中期經(jīng)濟展望:預(yù)計中國經(jīng)濟增長7.8%-經(jīng)合組織_第1頁
中期經(jīng)濟展望:預(yù)計中國經(jīng)濟增長7.8%-經(jīng)合組織_第2頁
中期經(jīng)濟展望:預(yù)計中國經(jīng)濟增長7.8%-經(jīng)合組織_第3頁
中期經(jīng)濟展望:預(yù)計中國經(jīng)濟增長7.8%-經(jīng)合組織_第4頁
中期經(jīng)濟展望:預(yù)計中國經(jīng)濟增長7.8%-經(jīng)合組織_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩13頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、OECD Economic Outlook, Interim ReportStrengthening the recovery: The need for speedMarch 2021STRENGTHENING THE RECOVERY: THE NEED FOR SPEED SummaryGlobal economic prospects have improved markedly in recent months, helped by the gradual deployment of effective vaccines, announcements of additional fi

2、scal support in some countries, and signs that economies are coping better with measures to supress the virus.Global GDP growth is projected to be 5 per cent in 2021 and 4% in 2022, with global output rising above the pre-pandemic level by mid-2021. Despite the improved global outlook, output and in

3、comes in many countries will remain below the level expected prior to the pandemic at the end of 2022.The significant fiscal stimulus in the United States, along with faster vaccination, could boost US GDP growth by over 3 percentage points this year, with welcome demand spillovers in key trading pa

4、rtners.There are increasing signs of divergence across countries and sectors. Strict containment measures will hold back growth in some countries and service sectors in the near term, while others will benefit from effective public health policies, faster vaccine deployment and strong policy support

5、.Sizeable risks remain. Faster progress in vaccine deployment in all countries would enable restrictions to be lifted more quickly and enhance confidence and spending. Slow progress in vaccine rollout and the emergence of new virus mutations resistant to existing vaccines would result in a weaker re

6、covery, larger job losses and more business failures.Cost pressures have begun to emerge in commodity markets due to the resurgence of demand and temporary supply disruptions, but underlying inflation remains mild, held back by spare capacity around the world.The top policy priority is to ensure tha

7、t all resources necessary are used to produce and fully deploy vaccinations as quickly as possible throughout the world, to save lives, preserve incomes and limit the adverse impact of containment measures on well-being. The resources required to provide vaccines to lower-income countries are small

8、compared with the gains from a stronger and faster global economic recovery.Fiscal policy support should be contingent on the state of the economy and the pace of vaccinations, with new policy measures implemented promptly and fully if required. A premature tightening of fiscal policy must be avoide

9、d.The current very accommodative monetary policy stance should be maintained, and allow temporary overshooting of headline inflation provided underlying price pressures remain well contained, with macroprudential policies deployed where necessary to ensure financial stability.Continued income suppor

10、t for households and companies is warranted until vaccination allows a significant easing of restraints on face-to-face activities, but should be refocused to support people and help companies with grants and equity rather than debt.Enhanced structural reforms are required in all countries to raise

11、opportunities, improve economic dynamism, and foster a strong, sustainable and inclusive recovery.The sequencing and packaging of reforms is important to enhance their collective benefit and support near-term demand.International policy co-ordination is essential to increase the gains from national

12、policy actions to tackle the pandemic, enhance resilience and ensure a strong and inclusive recovery.OECD Interim Economic Outlook Forecasts March 2021Real GDP growthYear-on-year % change20202021Interim EODifference from projectionsDecember EO5.61.42022Interim EODifference from projectionsDecember E

13、O4.00.3World-3.4G201-4.10.4Australia-3.10.0Canada-4.02.0Euro area-3.80.5Germany-5.33.0France-8.25.9-Italy-8.94.1-0.24.00.8Spain2-11.00.8Japan-1.80.3Korea-1.0-0.3Mexico-3.0-0.4Turkey3.0-0.2United Kingdo

14、m-4.70.6United States-4.00.5Argentina-2.1-2.5Brazil-2.70.5China2.37.8-India3-7.40.6Indonesia-5.40.3Russia-3.62.7-Saudi Arabia-4.02.6-South Africa-7.23.0-0.12.0-0.5Note: Difference from December 2020 Economic Outlook i

15、n percentage points, based on rounded figures. World and G20 aggregates use moving nominal GDP weights at purchasing power parities.The European Union is a full member of the G20, but the G20 aggregate only includes countries that are also members in their own right.Spain is a permanent invitee to t

16、he G20.Fiscal years, starting in April.The rebound from the pandemic has been faster than expectedProspects for an eventual path out of the crisis have improved, with encouraging news about progress in vaccine production and deployment and a faster-than-expected global rebound in the latter half of

17、2020, but there are signs of increasing divergence in activity developments across sectors and economies. Expectations for a stronger recovery are also being reflected in financial and commodity markets, with US long-term bond yields and oil prices returning to their levels prior to the pandemic.Fig

18、ure 1. Growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2020, but there are signs of rising divergenceNote: OECD projections for GDP in the fourth quarter of 2020 are used for Argentina and South Africa. World GDP is a PPP-weighted aggregate. World GDP is a PPP-weighted aggregate. Quarterly GDP growth in 2

19、020Q4 is non-annualised.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database.The recovery in activity continued in the fourth quarter of 2020, despite new virus outbreaks in many economies and tighter containment measures. Global output remained around 1% lower than prior to the pandemic, with marked variation in

20、 the pace of recovery across economies (Figure 1). HYPERLINK l _bookmark0 1 The rebound has been relatively fast in several large emerging-market economies. Activity moved above pre-pandemic levels in China, India and Turkey, helped by strong fiscal and quasi-fiscal measures and a recovery in manufa

21、cturing and construction. Output shortfalls remained relatively mild in many Asia-Pacific economies, including Australia, Japan and Korea, reflecting strong and effective containment measures, government support and the broader regional revival in manufacturing. Strong stimulus measures and improved

22、 financial conditions have boosted activity in the United States, although momentum slowed at the end of 2020. In the major European advanced economies the pace of the recovery has been more modest, reflecting extended disruptions from renewed virus outbreaks and associated reductions in working hou

23、rs in many service sectors. The different sector specialisation of economies is also affecting growth, with the economies most dependent on international travel and tourism generally experiencing a larger GDP decline in 2020.Containment measures and the associated declines in mobility now appear to

24、be having a smaller adverse impact on activity than in the early stages of the pandemic (Figure 2). In part, this may reflect a more careful targeting of public health measures and income support. Recent restrictions have focused largely on service sectors with high levels of direct contact between

25、consumers and producers, with manufacturing and construction activities generally affected only mildly. Businesses and consumers have also adapted to changes in working arrangements and sanitary restrictions. Whilst this helps to ensure that the economic cost of current containment measures is lower

26、 than in spring 2020, it also suggests that the economic rebound from their eventual removal might be smaller than generally expected.1 Differences in the national measurement of non-market service activity during shutdowns and re-openings complicate the comparison of GDP developments across economi

27、es since the pandemic began.Figure 2. The impact of mobility restrictions on activity has moderatedGDP growth and mobility 2020Q2 to 2020Q4Note: Based on a sample of 51 advanced and emerging-market economies in the second (blue) and third (green) quarter of 2020, and 43 countries in the fourth (red)

28、 quarter. The coefficients imply that on average a quarterly decline (rise) of 10 points in mobility was associated with a 2.2 percentage point decline (increase) in quarterly GDP growth in 2002Q2 (and 2020Q3), and a 0.9 percentage point decline in 2020Q4.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; Goog

29、le LLC, Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports, HYPERLINK /covid19/mobility /covid19/mobility; and OECD calculations.High-frequency activity indicators point to increasing divergence in the early part of 2021 (Figure 3). The OECD weekly tracker of GDP growth, based on Google Trends search-based

30、indicators, points to stable or improving outcomes in countries such as Australia, the United States and Japan, relative to those in countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom, where strict containment measures persist. A similar pattern is apparent in recent business surveys, with weaker outp

31、ut PMI indicators in the major European economies than elsewhere, particularly in services. Location-based Google mobility indicators of retail activity and travel also show rising divergence, with continued improvement in the emerging-market economies relative to the advanced economies.Global indus

32、trial production has continued to strengthen in recent months and global merchandise trade has now returned to pre-pandemic levels (Figure 4), helped by the strong demand for IT equipment and medical supplies. Business investment has also picked up sharply, despite continued near-term uncertainty an

33、d high corporate debt. However, momentum eased towards the end of 2020 in the economies with monthly measures of economy-wide output or GDP, reflecting the impact of subdued service sector activities.Figure 3. High-frequency indicators point to rising divergenceNote: The OECD Weekly Tracker of GDP g

34、rowth is a real-time high-frequency indicator of economic activity using machine learning and Google Trends data. The Tracker provides estimates of the year-on-year growth rate of weekly GDP. Data in Panel B are location-based indicators of mobility and aggregated using PPP weights.Source: OECD; Goo

35、gle LLC, Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports, HYPERLINK /covid19/mobility /covid19/mobility; and OECD calculations.Figure 4. Industrial activity and trade are rebounding but service sectors have lost momentumNote: Data in Panel A are PPP-weighted aggregates. The retail sales measure uses mont

36、hly household consumption for the United States and the monthly synthetic consumption indicator for Japan. The 11-country activity indicator uses GDP or economy-wide output data for Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Finland, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway and the United Kingdom. Data in Pane

37、l B are all in volume terms apart from services exports, which are an aggregate of monthly nominal USD exports in 38 countries.Source: OECD Economic Outlook database; CPB; IATA; RWI/ISL Container Throughput Index; WTO; and OECD calculations.Consumer spending drove the initial rebound in activity as

38、economies reopened last summer but remained broadly flat through the fourth quarter, reflecting the resurgence of health concerns and the impact of renewed containment measures on retail and leisure spending. Cross-border services trade also remained weak. Household saving rates were still well abov

39、e pre-pandemic levels in the fourth quarter of 2020, providing scope for future spending, but consumer confidence has yet to recover in most countries (Figure 5). Faster progress in vaccine deployment will be needed to help restore confidence, improve labour market conditions and reduce precautionar

40、y saving.Figure 5. Household savings provide scope for pent-up demand but confidence remains weakSource: OECD Economic Outlook database; Insee; OECD Main Economic Indicators database; and OECD calculations.Labour market conditions are recovering slowly, with job retention measures such as short-time

41、 work schemes and wage subsidies continuing to help preserve employment in Europe and Japan. However, across the OECD economies, almost 10 million more people are unemployed than prior to the crisis, inactivity rates have risen and employment rates have declined. In developing countries, substantial

42、 job losses have increased poverty and deprivation of millions of workers. Total hours worked remain around 5% lower than prior to the pandemic on average in the large advanced economies (Figure 6, Panel A), with marked differences across sectors. Shortfalls are concentrated largely in job-rich serv

43、ice activities with high levels of social interactions (Figure 6, Panel B), such as leisure, hospitality, transportation, and retail and wholesale trade. Taken together, these sectors account for between 20-30 per cent of employment in most economies, highlighting the still-precarious nature of many

44、 jobs unless vaccines are deployed rapidly and containment measures are eased substantially. Women, youth and low-income workers are particularly exposed to such risks given the relative importance of these sectors for their employment.Significant fiscal and monetary support continues to underpin ac

45、tivity. Additional discretionary fiscal measures announced in several countries during the past three months will add to the overall support this year, including in the United States, Japan, Germany, Canada, and India. Many countries have also extended existing income support schemes, or planned for

46、 their reintroduction as in Brazil. However, fiscal policy may tighten in some emerging-market economies this year, including China. In Europe, spending from the Next Generation recovery fund is due to begin later this year, but the total discretionary fiscal stimulus in 2021 appears likely to be re

47、latively mild, at around 1% of GDP in the euro area, despite considerable spare capacity.The extent of fiscal support in the United States this year is set to be considerably larger than in most other economies. The Consolidated Appropriations Act enacted in December contained new temporary measures

48、 worth USD 900 billion (4% of GDP), largely concentrated on emergency assistance for households and the unemployed. US household real disposable income jumped by 11% in January, and real consumer spending by 2%, with most of the additional funds initially being saved. The forthcoming American Rescue

49、 Plan provides a considerably larger stimulus, potentially raising aggregate demand by between 3-4% on average in the following four quarters, with welcome spillovers for activity in major trading partners (Box 1).Figure 6. Labour market conditions are still weak in some sectorsNote: Economy-wide da

50、ta for hours worked in all economies apart from the United States, where the data refer to total hours worked by private non-farm employees. For Japan, estimates are based on total employment and average monthly hours worked by employed persons. High-contact sectors are ones with high social interac

51、tions between consumers and producers. These include retail and wholesale trade, accommodation and food services, transportation and storage, arts and entertainment, and other personal services.Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis; Statistics Canada; Australian Bureau of Statistics; Statistics Bureau

52、, Japan; Eurostat; Office for National Statistics; and OECD calculations.Box 1. The potential impact of the American Rescue PlanThe planned fiscal stimulus in the United States, set out in the American Rescue Plan, will provide a significant near-term boost to activity if enacted in full. In total,

53、the new measures are planned to be worth up to USD 1.9 trillion (around 8 per cent of baseline GDP). The pace at which these measures would take effect remains uncertain, although there would be a clear immediate boost from stimulus payments to households, which represent around one-fifth of the ove

54、rall package of measures. Other measures, such as stronger final consumption spending at the Federal and State level and tax credits, are only partly pandemic-related and may be spread over the next year or so. Continued US monetary policy accommodation, as implied by the current policy stance, woul

55、d help to raise the near-term multiplier effects of the package. However, containment measures could moderate the speed at which higher income feeds through to spending, and uncertainty is likely to enhance precautionary saving by households.Illustrative simulations on the NiGEM macroeconomic model

56、suggest that the proposed measures could raise US output by around 3-4 per cent on average in the first full year of the package (from 2021Q2 to 2022Q1), broadly equivalent to the spare capacity currently estimated to exist in the US economy. This helps to stimulate demand in other economies, with o

57、utput rising by between -1 percentage point in Canada and Mexico, and between - percentage point in the euro area and China (Figure 7, Panel A). In the near-term, US employment is also boosted, rising by between 2-3 million at the end of 2021, but inflation also rises, by around percentage points pe

58、r annum on average in the first two years of the shock. Strong US import growth widens the US current account deficit by around per cent of GDP on average in the first four quarters of the shock.Figure 7. The GDP impact of the stimulus will be sizeableNote: The profile of the stimulus shown in Panel

59、 B is illustrative. Source: OECD calculations using the NiGEM macroeconomic model.These simulations assume that two-fifths of the overall stimulus takes effect in the second quarter of 2021, largely via higher government transfer payments, with the remainder spread over the following year (Figure 7,

60、 Panel B). Policy interest rates remain unchanged in the United States and other advanced economies until mid-2022, but are endogenous in the emerging-market economies. The simulations do not incorporate a rise in the Federal minimum wage.The largest near-term impact of the US fiscal package arises

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論