GRE寫(xiě)作argue高分模_第1頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作argue高分模_第2頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作argue高分模_第3頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作argue高分模_第4頁(yè)
全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、開(kāi)頭:(1) It seems that, at first sight, the authors reasoning is logical to lead to the proposal/recommendation/prediction/assertion that (2) However, careful scrutiny of the argument reveals that some assumptions this argument depends on are problematic (the evidence this argument contains is inadequ

2、ate) (additional questions need to be asked in order to fully evaluate this argument) (some alternative explanations also need to be considered). (3) Unless the author could provide more accurate information or critical evidence, this argument will not be convincing enough to reach its conclusion.替換

3、詞:作者author/writer/speaker/arguer/“title”文章argument/editorial/article建議suggest/advise/advocate/recommend/propose預(yù)測(cè)predict/project/forecast/foresee/expect/anticipate承接Therefore/thus/hence/so/consequently/clearly/moreover/furthermore/besides表明show/imply/indicate/illustrate/demonstrate/point out聲稱(chēng)assert

4、/allege/state/claim/contend/maintain聲明 assertion/statement/claim/implication/indication/illustration/demonstration證實(shí)prove/substantiate/corroborate支持 support/bolster可信度validity/credibility/reliability/feasibility推斷 infer/deduce/suggest草率的,魯莽的 hasty/rash/reckless值得懷疑的,沒(méi)有說(shuō)服力的 unsubstantiated/unconvinci

5、ng/unpersuasive/unfounded/unwarranted/suspicious/unreliable/groundless/suspectable/doubtable/questionable/problematic/specious1. 類(lèi)比 (5, 7, 13)(1) Indicating that (措施在某地或某公司取得了成功), the author implies that (該措施在另一地也會(huì)成功) (2) This comparison between the two areas/companies/towns (analogy), however, migh

6、t not be very reasonable on the grounds that the circumstances facing the two areas might be very different. (3) (列舉兩者之間可能不同的狀況) all might influence the effectiveness of (措施) at the two places. (4) Therefore, the deduction that the success of (措施) can be definitely achieved at (另一地) is groundless an

7、d unreliable.2. 絕對(duì)與相對(duì)數(shù)量(1) The author mentions (絕對(duì)數(shù)量) to illustrate that , but the author does not address (總數(shù)) (2) If (總數(shù)很大/很小), (絕對(duì)數(shù)量) would not seem to be surprisingly high/low.(3)The arguer needs to provide more specific statistics regarding the ratio of (相對(duì)數(shù)量) (4) Such data would be of much mor

8、e value in comparing the relative amounts of 3. 沒(méi)發(fā)現(xiàn)不代表沒(méi)有(1) The argument treats a lack of proof that (某事物) had ever been found as sufficient evidence that (某事物) never existed. (2) One possibility is that which makes it extremely hard to find trace of the existence of (某事物) It is also likely that cur

9、rent research methods and technologies are not yet advanced enough to identify(detect) potential evidence involving the possible existence of (某事物) (3) Also, if researchers could find (其他事物), these objects might be used as secondhand evidence to infer that (某事物) once existed.4. 質(zhì)疑權(quán)威性The authors cita

10、tion of could not lend strong support to this argument, since the authority (accuracy) of is questionable. ? ? Apparently, the author should address more background information about in order to prove that are just and objective. Otherwise the claim of would be dubious.段首句:1. One of the underlying a

11、ssumptions that needs evaluation is that2. The author also hastily assumes that3. Building upon the implication(assumption) that通用句型:1. could not lend strong support to the arguers claim/proposal2. The argument treats a lack of proof thatwas found as sufficient evidence that (沒(méi)發(fā)現(xiàn)不代表沒(méi)有)3. The arguer

12、fails to convince us that4. All of these different factors need to be taken into consideration before making an assertion that.5. Without evidence that, the authors claim that is dubious at best.6. The claim that lacks credibility if the author fails to prove7. To (further) bolster the editorials cl

13、aims, the author must provide clear evidence that reason A was in fact responsible for (a increase/decline in )8. cannot be representative enough to reflect the true/universal situation regarding調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù):1. The author unfairly/fallaciously/falsely assumes that the result of the cited survey/statistics i

14、s fully genuine and credible.2. The author cites a survey/study of to report/explain that3. Failing to indicate the source of the survey, the author could not convince us about the credibility of the survey.4. The scope/validity/representativeness/reliability of the survey is doubtable.5. The sample

15、 is too limited/not representative, including only those people who6. The result of the nationwide survey may not be representative enough to reflect the true situation in area.7. Does the survey include respondents from different age groups?8. The survey does not provide specific statistics (comple

16、te information) concerning the effect of9. Although the total number of is high, the per (capita) number might be relatively low.類(lèi)比:1. Are the two towns/companies fully comparable at every aspect?2. The comparison between A and B might not be very reasonable on the grounds thatthe circumstances faci

17、ng A and B might be very different. 3. Without showing that all other conditions in the two areas/universities have been essentially the same, the author cannot convince us that因果關(guān)系:1. Although A and B happens at the same time, no evidence was given to substantiate the claim that A contribute to B2.

18、 Other possible factors should be considered in order to evaluate the real causes of列舉他因:1. The author overlooks the possibility that (only a small portion of )2. The arguer ignores other possible factors that may also leads/contribute to3. Some other possible solutions to the problem of, such as, s

19、hould not be excluded from consideration.段落結(jié)尾:1. In short2. In a word結(jié)尾:(1) While might be beneficial to, this argument is not strongly persuasive in the absence of additional supporting details. (2) More research should be conducted in order to determine whether the is a reasonable recommendation/p

20、rediction/choice (the appropriateness and effectiveness of the recommendation provided).難題:1,2,6,74,79,83,85,91論據(jù)論點(diǎn):1. Problems about surveys(1) quantity of the sample(2) the actual meaning or influence of the survey(3) what questions were asked in the survey?(4) are the respondents representative?2. Problems about statistic

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論