship
of
2023
hasevolved
from
simply
aquid-pro-quoarrangement
between
capitaland
labortoamultifaceted
bondthatincludesseveral
aspects
of
well-being
tobetter
engagetheworkforce.employees
whopromote
theiremployer
over
thosewho
donot.?
APAC
was
theregion
with
the
largest
shareof
promoters,
withanNPSof
30percent,
andthe
Philippineswas
theleading
country
at50
percent.
Asfarasindustrieswere
concerned,
theIT,technology,
and
telecommunication
sectorhadthehighest
NPS,at34
percent.?
Explainingwhatdrives
employee
satisfaction,analyzed
theimportanceof
fivekey
metrics,
includingcompany
image,
the
employer’s
culture,colleagues,andsuperiors,
theperceived
equality
intheworkplace,
employee
salary,andtheinfrastructureandequipment
supplied
byacompany.
Estimatessuggest
thatequality
isthe
most
valuedamong
thefivesatisfaction
factors.Inasurvey
conducted
between
the
monthsof
September
2022
and
August
2023,collected
answers
from
almost
200,000
employees
in56
world
countries
toquestionsregarding
satisfactionwith
theircurrent
employer.
Thisreport
analyzestheoutcome
of
thissurvey,
focusingon
theshare
ofrespondents
sosatisfied
withtheiremployer
thattheywould
recommend
ittoafriend
or
relative,
compared
totheshare
of
respondents
who
would
not
recommend
theiremployer.
Thedifference
between
these
twogroupsof
employees
iscalled
thenetpromoterscore
(NPS).?
Whereas
thevariousdemographic
groups
do
notshow
remarkable
differencesinratingthe
importance
ofthefivedifferent
satisfaction
factors,country-specifictrendsaremore
clearly
observed.Thisreport
presents
theaggregated
survey
resultsandfurtherevaluationsonemployee
satisfaction,offering
detailedinsightsregarding
regions,
industries,selected
focuscountries,
and
selected
companies.Some
of
the
key
findings
inthisreport
are:301Introduction?
Thesurvey?
Overview
of
countries
and
respondentsAre
employees
satisfied
with
their
employers?
Statista’s
comprehensive
surveyprovides
answersto
this
questionGlobal
employee
survey,
questions“Ona
scaleof0to10,
howlikelyisitthatStatista’s
survey
consistsof
two
differentmeasurementsegments:
First,
the
question
of
whether
theemployee
wouldrecommend
the
employer
to
friendsor
family
evaluates
thegeneral
satisfaction
of
theemployee.
Thesecond
part
divesdeeper
into
their
satisfaction
with
key
aspectsof
theworkingenvironment,
like
the
image
of
theemployer,
thecompany’sculture
and
the
relationship
with
colleagues
andsuperiors
intheworkplace,
working
conditions
(the
infrastructure
andequipment
provided),
salary,
and
thelevel
of
equality.OverallExplained
variableScore:
0(lowest)to10youwouldrecommendyouremployertosatisfactionafriendorfamilymember?”ImageThecompanyenjoysa
good
imageThecompanyprovidesroomfor
growthanddevelopment,andpromotestheemployees’wellbeingCulture,colleagues,andsuperiorsThe
surveywas
conductedbetweenSeptember2022InfrastructureandequipmentThecompanyhasgood
workingconditions(infrastructure/equipment)Explanatory
variablesScore:
1(lowest)to5andAugust
2023.
In
total,interviewed
198,284employeesfrom
56
countriesworldwide.appliedthe
Random
Forest
algorithm
to
estimatetheimpact
each
ofthesatisfactionfactors
hasontheoverall
satisfaction–therecommendation
probability.TheRandomForest‘s
outputistheestimate
ofwhich
shareof
theoverall
satisfactionis
driven
byeach
oftheexplanatory
categories.SalaryThecompanypaysa
good
wageMenandwomendoingthesamejobarepaidthesamesalaryANDmenandwomenhavethesameopportunitiesforadvancementEquality5Sources:The
analysis
includes
198,284
respondents
from
56
countries
fromall
world
regionsGlobal
employees
survey,respondents
perregion
andfocuscountry*90,843
Europe8,350
MEA55,223
Americasv43,117
APAC6Notes:*All
focus
countries
have
more
than
9,000
respondents
in
the
survey.MEArefers
toQatar,Saudi
Arabia,
Kuwait,
Egypt,
UAE,Morocco,Israel,Iran,and
Tunisia.
APAC
refers
to
Asian
and
Oceanian
ones.Additional
564
respondents
arefrom
the
Africancountries
notincluded
in
the
MEAregion.Due
to
the
low
number
ofrespondents
in
this
region,no
detailed
analysis
forthis
regionis
provided
in
the
following.
Forthe
remaining187
respondents,
the
country
is
unknown
and
thereforenotpartofthe
analysis.Sources:
Gyglietal.;WorldBank02Findings
by
region?
Net
promoter
score,
overview?
Image?
Culture,colleagues,
and
superiors?
Infrastructureandequipment?
Salary?
EqualityEmployees
promoting
their
employer
exceed
those
who
do
not
bya
globalaverage
of
16
percentage
pointsNet
promoter
score,
byregions
and
focuscountriesThenetpromoter
score
(NPS)
measurestheworkforce’s
satisfactionwith
theiremployer
byaskingabouttheprobability
ofrecommending
theemployer
to
friendsor
family.TocalculatetheNPS,theshare
ofdetractors
(respondents
answering
sixor
less)
isdeducted
from
thepromoters(respondents
answering
nineor
10).R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
S100%80%60%40%20%0%50%30%Worldwide,
42
percent
ofemployees
arepromoters,
almost
certain
to
activelyrecommend
theiremployer
tofriendsandfamily.26
percent
would
rathernotrecommend
theiremployer
–thedetractors**.
Asaresult,
theworldwideaverage
netpromoter
score
(NPS)lies
at16
percent
(detractor’s
sharesubtractedfrom
promoter’s
share).25%25%U.S.24%20%16%7%5%5%-4%World*AmericasEuropeAPACMEACanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesPromoter(Scores:9or
10)Passive(Scores:7or
8)Detractor(Scores:0-6)NPS(promoters-detractors)8Notes:*World
figures
are
based
onthe
full
dataset,
including
observations
forwhich
the
industry
was
notreportedby
the
respondent.
**Hereby
and
in
the
following
are
defined
“promoters”those
employees
that
answeredthequestion
“On
a
scale
of0
to10,
how
likely
is
it
that
yourecommend
youremployerto
afriend
orfamily
member?”either
9or
10;
“passives”
those
that
answered
with
a
score
of7or8;“detractors”those
who
answeredwith
ascore
of6orlower.The
net
promoterscore
(NPS)
is
the
difference
between
the
shareofpromoters
and
detractors.Sources:APAC
employees
the
happiest
with
their
company’s
imageSatisfactionwith
theemployer’s
image,
byregions
andfocuscountries*Witharatingof
4.4
outof
5.0,
employees
who
worked54321forAPAC
companies
were
the
most
satisfied
withtheimage
oftheiremployer.
By
comparison,
workersbased
inEuropewere
the
least
satisfiedandhad
aratingof
3.7.
American
employees
were
equaltotheglobal
average,
with
aratingof
3.9,
while
MEArespondents
were
justbelow
at3.8.4.54.44.24.13.93.93.93.83.73.73.7Among
the
focus
countries
forthisreport,
GermanyandFrancehadthe
lowest
ratingsrelating
totheircompany’s
image.
Thecountry
with
the
highest
scorethisyearwas
the
Philippinesat4.5,
with
SingaporeandCanada
alsobeingabove
the
global
average.
Thescore
forthe
United
Stateswas
the
same
astheglobalaverage
this
year.R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile9Notes:*198,284
respondents.
Only
respondents
fromCanada,
Germany,France,the
Philippines,
Singapore,and
the
United
States
werespecifically
askedquestions
about
their
perception
oftheircompanies’
image,culture,
colleagues,
and
superiors,salary,equality,
and
infrastructure
and
equipment.
Therefore,only
respondents
from
these
countries
are
included
here.mageSources:German
workers
the
least
satisfied
with
their
employer’s
atmosphereSatisfactionwith
theemployer’s
culture,colleagues,
andsuperiors,
byregions
andfocuscountries*Firms
in
Germany
were
given
the
lowest
rating
for54321their
culture,
colleagues,
andsuperiors
among
theprovided
focus
countries.
How
these
aspects
areperceived
byemployees
may
includefactors
suchasgood
communication,
aninformal
butprofessionalatmosphere,
androom
forindividualgrowthanddevelopment.4.14.03.93.93.83.73.73.53.53.43.3Thehigherscores
given
byAPAC
and
Americanrespondents
inrelation
tocompany
image
(see
page9)
arerepeated
here.
Filipinorespondents
rated
theatmosphere
attheiremployer
the
highest,at4.1,followed
closely
byU.S.employees
at4.0.
SingaporeanandCanadian
employees
were
slightlylesspositiveabouttheirworking
atmosphere
and
were
close
totheworld
average
of3.7.
Europe’s
overall
score
of
3.4
isinfluenced
bythecomparatively
low
ratingsgiven
byFrenchandGerman
employees.R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartileCulture,colleagues,andsuperiors10
Notes:Sources:*198,284
respondents.
Only
respondents
fromCanada,
Germany,France,the
Philippines,
Singapore,and
the
United
States
werespecifically
askedquestions
about
their
perception
oftheircompanies’
image,culture,
colleagues,
and
superiors,salary,equality,
and
infrastructure
and
equipment.
Therefore,only
respondents
from
these
countries
are
included
here.Satisfaction
with
working
conditions
in
APAC
and
the
Americas
contrasts
withEurope
and
MEASatisfactionwith
theemployer’s
infrastructureandequipment,byregions
and
focuscountries*Working
conditions(infrastructureandequipmentprovided
to
theemployee)
canvary
substantiallyacross
different
countries,
industrysectors,
andjobroles.
Among
the
focus
countries
forthissurvey,workers
inthePhilippinesperceived
theirworkingconditionstobethe
most
satisfactory.
By
contrast,workers
inFrance
rated
theirworking
conditionsthelowest,
with
discontent
among
German
workers
alsodraggingdown
Europe’s
overall
score.543214.34.24.14.14.13.93.93.73.73.73.5Alongwith
Europe,
respondents
from
the
MEA
regionalsoreported
low
satisfaction
withtheir
workingconditions.
Inthemiddleofthepackonce
again
wereAmerican
countries,
with
Canada
reporting
the
samescore
astheglobalaverage
at3.9.R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartilenfrastructureandequipment11
Notes:Sources:*198,284
respondents.
Only
respondents
fromCanada,
Germany,France,the
Philippines,
Singapore,and
the
United
States
werespecifically
askedquestions
about
their
perception
oftheircompanies’
image,culture,
colleagues,
and
superiors,salary,equality,
and
infrastructure
and
equipment.
Therefore,only
respondents
from
these
countries
are
included
here.Wagedissatisfaction
evident
in
France
and
MEA
countriesSatisfactionwith
thesalarypaidbytheemployer,
byregions
and
focuscountries*Theperception
of
beingpaidafairsalary
byan54321employer
isacritical
factorinrelation
to
employeesatisfaction.
Amongtheprovided
regions,
APACcountries
were
happiestwith
theirremuneration,followed
byAmerican
ones,
andthenEuropeancountries
second
to
last.Employees
based
inMEAcountries
were
the
least
satisfied
inthisregard,scoring
farbelow
the
global
average.4.14.03.93.93.83.73.73.53.53.23.1Thiscategory
displayssome
of
the
lowest
levels
ofsatisfaction
when
itcomes
to
employee
perceptions.Among
the
individualcountries
included,Frenchworkers
were
the
least
satisfied,while
workers
inthePhilippinesrated
theiremployer
thehighest.R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile12
Notes:Sources:*198,284
respondents.
Only
respondents
fromCanada,
Germany,France,the
Philippines,
Singapore,and
the
United
States
werespecifically
askedquestions
about
their
perception
oftheircompanies’
image,culture,
colleagues,
and
superiors,salary,equality,
and
infrastructure
and
equipment.
Therefore,only
respondents
from
these
countries
are
included
here.SalaryEquality
rated
highly
in
APAC
and
MEA,
with
work
to
be
done
according
toEuropean
employeesSatisfactionwith
equality
intheworkplace,
byregions
and
focuscountries*Inrecent
years,
workers
havebecome
farlesstolerant54321of
inequalityinthe
workplace.
Contemporary
socialmovements
thathavehad
amassive
influenceonpoliticsandcultureincludeBlack
Lives
Matter,
aswellasthelegalization
ofsame-sex
marriage
inavariety
ofcountries.
Associety
haschanged,sotoohavetheexpectations
of
employees,
andequalityhasbecome
acentral
issue
intheworkplace.4.24.04.03.93.83.83.73.73.63.53.5From
thissurvey,
we
cansee
thatwhile
workers
inAPAC
and
MEA
countries
thoughttheiremployersperformed
well
inthisregard,workers
inAmerica,
andespecially
Europe,were
farmore
ambivalent.
WhileU.S.workers
rated
theiremployer's
equalityslightlyabove
the
global
average,
Canadian
companies
weregraded
slightlylower.
German
workers
rated
equalityintheirworkplaces
the
lowest,
atjust3.5.R
E
G
I
O
N
SF
O
C
U
S
C
O
U
N
T
R
I
E
SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore
PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile13
Notes:Sources:*198,284
respondents.
Only
respondents
fromCanada,
Germany,France,the
Philippines,
Singapore,and
the
United
States
werespecifically
askedquestions
about
their
perception
oftheircompanies’
image,culture,
colleagues,
and
superiors,salary,equality,
and
infrastructure
and
equipment.
Therefore,only
respondents
from
these
countries
are
included
here.Equality03Country
profiles?
Overview
of
focuscountries?
United
States?
Canada?
Germany?
France?
Singapore?
PhilippinesMain
influences
of
employee
satisfaction
differ
across
our
focus
countriesMost
importantaspects
ofemployee
satisfaction
worldwideThefollowing
pagesexamine
thecountries
with
the
most
respondents.Eachcountry-specific
snapshotincludes:CanadaCountry
profilesGermany?
(1/2)
Overview
of
the
survey’s
resultforthecountry
(barchartand
table)andestimation
of
the
impact
ofthescore
ineach
ofthefivecategorieson
the
overall
satisfactionFranceUnitedStatesPhilippines(doughnut
chart).?
(2/2)
Topfivecompanies
rankedSingaporebycategory.Disputed
areas15U.S.
employees
are
happiest
with
their
employer’s
infrastructure
andequipment,
but
less
content
when
it
comes
to
equality(1/2)
United
States:
employee
profile
2023“Onascaleof
0to10,
howNetpromoter
score
(inpercentage)likelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa
friendorfamilymember?23%28%49%At
26percent,
theU.S.scores
abovetheworldaverage
intheNPS(16percent).26%”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction
drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSImage
hadthehighest
influence
onoverall
satisfaction
and
wasgivenanaverage
score
of3.90
byU.S.respondents.3.903.964.103.873.81Interms
ofhowtheywouldrate
theiremployer’s
culture,colleagues,
andsuperiors,
U.S.respondents
hadanaverage
score
of3.96.16.5%21.0%Employees
withintheU.S.thought
their
employers
performed
best
inrelation
to
infrastructureand
equipment.18.1%At
3.87,salaryhadthesecond-lowest
score
across
all
factors
intheUnited
States.22.9%21.6%Withanaverage
score
of3.81,
equality
hadthelowestscore
amongtheprovided
satisfaction
drivers.16
Notes:Sources:United
States;
September
2022
toAugust
2023;
41,271
respondents;18
years
and
olderUnitedStatesAlphabet
dominates
3
out
of
5
rankings
but
misses
out
on
overall
top
spotto
Microsoft(2/2)
United
States:
Top-performing
employer
rankingintheUnited
States2023,
bymetricCulture,
colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345MicrosoftAlphabetAlphabetVerizonVerizonMicrosoftVerizonAlphabetAlphabetBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupVerizonMicrosoftVerizonAlphabetBankofAmericaMicrosoftMicrosoftVerizonMicrosoftUnitedHealthGroupAlphabetBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupBankofAmericaStarbucksBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupAT&TUnitedParcelService17
Notes:Sources:United
States;
September
2022
toAugust
2023;
41,271
respondents;18
years
and
olderUnitedStatesCanada
scores
highly
across
all
metrics,
withimage
and
equality
especially
high(1/2)
Canada:employee
profile
2023“Netpromoter
score
(inpercentage)Onascaleof
0to10,
howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa
friendor23%33%43%WithanNPS
of20percent,
employees
inCanada
ranked
around
themiddleofthefocus
countries.20%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction
drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSTheaverage
score
for
image
isthehighest
across
allfactors
inCanada,coming
out
at4.39.4.394.094.143.994.31Culture,colleagues,
and
superiors
wasalso
scored
highly
byCanadianworkers,especially
in
relation
totheother
focus
countries.21.8%19.9%Thethird-highest
metric
forCanadian’s
was
infrastructureandequipment,
withascore
of4.14.20.1%Theaverage
score
for
salary
inCanada
wasthelowest
across
allfactors,
butsecond
only
tothePhilippines
incomparison
toother
focus
countries.20.4%17.8%Theemployer’s
equality
score
inCanada
wasthehighest
amongallfocuscountries
but
forCanada
wassecond
toimage.18
Notes:Sources:Canada;
September
2022
to
August
2023;
9,204
respondents;18
yearsand
olderCanadaFinancial
firms
Desjardins
and
TD
Bank
achieve
Canada’s
highest
NPS
this
year(2/2)
Canada:Top-performing
employer
ranking
inCanada
2023,
bymetricCulture,
colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEqualityCanadian
ImperialBank
ofCommerce12345DesjardinsCostco
WholesaleDesjardinsDesjardinsCostco
WholesaleCanadianImperialBankofCommerceTDBankCanadianTireDesjardinsTelusDesjardinsAmazonDesjardinsAmazonRogersCommunicationsRogersCommunicationsAmazonCostcoWholesaleScotiabankRoyalBankofCanadaCanadianImperialBankofCommerceCanadianImperialBankofCommerceBankofMontrealTDBankRogersCommunicationsCostcoWholesaleTelusAmazonCanadaBank
ofMontreal19
Notes:Sources:Canada;
September
2022
to
August
2023;
9,204
respondents;18
yearsand
olderImage
important
to
German
workers
but
infrastructure
and
equipment
receivehighest
rating(1/2)
Germany:
employee
profile
2023“Netpromoter
score
(inpercentage)Onascaleof
0to10,
howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa
friendor30%34%35%At
five
percent,
Germany's
NPS
isthesecond
lowestcompared
totheotherfocus
countries.5%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction
drivers(scale1–5)Theemployer’s
imageisthemostimportant
driver
for
thesatisfaction
ofGerman
employees.
Withanaverage
score
of3.67,
however,
Germanyscored
below
theworld
average
intheimage
factor.InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPS3.673.323.743.533.46Withascore
ofjust
3.32,theaverage
score
for
culture,colleagues,
andsuperiors
wasthelowest
across
allfactors
forGermany,
andthelowestamong
allfocuscountries.18.6%Althoughworkinginfrastructureand
equipment
wastheleast
importantsatisfaction
driver,
German
employees
nevertheless
scored
thismetric
thehighest.18.9%20.1%For
salary,
thescore
for
Germany
was3.53.Thiswasthethird-highest
scoreamong
thesatisfaction
drivers.
Thoughwith20.1
percent
influence
ontheNPS,salary
wasnotrated
especially
highforGerman
workers.22.2%20.3%Theaverage
score
for
equality
isthesecond
worstacross
all
categories
inGermany,
andtheworst
whencompared
toother
focus
countries.20
Notes:Sources:Germany;September
2022
toAugust
2023;
30,053
respondents;18
yearsand
olderGermanyBMW
leads
the
NPS
ratings
and
was
also
rated
the
best
for
image(2/2)
Germany:
employee
profile
2023Culture,
colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345BMW
GroupBMW
GroupSAPBMWGroupAllianzAllianzSAPVolkswagen
GroupSAPVolkswagenGroupSAPSchwarzGruppeDaimlerBMWGroupBASFBASFSAPAllianzBoschBMWGroupBoschBoschBoschSiemensAllianzDaimlerSiemensSiemensSiemensBMWGroup21
Notes:Sources:Germany;September
2022
toAugust
2023;
30,053
respondents;18
yearsand
olderGermanyLow
scoresgiven
to
employers
in
France
across
the
board(1/2)
France:
employee
profile
2023“Netpromoter
score
(inpercentage)Onascaleof
0to10,
howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa
friendor32%40%28%France’s
NPS
wasbyfarthelowestamong
thefocus
countries
at
negativefourpercent.-4%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction
drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSTheimage
oftheemployer
received
ascore
of3.67
fromFrenchemployees,
thehighest
ofthefivesatisfaction
drivers.3.673.453.553.163.65Culture,colleagues,
and
superiors
intheworkplace
hadascore
of3.45,thesecond
lowestamong
theprovided
focus
nations.20.2%Infrastructureand
equipment
wererated
justabove
salary
andculture,colleagues,
andsuperiors
for
French
workers,
butreceived
thelowestscorewhencompared
totheothercountries.17.8%20.7%French
workers
weretheleastsatisfied
withtheirsalary,
andwithascoreof3.16,
ithadthelowestrating
ofalldrivers
forall
thefocus
countries.21.9%19.5%Equalityintheworkplace
hadthemostimportant
influence
forFrenchworkers
andwasgiven
ascore
of3.65,
higher
thanthescore
fromemployees
inGermany.22
Notes:Sources:France;September
2022
toAugust
2023;
15,730
respondents;
18
years
and
olderFranceOrange
ratedthe
highest
across
all
categories
in
France(2/2)
France:
Top-performing
employer
rankinginFrance2023,
bymetricCulture,
colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345OrangeOrangeOrangeCréditAgricoleélectricitédeFranceBNPParibasOrangeBNPParibasOrangeOrangeélectricitédeFranceélectricitédeFranceBNPParibasBNPParibasélectricitédeFranceCréditAgricoleLaPosteCréditAgricoleSNCFGroupSocd'importationleclercélectricitédeFranceCréditAgricoleBNPParibasCreditAgricoleSocd'importationleclercSocd'importationleclercSocd'importationleclercCréditAgricoleLaPosteélectricitédeFrance23
Notes:Sources:France;September
2022
toAugust
2023;
15,730
respondents;
18
years
and
olderFranceEquality
highly
valued
but
rated
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 醫(yī)院保潔清潔方案(五篇)
- 2025年度住宅小區(qū)智能化改造與維護合同
- 蘇人版道德與法治九年級上冊8.1《公民的生命健康權教》聽課評課記錄
- 七年級數(shù)學下冊9.3平行線的性質聽評課記錄
- 電力市場趨勢分析與未來預測
- 2025年度國際貿易合同履行中的環(huán)境保護與社會責任
- 班級特色活動策劃流程詳解
- 現(xiàn)代醫(yī)療設施中如何實現(xiàn)高效節(jié)能的環(huán)保設計思考與實踐案例分享
- 2025年度美容美發(fā)行業(yè)美容院連鎖經(jīng)營咨詢合同
- 珠寶行業(yè)銷售心理學如何抓住客戶心理
- 四川省自貢市2024-2025學年上學期八年級英語期末試題(含答案無聽力音頻及原文)
- 2025-2030年中國汽車防滑鏈行業(yè)競爭格局展望及投資策略分析報告新版
- 2025年上海用人單位勞動合同(4篇)
- 二年級上冊口算題3000道-打印版讓孩子口算無憂
- 新疆烏魯木齊地區(qū)2025年高三年級第一次質量監(jiān)測生物學試卷(含答案)
- 衛(wèi)生服務個人基本信息表
- 高中英語北師大版必修第一冊全冊單詞表(按單元編排)
- 新教科版科學小學四年級下冊全冊教案
- 苗圃建設項目施工組織設計范本
- 廣東省湛江市廉江市2023-2024學年八年級上學期期末考試數(shù)學試卷(含答案)
- 2025年生物安全年度工作計劃
評論
0/150
提交評論