認(rèn)知心理學(xué)一般知識(shí)組織_第1頁(yè)
認(rèn)知心理學(xué)一般知識(shí)組織_第2頁(yè)
認(rèn)知心理學(xué)一般知識(shí)組織_第3頁(yè)
認(rèn)知心理學(xué)一般知識(shí)組織_第4頁(yè)
認(rèn)知心理學(xué)一般知識(shí)組織_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩56頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、1張亞旭nThe storage, integration, and organization of information in memorynOrganized informationnPart of a system or network of structured information3Where Are They and How Are They Organized?n動(dòng)物n水果n蔬菜n人造物體n6Semantic Feature-Comparison ModelnSmith, Shoben, & Rips, 1974nConcepts are represented in

2、 memory as a set of semantic featuresnDefining features (essential components)nCharacteristic featuresn句子核證 (sentence verification)n狗是一種動(dòng)物。n蛇是一種動(dòng)物。7WZWn真夠嗆,有知識(shí)的人這樣的東西早就用上了。往上一點(diǎn),往下一點(diǎn)。(水里的還是天上飛的)天上飛的。(是鳥(niǎo)嗎)不是。(是坦克嗎)很可能。(是軍艦嗎)不象,這是往上推的那個(gè)8LWZn鋤鋤樹(shù)用的n下雨使的那個(gè),燈罩,雨罩吧9Network ModelnKnowledge is represented in

3、memory as independent units connected in a network10Network Model:Spreading Activation Theory, Collins & Loftus, 1975n節(jié)點(diǎn)(nodes)與聯(lián)結(jié)(links)11Network Model:ACT (Adaptive Control of Thought, Anderson, 1976, 1983, 1985)nPropositional networksnSusan gave a white cat to Maria, who is the president of t

4、he club.nSusan gave a cat to Maria.nThe cat was white.nMaria is the president of the club.n每個(gè)命題可以用一個(gè)節(jié)點(diǎn)來(lái)表征,命題網(wǎng)絡(luò)則代表了各個(gè)命題之間的重要關(guān)系。命題中的每一個(gè)概念,也都可以用一個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)來(lái)表征12原型途徑Prototype Approach, Rosch, 1973nThe robbers had many weapons.nThe robbers had many guns.nThe robbers had many bricks.13Cognitive Neuroscience Mode

5、lnKnowledge is represented in the organization of neural networksnPDP (Parallel Distributed Network)nKnowledge is in the connections between unitsnThe patterns (objects) themselves are not stored; what is stored is the connection strength between units, which allows these patterns to be recreated15T

6、he Organization of Knowledge: Revealed by Semantic Memory Disorders1920范疇特異的語(yǔ)義損傷Category-Specific Semantic ImpairmentsnWarrington & Shallice, 1984n4名曾患單純皰疹性腦炎的病人n同無(wú)生命物體相比,病人產(chǎn)生/理解有生命物體名稱(chēng),更加困難n病人JBR雖然只能識(shí)別或命名48個(gè)有生命物體中的2個(gè),但能正確地描述和命名48個(gè)無(wú)生命物體中的45個(gè)Warrington, E.K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category s

7、pecific semantic impairment. Brain, 107, 829-854Mahon & Caramazza, 2009Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuro-psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27-5122n絕大多數(shù)發(fā)表的個(gè)案,有生命物體損傷更為嚴(yán)重(Capitani et al., 2003)n動(dòng)物、水果、蔬菜、人造物體Capitani, E.,

8、Laiacona, M., Mahon, B.Z., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20 (3/4/5/6), 213261Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidenc

9、e from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 354-36123混淆因素的結(jié)果?n名稱(chēng)頻率n項(xiàng)目熟悉度n視覺(jué)復(fù)雜度n可想象力24至少不能完全歸于混淆因素n偶爾的個(gè)案,相對(duì)于有生命物體來(lái)說(shuō),在無(wú)生命的或人造的物體上,表現(xiàn)出更大的困難n使用名稱(chēng)頻率、熟悉度、視覺(jué)復(fù)雜度和可想象力等方面嚴(yán)格匹配的刺激,仍然發(fā)現(xiàn)范疇特異性損傷現(xiàn)象n回歸分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)有無(wú)生命這一語(yǔ)義范疇變量,影響病人的任務(wù)成績(jī)25Domain-specific hypothesis(Caramazza & Shelton

10、, 1998)n認(rèn)為人腦中語(yǔ)義知識(shí)按分類(lèi)學(xué)范疇(如有無(wú)生命)來(lái)組織n它假設(shè),生物進(jìn)化使得人類(lèi)發(fā)展了從知覺(jué)和概念兩方面,區(qū)分有無(wú)生命物種的特殊機(jī)制,從而導(dǎo)致人腦中這些知識(shí)按范疇來(lái)組織n動(dòng)物、水果、蔬菜、人造物體n因?yàn)椴煌懂牭闹R(shí)存儲(chǔ)在大腦的不同區(qū)域,所以,特定腦區(qū)的損傷,將造成存儲(chǔ)在該腦區(qū)的特定范疇的知識(shí),出現(xiàn)選擇性的缺陷Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J.R. (1998). Domain specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of C

11、ognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.26領(lǐng)域特異性假設(shè):神經(jīng)心理學(xué)證據(jù)n大多數(shù)有生命物體知識(shí)選擇性受損病人,左側(cè)顳葉受損,或者在單純皰疹性腦炎康復(fù)之后,右側(cè)顳葉受損。而人造物體知識(shí)選擇性受損病人,典型的受損部位是額頂區(qū)n不過(guò),也有一些有生命物體知識(shí)選擇性受損病人,額葉和頂葉下部受損,或者在經(jīng)歷腦外傷之后大腦廣泛受損。此外,也有一些人造物體知識(shí)選擇性受損病人,顳葉受損n總的看,有生命范疇的特異性損傷,通常同顳葉受損相聯(lián)系,有時(shí)和額葉、頂葉相聯(lián)系。而無(wú)生命范疇的特異性損傷,通常同顳、頂和背側(cè)額葉的損傷相聯(lián)系27領(lǐng)域特異性假設(shè):腦成像證據(jù)28領(lǐng)域特異性假設(shè):評(píng)價(jià)n對(duì)范疇特

12、異性損傷現(xiàn)象的解釋?zhuān)?jiǎn)捷明了n難以解釋廣泛性腦損傷病人所表現(xiàn)出的范疇特異性損傷n經(jīng)歷腦外傷之后大腦廣泛受損,能夠?qū)е掠猩矬w知識(shí)的范疇特異性損傷n阿爾茲海默病 (Alzheimers Disease) 病人也能產(chǎn)生范疇特異性損傷,而這類(lèi)病人的病變通常是彌散性的,并不局限于某個(gè)特定的腦區(qū)29Visual similarity & crowding of visual representationsHumphreys & Forde, 2001; Tranel, Logan, Frank, & Damasio, 1997n不是用有無(wú)生命這樣的二分法來(lái)解釋范疇特異性損傷,而

13、是強(qiáng)調(diào)視覺(jué)信息與有生命物體識(shí)別之間的關(guān)系n有/ 無(wú)生命物體之間,在把范疇的一個(gè)成員同另一個(gè)成員區(qū)分開(kāi),所要求的視覺(jué)加工的程度和細(xì)節(jié)上,有重要區(qū)別30n同人造物體相比,動(dòng)物、水果和蔬菜,有著驚人的范疇內(nèi)的結(jié)構(gòu)相似性。因此,這些物體的識(shí)別,對(duì)前語(yǔ)義的結(jié)構(gòu)描述系統(tǒng)要求較高n較高的范疇內(nèi)的結(jié)構(gòu)相似性,容易造成“視覺(jué)擁擠”,使得不同成員之間難以區(qū)分n這種觀點(diǎn)實(shí)際上隱含地認(rèn)為,沒(méi)必要假設(shè)兩個(gè)語(yǔ)義記憶系統(tǒng),單一的語(yǔ)義記憶系統(tǒng),完全能夠解釋腦損傷病人身上所出現(xiàn)的范疇特異性損傷31特征途徑n第三種觀點(diǎn)可稱(chēng)之為特征途徑(attribute approach)n迄今為止,該理論已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了n簡(jiǎn)單的通道特異性假設(shè) n相

14、互作用的通道特異性假設(shè) n特征相關(guān)32Domain-specific hypothesis or sensory/functional theory (Warrington & McCarthy 1983, 1987; Warrington & Shallice 1984)n語(yǔ)義知識(shí)按照不同的感覺(jué)運(yùn)動(dòng)通道(如視覺(jué)或知覺(jué)語(yǔ)義知識(shí)、功能或聯(lián)想語(yǔ)義知識(shí))來(lái)組織n特定語(yǔ)義特征對(duì)知識(shí)獲得和描述來(lái)說(shuō),具有不同的權(quán)重Warrington EK, McCarthy RA. 1983. Category specific access dysphasia. Brain 106:85978Warr

15、ington EK, McCarthy RA. 1987. Categories of knowledge: further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110:127396Warrington EK, Shallice T. 1984. Category specific semantic impairment. Brain 107:8295433n對(duì)有生命物體來(lái)說(shuō),同功能或聯(lián)想特征(做什么用、在哪里用、什么時(shí)候用)相比,知覺(jué)特征(一個(gè)物體看起來(lái)、聽(tīng)起來(lái)或感覺(jué)起來(lái)怎么樣)有更大的權(quán)重n因此,在有生命物體范疇內(nèi),概念(如

16、“老虎”和“豹子”)的區(qū)分和加工更多地依賴(lài)于它們的知覺(jué)特征34n對(duì)人造物體來(lái)說(shuō),同知覺(jué)特征相比,功能特征有更大的權(quán)重n因此,在人造物體范疇內(nèi),概念的區(qū)分和加工更多地依賴(lài)于它們的功能特征35n語(yǔ)義記憶由兩個(gè)子系統(tǒng)構(gòu)成,即知覺(jué)特征子系統(tǒng)和功能特征子系統(tǒng)n有生命物體或人造物體兩個(gè)不同范疇的特異性損傷,分別是由知覺(jué)和功能這樣兩個(gè)子系統(tǒng)分別受損造成的n這種途徑既能解釋大多數(shù)有生命物體范疇出現(xiàn)特異性損傷的個(gè)案,也能解釋偶爾發(fā)現(xiàn)的無(wú)生命物體范疇選擇性受損的個(gè)案36Evidence for modality-specific hypothesisn計(jì)算機(jī)模擬 (Farah & McClelland,

17、1991)n選擇性損傷知覺(jué)或功能特征,確實(shí)能夠產(chǎn)生范疇特異性損傷n一些有生命物體范疇出現(xiàn)特異性損傷的病人,同功能特征任務(wù)相比,完成知覺(jué)特征任務(wù),更為困難。這些病人甚至在辨別人造物體(如不同的轎車(chē))時(shí)也有困難,只要這些物體視覺(jué)上容易混淆Farah M, & McClelland J. 1991. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gen

18、eral, 120, 339-35737Martin et al., 1995nfMRI研究,要求被試想象一個(gè)物體的知覺(jué)屬性或功能屬性n結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),知覺(jué)條件使腹側(cè)顳葉活動(dòng)增強(qiáng),而功能條件使左側(cè)顳葉中后部活動(dòng)增強(qiáng)Evidence against the modality-specific hypothesis(Mahon & Caramazza, 2009)differential impairments for visual/perceptual knowledgecan be associated with (if anything) a disproportionate impair

19、ment for nonliving things compared toliving thingsEvidence against the modality-specific hypothesis(Mahon & Caramazza, 2009)40簡(jiǎn)單的通道特異性假設(shè):評(píng)價(jià)n同按分類(lèi)學(xué)范疇組織知識(shí)相比,用通道特異性的語(yǔ)義表征來(lái)組織知識(shí),似乎更經(jīng)濟(jì)n不能說(shuō)明范疇特異性知識(shí)損傷中的一種現(xiàn)象,即對(duì)有生命物體來(lái)說(shuō),知覺(jué)和非知覺(jué)的知識(shí)都受到損傷41相互作用的通道特異性假設(shè)n這種觀點(diǎn)在承認(rèn)知識(shí)按照不同的感覺(jué)運(yùn)動(dòng)通道組織的同時(shí),認(rèn)為知識(shí)表征是分布式的和相互作用的n它假設(shè),客體表征的每一個(gè)部分都為

20、另一個(gè)部分提供額外的激活。因此,一個(gè)部分的受損可能影響激活其它部分的能力n對(duì)于有一個(gè)優(yōu)勢(shì)表征通道的知識(shí)范疇來(lái)說(shuō),任何一個(gè)通道信息的提取,都可能要求優(yōu)勢(shì)通道信息的提取42相互作用的通道特異性假設(shè):腦成像證據(jù)nThompson-Schill et al., 1999nfMRI 技術(shù)n有無(wú)生命兩種物體的信息提取與左側(cè)梭狀回的激活n左側(cè)梭狀回參與視覺(jué)信息提取過(guò)程,甚至是缺乏外顯視覺(jué)刺激時(shí),也是如此n產(chǎn)生顏色詞和心理表象可激活該腦區(qū)n按照相互作用的通道特異性假設(shè),即使是在提取有生命物體的非視覺(jué)信息時(shí),也會(huì)出現(xiàn)左側(cè)梭狀回的活動(dòng)Thompson-Schill SL, Aguirre GK, DEsposit

21、o M, Farah MJ. 1999. A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 37, 671-67643Mummery et al., 1998nPETn使用了三種相似性判斷任務(wù)n就物體的典型顏色(視覺(jué)特征)進(jìn)行判斷n就物體所處的典型空間位置(聯(lián)想特征)進(jìn)行判斷n就詞中所包含的音節(jié)的數(shù)目進(jìn)行判斷n實(shí)驗(yàn)材料n有生命物體、人造物體44結(jié)果n兩種范疇(即有無(wú)生命)和兩種特征(即知覺(jué)特征和聯(lián)想特征),盡管都激活了左半球語(yǔ)義系統(tǒng),但仍然引起了某些區(qū)別性的

22、激活,尤其是不同類(lèi)型的特征n典型空間位置判斷條件下,左側(cè)顳枕頂交界顯示出增強(qiáng)的活動(dòng)n顏色判斷激活了左側(cè)靠前的顳皮層中部和尾狀核n有生命與無(wú)生命兩種范疇之間,所激活的腦區(qū)差異較小n在詞所激活的分布式概念系統(tǒng)中,神經(jīng)上的區(qū)別主要與特征類(lèi)型有關(guān)45Different types of features are differentially correlated across different semantic categoriesn有無(wú)生命兩種物體之間,視覺(jué)與功能/聯(lián)想兩種特征之間的關(guān)系不同n有生命物體視覺(jué)和功能/聯(lián)想特征之間沒(méi)什么聯(lián)系n而無(wú)生命物體則不然n這種觀點(diǎn)能夠解釋為什么有生命物體更容易選

23、擇性地受損46Tyler & Moss, 2001nLiving things have more shared features, whereas nonliving things have more distinctive featuresnThe shared features of living things are highly correlated (has eyes/can see), whereas for nonliving things, distinctive features are highly correlated (used for spearing/ha

24、s tines)Tyler LK, Moss HE. 2001. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 244-25247Tyler LK, Moss HE. 2001. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 244-25248Tyler & Moss, 2001nIf distinctive features are

25、 critical for identification, and if greater correlation confers resilience to damage, then an interaction between the severity of overall impairment and the direction of category-specific semantic deficit is predictednMild levels of impairments should produce disproportionate impairments for living

26、 things compared to nonliving thingsnAt more severe levels of impairments, the distinctive features of nonliving things will be lost and a disproportionate impairment for this category will be observedTyler LK, Moss HE. 2001. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive

27、 Science, 5, 244-25249But an opposite prediction can also be predicted.n有生命物體內(nèi)部,特征與特征之間具有很強(qiáng)的相關(guān)。例如,有毛皮的也有胡須n對(duì)于有生命物體來(lái)說(shuō),少量的損傷(少量聯(lián)結(jié)的丟失),通常不會(huì)影響一個(gè)物體的識(shí)別,因?yàn)樘卣髦g很強(qiáng)的相關(guān)會(huì)起到一種保護(hù)的作用。然而,足夠量的損傷,將導(dǎo)致一些特征的丟失,這會(huì)引起有生命物體范疇內(nèi)許多成員Devlin J, Gonnerman L, Andersen E, Seidenberg M. 1998. Category-specific semantic deficits in f

28、ocal and widespread brain damage: a computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-9450n然而,對(duì)于無(wú)生命物體來(lái)說(shuō),通常,一些特征對(duì)于特定的項(xiàng)目來(lái)說(shuō),恰好是關(guān)鍵的,但是與其它特征之間并沒(méi)有較高的相關(guān)n因此,這些特征的神經(jīng)病理學(xué)損傷,將影響特定項(xiàng)目上的作業(yè)。這樣,同有生命物體范疇不同,在無(wú)生命物體范疇內(nèi),成員的損傷具有 的性質(zhì)Devlin J, Gonnerman L, Andersen E, Seidenberg M. 1998. Category-specific sem

29、antic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: a computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-94Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B.Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354-360

30、52Very recent development of these theoriesnEvidence from functional neuroimaging of the human brain indicates that information about of an object-such as what it looks like, how it moves, and how it is used-is stored in sensory and motor systems active when that information was acquirednAs a result

31、, object concepts belonging to different categories like animals and tools are represented in partially distinct, sensory- and motor propertybased neural networksnThis suggests that object concepts are not explicitly represented, but rather emerge from weighted activity within property-based brain r

32、egionsnHowever, some property-based regions seem to show a categorical organization, thus providing evidence consistent with category-based, domain-specific formulations as wellMartin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-4553Distributed

33、Domain-Specific Hypothesis (Mahon & Caramazza, 2009)nThe first order principle of organization is nWithin any given domain of knowledge, there will be functional and neural specialization according to of knowledgeMahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27-515455One of Future DirectionsnAre different domains of knowledge represented differently in males and females?nSome researchers have highlighted the fact that patients w

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論