股東承包經(jīng)營論文-有限公司股東承包經(jīng)營問題研究報(bào)告

1、-. z股東承包經(jīng)營論文：*公司股東承包經(jīng)營問題研究【中文摘要】承包經(jīng)營責(zé)任制在國有企業(yè)改制中被宣布失敗后,似乎銷聲匿跡。然而近些年,股東承包經(jīng)營這一新的經(jīng)營模式在實(shí)踐中又悄然興起,由此引發(fā)人們對(duì)股東承包經(jīng)營合同的效力產(chǎn)生了爭議。在現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制下,在新公司法鼓勵(lì)公司自治的根本理念指引下,股東承包經(jīng)營模式是否有其存在的合理性,以及合理性存在的法理依據(jù)是什么,積極影響是什么,都是實(shí)務(wù)中亟待澄清和解決的問題。本文擬通過對(duì)實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的股東承包經(jīng)營的案例分析以及法理分析,并將公司自治理念貫穿其中,對(duì)上述相關(guān)問題做出答復(fù)和解釋,并提出相應(yīng)的改良措施。全文共分四個(gè)局部,具體而言：第一局部,*公司股東承包

2、經(jīng)營合同綜述。該局部首先對(duì)股東承包經(jīng)營公司的含義和特征進(jìn)展了概括,對(duì)承包經(jīng)營合同的發(fā)包主體進(jìn)展了論述。其次闡述了公司承包經(jīng)營產(chǎn)生的歷史背景,主要是承包經(jīng)營責(zé)任制在我國開展的各個(gè)歷史階段以及如何催生了的承包經(jīng)營。在該局部最后,提出了本篇論文研究的重點(diǎn),即承包經(jīng)營合同的效力問題；在列舉分析了理論界中存在的關(guān)于承包經(jīng)營合同的效力爭議之后,筆者提出了自己的見解,并解釋了承包股東在承包經(jīng)營后是否享有有限責(zé)任待遇的問題。第二局部,*公司股東承包經(jīng)營的根本理論分析。此局部是本文的理論核心局部。在此局部的前四節(jié),筆者分別從公司自治的角度、公司法規(guī)的性質(zhì)的角度、公司章程的性質(zhì)的角度、承包合同的性質(zhì)的角度分析了公

3、司承包經(jīng)營合同的有效性與合理性。最后對(duì)傳統(tǒng)公司經(jīng)營模式下“三權(quán)分立的治理構(gòu)造進(jìn)展了簡單介紹,并指出了這種傳統(tǒng)模式下存在的“大股東部控制問題和“股東干預(yù)和經(jīng)營者獨(dú)立傾向的矛盾問題等。第三局部,股東承包經(jīng)營對(duì)*公司治理的影響。在前兩局部的理論根底上,此局部首先指出了股東承包經(jīng)營公司后產(chǎn)生的公司治理構(gòu)造的變化,其中包括此種承包模式對(duì)股東會(huì)制度和股東權(quán)利的影響,對(duì)董事會(huì)制度和監(jiān)事會(huì)制度的影響以及對(duì)公司經(jīng)理、法定代表人制度的影響等。接著明確提出了股東承包經(jīng)營公司產(chǎn)生的積極作用：主要解決了傳統(tǒng)模式下*公司中存在的問題,即經(jīng)營者獲得了自主經(jīng)營權(quán),同時(shí)收益和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)同步轉(zhuǎn)移,防止了“股東干預(yù)和經(jīng)營者獨(dú)立傾向之間的

4、矛盾。最后文章指出了“小公司是采取承包經(jīng)營模式的最正確選擇,并說明了理由。第四局部,*公司股東承包經(jīng)營中存在的問題及建議。首先,關(guān)于股東承包收益分配問題,本局部明確指出在承包經(jīng)營模式下,可以突破公司法中關(guān)于公司利潤分配的倡導(dǎo)性規(guī)定,而根據(jù)承包合同中雙方自由協(xié)商規(guī)定的分配方式分配利潤；同時(shí)在債務(wù)承當(dāng)問題上,也依據(jù)合同的相對(duì)性原理分析了承包股東、發(fā)包公司以及債權(quán)人之間的權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系。其次,提出了關(guān)于承包股東可能對(duì)公司未來利益造成損害的問題,以及相應(yīng)的對(duì)策建議。最后,文章提出了股東承包經(jīng)營公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防措施,主要是關(guān)于在訂立承包合同時(shí)的具體決議程序安排,以及對(duì)承包經(jīng)營期限、承包金的繳納比例、收益分配等

5、條款的靈活規(guī)定?！居⑽恼緼fter had been declared fail utterly in transformation of state-owned enterprises, managerial responsibility system of contracting seemed disappear from the scene. But in recent years, the new operating model of shareholders contract of Limited Liability pany has been appearing quietly

6、, which brings out peoples controversy to the validity of the contracts. Under the system of market economy in nowadays, and with the guiding of basic ideas of pany autonomy, is it reasonable or not for the operating model of contract of Limited Liability pany, and what is the legal basis for its re

7、asonable e*istence, what is the positive impact, all the issues mentioned above need prompt solution in the practice. By case analysis and jurisprudence analysis of the law cases about shareholders contract of Limited Liability pany, with the basic ideas of pany autonomy throughout the paper, this p

8、aper is to answer and to interpret these questions mentioned above, and propose appropriate measures.This paper is divided into four parts, to be specific:The first part, a summary of shareholders contract of Limited Liability pany. Firstly, this part recapitulates the implication and the features o

9、f shareholdercontract of Limited Liability pany, and e*pounds the party awarding contract. Secondly, it elaborates the historical background of the shareholders contract of the pany, mainly contains the historical period of managerial responsibility system of contracting and how it motivated the sha

10、reholders contract of the pany. In the end of this part, it presents the focal point of the paper, that is about the validity of the contract; after analyzing the argue about the validity of the contract among theoretical workers, the writer presents her own opinions, and interprets the problem that

11、 whether the shareholder has the treatment of limited liability or not after he contracts for the pany.The second part, the basic theoretical analysis about the contract operating of the pany. This part is the core of the thesis. In the first four section, the present writer analyses the validity an

12、d the reasonability of the contract separately from the angle of the pany autonomy, the nature of pany law norms, the nature of the article of association, the nature of the contract. Finally, the paper presents simply the administer structure of “separation of the three powers under the traditional

13、 operating model, and points out the problems of “the control of heavy stockholders and “contradictions between the stockholders intervention and the managersindependence inclination.The third part, the influence of shareholders contract of Limited Liability pany. On the theoretical basis of the fir

14、st two part, this part points out the changes of the panys administer structure caused by the shareholders contract of the pany, which include this operating models influence to the system of shareholders general meeting and the shareholdersrights, to the board of director and the board of censors a

15、nd also the panys manager and the legal representatives, and so on. After that, the paper specifically point out the positive effect of the shareholders contract of the pany:it mainly solve the problems which e*ist in the traditional operating model, including that the manager get voluntary manageme

16、nt rights, at the same time, the profits and the risk shift in synchrony, which avoid the “contradictions between the stockholders intervention and the managersindependence inclination. Finally, the paper points out that “small panies are the best selection which take the operating model of contract

17、, and the reasons for that also be presented.The fourth part, problems e*isting during the shareholders contract of Limited Liability pany and the suggestions to reach perfection. Firstly, problems about the profits distribution, in this part, it is pointed out specifically that under the model of s

18、hareholders contract, the pany can make a breakthrough of the advocated rules that refer to the distribution of the profits, and distributes the profits in accordance with a freewheeling consult between the contract parties; Similarly, at the problem of acceptance of risk, the paper also according t

19、o the contracts relativity principle analyze the rights and obligations among the shareholders, the party awarding contract and the creditor. Secondly, the paper puts forth the problem about shareholders doing damage to the panys future benefits, and the corresponding suggestions. Finally, the paper

20、 proposes the basic precautions of risk, it mainly contains the specific procedure of decision makings when deciding to contract for the pany, and the fle*ible rules about the time limit of the contract, the payment ratio of the contract cash, the distribution of the profits.【關(guān)鍵詞】股東承包經(jīng)營 公司自治 公司契約 治理

21、構(gòu)造 自主經(jīng)營【英文關(guān)鍵詞】shareholders contract operating pany autonomy corporate contract corporate governance structure operate independently【目錄】*公司股東承包經(jīng)營問題研究容摘要6-8Abstract8-9引言12-14一、*公司股東承包經(jīng)營合同綜述14-21(一) 股東承包經(jīng)營的含義和特征14-151. 股東承包經(jīng)營的含義142. 股東承包經(jīng)營合同的主體14-153. 股東承包經(jīng)營合同的特征15(二) 公司承包產(chǎn)生的歷史背景15-181. 承包經(jīng)營責(zé)任制在我國開展的歷史15-162. 股東承包經(jīng)營的產(chǎn)生16-18(三) 股東承包經(jīng)營合同的效力