




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
PropertyvsCommonsThebenefitsoftreatingsomethingaspropertyAmechanismformovingittoitshighestvalueduseAnincentivetomaintainpropertyAnincentivetomakethingsTherightincentiveThecostsoftreatingsomethingaspropertyYouhavetomonitoruseandenforceyourrightsYouhavetobearthecostoftransactingoverit–considertollsvsfreetrespassTheremaybecoststoconvertingunownedresources,suchaswildernessland,topropertyHowImportantIsEachofThese?ThatdependsontheparticularthingthatmightormightnotbepropertyDoesithavetobeproduced?Istherealimitedsupply?Isoveruseaproblem?Howelasticisthesupply?Willnotgettingownershipmuchreduceit?Aretherecoststoassigningpropertyrights?Considerland.ItalsodependsonthetechnologiesforenforcingpropertyrightsConsiderthedifferencebetweenIPthatrequiresaprintingpressandthatdoesn’tTechnologiesfordetectingtrespassers.Burglaralarms.DogsWhatBelongsintheBundle?ConsiderthecaseoflandWhichrightsbelongtogetherWhichrightsareclearlymorevaluabletosomeoneelse?Whicharevaluabletotwoormorepeople?InwhichcaseyoumightgettheinitialassignmentwrongWhichraisesthequestionofhoweasilycanitbefixed?Thatgetsusbacktopropertyvsliability,transactioncosts,andallthatstuffOryoumightfindsomewayofdividingtherighttogiveeachpersontheparthewantsYouhavetherighttodigonyourproperty,exceptthatIhavetherightoflateralsupportOrofdividingitsothatonlythepartvaluabletobothmustbetransactedoverCoalrightsinPennsylvaniaOnlythesupportrightneedbargainingoverPropertyRightsforSpaceAssumewegetmuchbetteratgettingthingsupcheaplyWhatsortofthingsoughttobetreatedasprivateproperty?WherearethebenefitsofpropertyhighThecostslow?Volumeofspace?PhysicalBodiessuchasAsteroids?Orbits?GeosynchronousorbitsarealreadyascarcegoodSolidAngleontheSun?GlobalWarmingCurrentlyacommons:anyoneisfreetoputCO2intheair.Supposewebelievethatisaproblem,wanttochangeit.How?Propertyrights:Youcan’tputCO2intheairIfitaffectsmebyraisingglobaltemperature,sealevelUnlessyouhavemypermissionLiabilityrule:Ifyoudo,youpaymedamagesbasedontheharmtomePigouviantax:CarbontaxRegulationWhataretheproblemswitheach?Propertyrightssolution:Nobodycanlightamatch.Breathout?Lifeends.Liabilityrule:Ihavetosueyoufordamagesof.000001cent?Carbontax:Problemofestimatingtheexternality,monitoringCO2output.DirectRegulation:NeedpermissiontodoalmosteverythingUsualproblemsofinformationneededbytheregulatorsIncentivesoftheregulators—lotsofopportunitiesforcorruptionofvarioussortsIntellectualPropertyCopyrightislonglastingandeasytoget,patentshortandhard.Why?CopyrightisbettersuitedtobepropertybecauseItiseasiertomarkandobserveboundariesYoueitherdidordidnotcopymychapterAndifyoudidit’seasytoproveAccidentalviolationisunlikely,forthesamereasonthat…Thereisnoproblemofdepletingthecommons.TherearesomanypossiblebooksSomeoneputamillionmonkeysonamilliontypewriterstotrytowrite“Hamlet”Afteramillionyears,thebesttheyhadcomeupwithwas“Tobeornottobe,thatisthegrglflx"IfIdidn’twritemine,nobodyelsewouldSoIamremovinganegligibleamountfromthecommonsofbookstobewrittenButallofthisisforprotectionagainstliteralcopyingLookandfeelandderivativeworksraisemoreofaproblemBecausetheyhavefuzzierboundariesPatentisworsesuitedtobepropertybecauseBoundariesarefuzzyandinvisiblePatentracesareevidenceofaproblemofdepletingthecommonsofideastobeinventedWhatistheRightIncentivetoCreateIP?ItdependsonthevalueproducedbytheIPConsiderthealternativeofusingasystemofrewardsHowdoyoudecidehowmuchrewardeachbookorinventiondeserves?Patentandcopyrightprovideanautomaticsolutiontothatproblem,sinceHowmuchpeoplewillpayyoutouseitevidenceofitsvalueButthereisacosttothatmethodMarginalcostofonemoreuseofanideaorexpressioniszeroButthelicensingfeeismorethanzero,sothereisadeadweightcostPeoplewhovalueitatmorethanMCbutlessthanthepricedon’tgetitItalsodependsonhowsoonsomeoneelsewouldproducethesameIPWhynotpermanentcopyrightprotection,sincenobodyelsewouldeverwritemybook?Thereisatradeoffbetweenalittlemoreincentive,andthedeadweightcostofmonopolyThesameargumentimpliesthatpatenttermshouldbeshorterthanthesimplerule“setincentivetoproduceequaltovalueofwhatisbeingproduced”impliesLouisKaplowwroteanarticlepointingthisout.Iwrotethesamearticleataboutthesametime,onlymysubjectwascriminalpunishment—theincentivenottocommitacrimeTheargumentinbothcaseswasthatincentivesarenotfree.Ifanincreaseinincentivethatcausestendollarsmorevaluecoststwentydollars…Orlessharminmycase(alaterchapter)TheExceptionstoCopyrightProtectionScenesafairedoctrineIfthereisonlyoneway,orafewways,ofsayingsomethingSayingsomethinginthatwayisnotprotectedBecausecopyrightingthatwaywoulddepletethecommonsFairUseexceptionSmallinfringementscostmoretotransactoverthantheyareworthAndsomeusesarebelievedtoproducepositiveexternalities,soimplicitlysubsidizedattheexpenseofthecopyrightholderBytreating(some)educationalandscientificusesasfairuseButthereisaproblemoffuzzybordersRequirementsforPatentProtectionNoveltyIftheideaisalreadyknownNothingofvaluehasbeenproducedNon-obviousnessIfanyonewhoneedstheideacaneasilyhiresomeonetoproduceitNotmuchofvaluehasbeenproducedNotworthmorethansixmonthsofprotection—whichisn’tanoptionUsefulness.Olddefinition:NotperniciousStory:“anewinventiontopoisonpeople,ortopromotedebauchery,ortofacilitateprivateassassination,isnotapatentableinvention”Soviagrashouldnotbepatentable,JamesBonddevicesareRicardvsDuBon:“It’spernicious,sothepatentIaminfringingisinvalid”Butnotillegal,soIshouldbeabletodoittoo”Argumentfortheolddefinition:Iftheinventorwantstowastemoneygettingapatentonsomethingnobodywantstodo,whyshouldweobject?Newdefinition:Uselessmeansnotuseful.Yet.Kitch’sProspectTheoryofPatentTherearetworeasonstogiveaprospectorrightstowhathefindsOneistorewardhim,givehimanincentivetofinditTheotheristocreateapropertyrightthatcanbeusedtobetterdevelopwhathefindsConsiderthecommonpoolproblemappliedtogoldorsilverminingTheoredoesn’tflowlikeoilorgasButknowingwhereyouhavefoundittellsmewheretodig—nexttoyourholeWhichnotonlyreducesyourincentivebutwastesresourcesEdmundKitcharguedthatthesameappliedtopatentsAninventionrequiresfurtherdevelopment,otherinventionsThepatentholderhastheincentiveandabilitytocoordinatethatprocessJustashomesteadingturnspubliclandintoprivatepropertyMakingitpossibletoinvestinimprovingitCoordinateusesofitPatentsviewedashomesteadingideaspaceTheArgumentAgainstIntellectualPropertyInthe19thcentury,therewereseriousargumentsagainstIPSomemadebypeoplewhosawitasinconsistentwithliberalfreemarketprinciplesSwitzerlanddidnothavepatentlawuntil1907BoldrinandLevine,TheCaseAgainstIntellectualMonopolyOneargumentisthedeadweightlossofchargingwhenMCiszeroInaddition,theyarguethatpatentlawretardsinnovationThefirstinventorcanblockimprovementsonhisinventionTheyclaimthatsteamtechnologieswasfrozenuntiltheWattpatentexpiredWhichraisesthequestionofwhyhedidn’tlicensetheimprovementsTheydescribemechanismsfordealingwiththefreeriderproblemSinceinvestorsincoalminestypicallydiversifiedtomanymines,theydidn’tmindifimproveddesignsinoneminegotcopiedinothersAndthefirstinventorgenerallyhassomefirstmoveradvantagesJusttheoppositeofKitch’sapproach,arguingcommonsarebetterforideaspaceComputerLawIsacomputerprogramawriting?SourcecodeonpaperobviouslyisWhataboutmachinelanguagecodeburnedintoaROM?ThecourtsdisagreedontheanswerTheprecedentwasaplayerpianorollRulednottobecoveredbycopyrightEventually,CongresssteppedintolegislatetheanswerTherightsolutionbutthewrongquestionNot“isaprogramawriting?”butDoesaprogramhavethecharacteristicsthatmakecopyrightappropriateforwritings?Theanswerisitdoes–hardtocreate,easytoreproduce,unlikelytobyaccident,…ReproducingthePCROMs:WhytheyneededtodoitCopyingwouldviolatecopyright,butindependentcreationdidn’tSotheyusedthecleanroomapproachPerhapstheyshouldhavecopiedandclaimedthescenesafaireexceptionTherebeingonlyonewayofwritingtheROMsthatwouldrunthePCprogramsTheDeathofCopyrightSofar,IhaveassumedthatcopyrightiseasytoenforceItisifcopyingisdonebyfirmswithprintingpresses,easytofindandworthsuingButnowthatanyonecaneasilycopydigitalworksandsharethemDigitalcopyrightislargelyunenforceable.Possibleexceptions?SoftwareusedbylargeorganizationswhoseemployeescouldbetraythemforpiratingFancydigitalrightsmanagementschemestomakesharingharder,but…AnyprotectionofaworkfullyrevealedinoneuseisbrokenbytheanalogholePlaythecopyprotectedsongintoarecorderthendigitizeit—nowitisoutofprotectionWhatsortofworksarenotfullyrevealedinuse?AdatabasesuchasWestlawAgamesuchasWorldofWarcraftSohowdoyougetpaidtocreateIP?Patronage–the18thcenturysolutionCharity–Patreon.Thesametechnologymakessmallscaledonationseasy.Tie-ins—webyourbooksforfree,chargeforspeechesorconsultingOtherideas?ExamplesofIPThatAlreadyWorksThatWayTheacademicworldYoudon’tgetpaidtowritejournalarticlesInsomefieldsyouhavetopaythejournalYourrewardisinthepositionorpromotionyougetfrompublicationMoregenerallythereputationyougetOpensourcesoftwareContributingtoaprojecthelpsestablishcredentialsasaprogrammer,getsyouajobFirmsthatuseopen
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 科技自立自強(qiáng)的路徑與策略創(chuàng)新
- 海洋能大規(guī)模應(yīng)用路徑與行動(dòng)計(jì)劃
- 低空經(jīng)濟(jì)崛起與投資機(jī)遇解析
- 品牌理念的落地實(shí)施計(jì)劃
- 建設(shè)科學(xué)考核機(jī)制提升公平性計(jì)劃
- 小語(yǔ)種證書(shū)考試復(fù)習(xí)提綱試題及答案
- 前臺(tái)文員如何提升專(zhuān)業(yè)知識(shí)計(jì)劃
- 急診科對(duì)外聯(lián)絡(luò)機(jī)制建設(shè)計(jì)劃
- 優(yōu)化公司資金管理的策略計(jì)劃
- 整體性教育理念在幼兒園的實(shí)踐計(jì)劃
- 2025年江蘇省徐州市銅山區(qū)中考一模道德與法治試題(原卷版+解析版)
- 制造業(yè)自檢自控流程優(yōu)化計(jì)劃
- 《人工智能的進(jìn)展》課件
- 風(fēng)濕免疫病患者結(jié)核病診治及預(yù)防實(shí)踐指南(2025版)解讀課件
- 大建安-大連市建筑工程安全檔案編制指南
- 上海2024-2025學(xué)年五年級(jí)數(shù)學(xué)第二學(xué)期期末聯(lián)考模擬試題含答案
- GB/T 45421-2025城市公共設(shè)施非物流用智能儲(chǔ)物柜服務(wù)規(guī)范
- 北京市豐臺(tái)區(qū)2025屆高三一模試卷語(yǔ)文試題(含答案)
- 安徽省合肥市高三下學(xué)期第二次教學(xué)質(zhì)量檢測(cè)數(shù)學(xué)試卷(含答案)
- 2025年河南工業(yè)貿(mào)易職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)傾向性測(cè)試題庫(kù)往年題考
- PE特種設(shè)備焊工理論復(fù)習(xí)題庫(kù)(帶解析)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論