版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
Chapter9LeadershipCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LearningObjectivesDefineleadershipanddiscusstheroleofformalandstrategicleadership.Explainandcriticallyevaluatethetraitapproachtoleadership.Explaintheconceptsofleaderconsideration,initiatingstructure,reward,andpunishment
behaviourandtheirconsequences.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LearningObjectivesDescribeandevaluateFiedler’sContingencyTheory,CognitiveResourceTheory,andHouse’sPath-GoalTheory.ExplainhowandwhentouseparticipativeleadershipusingtheVroomandJagomodel.DescribeandevaluateLeader-Member-ExchangeTheory.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LearningObjectivesDiscussthemeritsoftransactionalandtransformationalleadership.Defineanddiscussethicalandauthenticleadership.Explaintherolethatcultureplaysinleadershipeffectivenessanddescribegloballeadership.Describegenderdifferencesinleadershipandexplainwhywomenareunderrepresentedinleadershiprolesinorganizations.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.WhatIsLeadership?Theinfluencethatparticularindividualsexertonthegoalachievementofothersinanorganizationalcontext.Effectiveleadershipexertsinfluenceinawaythatachievesorganizationalgoals.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.StrategicLeadershipLeadershipthatinvolvestheabilitytoanticipate,envision,maintainflexibility,thinkstrategically,andworkwithotherstoinitiatechangesthatwillcreateaviablefuturefortheorganization.Strategicleadersareopenandhonestintheirinteractionswiththeorganization’sstakeholdersandtheyfocusonthefuture.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.FormalLeadershipIndividualswithtitlessuchasmanager,executive,supervisor,anddepartmentheadoccupyformalorassignedleadershiproles.Theyareexpectedtoinfluenceothers,andtheyaregivenspecificauthoritytodirectemployees.Individualsmightalsoemergetooccupyinformalleadershiproles.Theydonothaveformalauthority.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.AreLeadersBorn?TheSearchforLeadershipTraitsTheassumptionthatthosewhobecomeleadersanddoagoodjobofitpossessaspecialsetoftraitsthatdistinguishthemfromothers.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchonLeadershipTraitsThesearchforleadershiptraitsbeganduringWorldWarI.Traitsareindividualcharacteristicssuchasphysicalattributes,intellectualability,andpersonality.Sometraitsareassociatedwithleadership.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TraitsAssociatedwithLeadershipEffectivenessCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchonLeadershipTraits(continued)Threeofthe““BigFive”dimensionsofpersonality(agreeableness,extraversion,opennesstoexperience)arerelatedtoleadershipbehaviours.Intelligenceisrelatedtoleadershipbutnotasstronglyaspreviouslythought.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LimitationsoftheTraitApproachItisdifficulttodeterminewhethertraitsmaketheleaderorwhethertheopportunityforleadershipproducesthetraits.Doesnottelluswhatleadersdotoinfluenceotherssuccessfully.Itdoesnottakeintoaccountthesituationinwhichleadershipoccurs.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LimitationsoftheTraitApproach(continued)Sometraitsareassociatedwithleadershipsuccess.Traitsalonearenotsufficientforsuccessfulleadership.Traitsareonlyapreconditionforcertainactionsthataleadermusttakeinordertobesuccessful.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheBehaviourofLeadersThemostinvolved,systematicstudyofleadershipwasbegunatOhioStateUniversityinthe1940s.Employeesdescribedtheirsuperiorsalonganumberofbehaviouraldimensions.Theresultsrevealedtwobasickindsofbehaviour:ConsiderationInitiatingstructureCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ConsiderationTheextenttowhichaleaderisapproachableandshowspersonalconcernandrespectforemployees.Theconsiderateleaderisseenasfriendlyandegalitarian,expressesappreciationandsupport,andisprotectiveofgroupwelfare.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.InitiatingStructureThedegreetowhichaleaderconcentratesongroupgoalattainment.Thestructuringleaderclearlydefinesandorganizeshisorherroleandtherolesoffollowers,stressesstandardprocedures,schedulestheworktobedone,andassignsemployeestoparticulartasks.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheConsequencesofConsiderationandStructureConsiderationandinitiatingstructurebothcontributepositivelytoemployees’motivation,jobsatisfaction,andleadereffectiveness.Considerationismorestronglyrelatedtofollowersatisfaction,motivation,andleadereffectiveness.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheConsequencesofConsiderationandStructure(continued)Initiatingstructureisslightlymorestronglyrelatedtoleaderjobperformanceandgroupperformance.Therelativeimportanceofconsiderationandinitiatingstructurevariesaccordingtothenatureoftheleadershipsituation.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheConsequencesofConsiderationandStructure:TheNatureoftheSituationWhenemployeesareunderahighdegreeofpressureduetodeadlines,uncleartasks,orexternalthreat,initiatingstructureincreasessatisfactionandperformance.Whenthetaskisintrinsicallysatisfying,theneedforhighconsiderationandhighstructureisgenerallyreduced.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheConsequencesofConsiderationandStructure:TheNatureoftheSituationWhenthegoalsandmethodsofperformingthejobareveryclearandcertain,considerationshouldpromoteemployeesatisfaction,whilestructureshouldpromotedissatisfaction.Whenemployeeslackknowledgeastohowtoperformajob,orthejobitselfhasvaguegoalsormethods,considerationbecomeslessimportant,whileinitiatingstructuretakesonadditionalimportance.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheConsequencesofConsiderationandStructure:TheNatureoftheSituationTheeffectsofconsiderationandinitiatingstructuredependoncharacteristicsofthetask,theemployee,andthesettinginwhichworkisperformed.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeaderRewardandPunishmentBehavioursLeaderrewardbehaviourprovidesemployeeswithcompliments,tangiblebenefits,anddeservedspecialtreatment.Whensuchrewardsaremadecontingentonperformance,employeesshouldperformatahighlevelandexperiencejobsatisfaction.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeaderRewardandPunishmentBehaviours(continued)Leaderpunishmentbehaviourinvolvestheuseofreprimandsorunfavourabletaskassignmentsandtheactivewithholdingofraises,promotions,andotherrewards.Whenpunishmentisperceivedasrandomandnotcontingentonemployeebehaviour,employeesreactnegativelywithgreatdissatisfaction.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeaderRewardandPunishmentBehaviours(continued)Leadercontingentrewardandpunishmentbehaviourispositivelyrelatedtoemployees’perceptions,attitudes,andbehaviour.Non-contingentpunishmentbehaviourisrelatedtounfavourableoutcomes.Relationshipsaremuchstrongerwhenrewardsandpunishmentaremadecontingentonemployeebehaviour.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeaderRewardandPunishmentBehaviours(continued)Themannerinwhichleadersadministerrewardsandpunishmentisacriticaldeterminantoftheireffectiveness.Leaderrewardandpunishmentbehaviourleadstomorepositiveperceptionsofjusticeandlowerroleambiguity.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalTheoriesofLeadershipThesituationreferstothesettinginwhichinfluenceattemptsoccur.Thebasicpremiseofsituationaltheoriesofleadershipisthattheeffectivenessofaleadershipstyleiscontingentonthesetting.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalTheoriesofLeadership(continued)Thesettingincludesthecharacteristicsoftheemployees,thenatureofthetasktheyareperforming,andcharacteristicsoftheorganization.Twosituationaltheoriesofleadershipthatareamongthebestknownandmoststudied:Fiedler’sContingencyTheoryHouse’sPath-GoalTheoryCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.Fiedler’sContingencyTheoryTheassociationbetweenleadershiporientationandgroupeffectivenessiscontingenton(dependson)theextenttowhichthesituationisfavourableforexertinginfluence.Somesituationsaremorefavourablethanothers,andthesesituationsrequiredifferentorientationsonthepartoftheleader.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeadershipOrientationLeadershiporientationismeasuredbyhavingaleaderdescribetheirLeastPreferredCo-Worker(LPC).LeastPreferredCo-Workerisacurrentorpastco-workerwithwhomaleaderhashadadifficulttimeaccomplishingatask.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeadershipOrientation(continued)TheleaderwhodescribestheLPCrelativelyfavourably(ahighLPCscore)isconsideredtoberelationshiporiented.TheleaderwhodescribestheLPCrelativelyunfavourably(alowLPCscore)isconsideredtobetaskoriented.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeadershipOrientation(continued)FiedlerhasarguedthattheLPCscorerevealsapersonalitytraitthatreflectstheleader’smotivationalstructure.TheLPCscoreisnotameasureofconsiderationorinitiatingstructurewhichareobservedbehaviours.TheLPCscoreisanattitudeoftheleadertowardworkrelationships.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFavourablenessSituationalfavourablenessisthe“contingency”partofContingencyTheory.ItspecifieswhenaparticularLPCorientationshouldcontributemosttogroupeffectiveness.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFavourableness(continued)Factorsthataffectsituationalfavourableness,inorderofimportance,arethefollowing:Leader-memberrelationsTaskstructurePositionpowerCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFavourableness(continued)Thesituationismostfavourableforleadershipwhen:Leader-memberrelationsaregoodThetaskisstructuredTheleaderhasstrongpositionpowerCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFavourableness(continued)Thesituationisleastfavourableforleadershipwhen:Leader-memberrelationsarepoorThetaskisunstructuredTheleaderhasweakpositionpowerCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.PredictionsofLeaderEffectivenessfromFiedler’sContingencyTheoryofLeadershipCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TheContingencyModelThemodelindicatesthatataskorientation(lowLPC)ismosteffectivewhentheleadershipsituationisveryfavourableorwhenitisveryunfavourable.Arelationshiporientation(highLPC)ismosteffectiveinconditionsofmediumfavourability.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidenceThetheoryhasbeenthesubjectofmuchdebate.TheexactmeaningoftheLPCscoreisnotclear.Amajorsourceofthemanyinconsistentfindingsisthesmallsamplesizesusedinmanystudies.Recentreviewshaveconcludedthatthereisreasonablesupportforthetheory.Thetheoryneedssomerefinement.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.CognitiveResourceTheory(CRT)Aleadershiptheorythatfocusesontheconditionsinwhichaleader’scognitiveresources(intelligence,expertise,andexperience)contributetoeffectiveleadership.Leaderintelligenceispredictedtobemostimportantwhentheleaderisdirective,thegroupsupportstheleader,andthesituationislow-stress.Inhigh-stresssituationsaleader’’scognitiveresourcesareimpaired,sotherehisorherworkexperiencewillbemostimportant.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidenceResearchsupportsthepredictionthatexperiencepredictsperformanceinhigh-stresssituations,whileintelligencepredictsperformanceinlow-stresssituations.Leaderintelligenceismorestronglyrelatedtogroupperformancewhentheleaderisdirectiveandhasthesupportofthegroup.CRTindicatesthattraitsareimportantforleadershipeffectivenessincertainsituations.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.House’’sPath-GoalTheoryRobertHouse’’stheoryconcernedwiththesituationsunderwhichvariousleaderbehavioursaremosteffective.Path-GoalTheoryisconcernedwithleaderbehaviours.Themostimportantactivitiesofleadersarethosethatclarifythepathstovariousgoalsofinteresttoemployees.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.House’’sPath-GoalTheory(continued)Theopportunitytoachievesuchgoalsshouldpromotejobsatisfaction,leaderacceptance,andhigheffort.Theeffectiveleaderformsaconnectionbetweenemployeegoalsandorganizationalgoals.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.House’’sPath-GoalTheory(continued)Toachievejobsatisfactionandleaderacceptance,leaderbehaviourmustbeperceivedasimmediatelysatisfyingorasleadingtofuturesatisfaction.Topromoteemployeeeffort,leadersmustmakerewardsdependentonperformanceandensurethatemployeeshaveaclearpictureofhowtheycanachievetheserewards.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.LeaderBehaviourPath-GoalTheoryisconcernedwithfourspecifickindsofleaderbehaviour:DirectivebehaviourSupportivebehaviourParticipativebehaviourAchievement-orientedbehaviourCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFactorsTheeffectivenessofeachsetofbehavioursdependsonthesituationthattheleaderencounters.Path-GoalTheoryisconcernedwithtwoprimaryclassesofsituationalfactors:EmployeecharacteristicsEnvironmentalfactorsCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ThePath-GoalTheoryofLeadershipCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFactors(continued)Differenttypesofemployeesneedorpreferdifferentformsofleadership:Highneedachieversshouldworkwellunderachievement-orientedleadership.Employeeswhoprefertobetoldwhatdodorespondbesttodirectiveleadership.Whenemployeeshavelowtaskabilities,theywillappreciatedirectiveleadership.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFactors(continued)Theeffectivenessofleadershipbehaviourdependsontheparticularworkenvironment:Whentasksareclearandroutine,directiveleadershipisredundantandunnecessaryandparticipativeleadershipisnotuseful.Whentasksarechallengingbutambiguous,directiveandparticipativeleadershipiseffective.Whenajobisfrustratingordissatisfying,supportiveleadershipismosteffective.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.SituationalFactors(continued)Leadersmighthavetotailortheirbehaviourtotheneeds,abilities,andpersonalitiesofindividualemployees.Effectiveleadersshouldtakeadvantageofthemotivatingandsatisfyingaspectsofjobswhileoffsettingorcompensatingforthosejobaspectsthatdemotivateordissatisfy.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidenceThereissubstantialevidencethatsupportiveorconsiderateleaderbehaviourismostbeneficialinsupervisingroutine,frustrating,ordissatisfyingjobs.Thereissomeevidencethatdirectiveorstructuringleaderbehaviourismosteffectiveonambiguous,less-structuredjobs.Thetheoryworksbetterinpredictingemployees’jobsatisfactionandacceptanceoftheleaderthaninpredictingjobperformance.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ParticipativeLeadership:InvolvingEmployeesinDecisionsParticipativeleadershipmeansinvolvingemployeesinmakingwork-relateddecisions.Leaderscanvaryintheextenttowhichtheyinvolveemployeesindecisionmaking.Minimally,participationinvolvesobtainingemployeeopinionsbeforemakingadecision.Maximally,itallowsemployeestomaketheirowndecisionswithinagreed-onlimits.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ParticipativeLeadership:InvolvingEmployeesinDecisions(continued)Participationcaninvolveindividualemployeesortheentiregroupofemployeesthatreportstotheleader.Thechoiceofanindividualorgroupparticipationstrategyshouldbetailoredtospecificsituations.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.PotentialAdvantagesofParticipativeLeadershipMotivationParticipationcanincreasethemotivationofemployees.QualityParticipationcanenhancethequalityofdecisions.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.PotentialAdvantagesofParticipativeLeadership(continued)AcceptanceParticipationcanincreasetheemployees’’acceptanceofdecisions.Thisisespeciallyimportantwhenissuesoffairnessareinvolved.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.PotentialProblemsofParticipativeLeadershipTimeandEnergyParticipationrequiresspecificbehavioursonthepartoftheleaderthatusetimeandenergy.LossofPowerSomeleadersfeelthataparticipativestylewillreducetheirpowerandinfluence.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.PotentialProblemsofParticipativeLeadership(continued)LackofReceptivityEmployeesmightnotbereceptivetoparticipationortheymightlacktheknowledgetocontributeeffectivelytodecisions.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’sSituationalModelofParticipationVictorVroomandArthurJagodevelopedamodelthatattemptstospecifyinapracticalmannerwhenleadersshoulduseparticipationandtowhatextenttheyshoulduseit.Theybeganwiththerecognitionthattherearevariousdegreesofparticipationthataleadercanexhibit.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)Forissuesinvolvingtheentireworkgroup,arangeofbehavioursisplausible(Astandsforautocratic,Cforconsultation,andGforgroup).Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)AI:Yousolvetheproblemormakethedecisionyourself.AII:Youobtainthenecessaryinformationfromyouremployees,thendecidethesolutiontotheproblemyourself.CI:Yousharetheproblemwiththerelevantemployeesindividually,gettingtheirideasandsuggestions,thenyoumakethedecision.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)CII:Yousharetheproblemwithyouremployeesasagroup,obtainingtheircollectiveideasandsuggestions,thenyoumakethedecision.GII:Yousharetheproblemwithyouremployeesasagroupandtogetheryougenerateandevaluatealternativesandattempttoreachagreement(consensus)onasolution.Whichofthesestrategiesismosteffective?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)Themosteffectivestrategydependsonthesituationorproblemathand.Theleader’sgoalshouldbetomakehigh-qualitydecisionstowhichemployeeswillbeadequatelycommittedwithoutunduedelay.Todothis,theleadermustconsiderquestionsinadecisiontree.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)Thequestionsareorientedtowardpreservingeitherdecisionqualityorcommitmenttothedecision.Bytracingaproblemthroughthedecisiontree,theleaderencounterstheprescribeddegreeofparticipationforthatproblem.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJagoDecisionTreeQuestionsHowimportantisthetechnicalqualityofthisdecision?(qualityrequirement)Howimportantissubordinatecommitmenttothedecision?(commitmentrequirement)Doyouhavesufficientinformationtomakeahigh-qualitydecision?Istheproblemwell-structured?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJagoDecisionTreeQuestions(continued)Ifyouweretomakethedecisionbyyourself,isitreasonablycertainthatyoursubordinateswouldbecommittedtothedecision?Dosubordinatessharetheorganizationalgoalstobeattainedinsolvingtheproblem?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJagoDecisionTreeQuestions(continued)Isconflictamongsubordinatesoverpreferredsolutionslikely?Dosubordinateshavesufficientinformationtomakeahigh-qualitydecision?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.VroomandJago’’sSituationalModelofParticipation(continued)Bytracingtheproblemthroughthedecisiontree,theleaderencounterstheprescribeddegreeofparticipationforthatproblem.Thetreeshowsthefastestapproachpossiblethatstillmaintainsdecisionqualityandcommitment.Ifaleaderiswillingtosacrificesomespeed,amoreparticipativeapproachcouldstimulateemployeedevelopment.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidenceThemodelhassubstantialresearchsupport.Followingthemodel’sprescriptionsismorelikelytoleadtosuccessfulmanagerialdecisionsthanunsuccessfuldecisions.Thereissubstantialevidencethatemployeeswhohavetheopportunitytoparticipateinwork-relateddecisionsreportmorejobsatisfactionthanthosewhodonot.Forparticipationtobetranslatedintohigherproductivity,certainfacilitatingconditionsmustexist.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidence(continued)Participationshouldworkbestwhen:Employeesfeelfavourablytowardit.Employeesareintelligentandknowledgeableabouttheissueathand.Whenthetaskiscomplexenoughtomakeparticipationuseful.TheseconditionsareincorporatedintotheVroomandJagomodel.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.Leader-MemberExchange(LMX)TheoryAtheoryofleadershipthatfocusesonthequalityoftherelationshipthatdevelopsbetweenaleaderandanemployee.Arelationship-basedapproachtoleadership.Effectiveleadershipprocessesresultwhenleadersandemployeesdevelopandmaintainhigh-qualitysocialexchangerelationships.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidenceHighLMXinvolvesahighdegreeofmutualinfluenceandobligationaswellastrust,loyalty,andrespectbetweenaleaderandanemployee.LowLMXischaracterizedbylowtrust,respect,obligation,andmutualsupport.Higher-qualityLMXrelationshipsresultinpositiveoutcomesforleaders,employees,workunits,andorganizations.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransactionalandTransformationalLeadershipTransactionalleadershipisleadershipthatisbasedonafairlystraightforwardexchangebetweentheleaderandthefollowers.Transactionalleadershipbehaviourinvolves:ContingentrewardbehaviourManagementbyexceptionCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ManagementByExceptionTheleadertakescorrectiveactiononthebasisofresultsofleader-followertransactions.Theleadermonitorsfollowerbehaviour,anticipatesproblems,andtakescorrectiveactionsbeforethebehaviourcreatesseriousproblems.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadershipTransformationalleadershipisleadershipthatprovidesfollowerswithanewvisionthatinstillstruecommitment.Transformationalleaderschangethebeliefsandattitudesoffollowerstocorrespondwithanewvisionandmotivatesthemtoachieveperformancebeyondexpectations.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadersPopularexamplesoftransformationalleaders:HerbKelleherMichaelEisnerStevenJobsCarlyFiorinaWhataretheskillsoftheseexceptionaltransformationalleaderswhoencourageconsiderableeffortanddedicationonthepartoffollowers?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadership(continued)Transformationalleadersareusuallygoodatthetransactionalaspectsofclarifyingthepathstogoalsandrewardinggoodperformance.Otherqualitiesthatsettransformationalleadersapartfromtransactionalleaders:IntellectualstimulationIndividualizedconsiderationInspirationalmotivationCharismaCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.IntellectualStimulationPeoplearestimulatedtothinkaboutproblems,issues,andstrategiesinnewways.Thiscontributestothe““newvision”aspectoftransformationalleadership.Itofteninvolvescreativityandnovelty.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.IndividualizedConsiderationThisinvolvestreatingemployeesasdistinctindividuals,indicatingconcernfortheirneedsandpersonaldevelopment,andservingasamentororcoachwhenappropriate.Theemphasisisaone-on-oneattempttomeettheconcernsandneedsoftheindividualinquestioninthecontextoftheoverallgoalormission.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.InspirationalMotivationThisinvolvesthecommunicationofvisionsthatareappealingandinspiringtofollowers.Leaderswithinspirationalmotivationstimulateenthusiasm,challengefollowerswithhighstandards,communicateoptimismaboutfuturegoalattainment,andprovidemeaningforthetaskathand.Theyinspirefollowersusingsymbolicactionsandpersuasion.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.CharismaTheabilitytocommandstrongloyaltyanddevotionfromfollowersandthushavethepotentialforstronginfluenceamongthem.Thisisthemostimportantaspectoftransformationalleadership.Charismaprovidestheemotionalaspectoftransformationalleadership.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.Charisma(continued)Charismaticleadershiphasbeenfoundtobestronglyrelatedtofollowersatisfactionandleadershipeffectiveness.ItisunclearastowhetherornotCEOcharismaleadstobetterperformance.Someevidencethatitdoeswhentheenvironmentisperceivedtobeuncertain.SeveralstudieshavefoundthatCEOtransformationalleadershipispositivelyrelatedtoorganizationalperformance.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadership:ResearchEvidenceTransformationalleadershipisstronglyrelatedtofollowermotivationandsatisfaction,leaderperformance,leadereffectiveness,andgroupandorganizationperformance.Contingentrewardleadershipisalsostronglyrelatedtotheseoutcomes.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadership:ResearchEvidence(continued)Transformationalleadershipisespeciallyeffectiveduringtimesofchangeandforobtainingemployees’’commitmenttochange.Whyaretransformationalleaderssoeffective?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.TransformationalLeadership:ResearchEvidence(continued)Transformationalleadersareinstrumentalindevelopinghigh-qualityLMXrelationships,identificationwithone’’sworkunit,andself-efficacy.Theyalsoenhanceemployees’’perceptionsofthefivecorejobcharacteristicsofthejobcharacteristicsmodel.Overall,researchindicatesthatthebestleadersarebothtransformationalandtransactional.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.EthicalLeadershipEthicalleadershipinvolvesthedemonstrationofnormativelyappropriateconductthroughpersonalactionsandinterpersonalrelationships,andthepromotionofsuchconducttofollowersthroughtwo-waycommunication,reinforcement,anddecision-making.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.EthicalLeadership(continued)Whatdoethicalleadersdo:Theymodelwhatisdeemedtobenormativelyappropriatebehaviour(e.g.,honesty)TheymakeethicssalientintheworkplaceTheysetethicalstandardsTheyrewardethicalconductTheydisciplinethosewhodon’’tfollowethicalstandardsCopyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.EthicalLeadership(continued)Ethicalleaderscareaboutpeopleandthebroadersocietyandseektodotherightthingpersonallyandprofessionally.Whatshouldleadersdotodevelopanethicalcultureandworkplace?Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.EthicalLeadership(continued)Theymusthaveastrongcommitmenttoethicsandraiseawarenessandreinforcetheimportanceofethicsby:Communicatingaclearandconsistentpositiveethicsmessagefromthetop.Creatingandembracingopportunitiesforeveryoneintheorganizationtocommunicatepositiveethicsvaluesandpractices.Ensuringconsequencesforethicalandunethicalconduct.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidence:EthicalLeadershipEthicalleadershiphasbeenfoundtobepositivelyassociatedwithemployeeperceptionsofhonesty,fairness,andeffectivenessandwithlesscounterproductivebehaviour.Employeesofethicalleadersweremoresatisfiedwiththeirsupervisor,morewillingtodevoteextraefforttoone’’sjob,andmorewillingtoreportproblemstomanagement.Copyright?2011PearsonCanadaInc.ResearchEvidence:EthicalLeadership(continued)Theethicalbehaviourofleadershasasi
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 基于2025年度市場調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)之分析報(bào)告保密協(xié)議2篇
- 二零二五年度工廠搬遷及設(shè)施重建合同3篇
- 2024網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全保障服務(wù)外包合同
- 2025年度抵押借款房屋租賃期滿續(xù)約合同示范4篇
- 二零二五版校企合作實(shí)習(xí)實(shí)訓(xùn)基地安全教育與保障協(xié)議3篇
- 2025年銷售渠道拓展勞動(dòng)合同標(biāo)準(zhǔn)范本3篇
- 2025年度個(gè)人買賣房屋交易稅費(fèi)結(jié)算及支付合同4篇
- 2025年度美容院連鎖經(jīng)營合作協(xié)議范本3篇
- 長沙航空職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《童話名篇研讀》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 個(gè)人二手物品交易平臺服務(wù)協(xié)議(2024版)3篇
- 2024年采購代發(fā)貨合作協(xié)議范本
- 工業(yè)自動(dòng)化設(shè)備維護(hù)保養(yǎng)指南
- 《向心力》參考課件4
- 2024至2030年中國膨潤土行業(yè)投資戰(zhàn)略分析及發(fā)展前景研究報(bào)告
- 【地理】地圖的選擇和應(yīng)用(分層練) 2024-2025學(xué)年七年級地理上冊同步備課系列(人教版)
- (正式版)CB∕T 4552-2024 船舶行業(yè)企業(yè)安全生產(chǎn)文件編制和管理規(guī)定
- JBT 14588-2023 激光加工鏡頭 (正式版)
- 2024年四川省成都市樹德實(shí)驗(yàn)中學(xué)物理八年級下冊期末質(zhì)量檢測試題含解析
- 廉潔應(yīng)征承諾書
- 2023年四川省成都市中考物理試卷真題(含答案)
- 泵車述職報(bào)告
評論
0/150
提交評論