詳解托福寫作考試中正確舉例方法.doc

1、詳解托福寫作考試中正確舉例方法要想舉出高分的例子，最好是寫兩種例子：1.舉例于美國人所熟知的歷史、文化的例子，但一定要有一些新意。2.講自己身邊的故事。假設(shè)是考生可以選用第一種例子，用得恰當(dāng)?shù)脑捵匀荒茏尶脊傺矍盀橹涣?。例如在討論媒體對(duì)人們的影響時(shí)，選用美國人所熟知的脫口秀女王 Oprah frey 作為例子?；蚴窃谟懻搶W(xué)生是否都應(yīng)該學(xué)習(xí)歷史的時(shí)候，選用美國歷史上知名的總統(tǒng)，如Thomas Jefferson, Herbert Hoover等進(jìn)展論證都非常好。這樣做既進(jìn)展了有效論證，又不落入俗套。然而，舉這類例子對(duì)于考生考前的積累要求比擬高。假如間隔 考試還有三個(gè)月或以上的時(shí)間，我建議考生可以

2、在考前多準(zhǔn)備一些類似的人物或事件的例子，以備考試之用。對(duì)于大多數(shù)備考時(shí)間比擬緊的考生來說，花大量的時(shí)間去準(zhǔn)備第一種例子顯得有些不太劃算。因此，性價(jià)比比擬高的第二種例子更合適于備考時(shí)間比擬短的考生。托?？荚噧H僅是語言才能考試，只要能用恰當(dāng)?shù)睦雨U述清楚問題就可以，因此用自己或身邊人的例子對(duì)于考官來說也有很大的說服力。有的考生仍然會(huì)問，那我身邊沒有那么多的例子可以用怎么辦這個(gè)時(shí)候，對(duì)待ETS的考官就不能這么死心眼了，就要學(xué)會(huì)編例子。但是編例子也要有技巧，也要讓考官信服，絕非信口胡編?？傊?，在文章中的例子除了新意之外，還是要有一定的真是可信性。所以，在平時(shí)閱讀中的積累，對(duì)于寫作中的舉例是非常重要的。

3、托福寫作開頭和中間段托福綜合寫作模板可以幫助我們理清思路，迅速組織語言和邏輯構(gòu)造，節(jié)省考慮時(shí)間，寫出正確率較高的托福作文。托福綜合寫作模板：開頭段In this argument, the arguer concludes that.To support the conclusion, the arguerpoints out that.In addition, the arguerreasons that.This argument suffers fromseveral crital fallacies.In this argument, the arguer remendsthat.To

4、 justify this claim, the arguer providesthe evidence that .In addition, he cites theresult of a recent study that .A careful eamination of this argument would reveal howgroundless the conclusion is.In this analysis, the arguer claims that .To substantiate the conclusion, the arguercites the ele that

5、.In addition, the arguer assumes that .This argument isunconvincing for several crital flaws.In this argument, the arguer advocates that .The remendation is based on theobservation that.Meanwhile, the arguer assumes that.The argument isproblemat for two reasons.The conclusion in this argument is tha

6、t.In support of this predtion, the arguerclaims that .Moreover, the arguer assumes that.This argument is fraught withvague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.托福綜合寫作模板：中間段First, the argument is based on a false analogy.The arguer simply assumes that, buthe does not provide any evidence that.

7、Second, the arguer mits a fallacy of hasty generalization.Even if, it does notfollow that。Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning that.Actually, the arguers remendation of would most probably turns out to beineffective and misleading.In the first place, the arguer fails

8、 to take into account the factors in the analysis.While we are informed that , the arguer fails to make clear that.In the second place, the parison in this argument is inplete and selective, thearguer discovers that .However the arguer fails to provide any information regarding.Furthermore .Unless t

9、he arguer also takes these factors into consideration, the parison isunconvincing.First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization.According to the citedstudies, .The fact tells very little about .Even if we accept the arguersassumption that, it is unwarranted to assume that.In addition

10、, the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that.Forinstance, .What s more,.Finally, the arguer hints that, but he fails to analyze that.The major problem with this argument is that the arguer fails to convince us that .First, the fact that does indate that.Second, , whh makes it i

11、mpossiblefor us to evaluate thatAnother point worth considering is the arguers hasty generalization.We are informedthat, but we do not know that.We can believe that , but based on this sliminformation, we can never evaluate the overall performance of discount.One major assumption in short of letimac

12、y is that.First, .Second, .This may prove misleading and counterproductive in the end.In addition, the conclusion is based on a gratuitous assumption that.This,however, is unwarranted.In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading.To makethe argument more convincing,

13、the arguer would have to prove that.Moreover, I wouldsuspend my judgment about the credibility of the remendation until the arguer canprovide concrete evidence that.Otherwise, the arguer is simply begng the questionthroughout the argument.To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands.Befo

14、re we accept theconclusion, the arguer must present more facts that.To solidify the argument, thearguer would have to produce more evidence concerning.As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned.To make it logally acceptable, thearguer would have to demonstrate that .Additionally, the arguer must provide evidenceto .To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysisdoes not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains.To strengthen the argument thearguer would hav