《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與法律的對(duì)話》課件 3 21 17 Contract_第1頁(yè)
《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與法律的對(duì)話》課件 3 21 17 Contract_第2頁(yè)
《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與法律的對(duì)話》課件 3 21 17 Contract_第3頁(yè)
《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與法律的對(duì)話》課件 3 21 17 Contract_第4頁(yè)
《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與法律的對(duì)話》課件 3 21 17 Contract_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩25頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

IamsupposedtoremindyoutoFillouttheLSSSEWhichstandsforLawSchoolSurveyofStudentEngagement???IntellectualPropertyCopyrightislonglastingandeasytoget,patentshortandhard.Why?CopyrightisbettersuitedtobepropertybecauseItiseasiertomarkandobserveboundariesAccidentalviolationisunlikely,forthesamereasonthat…Thereisnoproblemofdepletingthecommons.ButallofthisisforprotectionagainstliteralcopyingLookandfeelandderivativeworksraisemoreofaproblemBecausetheyhavefuzzierboundariesPatentisworsesuitedtobepropertybecauseBoundariesarefuzzyandinvisiblePatentracesareevidenceofaproblemofdepletingthecommonsofideastobeinventedWhatistheRightIncentivetoCreateIP?ItdependsonthevalueproducedbytheIPPatentandcopyrightprovideanautomaticsolutiontotheproblemofsettingtherewardsinceHowmuchpeoplewillpayyoutouseitevidenceofitsvalueButtherearecoststorewardinginnovationinthatwayThedeadweightcostofmonopolypricingThetransactioncostsoftreatingideasaspropertyratherthancommonsItalsodependsonhowlongbeforesomeoneelsewouldproducethesameIPWhynotpermanentcopyrightprotection,sincenobodyelsewouldeverwritemybook?ThereisatradeoffbetweenalittlemoreincentiveandthedeadweightcostofmonopolySopatenttermshouldbeshorterthan“setrewardequaltovalueproduced”impliesTheExceptionstoCopyrightProtectionScenesafaire

MergerofideaandexpressiondoctrineIfthereisonlyoneway,orafewways,ofsayingsomethingSayingsomethinginthatwayisnotprotectedBecausecopyrightingthatwaywoulddepletethecommonsFairUseexceptionSmallinfringementscostmoretotransactoverthantheyareworthAndsomeusesarebelievedtoproducepositiveexternalitiesButthereisaproblemoffuzzybordersRequirementsforPatentProtectionNoveltyIftheideaisalreadyknownNothingofvaluehasbeenproducedNon-obviousnessIfanyonewhoneedstheideacaneasilyhiresomeonetoproduceitNotmuchofvaluehasbeenproducedUsefulness.Olddefinition:NotperniciousStory:“anewinventiontopoisonpeople,ortopromotedebauchery,ortofacilitateprivateassassination,isnotapatentableinvention”Argumentfortheolddefinition:Iftheinventorwantstowastemoneygettingapatentonsomethingnobodywantstodo,whyshouldweobject?Newdefinition:Uselessmeansnotuseful.Yet.NoreasontorewardprematureinventionOnereason:KnowingachemicalcanbesynthesizedisareasontolookforusesKitch’sProspectTheoryofPatentTherearetworeasonstogiveaprospectorrightstowhathefindsOneistorewardhim,givehimanincentivetofinditTheotheristocreateapropertyrightthatcanbeusedtobetterdevelopwhathefindsEdmundKitcharguedthatthesameappliedtopatentsAninventionrequiresfurtherdevelopment,otherinventionsThepatentholderhastheincentiveandabilitytocoordinatethatprocessJustashomesteadingturnspubliclandintoprivatepropertyMakingitpossibletoinvestinimprovingitCoordinateusesofitPatentsviewedashomesteadingideaspaceTheArgumentAgainstIntellectualPropertyInthe19thcentury,therewereseriousargumentsagainstIPSomemadebypeoplewhosawitasinconsistentwithliberalfreemarketprinciplesSwitzerlanddidnothavepatentlawuntil1907BoldrinandLevine,TheCaseAgainstIntellectualMonopolyOneargumentisthedeadweightlossofchargingwhenMCiszeroInaddition,theyarguethatpatentlawretardsinnovationJusttheoppositeofKitch’sapproach,arguingcommonsarebetterforideaspaceComputerLawIsacomputerprogramawriting?Thecourtsdisagreed,CongresssteppedintolegislatetheanswerTherightsolutionbutthewrongquestionNot“isaprogramawriting?”butDoesaprogramhavethecharacteristicsthatmakecopyrightappropriateforwritings?CleanroomreproductionofthePCROMs:Copyingwouldviolatecopyright,butindependentcreationdidn’tSotheyusedthecleanroomapproachCouldtheyhavecopiedandclaimedthescenesafairemergerexceptionTherebeingonlyonewayofwritingtheROMsthatwouldrunthePCprogramsTheDeathofCopyrightNowthatanyonecaneasilycopydigitalworksandsharethemDigitalcopyrightislargelyunenforceable.Possibleexceptions?SoftwareusedbylargeorganizationswhoseemployeescouldbetraythemforpiratingFancydigitalrightsmanagementschemestomakesharingharder,but…AnyprotectionofaworkfullyrevealedinoneuseisbrokenbytheanalogholeWhatsortofworksarenotfullyrevealedinuse?AdatabasesuchasWestlawAgamesuchasWorldofWarcraftSohowdoyougetpaidtocreateIP?Patronage–the18thcenturysolutionCharity–Patreon.Thesametechnologymakessmallscaledonationseasy.Tie-ins—webyourbooksforfree,chargeforspeechesorconsultingOtherideas?ExamplesofIPThatAlreadyWorksThatWayTheacademicworldYourrewardisinthepositionorpromotionyougetfrompublicationMoregenerallythereputationyougetOpensourcesoftwareContributingtoaprojecthelpsestablishcredentialsasaprogrammer,getsyouajobFirmsthatuseopensourcesoftwarewantanemployeewhoispartoftheprojectTheWebPutupwebpages,blogs,tospreadideas,getreputationGetpaidbyputtingadvertisementsonthemTradeSecretWhatisit?LawthatgivestheholderofatradesecretrightsagainstsomeonewhogetsitwrongfullyProvidedtheholdermadereasonableeffortstoprotectitReverseengineeringisnotwrongful.Gettinganemployeetorevealthesecretis.Whataboutaerialphotographyofafactoryunderconstruction?WhyisitNotapropertyrightNotunnecessarybecauseofpatentlawConsideritaslessofaonesizefitsallapproachthanpatentlawSupposeIbelievemyinventionwillnotbeduplicatedforahundredyearsPatentlawonlygivesmy14years(orwhateveritthenis)ofprotectionImightbeabletokeepmytradesecretforacentury.TheformulaforCocaColahasbeenatradesecretsince1891SupposeIthinkmyinventionisnon-obvious,thepatentexaminerdoesn’tConsideritasawayofmakingunpatentedinventionslesscostlytoprotectContractReputationalEnforcementInaworldwithoutlegalenforcementofcontractsIfIbreakacontract,otherpeoplewon’twanttocontractwithmeWhichisapunishment,butthatisnotwhytheyaredoingitItisasideeffectofthirdpartieswantingtoprotectthemselvesItdependsontheirknowingIwastheoneresponsibleIclaimitwasyourfaultIfthirdpartiescannoteasilytell,theyavoidbothofusSoyou,anticipatingthat,don’taccusemeofbreakingthecontractAndreputationalenforcementdoesn’tworkOnesolutionistolowertheinformationcosttothirdpartiesIfwehaveagreedinadvancetoarbitrationAlltheyhavetoknowisthearbitrator’sverdictAnotheristopostabondwithatrustedthirdpartyarbitratorIfheconcludesthatIbrokethecontract,thebondforfeitstoyouThisalsoworksagainstapartywithnoreputationtolose—perhapsaonetimetransactionProvidedthearbitratorhasareputationContractEnforcementinCyberspacePublickeyencryptionIcreateapairofkeys,longnumbersAmessageencryptedwithonecanonlybedecryptedwiththeotherImakeonekeypublic,keeptheotherprivateTosendmesecretmessages,youencryptitwithmypublickeyTodigitallysignamessage,IencryptitwithmyprivatekeyWeagreeonacontractandanarbitratorBothofusdigitallysignthecontractAnditincludesthepublickeyofthearbitratorIbreakthecontract,youappealtothearbitrator,herulesagainstmeHewritesuphisdecision,signsitusinghisprivatekeyIputthatresultonlinewithyournameonitAnyonesearchingforinformationonyoufindsitAndcanprove,bycheckingthesignaturesThatthearbitratorIagreedoninadvanceruledagainstmeThusreducingtheinformationcosttothirdpartiestonearzeroImperialChineseSolutionDesigncontractstominimizethecosttothirdpartiesofknowingwhobrokethemOwnershipgoeswithpossessionCaveatemptor—IamresponsibleforcheckinggoodswhenIbuythemPutthetemptationtobreachonthepartywithareputationalincentivenottoIfthesellercanbetrusted,payinadvanceIfthebuyercanbetrusted,payonreceiptSowhydowehavecontractlaw?TodecideifthereisacontractCourtsmaynotwishtoenforceallcontractseitherbecauseTheydonottrustindividualstoactintheirowninterest(paternalism)orTheybelievesomecontractshavelargeeffectsonthirdpartiesBecausethereisneverenoughsmallprinttocovereverythingIfthecourt’sdefaultrulesareknown,partiescanleavethingsoutUnlesstheydisagreewiththedefaultruleTheCaseforFreedomofContractCoaseTheoreminalowtransactioncostcontextAnychangethathelpsyoumorethanithurtsmeCanbecombinedwithasidepaymenttomakebothofusbetteroffUnequalbargainingpower:Whataboutamonopolyseller?ItstillpaysmetoincludefeaturesthatbenefityoumorethantheycostmeAndchargeforthemButproductcharacteristics,contractterms,canbeusedforpricediscriminationThatmightproduceaninefficientcontractorproductdesign,but…HaslittletodowithunequalbargainingpowerPriceconstraint—apartmentunderrentcontrolIfthecontrolledpriceislessthanthemarketpriceItpaysthelandlordtolowerqualityifdoingsosaveshimmoneyEvenifitisinefficientSothereisthenanargumentformandatoryterms(orabolishingrentcontrol)TheCaseAgainstFreedomofContractContractsthatimposecostsonthirdpartiesHiringahitmanContractsinrestraintoftrade—cartelagreementsContractsbypeoplenotcompetenttoactintheirowninterestChildren,lunaticsSpendthrifts?Contractsthecourtbelievescouldonlyhavebeensignedbypeoplenotcompetentto…ThatassumesthecourtcanjudgetheinterestofthepartybetterthanhecanConsiderthecaseofliquidateddamagesThecourtwillnotenforcewhatitinterpretsasapenaltyclauseLiquidateddamages>>actualdamagesButthat’sjustaprivatelynegotiatedpropertyruleActualDuressIsacontractunderliteralduressenforceable?YourmoneyoryourlifeWillyoutakeacheck?Argumentfor:Iprefermylife,whichiswhyIagreeArgumentagainst:Itmakesmuggingmoreprofitable,somoremuggingProbablyagoodargumentinthecaseofmugging,butconsiderPinochetcaseMilitarydictatoragreestogiveuppowerinexchangeforimmunityShouldthecontractbebroken?Whatisthecostoftreatingitasenforceable?Ofnotdoingso?Parolepriortothe19thcenturyPrisonersofwargavetheirparolenottotrytoescape,makesitmuchpleasanterPossiblysenthome,givetheirwordnottorejointhearmyuntilexchangedContractenforcedbysocialpressureathome,sinceIfpeoplebreakit,thenextprisonerstaysinprisonBenefit:WarislessunpleasantCost:Andtherefortherewillbemoreofit“Itiswellthatwarissoterrible,otherwiseweshouldgrowtoofondofit.”RobertE.LeeUnequalBargainingPowerasDuress?Youarelostinthedesert,IhavewaterMyprice:EverythingyouownplushalfyourincomeforeverYouarebetteroffifthatcontractisnotenforceableThatisrelevantonlywhereUnenforceabilitysubstitutesforacommitmentstrategyAwayoflimitingwhatyoucanpayinabilateralmonopolyAndeventhere,myhighpricehassomeefficiencybenefitThesupplyargumentfromthemuggingcaseturnedupsidedownItmakesitmoreworthwhilebeinginthedesertwithwaterLookingforpeopledyingofthirstWhichisagoodthingWhatcountsasduress?YourshipissinkingThetugwantstochargeyoumostofwhatitisworthYouagree.Whenyougetbacktoshore,canyourenegeonthecontract?Isthisduress?Unlikethemuggingcase,theeffectoftheincentiveisgoodThetugboatdidn’tgetyouintotheproblemAndyouwantittobetheretogetyououtWhichismorelikelythemoreitcanchargeAswiththewaterinthedesertcaseWhatistheefficientpriceforsavingtheship?CoaseatSeaWhatistheefficientpriceforsavingtheship?Thepricethatgivesthetugboattherightincentivetobeoutthere?Thepricethatgivesyoutherightincentivenottogooutinbadweather?Onepricecan’tbeoptimalforbothmarginsThisisCoase’sdualcausationproblemTheshipownercankeeptheshipfromsinkingbynotgoingoutinastormThetugboatownercankeeptheshipfromsinkingbygoingoutinthestormEithermight,inaparticularsituation,betheleastcostavoiderBargainingoveranenforceablecontractonasinkingshipIsabilateralmonopolygameBargainingbreakdownmeanstheshipsinksWhichisanargumentagainstanenforceablecontractEitherhavethesalvagepricesetbytheadmiraltycourtorBargainedinadvancebetweentheshipownerandthetugownerContractsofAdhesionOnesidesetstheterms,theotherstakesitorleavesitAslongasoneorthetermsbeingsetisthepricethecontractisstillefficientSoconstraintsonwhatthecourtwillenforcemakebothpartiesworseoffWhydoesAvisnotbargainovereachcontract?ThatwouldincreasetransactioncostsAndmakeiteasierfortheiremployeestocheatthem,acceptbribesforbettertermsIsthereacontract?FormalitiessoweandthecourtknowifthereisThedoctrineofconsiderationMyrichuncleofferstopaymyexpensesatHarvard,thenchangeshismindNoconsideration,sonocontract?ButthedoctrineofdetrimentalreliancemightsavemeLostcatsIpostarewardoffer,youfindthecatandreturnit,notknowingoftherewardWhenyoufindout,canyoucollectit?Ifyoucan,Iwillbelesslikelytopostareward,but…Ifyouseealostcatyouwillbemorelikelytotrytolocatetheowner,becausetheremightbearewardMedicalservicesforanunconsciousvictimChargingforthemisanegativePigouviantaxWedon’tusuallyhavethoseforservices,becauseapropertyruleworksbetterButifIamunconsciousIcan’tagreetohireyouHowshouldacourtfillinmissingterms?FigureoutwhatthepartieswouldhaveagreedtoBecausethosearetheefficientterms,andDoingitthatwayreducestheneedtowriteamoredetailedcontractAllocatingRiskIfsomethinggoeswrongdevelopingmyfilmMakeWalgreen’sliableforlosingmyfilmBecausetheycanspreadtheriskovermanytransactionsAndIamriskaverseWhatifthephotographerknowsthesefilmsareunusuallyvaluable?MakethephotographerliableSinceheknowsthesefilmsareespeciallyvaluableAndsoneedtobetreatedwithspecialcareFurther,ifWalgreen’sisliableandknew,theywouldn’tagreesaveatahigherpriceSinceitiscostlytothemtotakespecialcarewithonebatchoffilmOrtopayyourhundredthousanddollardamageawardAspecialistlabcouldhandlethisbatchatlowercostLetthepartywhoknowstheriskbeliableTheneachpartyknowswhetherthecontractisworthsigningEconomicsofinsurance:RiskAversion,MoralHazard,AdverseSelectionNoteformillenials”Film”isadeviceforstoringgraphicinformationAsortofanalogflashdisk

RulesforBreachSomecontractsshouldbebreachedWhencircumstanceschange,suchthatPerformancenowresultsinanetlossWhatrulesgivetherightincentivesTobreachwhenperformingisanetnegativeTosignacontractwhendoingsoisanetpositiveFordecisionsduringperformanceDoIbearcoststhatareawasteifthecontractgetsbreached?Thatdependsonwho,incaseofbreach,paysforthemIntheusualcontextofindividualsactingintheirowninterestWhichdependsonwhathappensifthereisabreachAndpossiblyonbargainingAlternativeRulesNodamages:Ifprofitgoesnegativeforme,Ibreach,evenifnetprofitforbothofusisstillpositiveThatmightbeavoidedbyrenegotiatingthecontractButthatopensupthepossibilityofcontinuousexpensiverenegotiationsSpecificperformance:NobreachwithoutpermissionNowyoudon’tbreachevenwhendoingsoisefficientBut…againbargainingcansolvethatproblemExpectationdamages:Makethevictimaswelloffasifyouhadn’tbreachedGivesefficientbreachSinceitonlypaysmetobreachifmygainislargerthanyourlossReliancedamages:Makethevictimaswelloffasifhehadn’tsignedthecontractGivesefficientsigningwhenonepartyknowsmoreabouttheriskofhavingtobreachButinefficientreliance.Ibuildthenewfact

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論