data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0daf1/0daf1f66e438cf25f047021bde304eed3f4dc321" alt="信用風險限額_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20abf/20abf76b86d1a00c7cd143672074e4cec6990cc3" alt="信用風險限額_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb26/8fb2646c9f1d7b65c2357ebf7e873fef2dda1edb" alt="信用風險限額_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1824/a1824c663226b10c2698f29b84879c08a7d16325" alt="信用風險限額_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdcd8/bdcd8798ab7885588fc6c68f4fd3de0c49570423" alt="信用風險限額_第5頁"
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1Outline?Overview?Market
Concerns?Credit
Risk
Limits?Credit
Risk
Models?Credit
Risk
Diversification?Credit
Risk
Management
Process1Overview:Current
State
of
the
CreditMa?rAkltehtough
Fixed
Income
has
recently
outperformed
equity,
theCorporate
Bond
market
has
severely
underperformedTreasuriesThe
market
has
experienced
rising
defaults,
downgrades,
and
anunprecedentednumberofInvestmentGradecreditsfallingintoHighYield(a.k.a.“FallenAngels”)– “FallenAngels”areoverwhelmingtheHighYieldmarketastheynumber14ofthetop25issuersandcomprise20%ofthetotalamountoutstandinginHighYieldTelecom/Energy
have
been
at
the
core
of
the
fundamentaldeterioration
in
credit
with
outsized
spending
to
meetunrealistic
demand
expectations
and
aggressive
expansions
intoenergy
trading
in
utilitiesExtreme
market
volatility
and
limited
liquidity
bestcharacterizes
the
current
state
of
the
corporate
bondmarket–
Banks
are
restricting
access
to
liquidity
and
the
resulting
illiquidityis
contributing
to
the
credit
market’s
volatilityPortfolio
diversification
is
difficult
to
achieve
given
that
33of
amount
outstanding
and
42%
of
new
issue
volume
are
in
the1Market
Concerns?What
is
contributing
to
the
currentcredit
volatility?Bear
equity
market
andcorporate
scandalsCredit
recession
(stressedcredit
market)Liquidity
crisisHistorically
low
ratesEconomic
recovery
unclear1A
Bear
Market
in
Equity?Volatility
at
historic
highs
since
19973+
years
upside
of
technology
bubble2.5
years
of
bubble
bursting
and
corporatescandalsVolatility
measure
of
“%
days
per
year
S&P500
Index
moved
greater
than
+/-
1%”
in
August2002
was
43%
versus
22%
historic
average
since1925?Current
downturn
deepest
since
1973-74
andlongest
since
1929-32
or
1946-49–
At
its
July
2002
low,
the
S&P
500
was
48%below
its
March
2000
peak
and
the
decline
hasendured
for
29
months.
This
makes
it
thelongest
bear
market
since
1946/49
and
together(1)
The
BawnkiCtrehdit
Atnahlyest,1Au9gu7st320/0274
cycle,
the
steepest
of
thepost-WWII
period.(1)A
Bear
Market
in
Equity1?Valuations
are
still
above
historicnorms
on
almost
every
measure(Price/Earnings,
DividendYield,
Price/BPrice/Sales),
except
forEarningsYield/BondYield
(which
is
nearfair
value,
as
bond
yields
are
athistoric
lows)?Earnings
remain
under
pressure?Outflows
from
domestic
equity
mutualfunds
and
foreign
sales
of
US
stockshas
intensified
since
June
2002(2)(2)
Ned
Davis
Research
Inc.,
September
2002Recent
Equity
and
Fixed
Income
Returns(For
Periods
Ended
10/31/2002)Source:
Lehman,
Standard
&
Poors11Credit
Market
UnderS?Utnrprreecsedsented
numbers
of
distressed
credits(“Fallen
Angels”
are
investment
grade
credits
that
have
been
downgrato
high
yield)$115
billion
Fallen
Angels
YTD
through
October
2002Since
2001
default
rates
have
exceeded
1991
highs–
"Default
rates
have
been
rising
continuously
since
1999.hasbeenlikeacreditrecessionforseveralyearsandIexpeittocontinueuntildefaultratesclearlyhavepeaked.”EdwAltman,Ph.D.NYUSternSchoolofBusiness–
2001
experienced
the
most
ever
Chapter
11
filings
with
17and
pre-petition
liabilities
of
$230
billion?First
half
of
2002
had
74
filings
totaling
$130
billionSince
June
1997
a
series
of
financial
crises
have
resultin
huge
volatility
in
and
widening
of
credit
spreads;
thhas
produced
sustained
negative
excess
returns
incorporate
issuesMoody’s
downgrade/upgrade
ratio
rose
from
1.4
in
1998
t4.1Moody’s
year-to-year
defaults
rose
from
1.3%
in
1998
tSource:
Lehman,
Moody’s,
Edward
Altman1Liquidity
Crisis?Credit
contraction
in
bank
lending
andcommercial
paper
is
causing
a
“l(fā)iquiditycrisis”,
reversing
trend for
last
5
years
of20%
annual
expansion–
Bank
lending
is
currently
15%
lower
thanlast
July–
Non-financial
CP
has
contracted
47.7%
toa
low
of
$179.5
billion
in
June
2002
from
higof
$343.3
billion
in
December
2000?Financial
leverage
(ratio
of
current
debt
tototal
market
capitalization)
of
corporationsSource:iLenhmacn
reased
in
2002
to
26.6%
(on
$4.5
trillion),the
highest
level
since
the
1990-91
recession1Historical
Lows
ForInterest
RatesAggressive
Fed
easing
with
Fed Funds
at
1.25%
sinceNovember
6,
2002
cut
of
50
bpsThe
resulting
yield
curve
is
the
steepest
sincFall
1992Rates
at
4-decade
lows10-year
Treasury
Note
yield
of
3.57%
on
Octobe9th
was
at
a
44-year
lowAs
of
November
11,
2002
the
10-year
has
risen58
bps
from
this
lowHistorically
low
rates
led
to
another
mortgagerefinancing
wave
which
is
supporting
consumer
spendinExpectation
is
for
interest
rates
to
stay
low
thisyear,
rising
next
year
as
the
yield
curve
to
flattenfrom
the
short
endSource:
BloombergUPDATEUncertainty
ofEconomic
Recovery1?Blue
Chip
consensus
GDP
growth
is
forecast
at1.6%
in
Q4-2002
and
3.3%
in
2003.?Concerns
that
declines
in
equity
markets
andfinancial
wealth
could
reduce
consumer
spendingand
economic
growth?Continued
concern:
Geopolitical
risk
may
disruprecoverySource:
Blue
Chip
Consensus
ForecastInvestment
Grade
CorporateCumulative
Excess
ReturnsPeriod
of
NarrowingCorporate
Spreads1A
Series
ofFinancial
CrisesWorldcomEnronAsiaCrisisRussiaCollapse,LTCMTechnology
Bubble
CollapsesSource:
LehmanCorporate
Bond
ValuationsAnything
But
Telecom
and
Pipelines!(From
December
31,
2001
through
September
30,
2002)1Avoiding
Credit
Disastersand
Defaults
is
EssentialSource:
Lehman
(2002
YTD
through
October
31,
2002)1Telecommunications,NiagaraTCI
Comm,
ITTMohawkUS
WestCapital,Columbia/HCAWasteRite
AidXerox,Conseco,Management,FinovaKMartThefirst
ten
months
of
2002saw
the
largest
number
of
Fallen
Angels
(Investgrade
credits
that
have
been
downgraded
to
High
Yield)
in
history
(245
tota$115.4
Billion).Enron,
Calpine,JCPenney,
PG&E,Lucent,
Mirant,S.Cal
Edison,Delta
AirlinesW,orldcom,Qwest,
Tyco,Williams
Co.,GeorgiaPacific,USWest
Comm.,AT&T
Canada,Dynegy,Nortel,
Gap,Goodyear1WorldCom’s
$22.8
Billitotal
public
debt
ranksas
largest
fallen
angelQwest’s
$14.4
Billion
isecondTyco’s
$8.4
Billion
isthirdWilliams’
$8.0
BillionfourthEnron’s
$6.8
Billion
issixthGeorgia-Pacific’s
$5.7Billion
is
in
the
top
10May
2002
will
be
recallefor
a
record
$42.8Billion
of
fallen
angeldebt
moving
into
highyieldJuly
2002
was
nextlargest
at
$22.8
BillioCumulative
$115
Billionprincipal
of
fallenSource:
Lehman
(2002
YTD
through October
31,
2002)* Index
Exposure
--
Actual
balance
sheet
exposure
may
be
higher.Top
50
Fallen
Angels
from
1995-2002
YTDCredit
Risk
Management
is
Critical
to
Performa*nceHigh
Yield
Corporates:
Index
Returns
andDefault
Rates(From
1980
through
September
30,
2002)Most
years
of
peak
default
rates
or
following
year
are
also
years
of
high
returns:
1982,Source:
Lehman
High
Yield
Index
1983-2002,
*
-7.63%
Return
is
YTD
through
September
30,
2002,
CreditSuisse
First
Boston
(CSFB)
Returns
for
1980-1982,
Moody’s
Default
Rates
1983-2002,
*9.2%
Default
Rateis
for
annual
period
from
October
2001-
September
20021High
Yield
Spreads
By
Credit
Quality(From
January
31,
1990
Through
September
30,
2002)Source:
Credit
Suisse
First
Boston
(CSFB)1Paradigm
Shift
inFallen
Angels1?Over
20%
of
the
Lehman
High
Yield
Indexis
now
comprised
of
former
investmentgrade
credits.?Returns
fell
more
rapidly
than
ever
in2001-2002,
so
the
punishment
for
owninga
distressed
credit
was
severe.?Good
credit
defense
and
index-likeperformance
made
for
great
performanceLosses
in
Investment
Grade
BondsOccur
in
Months
Prior
to
DowngradesLoss
of
value
due
to
a
downgradeoccurs
over
a
few
prior
months.Depending
on
the
initial
credit
qualitylosses
could
stretch
over
2
months
forAAA-AA
and
up
to
8
months
forBAAThe
variability
of
the
magnitude
of
theloss
(i.e.,
Standard
deviation)
is
verysignificantAverage
Monthly
Underperformance
Due
to
Downgrade8/88
–
12/01Source:
Lehman11“Vintage
Year”#
distressedissues24-monthexcessreturnvs.UST16.56%-24.21%19905028.28%1991...1998142940.94%19.33%19991010.69%2000139Years
prior20012508.35%200154YTD
Jun
2002-68Years
since
2001122-23.71%AllYears3723.35%SubsequentExcessReturns(vs.UST)ofinvestment-gradebondsafterdistress**Since
2001
Long
Term
Relative*Performance
Subsequent
to
Distress
wasNegative
for
Investment
Grade
BondsConsistently
positiveexcess
returnssubsequent
todistress
before
2001resulting
from
aliquidity
crisisSource:
LehmanSince
2001
longhorizon2e3x.c08e%ss
returns
for
distressedbonds
have
beennegative
because
ofthe
credit
recession
*
Relative
to
Treasuries**
Lehman
defines
a
distressed
investment-grade
bond
as…Rated
Baa3
or
higher;
Fixed
coupon;
OAS
to
US
Treasuries
of
400bp
ormore;
and
Dollar
price
<80%
of
par.Absolute
vs.
RelativeRisk:
A
Debate1?A
desire
to
limit
absolute
risk
has
led
toincreased
tracking
error
for
credit
defensiveplayers
that
have
limited
issuer
exposures.?Index
issuer
considerations–
Should
indices
represent
the
active
investable
universe
othe
few
active
issues
available?–
Or
should
index
providers
keep
large
numbers
of
illiquidissues?–
Should
indices
caps
the
max
percentage
for
an
individualissuer??Should
limits
be
placed
on
the
amountoutstanding
for
currently
dominant
credits?–
Fallen
Angels
comprise
over
20%
of
Lehman
High
Yield
IndeRisk
Limits1?Divide
investment
grade
corporates
into
groupsby
quality
(AAA,
AA,
A,
BBB),
by
sectors
(oreven
subsectors),
and
by
duration
(0–2,
3-5,
6–10,
10+)?High
yield:
diversify,
diversify,
diversify?Classic:
Establish
limits
by
groups
and
byspecific
issuers
overall?Contemporary:
Use
a
combination
of
trackingerror
and
absolute
limits1Quantitative
CreditRisk
MetricsSpreadOASOAS
volatilitySpread
durationSwap
spread
durationReturnExcess
returnVariance/Covariance
ofSpreads
or
ExcessReturnsIntegrates
well
withMarket
RiskSpreads
can
be
difficultDefaultCDSCDS
volatilityDefault
ProbabilityLoss
FrequencyLoss
Given
DefaultTransition
ProbabilityMatrixVariance/Covariance
ofSpreadsCredit
VaRDifficult
to
estimateduring
periods
of
sparseQuantititative
CreditMeasures1?Moody’s
KMV
EDFs?Moody’s
RiskCalc
PDs?CreditSights’
BondScore
CREs?CSFB
CreditRisk+?McKinsey
CrPortView?RiskMetrics
CreditMetrics/CreditGrad?Standard
&
Poor’sModel
Comparison1Model
Comparison1QuantititativeDiversification
Products1Default
related?Moody’s
KMV?CreditGrades?Gifford
Fong
AssociatesSpread/Return
based?Lehman
POINT?Barra
TotalRiskCredit
Risk
Diversification
bySector
and
Rating1Credit
diversification
across
sectors
can
reduceportfolio
volatility
from
concentration
risk
for
crethat
have
a
higher
probability
of
becoming
distresseor
can
experience
higher
volatility
-
thus
reducingstandard
deviation
of
returnsSystematic
vs.
Idiosyncratic
RiskContagion
risk
has
hammered
certain
sectors
wherethere
have
been
considerable
bankruptcy
filings
and“fallen
angels”;
these
sectors
are
slowly
becomingmore
attractiveHistorically
fixed
income
has
a
low
probability
of
lprincipalCredit
differences
result
in
diversification
benefitFinancialIndustrial1Credit
DiversificationDowngrade
Risk
vs.Other
Non-Systematic
RiskDowngrade
only
idiosyncratic
size
ratio
for
different
ratings:
AaAaa:A:Baa
=
9:4:1–
Downgrade
diversify
requires
9
times
more
low
grade
Baa
thigh
grade
AaaIdiosyncratic
risk
as
stable-rated
bonds
experience
“natural”spread
volatilityTotal
idiosyncratic
risk
less
differentiated
by
quality
thandowngrade
risk
aloneSource:aLeshmain,nLedviDycnkaintAeugd14,b2y0y02,sPiRiMzIAeNewrFraonttiiieors
ifnfCorerditdRiiskf)ferent
quality
ratings:
Aa-Diversificat
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 勞動合同范本海南
- 2025年硬質橡膠及其制品合作協(xié)議書
- 2025年孕產(chǎn)婦保健項目建議書
- 合伙酒店轉讓合同范本
- epc工程總價合同范本
- 信貸機構合同范本
- 創(chuàng)業(yè)魔芋種植合作合同范本
- 合伙奶茶協(xié)議合同范本
- 低價手套租賃合同范本
- 南寧個人租房合同范本
- 上??萍及嫘W二年級下冊綜合實踐活動全冊教案
- 氣缸磨損的測量說課教案
- 《高鐵乘務安全管理及應急處置》課程教案-崔藝琳編寫
- 新課程標準2022版初中歷史考試題及答案
- 前言 馬克思主義中國化時代化的歷史進程與理論成果
- 產(chǎn)品可靠性測試計劃
- 高等數(shù)學考研輔導課(一)學習通超星課后章節(jié)答案期末考試題庫2023年
- 心理健康與職業(yè)生涯(中職)PPT完整全套教學課件
- 中國文藝美學要略·論著·《畫學心法問答》
- 公共藝術-音樂篇(中職公共藝術)PPT完整版全套教學課件
- 高等教育自學考試轉考轉出登記表
評論
0/150
提交評論