




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
BloggingandthepublicsphereLifeOnlineBruceFerwerdaTommyvanderVorst31maart2021InthispresentationWhoarethosebloggers?Lenhart&Fox(2006):Aportraitoftheinternet’snewstorytellersWhatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):Whatdobloggersdo:anaveragedayonanaveragepoliticalblogThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007):Blogs,politicsandpowerInteractionsamongbloggers:theblogosphereHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007):Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggers/InnovationSciencesPAGE14/5/2024Weblogs/InnovationSciencesPAGE24/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Let’sthrowinsomestatistics.../InnovationSciencesPAGE34/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?BloggingisbringingnewvoicestotheonlineworldLenhart&FoxconductedasurveyintheUS:54%ofbloggershaveneverpublishedanywhereelse8%ofinternetusersmaintainsablog39%readblogsVarioustopics&motivesforbloggingHighpercentageofbloggersstop
afterawhile/InnovationSciencesPAGE44/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Thebloggingpopulation:Isyoung(54%is<30)ConsistsofasmanywomenasmenMostlyinurban/suburbanareas(13%inruralareas)Lesslikelytobewhitethanaverageinternetuser/InnovationSciencesPAGE54/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Blogscanbepersonalorbea‘publicendeavour’:55%ofbloggersuseapseudonymFor84%,bloggingisahobbyor“somethingIdo,butnotsomethingaspendalotoftimeon〞59%spendjustoneortwohoursperweekmaintainingtheirblog52%blogmostlyforthemselves,notforanaudience;32%blogmostlyfortheiraudience(Whyblog‘justforyourself’?)/InnovationSciencesPAGE64/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Bloggingvs.Journalism:34%considertheirblogaformofjournalism57%includelinkstooriginalsources‘often’/InnovationSciencesPAGE74/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):exploratoryempiricalstudyHowdopoliticalbloggersusetheirblogsCategorizationofbloggingactivities:InformeractivitiesWatchdogactivities(“keepinganeyeonmainstreammedia〞)PoliticalactivitiesPhilantropicactivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE84/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?Findingsaverageblogger≠averagecitizen
(DemographicsdifferfromLenhart&Fox:morewhites,moremales)Informeractivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE94/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsWatchdogactivities80%ofbloggersnotifytheirreadersaboutbiasoromissionsinthemediaClosesecondtoinformingactivitiesBloggersdonottrustmainstreammediaButalsorelyonit!Bloggingas‘first-ratejournalism’incountrieswithoutfreepressorinthecaseofevents(i.e.HurricaneKatrina)/InnovationSciencesPAGE104/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE114/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE124/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE134/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPhilantropicactivitiesAskingreaderstodonate(44%)(interestingly,thisislowerthanthe66%donatorsintheUS)Rarelypursuedactivity(i.e.notthe‘corebusiness’)/InnovationSciencesPAGE144/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007)Introduction:Blogs,politicsandpower:aspecialissueofPublicChoiceAreblogsindeedimportanttopolitics?Dotheyhaveabeneficialorharmfuleffect?/nameofdepartmentPAGE154/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDoblogsaffectpolitics?BlogscanbeimportantMoreimportantasreactorstothemediathanindependentagendasettersWhendoesblogshavepoliticalpower?Leasttrustedsourceofnews(BBC/Reuters/MediaCenter2006)/nameofdepartmentPAGE164/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsAreblogsgoodforpolitics?OngoingdiscussionCyberapartheid“...increasingpeople’sabilitytohearechoesoftheirownvoicesandtowallthemselvesofffromothers.〞(Sunstein2001,p.49)Linking&comments/nameofdepartmentPAGE174/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggersDopeopleabandonthereadingofdissentingpoliticalopinionsinfavorofmaterialthatiscloselyalignedwiththeirownideologicalposition?/nameofdepartmentPAGE184/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersH1BlogsaremorelikelytolinktoblogsthatmatchtheirideologicalpersuasionH2Theamountofcross-ideologicallinkingamongblogswilledeclineovertimeHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)/nameofdepartmentPAGE194/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereBlogrollconnections27%presentedinthewholenetwork91%resembleideologicalpositions9%differentviewpoints/nameofdepartmentPAGE204/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereLinksinpostsMorelikelytolinktoideologicalblogs12%conservativeliberal16%liberalconservative/nameofdepartmentPAGE214/5/2024Interactionsam
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- Vaccarin-C-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- Topo-I-II-IN-1-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- 2025注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師自我檢討與調(diào)整試題及答案
- PRMT5-targeted-fluorescent-ligand-1-生命科學(xué)試劑-MCE
- 微生物生長(zhǎng)條件的影響因素試題及答案
- 電線電纜行業(yè)發(fā)展動(dòng)態(tài)與未來市場(chǎng)展望分析
- 2025年證券從業(yè)資格考試知識(shí)點(diǎn)貫通分析試題及答案
- 項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)識(shí)別與應(yīng)對(duì)試題及答案
- 微生物鑒定的分子生物學(xué)技術(shù)試題及答案
- 注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師職業(yè)素養(yǎng)的培養(yǎng)與發(fā)展試題及答案
- 運(yùn)動(dòng)減脂講義
- 中國(guó)綠色資本市場(chǎng)綠皮書(2023-2024)
- 加油站施工施工組織設(shè)計(jì)方案
- 應(yīng)急停水停電培訓(xùn)資料
- 傳染病防治知識(shí)和技能培訓(xùn)計(jì)劃
- 《EPS處理表面氧化鐵皮技術(shù)要求 》
- MCN機(jī)構(gòu)運(yùn)營(yíng)流程優(yōu)化與管理方案
- 【MOOC】書法鑒賞-浙江傳媒學(xué)院 中國(guó)大學(xué)慕課MOOC答案
- 足球場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)草坪全年養(yǎng)護(hù)計(jì)劃
- (高清版)DBJ52∕T 017-2014 回彈法檢測(cè)山砂混凝土抗壓強(qiáng)度技術(shù)規(guī)程
- 現(xiàn)代化背景下企業(yè)檔案管理創(chuàng)新路徑
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論