GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)

1、GMAT考試閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)及練習(xí)閱讀題三大難點(diǎn)：一、時間問題很多同學(xué)在面對GMAT閱讀考試時，都會感嘆時間不夠，常會有考生來不及看完整篇閱讀文章。其中做題速度無法達(dá)到要求的原因有很多，詞匯量，閱讀方法，做題技巧無一不是。此外，還有一個很重要的因素：不會取舍，不會衡量做題的優(yōu)先性。鑒于GMAT考試開弓沒有回頭箭的考試模式，如果在做閱讀題時碰到了難度很高，預(yù)計會花費(fèi)大量時間定位解析也難以保證正確率的題目，建議大家直接猜測答案后進(jìn)入下一題，不要在這些題目上花費(fèi)太多時間。學(xué)會取舍才能保證后續(xù)題目的解題時間，從而彌補(bǔ)損失，取得更好的成績。二、理解問題很多考生在平時的練習(xí)和考場上面對需要找關(guān)鍵詞和中心句的

2、題目時總是跟著感覺走， 完全失了方向和重點(diǎn)，直接導(dǎo)致面對題目時難以回到原文中定位。所以，考生應(yīng)學(xué)會在閱讀過程中直接發(fā)現(xiàn)題目的線索，也就是關(guān)鍵詞中心句。建議大家在平時的課堂和練習(xí)中，多加總結(jié)考點(diǎn)詞的特點(diǎn)，以達(dá)到用一到兩個詞就涵蓋整個題目的效果。利用關(guān)鍵詞定位答案，更集中目標(biāo)，更有方向性。三、生詞問題GMAT閱讀考試文章很多來源于國外原版的期刊或雜志，話題覆蓋面廣，科技，自然，環(huán)保，社會，文化，工作，生物，地理等無不涉及，所以遇到生詞在情理之中。但一部分考生遇到生詞后就信心全失，慌亂至極，打破了自己原有的閱讀節(jié)奏和速度，做題時也因?yàn)樯~被卡殼，結(jié)果題目不僅沒有解出，還影響了后面的做題速度和時間，可

3、謂“一發(fā)動而遷全身”。對此，專家認(rèn)為，生詞的出現(xiàn)在所難免，只要大家有基本的詞匯量，完全可以將生詞的問題逐一擊破。1. 有時候生詞屬于比較專業(yè)的詞匯，它們的出現(xiàn)不是為了考察考生的詞匯量，更多的是檢閱大家的應(yīng)變和判斷能力。尤其在題目中出現(xiàn)的所謂生詞，更是可以壞事變好事，成為考生定位答案的線索詞。2. 有時候生詞的含義可以在上下文中直接得到。在GMAT閱讀文章時遇到的生詞，有相當(dāng)一部分的含義可以通過多種猜測單詞的方法得到，所以，在生詞的周圍或上下文尋找其解釋不失為有效途徑。閱讀練習(xí)：Since Would War II considerable advances have been made in

4、the area of health-care services. These include better access to health care (particularly for the poor and minorities), improvements in physical plants, and increased numbers of physicians and other health personnel. All have played a part in the recent improvement in life expectancy (life expectan

5、cy: n.平均壽命(=expectation of life). But there is mounting criticism of the large remaining gaps in access, unbridled cost inflation, the further fragmentation of service, excessive indulgence in wasteful high-technology “gadgeteering,” and a breakdown in doctor-patient relationships. In recent years (

6、in recent years: 最近幾年中) proposed panaceas and new programs, small and large, have proliferated at a feverish pace and disappointments multiply at almost the same rate. This has led to an increased pessimism“everything has been tried and nothing works”which sometimes borders on cynicism or even nihil

7、ism.It is true that the automatic “pass through” of rapidly spiraling costs (spiraling costs: 螺旋式上升的費(fèi)用) to government and insurance carriers, which was set in a publicized environment of “the richest nation in the world,” produced for a time (for a time: adv.暫時, 一度) a sense of unlimited resources an

8、d allowed to develop a mood whereby every practitioner and institution could “do his own thing” without undue concern for the “Medical Commons.” The practice of full-cost reimbursement encouraged capital investment and now the industry is overcapitalized. Many cities have hundreds of excess hospital

9、 beds; hospitals have proliferated a superabundance of high-technology equipment; and structural ostentation and luxury were the order of the day (order of the day: 議程,<口>流行的事物,風(fēng)尚). In any given day, one-fourth of all community beds are vacant; expensive equipment is underused or, worse, used

10、unnecessarily. Capital investment brings rapidly rising operating costs (operating costs: 生產(chǎn)費(fèi)用,營業(yè)成本).Yet, in part, this pessimism derives from expecting too much of health care. It must be realized that care is, for most people, a painful experience, often accompanied by fear and unwelcome results.

11、Although there is vast room for improvement, health care will always retain some unpleasantness and frustration. Moreover, the capacities of medical science are limited. Humpty Dumpty (一經(jīng)損壞無法修復(fù)的東西) cannot always be put back together again. Too many physicians are reluctant to admit their limitations

12、 to patients; too many patients and families are unwilling to accept such realities. Nor is it true that everything has been tried and nothing works, as shown by the prepaid group practice plans of the Kaiser Foundation and at Puget Sound. In the main (in the main: adv.大體上), however, such undertakin

13、gs have been drowned by a veritable flood of public and private moneys which have supported and encouraged the continuation of conventional practices and subsidized their shortcomings on a massive, almost unrestricted scale. Except for the most idealistic and dedicated, there were no incentives to s

14、eek change or to practice self-restraint or frugality. In this atmosphere, it is not fair to condemn as failures all attempted experiments; it may be more accurate to say many never had a fair trial.1. The author implies that the Kaiser Foundation and Puget Sound plans (lines 47-48) differed from ot

15、her plans by(A) encouraging capital investment(B) requiring physicians to treat the poor(C) providing incentives for cost control(D) employing only dedicated and idealistic doctors(C)(E) relying primarily on public funding2. The author mentions all of the following as consequences of full-cost reimb

16、ursement EXCEPT(A) rising operating costs(B) underused hospital facilities(C) overcapitalization(D) overreliance on expensive equipment(E)(E) lack of services for minorities3. The tone of the passage can best be described as(A) light-hearted and amused(B) objective but concerned(C) detached and unco

17、ncerned(D) cautious but sincere(B)(E) enthusiastic and enlightened4. According to the author, the “pessimism” mentioned at line 35 is partly attributable to the fact that(A) there has been little real improvement in health-care services(B) expectations about health-care services are sometimes unreal

18、istic(C) large segments of the population find it impossible to get access to health-care services(D) advances in technology have made health care service unaffordable(B)(E) doctors are now less concerned with patient care5. The author cites the prepaid plans in lines 46-48 as(A) counterexamples to

19、the claim that nothing has worked(B) examples of health-care plans that were over-funded(C) evidence that health-care services are fragmented(D) proof of the theory that no plan has been successful(A)(E) experiments that yielded disappointing results6. It can be inferred that the sentence “Humpty Du

20、mpty cannot always be put back together again” means that(A) the cost of health-care services will not decline(B) some people should not become doctors(C) medical care is not really essential to good health(D) illness is often unpleasant and even painful(E)(E) medical science cannot cure every ill7.

21、 With which of the following descriptions of the system for the delivery of health-care services would the author most likely agree?(A) It is biased in favor of doctors and against patients.(B) It is highly fragmented and completely ineffective(C) It has not embraced new technology rapidly enough(D)

22、 It is generally effective but can be improved(D)(E) It discourages people from seeking medical care8. Which of the following best describes the logical structure of the selection?(A) The third paragraph is intended as a refutation of the first and second paragraphs.(B) The second and third paragrap

23、hs explain and put into perspective the points made in the first paragraph.(C) The second and third paragraphs explain and put into perspective the points made in the first paragraph.(D) The first paragraph describes a problem, and the second and third paragraphs present two horns of a dilemma.(C)(E