量刑建議論文：量刑建議實(shí)證考察影響因素理論價(jià)值實(shí)踐意義

1、量刑建議論文：量刑建議實(shí)證考察影響因素理論價(jià)值實(shí)踐意義【中文摘要】檢察機(jī)關(guān)雖然被法律賦予了法律監(jiān)督職能，但在以往的司法實(shí)踐中，檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)審判機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督在提起公訴環(huán)節(jié)具有一定的局限性，往往局限于抗訴形式。量刑建議作為一種監(jiān)督措施，沒(méi)有發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的效用。近年來(lái)，隨著量刑建議制度在全國(guó)各檢察機(jī)關(guān)的廣泛推行,至今已取得了很大成效。量刑建議具有很強(qiáng)的實(shí)踐價(jià)值，在我國(guó)理論界還未形成系統(tǒng)的制度研究，但并不是說(shuō)量刑建議沒(méi)有理論基礎(chǔ)。為了探討量刑建議的理論價(jià)值及其實(shí)踐價(jià)值，本文對(duì)搜集的關(guān)于某市檢察院提起公訴的運(yùn)用量刑建議的案件，以調(diào)查研究的形式對(duì)量刑建議的運(yùn)用狀況進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)在盜竊案件中量刑建議運(yùn)用的次數(shù)較

2、其他普通案件多，文中試對(duì)這一問(wèn)題進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要分析。通過(guò)分析影響量刑的各種因素，結(jié)合刑法規(guī)定，筆者總結(jié)了三種主要的影響因素：法定量刑情節(jié)、酌定量刑情節(jié)和政策因素。除了這三種因素外，仍有一些其他因素也對(duì)被告人的量刑幅度產(chǎn)生一定的影響。量刑建議對(duì)法院的最終判決結(jié)果的影響，首先表現(xiàn)為采納率的高低。具體而言,采納率的高低與檢察機(jī)關(guān)提出的量刑建議內(nèi)容的類型有很大關(guān)系。對(duì)于沒(méi)有采納量刑建議的案件，檢察機(jī)關(guān)基本上都提出了抗訴，這是檢察機(jī)關(guān)行使法律監(jiān)督職能的體現(xiàn)。量刑建議制度在實(shí)踐中所體現(xiàn)的理論價(jià)值,在其功能性上，主要表現(xiàn)為具有表述功能、雙重提示功能及保護(hù)被告人利益的功能三個(gè)方面；在價(jià)值判斷上，實(shí)現(xiàn)了其公正與效率的

3、價(jià)值。此外,量刑建議具有深刻的實(shí)踐意義，如保證量刑公正的實(shí)現(xiàn)強(qiáng)化法庭審判中控辯雙方的訴訟職能；提高檢察人員的專業(yè)素質(zhì)；提高案件審判效率；節(jié)約司法資源等。除了上述意義，量刑建議的廣泛運(yùn)用,對(duì)檢察制度也產(chǎn)生了一定程度的影響，比如加強(qiáng)了事前監(jiān)督的能力，彌補(bǔ)了事后監(jiān)督的不足等?！居⑽恼緼lthoughtheprocuratorialorganhasafunctionoflegalsupervisionunderthelaw,inthepastjudicialpractice,thefunctionoflegalsupervisionhascertainlimitationstosuperviset

4、hejudicialorganinlitigationstage,asoftenlimitinthecounterappealform.Althoughtherecommendationasasupervisorymeasures,didnotplayitseffectiveness.Inrecentyears,withthewidespreadimplementoftherecommendationofpenaltymeasurementinthewholecountry'sprocuratorialorgans,sofar,ithasmadegreatachievements.Th

5、erecommendationofpenaltymeasurementhasastrongpracticalvalue,althoughthetheoreticalcirclesinourcountryhasnotyetformedasystemofsystems,itdoesnotsaythatthereisnotheoreticalbasis.Forinvestigatethemeasurementofpenalty'stheoreticalvaluesandpracticalvalues,thearticlecollectedononecity'sprocuratorat

6、eandProcuratorialDailycasesinvoIvedinformationtotheformofresearchforthestatusoftheproposedrecommendationofpenaltymeasurement,whichlfoundthattherecommendationofpenaltymeasurementintheftcasesappliedmuchmorecommonlythanothercases,thetextbrieflyanalyzedthisissue.Inaddition,byanalyzingthevariousfactorsth

7、ataffectpenalty,withcriminallaw,Isummarythreemainfactors:thestatutoryofsentencingplot,thediscretionaryofsentencingplot,thecircumstancesandpolicyfactors.Beyondthesethreefactors,therearestillsomeotherfactorsalsoimpacttheextentofsentencing.TheimpactofrecommendationofpenaltymeasurementtotheCourt'sfi

8、naljudgment,firstlymanifestsontheadoptionrateoftherecommendation.Inparticular,theadoptionratewiththeprosecution'ssentencingrecommendationhasalotoftypesofcontent.Thecasewhichdidnotadoptthesentencingrecommendation,basicallytheprocuratorialorganwouldmakeprotest,whichistheexerciseofthefunctionsoflegalsupervisionoftheprocuratorialorgan.Thesystemofrecommendationofpenaltymeasurementexemplifiesthevalueofjurisprudeneeintopractice,functionally,behavedastheexpressionfunction,theDoublepromptsfunctionandthefunctionofprotectingthedefendant'sbenefit;fromtheviewofvaluejudgment,itha