2016年3月ACCA-P3考試模擬題

1、2016年3月ACCA P3考試模擬題2016年ACCA將推出四個(gè)考季，為了方便大家更好地復(fù)習(xí)2016年3月ACCA P3考試，小編在百度文庫(kù)定期傳一些考試資料，如有其他需要可以訪問(wèn)財(cái)萃網(wǎng)。World Engines (WE) is one of the largest producers of aircraft and ship engines in the world. It has assets in excess of $600bn. It is currently considering improvements to its marine engine production fac

2、ilities. These improvements include the introduction of specialist hardware and software engine testing technology. Two companies have been shortlisted for supplying this technology.Amethyst is a well-established company whose product provides sophisticated testing facilities and costs $7m. The soft

3、ware that supports the product is written in a conventional programming language. The solution is widely used,but it is relatively inflexible and it has an out-of-date user interface. Amethyst has been trading profitably for 20 years and currently has an annual turnover of $960m.Topaz is a relativel

4、y new company (formed three years ago) whose product is more expensive ($8m) but it offers significant advantages in high volume performance and stress testing. It has a modular software design that allows it to be easily maintained and upgraded. It is written in a relatively new powerful programmin

5、g language and it also has an attractive and contemporary user interface. Topaz currently has a turnover of $24m per year. Some WE executives are concerned about purchasing from such a young, relatively small company, although externally commissioned credit reports show that Topaz is a profitable, l

6、iquid and lightly geared company.On a recent evaluation visit to Amethyst, WEs complete evaluation team of five people, including the financial specialist, were killed when their aircraft crashed on its approach to landing. It was a small, 12 seat commuter aircraft that was flying the WE team on a s

7、hort 100 km flight from the international airport to a small rural airport close to Amethysts base. It later emerged that small commuter airlines and aircraft were subject to less stringent safety procedures than larger aircraft used by established airlines.Later that year, one of the divisional dir

8、ectors of WE was given responsibility for picking up and running the testing technology evaluation project. He has found the following table (Figure 1) produced by the financial specialist in the evaluation team who was killed in the air crash. The divisional director recalls that these returns were

9、 based on tangible benefits resulting from the two options. The returns reflect the characteristics of the two products. Topaz produces better returns if demand for testing is high, but is less effective in low demand circumstances. This is a reflection of the fact that the two solutions differ slig

10、htly in terms of their functional scope and power.Figure 1: expected returns for three demand and supplier combinations.Option Supplier IF High demand IF Low demandA Amethyst $3m per annum $05m per annumB Topaz $4m per annum $01m per annumThe divisional director also recalls a workshop convened to c

11、onsider future market demand.Demand in the marine industry is currently affected by global economic uncertainty and it is increasingly difficult to predict demand. I remember that we were also asked to estimate demand for our marine products for the next six years. We eventually came up with the fol

12、lowing figures, although it was relatively hard to get everyone to agree and debate at the workshop became a little heated. High demand for six years: probability p = 04 Low demand for six years: probability p = 04 High demand for three years, followed by low demand for three years: probability p =

13、02These figures are confirmed by a document also recovered from the air crash site. As I recall, said the divisional director, the financial specialist intended to develop a decision tree to help us evaluate the Amethyst and Topaz alternatives. However, there is no evidence that he ever constructed

14、it, which is a pity because we could have taken the procurement decision on the basis of that decision tree.Required:(a) Develop a decision tree from the information given in the scenario and discuss its implications and shortcomings.Ignore the time value of money in your analysis. (9 marks)(b) The

15、divisional director suggests that the procurement decision could have been taken on the evidence of the decision tree.Discuss what other factors (not considered by the decision tree analysis) should also be taken into consideration when deciding which option to select. (6 marks)(c) WE executives are

16、 concerned about the risk of Topaz, as a relatively new company, going out of business. They have also expressed concern about the loss of the evaluation team in a fatal accident and they believe that this should lead to a review of the risks associated with employee travel.Discuss how EACH of the a

17、bove risks (supplier business failure and employee travel) might be avoided or mitigated. (10 marks)(25 marks)Answer:(a) A decision tree for the information in the scenario is given below.The expected value of Amethyst is:($18m x 04) + ($3m x 04) + ($105m x 02) = $105m MINUS cost of $7m = $35mThe ex

18、pected value of Topaz is:($24m x 04) + ($06m x 04) + ($123m x 02) = $123 MINUS cost of $8m = $43mThe analysis suggests that the Topaz option should be chosen.This decision tree is based on the information available at this point in time. The probabilities set in the workshop are subjective and are n

19、ot based on an analysis of past statistical data. As the divisional director recalls in the scenario, it was relatively hard to get everyone to agree and debate at the workshop became a little heated. The sensitivity of the outcome to slight alterations in probability assessments should be undertake

20、n. It is also unlikely that the predicted returns will be completely accurate. The basis of these estimates is not given, but a further sensitivity analysis, this time focusing on returns, would be valuable. The predicted annual return of Topaz ($4m per annum) under conditions of high demand needs p

21、articular attention. This value (and its associated probability) contributes about 78% of the total expected value of this option. If the annual returns are overestimated by 10% (say $36m per annum not $40m), then this ceases to be the best option.Software prices may also be negotiable, and changes

22、in prices and structure may also need to be experimented with. The decision tree will have been just one input into the procurement decision.(b) As highlighted in the first part of the answer, the decision tree is only one input to the procurement decision. The scenario states that the returns used

23、in the decision tree analysis were based on tangible benefits. The business case for each option would also have to state intangible benefits offered by each option. For example, the Topaz option offers a more contemporary user interface and this may provide intangible benefits associated with a bet

24、ter user experience. Intangible benefits need to be identified and listed for each option.Importantly, the risk associated with each option will also have to be considered and documented. An element of this is reflected in the scenario. Amethyst, a well-established supplier, is perceived as a less r

25、isky option than the relatively newly formed, smaller Topaz. The relative supplier risk is not reflected in the decision tree. This risk, and other risks identified for each option, must be documented in the business case.Amethyst optionTopaz optionHigh p = 04Low p = 04High then low p = 02High p = 0

26、4Low p = 04High then low p = 026 x $01m6 x $4m3 x $4m + 3 x $01m6 x $05m6 x $3m3 x $3m + 3 x $05mIt may also be necessary to assess the relative impact on the organisation of each option. The options appear to differ in their functional scope and power and these differences might have disproportiona

27、te effects on the degree of change necessary within the organisation to accommodate the solution and the effect that each option has on organisational processes and the people with responsibility for those processes.Finally, an effective selection process should allocate appropriate weight to featur

28、es associated with the supplier of the solution. This is not just financial robustness, but also factors such as the availability of support, the presence and effectiveness of a user group, process certification etc. Similarly, the product needs to be assessed for functional fitness and for overall

29、product characteristics, such as usability, flexibility and its overall design philosophy. We are told that Topaz is modular and up-to-date and this may be in its favour, but it will not be reflected in the decision tree analysis.(c) The risk assessment for Topaz has documented concerns about the lo

30、ng-term viability and stability of the supplier. Current financial analysis reveals a profitable, liquid and lowly geared company. However, the company is relatively young and it has a very small turnover compared to WE. It also has to be recognised that WE intends to enter a long-term relationship

31、with this supplier. Hence the continuing success and viability of Topaz is important to WE. A risk avoidance strategy would be to avoid purchasing from small, newly-established companies. Hence Topaz would not be considered.Should this risk actually take place, and Topaz goes out of business, then i

32、ts impact may be mitigated by the following: The software used in the product is perceived to be innovative, modular and up-to-date. WE should ensure that this software is lodged in an escrow agreement. In such an agreement the source code is stored with an independent third party. If Topaz goes out

33、 of business, then their customers (including WE) have access to the software source code which should allow them, or their appointed agents, to maintain and support it. WE should also consider establishing in-house expertise in the programming language used by the Topaz product. This could have two

34、 objectives:(1) As a basis for developing a long-term in-house software application that could be used to replace the software elements of the product offered by Topaz. The team could also be used to develop other significant applications required by the company. The software is contemporary and pow

35、erful and so other applications within WE should not be difficult to find.(2) To provide a basis for enacting the escrow agreement if Topaz goes out of business. Access to the source code is particularly appropriate if an in-house team is able to pick up the software, maintain it and develop it. WE

36、is a very significant company, with considerable assets. It should be relatively easy for it to maintain funds which could be used for purchasing Topaz should it run into difficulties. Many large companies take this approach as it secures software supply and potentially severs the supply, in this ca

37、se, of the software to competitors.WE need to maintain a contingency plan for moving to an alternative supplier or an in-house team. This contingency plan could be linked to monitoring the financial performance of Topaz. Many financial organisations offer a continuous monitoring facility to ensure t

38、hat suppliers are not just evaluated at the point of purchase, but throughout the subsequent business relationship. This is particularly important when the suppliers application is business-critical to the customer and any interruption in supply would have significant implications.The key lessons learned from the fatal air crash should result in WE developing risk avoidance or mitigation actions to make sure that such catastrophic events do not happen again, or, if they do happen, that they have less impa