司法論文：論司法人員之獨立人格與司法制度的合理設(shè)計

1、 司法論文：論司法人員之獨立人格與司法制度的合理設(shè)計【中文摘要】我國在制度上尚未確立司法獨立或者司法人員獨立,僅規(guī)定了狹義的、形式上的獨立行使審判權(quán)、獨立行使檢察權(quán),現(xiàn)代意義的司法獨立在司法實踐中沒有得到良好的確立,即使狹義的審判獨立和檢察獨立仍受到來自各方的干預(yù),司法權(quán)威遭到破壞。司法獨立本身應(yīng)當(dāng)歸結(jié)為政治體制改革的范疇,但是在完成這項政治改革之前,我們并不是無所作為的,本文關(guān)注到司法獨立與司法人員的獨立人格有條件關(guān)系,只有獨立的人和獨立的人格才能承擔(dān)司法獨立的重大責(zé)任。筆者認為從現(xiàn)行制度演化到真正的司法獨立,其必然過程是司法活動和管理的去行政化,本文通過對司法人員獨立人格的探討以及相關(guān)非行

2、政化制度建設(shè)的設(shè)想,深入到司法獨立的創(chuàng)建當(dāng)中,為我國早日實現(xiàn)司法獨立盡學(xué)術(shù)思考之責(zé)。第一部分探討司法人員的核心倫理品質(zhì)就是獨立人格。在本部分中,首先對司法人員的獨立人格進行說明,強調(diào)法官、檢察官同作為司法人員,其人格既有相似處亦有差異性,由此凸顯其獨立人格的內(nèi)涵。緊接著指出研究司法人員獨立人格的深層意圖是旨在研究司法獨立的實現(xiàn)路徑。同時,對我國司法人員人格的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀進行了介紹和評價,得出急需改善我國司法人員人格不夠獨立的問題。最后,提出司法人員所應(yīng)當(dāng)具有的獨立人格的具體要求及對國外立法、司法、教育、培養(yǎng)的司法人員獨立人格進行比較研究,引出司法人員人格獨立應(yīng)包含的道德要素。第二部分探討司法

3、人員獨立人格及品格的重要道德要素。司法人員獨立人格的培養(yǎng)既然是司法獨立的重要基礎(chǔ),那么當(dāng)然要對司法人員的獨立人格所應(yīng)具備的要素或者說素質(zhì)進行探討,清楚怎樣的人才能成為具有獨立人格的司法人員。第三部分主要通過對非行政化制度的設(shè)計來保障獨立人格的實現(xiàn)。要保障司法人員獨立人格,不是一句空話,需要制度的保障。司法人員與行政人員不同,這就決定了要從非行政化的角度對制度進行設(shè)想和建立。其中機構(gòu)獨立、上下級監(jiān)督關(guān)系的落實、司法機關(guān)考評制度的改革等等是筆者認為保障司法人員獨立人格必需解決的問題?！居⑽恼縊ur country is in the system hasnt established on ju

4、dicial independence or judicial personnel, the only independent regulation of narrow sense, in the form of the exercise judicial power independently, exercise procuratorial power independently and modern meaning of judicial independence in the judicial practice didnt get good established, even if th

5、e narrow sense of independence and procuratorial independent judgment from all parties are still subject to the intervention, the judicial authority undermined. The independence of the judicature itself shall be attributed to the category of the reform of the political system, but in finish the poli

6、tical reform before, we are not doing nothing.This paper focus on the judicial independence and judicial independence with personality conditions, the only independent relationship and independent personality can take the big responsibility of judicial independence. The author thinks that the curren

7、t system from evolution to the real judicial independence and its inevitable process is judicial activities and management to embody the, this paper discusses the judiciary independent personality and related not embody the idea of construction system, deep into the creation of judicial independence

8、, for our country of early realization of judicial independence do academic thinking the cooperative.First part discussion on the core ethics quality of the judiciary is independent personality. In this section, first describes the independent personality of the judiciary, stressing that judges, pro

9、secutors and judicial personnel, its existing similarities there are also differences in personality, its independent personality connotation. Followed by judicial officers pointed out that research deep intention is to examine the independence of the independent character of realization of the path

10、. At the same time, our judicial personality describes legislative, judicial status and evaluation, personality is not independent enough to draw much-needed improvement of Chinas judicial personnel issues. Finally, a judicial officer to have the specific requirements of independent personality and

11、the countries legislative, judicial, education, training of judicial officers to conduct a comparative study on independent personality, leads to moral element of personality independent judicial officers should be included.Part II discussion on personality and character important moral elements of

12、judicial independence. Judiciary independent personality since the culture of judicial independence is an important basis, then, of course, of members of the judiciary should be independent personality qualities of elements or by exploring how a person becomes independent character of judicial offic

13、ers.Partmainly through against non-administrative system designed to safeguard independent realization of personality. To protect the judiciary independent personality, not empty words, required system protection. Different judicial officers and executives and this determined from non-angle of admin

14、istrative system conceived and established. Which are detached, the subordinate supervisory reform of evaluation system of implementation, the relationship between the judiciary and so on is in my view the protection judiciary independent character necessary to address the problem.【關(guān)鍵詞】司法 人格獨立 司法倫理【

15、英文關(guān)鍵詞】Justice personality independence Judical moral【目錄】論司法人員之獨立人格與司法制度的合理設(shè)計【備注】加好友：139.938.848索購全文 .同時提供論文寫作一對一指導(dǎo)和論文發(fā)表委托服務(wù)中文摘要4-5Abstract5-6引言9-10一、獨立人格司法人員的核心倫理品質(zhì)10-29（一） 什么是司法人員的獨立人格10-11（二） 從司法人員的人格獨立到司法獨立11-15（三） 我國司法人員獨立人格之立法現(xiàn)狀15-17（四） 關(guān)于我國司法制度對于司法人員的獨立人格具體要求的反思17-23（五） 司法人員獨立人格規(guī)定的比較借鑒23-291. 加拿大23-242. 澳大利亞243. 法國24-254. 南非255. 評述25-29二、司法人員獨立人格的重要道德要素29-37（一） 對法律的忠誠和信任30-31（二） 良知的培養(yǎng)31-34（三） 理性與心靈信仰34-37三、非行政化制度的設(shè)計：建立與獨立人格相適應(yīng)的非行政化制度37-49（一