版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
PAGE
PAGE
74
AClinicalPracticeGuidelinefortheManagementofBell’sPalsy
JohnR.deAlmeida,MD,MSc,FRCSC
GordonH.Guyatt,MD,MSc,FRCPC
SachinSud,MD,MSc,FRCSC
JoanneDorion,PT,BScPT
MichaelD.Hill,MD,FRCPC
MichaelR.Kolber,MD,MSc,CCFP
JaneLea,MD,FRCSC
SylviaLoong,RegPT
BalvinderK.Somogyi,BSW
BrianD.Westerberg,MD,FRCSC
ChrisWhite,MD,FRCPC
JosephM.Chen,MD,FRCSC
Introduction
Bell’spalsyisanacuteonsetidiopathicweaknessorparalysisofthefaceofperipheralnerveorigin.Otherperipheralcausesoffacialweaknessorparalysisincludeinflammationoftheearortemporalbone(otitismedia,mastoiditis,cholesteatoma),viralinfections(herpeszosteroticusorRamsayHuntsyndrome,Lymedisease),granulomatousdiseases(sarcoidosis,Melkersson-Rosenthalsyndrome),andneoplasmsofthecerebellopontineangle,temporalbone,orparotidgland.
Bell’spalsyaffects20-30personsper100,000onanannualbasisand1in60individualswillbeaffectedoverthecourseoftheirlifetime.1,2Theconditionisresponsibleforalmostthree-quartersofallacutefacialpalsies.1Thereisnogenderpredilection,althoughithasbeenassociatedwithpregnancy.1StudieshavealsosuggestedanassociationbetweenBell’spalsyanddiabetes.3,4Certainvaccinationshavealsobeenassociatedwiththedevelopmentofthisconditionincludinganintranasalinfluenzavaccine5andaSwedishinfluenzaH1N1vaccine.6Todate,therehasbeennoassociationwithNorthAmericanvaccines.7,8
Roughly75%ofpatientswithBell’spalsybelievetheyarehavingastroke.9Fortheclinician,itisimportanttodifferentiateperipheralfromcentralcausesforfacialweakness.Patientswithperipheral(lowermotorneuron)facialnervepalsiesdemonstrateweaknessofboththeupperandlowerhalfoftheface.However,duetouppermotorneuroninnervationfrombothcerebralhemispheres,centralfacialnervepalsiesdemonstrateparesisorparalysisonlyonthelowerquadrantofthefacewithsparingofeyeclosureandforeheadwrinklemovements.1,3,10
ThemajoretiologyofBell’spalsyisbelievedtobeaviralinfectionofthefacialnervebytheherpessimplexvirus.11-13Inonestudy,herpesvirusDNAwasidentifiedintheendoneurialfluidatthetimeofsurgicaldecompressionofthenerve.14Asaresultofthisviralinfectionthefacialnerveswellsandiscompressedinitscanalasitcoursesthroughthetemporalbonecausinganischemicinjurytothenerve.
Indevelopmentoftheseguidelines,anumberofprognosticfactorswereconsideredtoberelevant.ClassifyingBell’spalsyaccordingtotheseverityofweaknessprovidesprognosticinformationthatmayguidetreatment.ThemajorityofBell’spalsypatients(70%)haveacompletefacialparalysis,while30%havepartialweaknessorparesis.15ThereareseveralinstrumentsavailabletoquantifytheseverityofBell’spalsy.15TheHouse-Brackmann(Table1)andSunnybrookscalesarethemostcommonlyusedinstruments.16,17Thesevalidatedinstrumentsobjectivelygradetheextentoffacialmuscleparesisallowtreatingclinicianstomonitorpatientsandtocounselthemregardingthelikelihoodofrecovery.Patientswithmildtomoderateparesis(theequivalentofHouse-BrackmanngradesII-IV)havebetterratesofrecoverythanthosewithseveretocompleteparesis(House-BrackmanngradesV-VI).18Inalargesingle-institutioncohortstudy,recoveryratesof61%and94%weredocumentedinpatientswithcompleteandincompleteparalysisrespectively.19
Electroneuronography(ENoG)mayalsoprovideadditionalprognosticinformation.Thiselectricalstimulationtestcomparestheaffectedorparalyzedsidetotheunaffectedside.Inonestudy,only42%ofpatientswithagreaterthan90%degenerationofthefacialnervefunctiononaffectedsidehadagoodrecovery(HouseBrackmanngrade1or2).20Historically,ENoGhasbeenusedtoselectpatientswithapoorprognosiswhomaybecandidatesforsurgicaldecompressionofthefacialnerve.
OtherimportantclinicaloutcomesexistinBell’spalsy.Upto16%willhaveresidualinvoluntarymovementsand/orsynkinesis,15whileothersmayhaveabnormallacrimationwithsalivation(crocodiletears).Failuretoprotectthecorneaamongpatientswhoareunabletoblinkadequatelymayresultincornealulcerationandpermanentvisualimpairment.Thosewithresidualdeficitsmayhavealong-termreducedqualityoflifeandpsychologicaldistress.4,21,22
PreviousguidelineshavemaderecommendationsforthetreatmentofBell’spalsy.AQualityStandardsSubcommitteeoftheAmericanAcademyofNeurologyissuedapracticeparameterin2001concludingthattherewasnotsufficientevidencetosupporttheuseofcorticosteroids,antiviralagents,orsurgicaldecompressionforBell’spalsy.23Arecentupdateofthisguideline,however,advocatedtheuseofcortisteroidsandconcludedthatantiviralsmaybeofmodestbeneft.24Oftwoothertreatmentguidelines,oneconcludedthattherewasinsufficientevidencetogivecorticosteroidsinchildren25andtheothersuggesteduseofcorticosteroidsbasedonanarrativereviewoftheavailableevidence.26Recentsystematicreviewsforexerciseandelectrostimulationphysiotherapy27aswellassurgicaldecompression23haveprovidedfurtherinsight.ThisgrowingbodyofliteraturewastheimpetusfordevelopingguidelinesforthetreatmentofBell’spalsy.ThisguidelinewillreviewtheevidenceforthemedicaltreatmentofBell’spalsywithcorticosteroidsandantivirals,facialexerciseandelectrostimulationphysiotherapy,decompressionsurgery,theneedforeyeprotectivemeasures,andtheneedforfurtherinvestigationandspecialistreferralinpersistingandprogressivecases.RecommendationsweremadeusingtheGradingofRecommendationsAssessment,DevelopmentandEvaluation(GRADE)systemforthedevelopmentofclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations.28-31Becauseoftheimportantprognosticimplicationsofinitialseverityofparesis/paralysis,thisguidelinepanelmadeseparaterecommendationsbasedthedegreeoffacialweaknessatpresentation(mildtomoderateparesisversusseveretocompleteparesis).ThisguidelineisaimedatallhealthcareproviderswhotreatBell’spalsy.
Methods
SelectionandOrganizationofthePanel
Aworkinggroupofelevenmemberswasassembledundertheauspicesof(insertendorsing{Pendingapprovalfromendorsingorganizations)
organizations-possiblyCanadianSocietyofOtolaryngologyandCanadianNeurologicalSciencesFederation).Thegroupconsistedofthreemethodologists(JDA,SS,GG),threeOtolaryngology-HeadandNeckSurgeons(JDA,JC,BDW),twoNeurologists(MDH,CW),oneFamilyPhysician(MK),twoFacialNerveTherapists(JD,SL),andonepatient(BKS).Anadditionalmethodologist(JL)wasinvolvedinthereviewprocess,butnottheguidelinerecommendations.PanelistswereselectedbasedonademonstratedacademicinterestinBell’spalsyand/orbyrecommendationofrelevantnationalsocieties.Thepatientpanelmemberwasselectedbyinvitationfromoneofthepanelists.GuidelinesweredevelopedthroughaseriesoffourconferencecallsandmultipleemailcorrespondencesbetweenJanuary,2010andJune,2012.GGchairedthepanelandJDAwasinchargeoforganizationalaspectsoftheprocess.
DefiningtheClinicalQuestionsandImportantOutcomes
ContentexpertsinthepanelincludingtheOtolaryngology-HeadandNeckSurgeons,Neurologists,FamilyPhysician,andFacialTherapistswereinvolvedindraftingalistofclinicalquestionsandsubjecttopicstobeaddressedbytheguideline(Table2).Theworkinggroupidentifiedoutcomesdeemedimportanttopatientsattheoutsetoftheguidelinedevelopmentprocess(Table3).Eachoutcomewasratedbyeachpanelmemberonascalefrom1-9assuggestedbytheGRADEworkinggroup.29Inmakingratings,panelistswereinstructedto,onthebasisoftheirpersonalorclinicalexperience,totaketheperspectiveofapatientwhohasBell’spalsy.Scoresfrom1-3wereclassifiedasnotimportant,scoresfrom4-6wereclassifiedasimportantbutnotcritical,scoresfrom7-9wereclassifiedascritical.Evidenceforoutcomeswereevaluatedbysystematicreviewandthenusedinmakingrecommendations.Theprimaryoutcomeforthisanalysisisunsatisfactoryfacialmotorrecovery(House-Brackmannscoreofgrade3-6orequivalent).Althoughotherfacialoutcomessuchassynkinesisandautonomicdysfunctionmaybeconsideredunsatisfactoryrecovery,wehavedefinedtheseasseparateoutcomesfromtheprimaryoutcome.
DataCollection,Synthesis,andMeta-analysis
RelevantsystematicreviewswereidentifiedforeachclinicalquestionbysearchingonPubMed/MEDLINEthroughJanuary2011.Allidentifiedsystematicreviewswerepresentedtothegroupinsummaryformatincludingnumberofincludedstudies,numberofpatients,outcomesconsidered,relevantfindingsandmethodologiclimitations.Onesystematicreviewforeachsubjectareawasselected.Reviewswereselectedbasedonmethodologicquality,numberofstudiesincluded,andmostrecentlypublished.Forsubjectareasinwhichnosystematicreviewwasavailable,newreviewswereconducted.Updatedreviewswereperformedforreviewspublishedmorethan2yearspriortothestartoftheguidelinedevelopmentprocess.
Previoussystematicreviewswerechosenbythegroupfortheuseofcorticosteroid,antiviralagent,andcombinedtreatment(recommendations1-6);32theuseofexercisephysiotherapyandelectrostimulationphysiotherapy(recommendations7-9);27andtheuseofsurgicaldecompresssioninthetreatmentofBell’spalsy(recommendation10).23UpdatestothesesystematicreviewswereperformedusingthesamesearchstrategyanddataextractionandsynthesismethodsasdefinedintheprimaryreviewandincludedstudiesuptoJanuary2011.Newsystematicreviewsofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsorobservationalstudieswereconductedforeyeprotectivemeasures(recommendation11),specialistreferral(recommendation12),investigationformalignancy(recommendation13),valuesandpreferences,andcost-resourceuse.
ThesearchesfornewstudiesincludedMEDLINE,EMBASE,CENTRAL,PsychInfo,CINAHL,andthroughJanuary2011.Bibliographiesofrelevantarticleswerealsosearched.IncludedstudiesforallreviewswereRCT’swiththeexceptionofthesurgicaldecompressionreview,asRCT’sforsurgicaldecompressionwereunavailable.Forrecommendations11-13wedidnotidentifyanyrandomizedcontrolledstudiesorobservationalstudies.Intheabsenceofevidencefromrandomizedcontrolledtrialsorobservationalstudies,recommendationswerebasedonpanelists’personalexperience.
Forneworupdatedreviews,tworeviewers(2ofJDA,CW,JL,SS)screenedallstudiesforeligibilityandextracteddata.Disagreementswereresolvedbyconsensus.Foreachreview,thesetting,patienteligibility,numberofpatients,treatmentineacharm,andoutcomesconsideredineachstudywasrecorded,anddatawasgatheredforeachofthechosenoutcomes.RiskofbiaswasassessedusingCochranesystematicreviewguidelines,whichassessadequacyofrandomsequencegeneration,allocationconcealment,blinding,losstofollow-up,selectivereporting,orotherbiases.33Meta-analyseswereconductedusingRevManSoftware(version5.0).HeterogeneitywasassessedusingtheI2statistic.
Foreachtreatmentorintervention,wecreatedsummarytablessummarizingtheavailableevidenceassuggestedbytheGRADEworkinggroup.29Thesesummarytablesincludedinformationforallidentifieddesirableandundesirableoutcomes.Foreachoutcome,werecordedthenumberofstudies,numberofpatients,evidenceratings,relativeriskwithtreatment,baselinerisk,interventiongrouprisk,numberneededtotreat,qualityofevidence,andoutcomeimportance.
EvaluatingConfidenceinEffectEstimates(QualityofEvidence)
ConfidenceineffectestimateswasassessedbasedonguidelinessuggestedbytheGRADEworkinggroup.29Inshort,theGRADEgroupsuggeststhattheconfidenceineffectestimatesforanyoutcomecanbegivenoneoffourgrades(verylow,low,moderate,orhigh).Factorsthatcandecreasetheconfidenceineffectestimateincluderiskofbias,inconsistencyofresults,indirectnessofevidence,imprecision,andpublicationbias.Factorsthatincreasetheconfidenceinaneffectestimateincludealargemagnitudeofeffect,plausibleconfoundingthatwouldreduceademonstratedeffect,andadose-responsegradient.Theoverallconfidenceforanygivenrecommendationisbasedonevaluatingtheconfidenceineffectestimatesforalltheoutcomesofinterest.Weratedtheoverallconfidenceacrossalloftheseoutcomesasthelowestconfidenceofeffectestimateforanycriticaloutcome.
MakingRecommendations(GRADE)
RecommendationsweremadeusingtheGRADEsystem28-31whichcategorizesrecommendationsasstrongorweak.Thestrengthofrecommendationsarebasedonfourfactors:28thebalanceofdesirableandundesirableconsequences,theconfidenceineffectestimateforeachofthecriticalandimportantoutcomes,29variabilityinpatientvaluesandpreferencesandresourceuse.31
Recommendationsweremadebasedonnominalgrouptechniqueswherebythegroupmembersmetbyconferencecall,voicedtheiropinions,andreflectedontheopinionsofothers.Attheendofthediscussionandafterconsideringtheabovefourfactors,thegroupmadeaconsensusrecommendation—eitherstrongorweakinfavouroragainstornorecommendation.Whenconsensuswaselusive(recommendations5and7),therecommendationsweresubmittedtoablindvoteandrecommendationswerebasedonaprocesspreviouslydescribed.34Eachworkinggroupmembervotedinoneoffivecategories(stronginfavor,weakinfavor,norecommendation,weakagainst,strongagainst).Forarecommendationtobeinfavouratleast50%ofgroupmemberswererequiredtovoteinfavour,withnomorethan20%votingagainst.Forarecommendationtobestrongrecommendation,atleast70%ofthegroupwererequiredtoendorseitasastrongrecommendation.
ConflictsofInterest
Groupmembersdisclosedfinancialandintellectualconflictsofinterest(AppendixA:COIDeclarationForm)).Eachpotentialconflictofinterest(COI)wasevaluatedtodeterminewhethertheCOIwasacceptableorunacceptable.Thefollowingcriteriaweredeterminedaprioriandservedasexclusioncriteriafrompanelinvolvement.
Significantequityholdingincompanyrelatedtothesubjectmatteroftheguidelines
Significantincomeoriginatingfromacompanyrelatedtothesubjectmatteroftheguidelines
Refusaltoavoidfinancialinvolvementinindustriestiedtotherapiesforwhichrecommendationswillbemadeforaperiodofayearfollowingthedevelopmentoftheguidelines.
FourpanelmembersweredeterminedtohaveimportantbutacceptableCOI’s.Threemembers(JDA,GG,JC)hadanintellectualCOIwiththerecommendationsforantiviralandcorticosteroidtherapyastheyhadpreviouslypublishedonthistopic.Onemember(SL)hadafinancialCOIonthetopicofexercisephysiotherapyassheiscurrentlyinvolvedinthedeliveryofthisserviceinprivatepractice.Theseindividualswerepermittedtoparticipateincollectingandinterpretingevidence,butwerenotinvolvedinthedeliberationforrecommendationsforwhichtheywereconflicted.35
Implementation
Implementationoftheseguidelineswillbeginwithpublicationofthecompletedmanuscript,whichwillfacilitatewidedistribution.Endorsingorganizationswillbeaskedtomakeacopyoftheguidelinesavailabletophysicianandotherhealth-caremembers.Toaidinutilizationoftheseguidelines,allpertinenthealth-carestakeholdershavebeeninvolvedintheguidelinemakingprocessandrelevantprofessionalorganizationshavebeeninvitedtoreviewand/orendorsetheguideline.
RecommendationsandRationale
1)CorticosteroidtreatmentforacuteBell’spalsyofanyseverity.
InpatientswithacuteBell’spalsyofanyseverity,werecommendtheuseofcorticosteroids.(StrongRecommendation:ModerateConfidenceinEffectEstimate)
Systematicreviewoftheliteratureyieldedtenstudiescomparingcorticosteroidstoplaceboincluding1285patients(Table4,5,6).36-46Wehadmoderateconfidenceineffectestimatebecauseofimprecisionineffectestimates.Meta-analysisofthesestudiesdemonstratedarelativerisk(RR)of0.69(95%CI,0.55-0.87)ofunsatisfactoryfacialrecovery.32Inthepreviouslypublishedmeta-analysis,32asubgroupanalysiswaspresentedformildtomoderateparesis(3studies)36,41,42versusseveretocomplete(4studies)36,41,42,43paralysis.Statisticalanalysisdidnotshowastatisticallysignificantsteroidsubgroupeffect(i.e.nodifferenceinrelativeriskinthetwogroups),eitherduetoasubgroupeffectnotbeingpresent,orduetoinsufficientpowertoshowaneffect.32WethereforeappliedthesameRR(0.69;95%CI,0.55–0.87)forbothmildtomoderateparesisandseveretocompleteparalysisatpresentation.
Theestimatedriskofincompleterecoverywithouttreatmentforpatientswithmildtomoderateparesiswas6per10019andacorrespondingriskwithtreatmentof4per100(95%CI,3-5)resultinginanabsoluteriskreductionof2%(95%CI,1-3%)andanumberneededtotreat(NNT)of50(95%CI,33-100).Inpatientswithseveretocompleteparesis,thebaselineriskforincompleterecoveryis39per100.19theriskofunsatisfactoryrecoveryaftertreatmentwithcorticosteroidsis27outof100(95%CI,21–34)resultinginanabsoluteriskreductionof12%inthisgroup(95%CI,5–18%)correspondingtoanNNTof8(95%CI,6–20)(Table6).Threestudieswith671patientsshowedasignificantreductioninsynkinesisandautonomicdysfunction(RR=0.56;95%CI,0.41-0.76),36,40,45withasimilarnumberneededtotreatof8(95%CI,(6–17).
Althoughcorticosteroidshavepotentialcomplications,sevenstudiesinvolving1155patientsshowednoincreaseriskofmajororminorsideeffectsinthosereceivingshorttermtreatmentversuscontrolsubjects.36,37,39,40,41,44,45Therewerenoreportedcasesofavascularnecrosisofthehipinpatientstreatedwithcorticosteroids.Onestudyreported4episodesofgastriculcerationinpatientstreatedwithcorticosteroidsgivenincombinationwithantiviralsandnoepisodesincontrolpatients.47
Thedosingregimensforcorticosteroidswerehighlyvariableinthesystematicreview.Allstudiesusedeitherprednisoneorprednisolonederivatives.Allbutonestudy36usedataperedregimen.Thedurationoftreatmentrangedfrom6to17days,40,45with6studiesusingatendaycourse.36,37,39,41,43,44Subgroupanalysisinthepreviouslypublishedmeta-analysisidentifiedasignificantlybettereffectwithatotaldoseof450mgorhighercomparedtolessthan450mg.32Areasonableregimensuggestedbyfouroftheincludedstudiesinvolvesafivedaycourseof60mgperdayfollowedbyafivedaytaper,reducingthepreviousday’sdoseby10mgperday.37,39,41,44
Thewindowofopportunityfortreatmentwithcorticosteroidsisunclear.Somerecenttrialsonlyincludedpatientstreatedwithin72hoursofsymptomonset.18,37Weperformedsubgroupanalysestoseeifpatientstreatedoutsideofthiswindowhadpoorerrecoveryandwereunabletoshowadifference.32However,arecentsubgroupanalysisofthelargeSwedishrandomizedcontrolledtrial,suggestedthatsteroidsareonlybeneficialifstartedwithinthefirst48hours(p=0.5).48
Thetreatingclinicianshouldexploreforrelativecontraindicationstocorticosteroidtherapysuchasdiabetes,pepticulcerdiseaseandaremotehistoryoftuberculosis.Ifpresent,adiscussionwiththepatient,explainingthepotentialbenefitofcorticosteroidsintreatingBell’spalsyandthepotentialrisksshouldensue.
UsingcorticosteroidsforthetreatmentofBell’spalsyisalsocost-effective.BasedonresourceusedatafromarecentUKcost-effectivenessanalysis,corticosteroidstreatmentdominatedallothertreatmentoptionsincludingplacebo,combinedcorticosteroidsandantiviraltherapy,andantiviralalonetreatment.49Patientsonsteroidsrequiredfeweroutpatientspecialistvisitsandfewervisitstotheprimarycarephysicianthanallothertreatmentarms.I
AntiviralswithoutcorticosteroidsforacuteBell’spalsyofanyseverity.
InpatientspresentingwithacuteBell’sPalsyofanyseverity,werecommendagainstantiviraltreatmentalone.(StrongRecommendation:ModerateConfidenceinEffectEstimate)
Systematicreviewoftheliteratureyieldedtwostudiescomparingantiviralsplusplacebotodoubleplaceboincluding658patients(Table4,5,7).36,37,46Therewerenosignificantstudylimitationsorpublicationbias,theresultswereconsistentanddirect.However,therewassomeimprecisionintheeffectestimates.Meta-analysisofthesestudiesdemonstratednobenefitintherelativeriskofunsatisfactoryrecovery(RR=1.14;95%CI0.8-1.62)forpatientstreatedwithantiviralscomparedtoplacebo.Subgroupanalysisfailedtodetectadifferenceineffectbetweenpatientswithmildtomoderateparesisandthosewithseveretocompleteparalysis.
Majorandminorsideeffectsassociatedwithantiviraltherapywereinfrequent.Oneepisodeofrecurrentatrialfibrillationwasdescribedinapatientwhoreceivedantiviralagents.Meta-analysisoftwostudies(N=653)comparingantiviraltherapytoplacebodidnotshowanincreaseriskofmajororminorsideeffects,althoughwideconfidenceintervalsduetosmallnumbersoftrialsandoutcomeeventsresultedinconsiderableimprecision.36,37
Therewasnosignificantbenefitofantiviraltherapyforsynkinesisandautonomicdysfunction(RR=1.04;95%CI,0.75–1.43,onetrial,N=373);painat9months(AdjustedOddsRatio(OR)=0.05,95%CI-0.91–1.01,onetrial,N=496);36orhealth-relatedqualityoflifeat9months(AdjustedOR)=-0.02,95%CI-0.05-0.01,onetrial,N=496).36
Inastudyofcost-utility,administrationofantiviralswasshowntobemorecostlyandlesseffectivethannotherapysuggestingthatantiviraltreatmentwasdominatedbynotreatment,corticosteroidalone,andcombinedtreatment.49Patientstreatedwithantiviralsalonerequiredmorevisitstotheirgeneralpractitionersandmorespecialistoutpatientappointmentsthanallothertreatmentarmsandthantheplacebogroup.
CombinedCorticosteroid/AntiviraltherapyforAcuteBell’sPalsywithmildtomoderateparesis
ForpatientspresentingwithacuteBell’spalsywithmildtomoderateparesis,wesuggestagainsttheadditionofantiviralstocorticosteroidsforpatients(Weakrecommendation:ModerateConfidenceinEffectEstimate).
Systematicreviewoftheliteratureyielded8studiescomparingcombinedcorticosteroidsandantiviraltherapytocorticosteroidsalonethatincluded1298patients(Table8).36,37,38,46,50-54Theconfidenceineffectestimatewasratedasmoderateduetosomeimprecisionineffectestimates.Meta-analysisofthesestudiesdemonstratedarelativeriskofunsatisfactoryrecoveryof0.75(95%CI,0.56-1.00)forpatientstreatedwithcombinedtherapycomparedtocorticosteroidsalone.Assumingariskofunsatisfactoryfacialrecoveryinpatientswithmildormoderateparesiswithcorticosteroidonlytreatmentof4per100,thecorrespondingriskwithcombinedtreatmentis3per100(95%CI,2-4)resultinginanabsoluteriskreductionof1%(95%CI,0–2%).
Majorandminorsideeffectsassociatedwithaddinganantiviraltocorticosteroidtherapywereinfrequent.Meta-analysisoffourstudies(N=941)comparingantiviraltherapytoplacebodidnotshowanincreaseriskofmajor(RR1.33,95%CI0.26–6.82)orminorsideeffects(RR1.160.81-1.62),althoughwideconfidenceintervalsduetosmallnumbersoftrialsandoutcomeeventsresultedinconsiderableimprecision.36,37,47,50
Inthreestudieswith511patients,therewasareductionintheriskofsynkinesisandautonomicdysfunctionwhenanantiviralwasaddedtocorticosteroid(RR0.59;95%CI0.39-0.89).36,40,45Assumingariskofsynkinesisof15per100inpatientstreatedonlywithcorticosteroids,19thecorrespondingriskwiththeadditionofanantiviralis9per100,withaNNTof17(95%CI20-50).
Thecost-effectivenessanalysiscitedabovealsoaddressedtheadditionofantiviraltherapyandfoundthatcorticosteroidmonotherapywaslesscostlyandmoreeffectivethancombinedtherapy.49Inourmeta-analysisofseveralstudiesincludingthetrialonwhichthiscost-effectivenessstudywasbased,wefoundthecontrary;thattheadditionofantiviralstocorticosteroidsismoreeffectivethancorticosteroidmonotherapy.Thisdifferenceislikelyduetoincreasedstatisticalpowerasaresultofpoolingstudies.
Theweakrecommendationagainsttheuseofantiviralsforpatientswithmildtomoderateparesisplacesrelativelyhighvalueonthelowabsolutereduction(andhighnumberneededtotreat)intheriskofunsatisfactoryrecoveryandrelativelylowvalueonthebenefitofreducedsynkinesis.Patientswithmildtomoderateparesiswhoplacehighervalueonavoidingsynkinesismightconsiderantiviralsinadditiontocorticosteroids.
CombinedCorticosteroid/antiviralforacuteBell’sPalsywithsevereparesistocompleteparalysis
ForpatientswithacuteBell’spalsywithseveretocompleteparesis,wesuggestthecombineduseofantiviralsandcorticosteroids.(WeakRecommendation:ModerateConfidenceinEffectEstimate)
Asinthepreviousrecommendation,meta-analysisdemonstratedarelativeriskofunsatisfactoryrecoveryof0.75(95%CI0.56-1.00)forpatientstreatedwithcombinedtherapycomparedtocorticosteroidsalone.32However,inthesevereparesistocompleteparalysisgroup,theriskofunsatisfactoryrecoverywithcorticosteroidaloneis27per100andthecorrespondingriskwithantiviralsandcorticosteroidsis20per100(95%CI;15–27)resultinginanabsoluteriskreductionof7%(95%CI,0–12%).
Thedosingregimenforantiviralswasheterogenousacrosstheincludedstudies.Fivestudiesusedvalacyclovir,37,38,50,51,52whilethreeusedacyclovir.36,53,54Nostudiesusedataperedregimen.Treatmentdurationvariedbetween5to10days—threestudiesuseda5dayregimen;50,51,533studiesuseda7dayregimen;37,38,52and2studiesuseda10dayregimen.36,54Allstudiesprescribingacyclovirusedaminimum
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 大大一班數(shù)學試卷
- 不同位勢下擬線性薛定諤方程解的存在性問題
- PARP抑制劑對骨肉瘤X射線-碳離子放療增敏和腫瘤免疫增效的機制研究
- 五元體系K+,NH4+-Cl-,H2PO4-,(NH2)2CO-H2O共結(jié)晶的研究
- 2025年度贍養(yǎng)老人醫(yī)療費用分攤及子女責任合同
- 2025年度餐飲企業(yè)員工健康保險勞動合同
- 2025年度防火卷簾門行業(yè)質(zhì)量監(jiān)督與認證服務(wù)合同
- 二零二五年度研究生定向培養(yǎng)協(xié)議書:智能制造與自動化專業(yè)研究生定向培養(yǎng)協(xié)議
- 2025年度道路養(yǎng)護項目竣工驗收合同
- 2025年度父母贈與子女保險理賠資金贈與協(xié)議
- 乳腺癌的綜合治療及進展
- 【大學課件】基于BGP協(xié)議的IP黑名單分發(fā)系統(tǒng)
- 2025年八省聯(lián)考高考語文試題真題解讀及答案詳解課件
- 信息安全意識培訓(xùn)課件
- 2024年山東省泰安市初中學業(yè)水平生物試題含答案
- 美的MBS精益管理體系
- 中國高血壓防治指南(2024年修訂版)解讀課件
- 2024安全員知識考試題(全優(yōu))
- 法律訴訟及咨詢服務(wù) 投標方案(技術(shù)標)
- 格式塔心理咨詢理論與實踐
- 英語六級詞匯(全)
評論
0/150
提交評論