美國版權(quán)與人工智能報告_第1頁
美國版權(quán)與人工智能報告_第2頁
美國版權(quán)與人工智能報告_第3頁
美國版權(quán)與人工智能報告_第4頁
美國版權(quán)與人工智能報告_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩133頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

unitedstatescopyrightoffice

CopyrightandArtificialIntelligence

Part1:DigitalReplicas

AREPORTOfThEREgisTEROfcOPyRighTsjuly2024

unitedstatescopyrightoffice

CopyrightandArtificialIntelligence

Part1:DigitalReplicas

AREPORTOfThEREgisTEROfcOPyRighTsjuly2024

ABOUTTHISREPORT

ThisReportbytheU.S.CopyrightOfficeaddressesthelegalandpolicyissuesrelatedtoartificialintelligence(“AI”)andcopyright,asoutlinedintheOffice’sAugust2023Noticeof

Inquiry(“NOI”).

TheReportwillbepublishedinseveralParts,eachoneaddressingadifferenttopic.ThefirstPartaddressesthetopicofdigitalreplicas—theuseofdigitaltechnologytorealistically

replicateanindividual’svoiceorappearance.SubsequentPartswillturntootherissuesraisedintheNOI,includingthecopyrightabilityofworkscreatedusinggenerativeAI,trainingofAImodelsoncopyrightedworks,licensingconsiderations,andallocationofanypotentialliability.Tolearnmore,visit/AI.

ABOUTTHEU.S.COPYRIGHTOFFICE

TheU.S.CopyrightOfficeisthefederalagencychargedbystatutewiththe

administrationofU.S.copyrightlaw.TheRegisterofCopyrightsadvisesCongress,providesinformationandassistancetocourtsandexecutivebranchagencies,andconductsstudieson

nationalandinternationalissuesrelatingtocopyright,othermattersarisingunderTitle17,andrelatedmatters.TheCopyrightOfficeishousedintheLibraryofCongress.Itsmissionis“to

promotescreativityandfreeexpressionbyadministeringthenation’scopyrightlawsandby

providingimpartial,expertadviceoncopyrightlawandpolicyforthebenefitofall.”Formoreinformation,visit.

FOREWORDFROMTHEREGISTEROFCOPYRIGHTS

Therecentemergenceofsophisticatedgenerativeartificialintelligence(“AI”)models

availableforusebyconsumersconstitutesamajorleapforwardintechnology.Itpresentsbothexcitingopportunitiesandcomplexchallengesforsocietyasawhole,whichhavecapturedtheattentionofpolicymakersaroundtheworld,aswellasthepressandthepublic.

Oneoftheareasaffectedisintellectualproperty.Copyrightissuesinparticularhaverisentotheforefront,duetotheirvisibility,immediacy,andrelevancetotheaverageperson.Bythefallof2022,millionsofAmericanswereutilizinggenerativeAIsystemsandservicestoproduceanastonishingarrayofexpressivematerial,includingvisualart,text,andmusic.

Almostweekly,tremendousstrideshavebeenannouncedinthetechnology’scapabilities.

ArtistshaveharnessedthepowerofAItofindnewwaystoexpressthemselvesandnewwaysofconnectingwithaudiences.Atthesametime,AI-generateddeepfakeshaveproliferated

online,fromcelebrities’imagesendorsingproductstopoliticians’likenessesseekingtoaffectvoterbehavior.Overthepastyearorso,theresultingdebateshaveintensified,with

enthusiasmaboutthepromiseofextraordinarytechnicalpotentialtemperedbyconcernabouttheimpactonindividuals’livelihoodsandreputations.

AIraisesfundamentalquestionsforcopyrightlawandpolicy,whichmanyseeas

existential.TowhatextentwillAI-generatedcontentreplacehumanauthorship?Howdoes

humancreativitydifferinnaturefromwhatAIsystemscangenerate,noworinthefuture?

Whatdoesthismeanfortheincentive-basedfoundationoftheU.S.copyrightsystem?Inwhatwayscanthetechnologyserveasavaluabletooltoamplifyhumancreativityandultimately

promotescienceandthearts?Howdowerespectandrewardhumancreatorswithoutimpedingtechnologicalprogress?

Forcopyright,thisisthelatestchapterinasymbioticrelationshipwithtechnology.

Throughouthistory,technologicalinnovationhasshapedtheevolutionofcopyrightlawandpolicy,withnewformsofexpression,suchasphotography,motionpictures,andcomputer

programs;newmethodsofcopying,suchasphotocopiersandvideo-cassetterecorders;and

newmeansofdistribution,suchasradio,television,andtheinternet.Inrecentdecades,the

paceofchangehassharplyaccelerated,andtoday’sgenerativeAItoolshavepickeditupevenfurther.Thelate20thcenturysawtheCopyrightActamendedtorespondtothechallengeofdigitalnetworkedtechnology.Historyhasshownthatthecopyrightsystemisresilientand

continuestoevolveasneeded.

Inresponsetotheimportanceandurgencyofthecopyrightissues,inearly2023theCopyrightOfficeinitiatedthestudythatledtothisReport.Ourworkisjustonepartofabroadernationalandglobalconversation.IntheUnitedStates,theBidenAdministration’s

October2023ExecutiveOrderontheSafe,Secure,andTrustworthyDevelopmentandUseof

ArtificialIntelligenceaddresseshowAItechnologiescanbedeployedsafelyandresponsibly

whiletakingintoaccountconcernsaboutfraud,bias,andtransparency,aswellastheimpactonintellectualpropertyrights.Otheragenciesareexaminingissueswithintheirownareasof

jurisdiction,andCongressisdebatingtheneedforlegislation.GovernmentsofothercountriesaresimilarlygrapplingwiththepotentialimpactofAIinallofitsforms.

AswithalloftheCopyrightOffice’sstudies,ouranalysisisguidedbytheConstitutionalgoalofpromotingcreativityinorderultimatelytobenefitthepublic.Thisrequiresan

appropriatebalance,enablingtechnologytomoveforwardwhileensuringthathuman

creativitycontinuestothrive.ItisourhopethatthisReportwillfurtherproductivediscussionsinCongress,thecourts,andtheexecutivebranch,tohelpachievethatbalance.

ShiraPerlmutter

RegisterofCopyrightsandDirectorU.S.CopyrightOffice

PREFACE

Inearly2023,theU.S.CopyrightOfficeannouncedabroadinitiativetoexploretheintersectionofcopyrightandartificialintelligence.

InMarchofthatyear,theOfficereleasedapolicystatementwithregistrationguidanceforworksincorporatingAI-generatedcontent.Overthespringandsummer,wehostedaseriesofonlinelisteningsessions,presentededucationalwebinars,andengagedwithnumerous

stakeholderstoenhanceourunderstandingofthetechnologyandhowitisused,thecopyrightimplications,andthepotentialimpactonbusinessesandindividuals.

TheseactivitiesculminatedinanAugust2023NoticeofInquiry,formallyseekingpublicinputonthefullrangeofcopyrightissuesthathadbeenraised.Inresponse,wereceivedmorethan10,000commentsrepresentingabroadrangeofperspectives,includingfromauthorsandcomposers,performersandartists,publishersandproducers,lawyersandacademics,

technologycompanies,libraries,sportsleagues,tradegroupsandpublicinterestorganizations,andevenaclassofmiddleschoolstudents.Commentscamefromall50statesandfrom67

countries.Thatvaluableandextensiveinput,supplementedbyadditionalOfficeresearchandinformationreceivedfromotheragencies,formsthebasisforthediscussionand

recommendationsinthisReport.

unitedstatescopyrightoffice

CopyrightandArtificialIntelligence

Part1:DigitalReplicas

AREPORTOfThEREgisTEROfcOPyRighTsjuly2024

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

i

TABLEOFCONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION 1

A.AIandDigitalReplicas 2

B.BackgroundofThisStudy 6

II.PROTECTIONAGAINSTUNAUTHORIZEDDIGITALREPLICAS 8

A.ExistingLegalFrameworks 8

1.StateCommonandStatutoryLaw 8

a)RightofPrivacy 8

b)RightofPublicity 10

c)NewStateRegulationofDigitalReplicas 15

2.FederalLaw 16

a)CopyrightAct 17

b)FederalTradeCommissionAct 17

c)LanhamAct 19

d)CommunicationsAct 20

3.PrivateAgreements 21

B.TheNeedforFederalLegislation 22

1.ShortcomingsofExistingLaws 23

2.CongressionalActivity 24

a)NoAIFRAUDAct 26

b)NOFAKESActDiscussionDraft 28

3.TheContoursofaNewRight 28

a)SubjectMatter 29

b)PersonsProtected 29

c)TermofProtection 30

d)InfringingActs 33

(i)CommercialNatureofUse 34

(ii)KnowledgeStandard 35

(iii)SecondaryLiability 36

e)LicensingandAssignment 39

(i)Duration 41

ii

(ii)InformedConsent 42

(iii)ContractswithMinors 42

f)FirstAmendmentConcerns 43

g)Remedies 47

h)Preemption 48

4.RelationshiptoSection114(b)oftheCopyrightAct 50

III.PROTECTIONOFARTISTICSTYLE 53

IV.CONCLUSION 57

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

iii

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

ThisfirstPartoftheCopyrightOffice’sReportoncopyrightandartificialintelligence(“AI”

)1

addressesthetopicofdigitalreplicas.FromAI-generatedmusicalperformancesto

robocallimpersonationsofpoliticalcandidatestoimagesinpornographicvideos,aneraof

sophisticateddigitalreplicashasarrived.Althoughtechnologieshavelongbeenavailabletoproducefakeimagesorrecordings,generativeA

I2

technology’sabilitytodosoeasily,quickly,andwithuncannyverisimilitudehasdrawntheattentionandconcernofcreators,legislators,andthegeneralpublic.

AspartofabroadAIInitiative,theCopyrightOfficesoughtcommentsonthese

developments.Weaskedwhetherexistinglawsprovidesufficientprotectionagainst

unauthorizeddigitalreplicasorifnewprotectionisneededatthefederallevel.Inresponse,

numerouscommenterscalledforanewfederallawtoprotectindividualsfromthe

appropriationoftheirpersona.Theyprovidedextensiveinputintothejustificationsforandtheappropriateparametersofsuchalaw.

InthemonthssincetheOffice’sinquirywaslaunched,unauthorizeddigitalreplicas

havecontinuedtomakeheadlines,andhavetriggeredCongressionalactivity.Duringthistime,weanalyzedthecommentsreceived,performedadditionalresearch,andconsultedwithotheragenciesontheirrelevantareasofexpertise.Basedonallofthisinput,wehaveconcludedthatanewlawisneeded.Thespeed,precision,andscaleofAI-createddigitalreplicascallsfor

promptfederalaction.Withoutarobustnationwideremedy,theirunauthorizedpublicationanddistributionthreatensubstantialharmnotonlyintheentertainmentandpoliticalarenas,butalsoforprivateindividuals.

SectionIsummarizesthecontextandhistoryoftheOffice’sstudyofthedigitalreplicasissue.SectionII.Aoutlinesthemainexistinglegalframeworks:staterightsofprivacyand

publicity,includingrecentlegislationspecificallytargetingdigitalreplicas,andatthefederallevel,theCopyrightAct,theFederalTradeCommissionAct,theCommunicationsAct,andtheLanhamAct.

1ForpurposesoftheCopyrightOffice’sReportonCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,“AI”or“Artificial

Intelligence”isageneralclassificationofautomatedsystemsdesignedtoperformtaskstypicallyassociatedwith

humanintelligenceorcognitivefunctions.ArtificialIntelligenceStudy:NoticeofInquiry,88Fed.Reg.59942,59948(Aug.30,2023)(“NOI”).SeealsoJohnS.McCainNationalDefenseAuthorizationActforFiscalYear2019,Pub.L.

115–232,§238(g)(2),132Stat.1636,1697–98(2018)(defining“artificialintelligence”toincludesystems“developedincomputersoftware,physicalhardware,orothercontextthatsolvestasksrequiringhuman-likeperception,cognition,planning,learning,communication,orphysicalaction”).

2“GenerativeAI”referstoapplicationsofAIusedtogenerateoutputsintheformofexpressivematerialsuchastext,images,audio,orvideo.NOIat59948–49.

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

iv

InSectionII.B,weexplainwhyexistinglawsdonotprovidesufficientlegalredressforthoseharmedbyunauthorizeddigitalreplicasandproposetheadoptionofanewfederallaw.Wemakethefollowingrecommendationsregardingitscontours:

?SubjectMatter.Thestatuteshouldtargetthosedigitalreplicas,whethergeneratedbyAIorotherwise,thataresorealisticthattheyaredifficulttodistinguishfrom

authenticdepictions.Protectionshouldbenarrowerthan,anddistinctfrom,thebroader“name,image,andlikeness”protectionsofferedbymanystates.

?PersonsProtected.Thestatuteshouldcoverallindividuals,notjustcelebrities,

publicfigures,orthosewhoseidentitieshavecommercialvalue.Everyoneis

vulnerabletotheharmsthatunauthorizeddigitalreplicascancause,regardlessoftheirleveloffameorpriorcommercialexposure.

?TermofProtection.Protectionshouldendureatleastfortheindividual’slifetime.Anypostmortemprotectionshouldbelimitedinduration,potentiallywiththe

optiontoextendthetermiftheindividual’spersonacontinuestobeexploited.

?InfringingActs.Liabilityshouldarisefromthedistributionormakingavailableofanunauthorizeddigitalreplica,butnottheactofcreationalone.Itshouldnotbe

limitedtocommercialuses,astheharmscausedareoftenpersonalinnature.It

shouldrequireactualknowledgeboththattherepresentationwasadigitalreplicaofaparticularindividualandthatitwasunauthorized.

?SecondaryLiability.Traditionaltortprinciplesofsecondaryliabilityshouldapply.Thestatuteshouldincludeasafeharbormechanismthatincentivizesonlineserviceproviderstoremoveunauthorizeddigitalreplicasafterreceivingeffectivenoticeorotherwiseobtainingknowledgethattheyareunauthorized.

?LicensingandAssignment.Individualsshouldbeabletolicenseandmonetizetheirdigitalreplicarights,subjecttoguardrails,butnottoassignthemoutright.Licensesoftherightsofminorsshouldrequireadditionalsafeguards.

?FirstAmendmentConcerns.Freespeechconcernsshouldexpresslybeaddressedinthestatute.Theuseofabalancingframework,ratherthancategoricalexemptions,wouldavoidoverbreadthandallowgreaterflexibility.

?Remedies.Effectiveremediesshouldbeprovided,bothinjunctivereliefand

monetarydamages.Theinclusionofstatutorydamagesand/orprevailingpartyattorney’sfeesprovisionswouldensurethatprotectionisavailabletoindividualsregardlessoftheirfinancialresources.Insomecircumstances,criminalliability

wouldbeappropriate.

?RelationshiptoStateLaws.Givenwell-establishedstaterightsofpublicityand

privacy,theOfficedoesnotrecommendfullfederalpreemption.Federallawshouldprovideafloorofconsistentprotectionnationwide,withstatescontinuingtobeable

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

v

toprovideadditionalprotections.Itshouldbeclarifiedthatsection114(b)ofthe

CopyrightActdoesnotpreemptorconflictwithlawsrestrictingunauthorizedvoicedigitalreplicas.

SectionIIIdiscussesprotectionagainstAIoutputsthatdeliberatelyimitateanartist’sstyle.Weacknowledgetheseriousnessofcreators’concernsandidentifylegalremedies

availabletoaddressthistypeofharm.Wedonot,however,recommendincludingstyleinthecoverageofnewlegislationatthistime.

TheOfficeappreciatesandhasbenefittedfromtheextensiveandthoughtfulcommentswereceivedonthisimportanttopic.WeremainavailabletoassistasCongresscontinuesto

considerlegislativesolutions.

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

1

I.INTRODUCTION

InAprilof2023,anewsongfeaturingthevoicesofDrakeandTheWeeknddrewoverfifteenmillionviewsonsocialmediaandsixhundredthousandlistensonSpotify

.3

Yetneitherartistwasawareofthesongbeforeitsrelease,becausethevocalswereunauthorized,AI-

generatedreplicas

.4

Theviralhit“HeartonMySleeve,”commonlyreferredtoasthe“FakeDrake”song,isahigh-profileexampleofaburgeoningsubgenreofsoundrecordingsusinggenerativeAI

system

s5

tocreatevocalsthatcanpassforthoseofafavoriteartist

.6

Vocaltracksaremerelyoneformofincreasinglyrealisticreplicasofindividuals’voices,images,andartisticstyles

.7

Ina

shortperiodoftime,generativeAItechnologyhasbecomesosophisticated,andsoaccessible,thatminimalexpertiseisrequiredtorapidlyproducesuchreplicas

.8

Onsocialmediaandotherinternetplatforms,theirvolumehasskyrocketed

.9

3BillDonahue,FakeDrake&TheWeekndSong—MadeWithAI—PulledFromStreamingAfterGoingViral,BILLBOARD(Apr.17,2023),

/pro/fake-ai-drake-the-weeknd-song-pulled-streaming/

.

4ColinStutz,TheFakeDrakeAISongEarnedMillionsofStreams—ButWillAnyoneGetPaid?,BILLBOARD(Apr.19,2023),

/pro/fake-drake-ai-song-earned-millions-streams-get-paid/

.

5An“AISystem”isasoftwareproductorservicethatsubstantiallyincorporatesoneormoreAImodelsandis

designedforusebyanend-user.NOIat59948;seealsoJamesM.InhofeNationalDefenseAuthorizationActforFiscalYear2023,Pub.L.117–263,§7223(4)(A),136Stat.2395,3669(2022)(defining“artificialintelligencesystem”as“any

datasystem,software,application,tool,orutilitythatoperatesinwholeorinpartusingdynamicorstaticmachinelearningalgorithmsorotherformsofartificialintelligence”).

6JoeCoscarelli,AnA.I.HitofFake‘Drake’and‘TheWeeknd’RattlestheMusicWorld,N.Y.TIMES(Apr.19,2023),

/2023/04/19/arts/music/ai-drake-the-weeknd-fake.html

.

7See,e.g.,MelissaHeikkil?,ThisArtistIsDominatingAI-GeneratedArt.AndHe’sNotHappyAboutIt,MITTECH.REV.

(Sept.16,2022),

/2022/09/16/1059598/this-artist-is-dominating-ai-generated-art

-

and-hes-not-happy-about-it/;JaneFriedman,IWouldRatherSeeMyBooksGetPiratedThanThis(Or:WhyGoodreadsandAmazonAreBecomingDumpsterFires),JANEFRIEDMANBLOG(Aug.20,2023),

/i-would-rather

-see-my-books-pirated/.

8SeeFederalTradeCommission(“FTC”)CommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat2(Oct.30,2023)(“FTCInitialComments”)(“AlthoughpolicymakershavedebatedthedisruptivepotentialofAIfordecades,thepaceofthetechnology’sdevelopmentandrollouthasacceleratedinrecentyears...

.”);Fast,Relax,&TurboModes,MIDJOURNEY,

/docs/fast-relax

(“WaittimesforRelaxare

dynamicbutgenerallyrangebetween0–10minutesperjob....TurboModeisavailableforsubscriberswhowant

extremelyquickimagegeneration....JobsruninTurbomodegenerateuptofourtimesfaster....”)(lastvisitedJuly21,2024);KarenX.Cheng(@karenxcheng),INSTAGRAM(Apr.11,2022),

/p/CcN5nBSpO9W/

(demonstratinghowtogenerateanimageinsecondsusingDALL·E).

9E.g.,DonPhilmlee,PracticeInnovations:Seeingisnolongerbelieving—theriseofdeepfakes,THOMSONREUTERS(July18,2023),

/en-us/posts/technology/practice-innovations-deepfakes/

.

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

2

A.AIandDigitalReplicas

ThisReportusestheterm“digitalreplica”torefertoavideo,image,oraudiorecordingthathasbeendigitallycreatedormanipulatedtorealisticallybutfalselydepictanindividual.A“digitalreplica”maybeauthorizedorunauthorizedandcanbeproducedbyanytypeofdigitaltechnology,notjustAI.Theterms“digitalreplicas”and“deepfakes”areusedhere

interchangeably

.10

Digitalreplicasmayhavebothbeneficialandharmfuluses.Onthepositiveside,theycanserveasaccessibilitytoolsforpeoplewithdisabilities

,11

enable“performances”bydeceasedornon-touringartists

,12

supportcreativework

,13

orallowindividualstolicense,andbe

compensatedfor,theuseoftheirvoice,image,andlikeness

.14

Inonenotedexample,musician

10Althoughtheterm“deepfake”isoftenassociatedwithunauthorizedordeceptiveuses,especiallyinexplicit

imagery,seeinfranotes22–23,somedictionarydefinitionsarebroader.Seedeepfake,MERRIAM-WEBSTERDICTIONARY,

/dictionary/deepfake

(“animageorrecordingthathasbeenconvincinglyalteredandmanipulatedtomisrepresentsomeoneasdoingorsayingsomethingthatwasnotactuallydoneorsaid”)(lastupdatedJuly20,2024);deepfake,CAMBRIDGEDICTIONARY,

/us/dictionary/english/deepfake

(“avideoorsoundrecordingthatreplaces

someone'sfaceorvoicewiththatofsomeoneelse,inawaythatappearsreal”).Inpopularmediatoo,thetermhasbeenusedtodescribeauthorizedusesaswellasmaliciousones.SeeNileshChristopher&VarshaBansal,Indian

VotersAreBeingBombardedWithMillionsofDeepfakes.PoliticalCandidatesApprove,WIRED(May20,2024),

/story/indian-elections-ai-deepfakes/

(“Politiciansareusingaudioandvideodeepfakesofthemselvestoreachvoters—whomayhavenoideathey’vebeentalkingtoaclone.“).

11E.g.,PressRelease,OfficeofCongresswomanJenniferWexton,WextonSharesVideoDebutingNewAIVoice

Model(July10,2024),

/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=952

(“Today,

CongresswomanJenniferWexton(D-VA)sharedavideodebutinganewArtificialIntelligence-generatedmodelofhervoiceasitwasbeforebeingimpactedbyherProgressiveSupranuclearPalsy(PSP)condition.”).

12UniversalMusicGroup(“UMG”),CommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat5–6(Oct.30,2023)(“UMGInitialComments”);seealsoEliasLeight,WillAIBeUsedtoRaiseMusiciansFromtheDead?,BILLBOARD(Nov.29,2023),

/pro/ai-bring-back-dead-artists

-musicians-estate-managers/.

13See,e.g.,LetterfromMotionPictureAssociation(“MPA”),SummaryofExParteMeetingonMay13,2024RegardingtheOffice’sAIStudy,toU.S.CopyrightOffice2(May20,2024)(“MPAhighlightedtheimportanceofthisissuetoourmembers,giventheubiquityofdepictionofindividualsindocudramas,biopics,andsimilarworks.Andwearguedthatuseofdigital-replicatechnologyissimplyanevolutionofthetypeoftechnologyourmembershavelongusedtomakeactorsmorecloselyresemblethepeopletheyportray,includingmake-upandprosthetics.”).

14See,e.g.,AmericanAssociationofIndependentMusic(“A2IM”)etal.,ReplyCommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat1–2(Dec.6,2023)(“A2IM-RecordingAcademy-RIAAJointReplyComments”);WilliamMorrisEndeavorEntertainment,LLC(“WME”),CommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat2(Oct.30,2023)(“WMEInitialComments”).

U.S.CopyrightOfficeCopyrightandArtificialIntelligence,Part1:DigitalReplicas

3

RandyTravis,whohaslimitedspeechfunctionsincesufferingastroke,wasabletousegenerativeAItoreleasehisfirstsonginoveradecade

.15

Atthesametime,abroadrangeofactualorpotentialharmsarisingfromunauthorizeddigitalreplicashasemerged.Acrossthecreativesector,thesurgeofvoiceclonesandimage

generatorshasstokedfearsthatperformersandotherartistswillloseworkorincome

.16

Therehavealreadybeenfilmprojectsthatusedigitalreplicaextrasinlieuofbackgroundactors

,17

andsituationswherevoiceactorshavebeenreplacedbyAIreplicas

.18

Withinthemusicindustry,concernshavebeenraisedthattheuseofAIinsoundrecordingscouldleadtothe“l(fā)ossof

authenticityandcreativity”anddisplacementofhumanlabor

.19

Numerouscommenters,

15DylanSmith,RandyTravisHarnessesAItoReleaseHis‘FirstNewMusicinMoreThanaDecade’–AnotherSongIs

AlreadyBeingCreated,DIGIT.MUSICNEWS(May6,2024),

/2024/05/06/randy-travis

-new-song.

16See,e.g.,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionArtists(“SAG-AFTRA”),CommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat4(Oct.30,2023)(“SAG-AFTRAInitial

Comments”);WritersGuildofAmerica(“WGA”),CommentsSubmittedinResponsetoU.S.CopyrightOffice’sAug.30,2023,NoticeofInquiryat2–3(Oct.30,2023)(“WGAInitialComments”);ChristiCarras,WhichEntertainmentJobsAreMostLikelytoBeDisruptedbyAI?NewStudyHasAnswers,L.A.TIMES(Jan.30,2024),

/entertainment-arts/business/story/2024-01-30/ai-artificial-intelligence-impact-report

-

entertainment-industry;SamO’brien,AiArt:WhySomeArtistsAreFuriousAboutAI-ProducedArt,IEEECOMPUT.SOC’Y(Nov.29,2023),

/publications/tech-news/trends/artists-mad-at-ai

;Ari’sTake,IsAIMusic

TakingRoyaltiesFromMusiciansandComposers?—TheNewMusicBusinessPodcast,YOUTUBE,at20:57(Jan.17,2024),

/watch?v=3I9dnxzjEzg

.

17JeremyDick,DisneyGetsRoastedfor‘Creepy’AIExtrasinDisney+MoviePromPact,CBR(Oct.12,2023),

/disney-prom-pact-ai-actors/

;seealsoBobbyAllyn,MovieExtrasWorryThey'llbeReplacedbyAI.HollywoodIsAlreadyDoingBodyScans,NPR(Aug.2,2023),

/2023/08/02/1190605685/

.Aswe

discussbelow,therehavebeenstepstakentoaddresstheseconcernsthroughprivateandcollectivebargainingagreements.SeeinfraSectionII.A.3.

18See,e.g.,FTCInitialComments,Attach.at37(statementofTimFriedlander,Nat’lAss’nofVoiceActors);CadeMetz,WhatDoYouDoWhenA.I.TakesYourVoice?,N.Y.TIMES(May16,2024),

/2024/05/16/technology/ai-voice-clone-lawsuit.html

;EdNightingale,Baldur’sGate3ActorsRevealtheDarkerSideofSuccessFuelledbyAIVoiceCloning,EUROGAMER(Apr.12,2024),

/baldurs-gate-3-actors-reveal-the-darker-side-of-success-fuelled-by-ai-voice-cloning

(addressingconcernsbyvideogamevoiceactors).

19See,e.g.,CVLECONOMICS,FUTUREUNSCRIPTED:THEIMPACTOFGENERATIVEAIONENTERTAINMENTINDUSTRYJOBS39–40(Jan.2024),

/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Future-Unscripted-The-Impact-of-Generative

-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Entertainment-Industry-Jobss-1.pdf(“Withthecapabilitytorecreatemelodiesand

replicatemusicians’voicesconvincinglyandquickly,itis

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論