混合教學環(huán)境下大學生學習投入影響機制研究-教學行為的視角_2

1、    混合教學環(huán)境下大學生學習投入影響機制研究教學行為的視角    francis，r.，& shannon，s.j.（2014）.engaging with blended learning to imporve students learning outcomes. european journal of engineering education，38（4），359-369.fredricks，j.a.，blumenfeld，p.c.，& paris，a.h.（2004）.school engagement：potential o

2、f the concept，state of the evidence. review of educational research，74（1），59-109.garrison，d.r.，anderson，t.，& archer，w.（2000）.critical inquiry in a text-based environment：computer conferencing in higher education. the internet and higher education，2，87-105.garrison，d.r.& kanuka，h.（2004）.blend

3、ed learning：uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. the internet and higher education，7（2），95-105.garrison，d.r.，& vaughan，n.d.（2008）.blended learning in higher education：framework，principle and guidelines（pp.76，79-81）.san francisco：jossey-bass.greenwood，c.r.（1996）.the case f

4、or performance-based models of instruction. school psychology quarterly，11（4），283-296.greenwood，c.r.，horton，b.t.，& utley，c.a.（2002）.academic engagement：current perspectives in research and practice. school psychology review，31（3），328.grow，g.o.（1991）.teaching learners to be self-directed. adult e

5、ducation quarterly，41（3），125-149.gunuc，s.，& kuzu，a.（2014）.factors influencing student engagement and the role of technology in student engagement in higher education：campus-class-technology theory. the trukish online journal of qualitative inquiry，5（4），86-113.gunuc，s.，& kuzu，a.（2015）.student

6、 engagement scale：development，reliability and validity. assessment & evaluation in higher education，40（4），587-610.halverson，l.r.，graham，c.，& spring，k.j.，et al.（2014）.a thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. the internet and hi

7、gher education，20，20-34.hu，s.，& kuh，g.d.（2002）.being（dis）engaged in educationally purposeful activities：the influences of student and institutional characteristics. research in higher education，43（5），555-575.kahu，e.r.（2013）.framing student engagement in higher education. studies in higher educat

8、ion，38（5），758-773.kim，m.k.，kim，s.m.，khera，o.，& getman，j.（2014）.the experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university：an exploration of design principles. the internet and higher education，22，37-50.korr，j.，derwin，e.b.，greene，k.，& sokoloff，w.（2012）.transitioning an adult-serving un

9、iversity to a blended learning model. the journal of continuing higher education，60，2-11.kuh，g.d.（2002）.the national survey of student engagement：conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. indiana university center for postsecondary research（pp.2-6）.bloomington，in.kuh，g.d.（2003）.w

10、hat were learning about student engagement from nsse. change，35，24-31.kuh，g.d.，chen，d.，& nelson laird，t.f.（2007）.why teacher-scholars matter：some insights from fsse and nsse. liberal education，93，40-45.kuh，g.d.，& hu，s.（2001）learning productivity at research universities. the journal of highe

11、r education，72（1），1-28.ma，j.，han，x.，& cheng，jg.，et al.（2015）.examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach：the role of the instructor. internet and higher education，24，26-34.manwaring，k.c.，larsen，r.，graham，c.r.，henrie，c.r.

12、，& halverson，l.r.（2017）.investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. internet and higher education，35，21-33.mcgee，p.，& reis，a.（2012）.blended course design：a synthesis of best practices. journal of asynchronous learn

13、ing networks，16（4），7-22.nespor，j.（2006）.technology and the politics of instruction（pp.67-68）.mahwah，nj：lawrence earlbaum and associates.ocak，m.a.（2001）.why are faculty members not teaching blended courses？ insights from faculty members. computer & education，56（3），689-699.osguthorpe，b.r.，& gr

14、aham，c.r.（2003）.blended learning environments；definitions and directions. the quarterly review of distance education，4（3），227-233.pellas，n.（2014）.the influence of computer serf-efficacy，metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs：evidence from the

15、virtual world of second life. computers in human behavior，35，157-170.pollock，p.h.，hamann，k.，& wilson，b.m.（2011）.learning through discussions：comparing the henefits of small-group and large-class settings. journal of political science education，7，48-64.printrich，p.r.，& de groot，e.v.（1990）.mot

16、ivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. journal of educational psychology，82，33-40.reiss，m.，& steffens，d.（2010）.hybrid toolboxes：conceptual and empirical analysis of blending patterns in application of hybrid media. technological and economic developme

17、nt of economy，16（2），305-326.shea，p.，li，c.s.，& pickett，a.（2006）.a study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. the internet and higher education，9（3）：175-190.skinner，e.a.，furrer，c.，& marchand，g.，et al.（2008）.engagement an

18、d disaffection in the classroom：part of a larger motivational dynamic？.journal of educational psychology，100（4），765-781.walker，c.，greene，b.，& mansell，r.（2006）.identification with academics，intrinsic/extrinsic motivation，and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. learning & individual differences，16，1-1