ethics lecture 6 護(hù)理倫理學(xué)課件_第1頁
ethics lecture 6 護(hù)理倫理學(xué)課件_第2頁
ethics lecture 6 護(hù)理倫理學(xué)課件_第3頁
ethics lecture 6 護(hù)理倫理學(xué)課件_第4頁
ethics lecture 6 護(hù)理倫理學(xué)課件_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩10頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、Lecture 3 Research ethics Learning outcomes Understand the main ethical principles required to conduct researchKnowledge of the strategies for conducting ethical researchEvaluate ethical conduct in research articles Ethics in research is about balance Respect for participants Requires adequate infor

2、mationAble to understand and evaluate the issues e.g vulnerability Avoid perceived or actual coercion Vulnerable individuals and groups Potentially every recipient of healthcare is vulnerable to the impact of research - some more than others Who might be particularly vulnerable?People with cognitive

3、 impartments People with mental ill health Children Prisoners Peolple with English as second language Maintaining confidentiality Healthcare research can involve collecting personal dataThis can be biographical, personal , medical history Anyone participating needs to be sure that the personal data

4、is managed and stored correctly Some data collection methods challenge confidentiality e.g. Focus groups.confidentiality in research is an absolute duty confidentiality is closely linked to anonymity Strategies for ethical research Balancing risk and benefitsLinked to beneficence (doing good) and no

5、n maleficence (doing no harm) Researchers should be clear about :Potential benefits to participants- these should be made clear before any research is started .AND 2. What they will do to minimise harm Non Maleficence doing no harm Researchers must be clear about any potential risks or harm that can

6、 happen to participants from the direct research .In quantitative / medical research this may relate to side effects , panful dressing changes etc. In qualitative research- potential harm could be from psychological stresses .Consider these questions when looking at research studies Is the aim of th

7、e research clear?What sort of ethical information was sought and is it this stated?What information were participants given and was consent checked ?Did participants have the right to withdraw ?Is there a hint of coercion ?What were the benefits of taking part ? And what were the potential areas of

8、harm?( adapted from Johnson and Long (2015) p 39)Ethics approval All healthcare research involving people in the UK, whether NHS or the private sector has to be approved by an independent research ethics committee . The committee protects the rights and interests of the people who will be in the tri

9、al ( study ) See NHS Health Research Authority References Johnson , M. Long, T . ( 2015) Resrearch ethics , In Gerrish, K. Lathlean, J. (eds) The Research process in Nursing , Oxford. Willey Blackwell. Polit, D. Beck, C. T. ( 2012) Nursing Research . Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice Directed Questions ?What issues do researchers ne

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論