![歐盟可持續(xù)金融議程-可持續(xù)性衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)展的雙重重要性治理_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac7/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac71.gif)
![歐盟可持續(xù)金融議程-可持續(xù)性衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)展的雙重重要性治理_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac7/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac72.gif)
![歐盟可持續(xù)金融議程-可持續(xù)性衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)展的雙重重要性治理_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac7/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac73.gif)
![歐盟可持續(xù)金融議程-可持續(xù)性衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)展的雙重重要性治理_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac7/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac74.gif)
![歐盟可持續(xù)金融議程-可持續(xù)性衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)展的雙重重要性治理_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac7/5c406e50bea3e8628358e5a79edb6ac75.gif)
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
123Vol.:(0123456789)
EuropeanBusinessOrganizationLawReview(2022)23:87–123
/10.1007/s40804-021-00229-9
ARTICLE
TheEUSustainableFinanceAgenda:Developing
GovernanceforDoubleMaterialityinSustainabilityMetricsIrisHYChiu?1
Accepted:13December2021/Publishedonline:31January2022
?TheAuthor(s)2022
Abstract
ThisarticlearguesthattheregulatorysteersintherecentEUSustainableDisclo-sureandTaxonomyRegulationsrelyheavilyontheoutworkingofmarket-basedgovernancetomeetpublicinterestgoalsinsustainablefnance.Hence,additionalworkinsustainabilitymetricsdevelopmentthatinformstheinvestmentsectorofsustainableperformanceincompanieswouldbeofkeyimportance.ThisarticlearguesthatthereremaingapsinEUleadershipforgoverningmetricsdevelop-ment,andsuggeststhatEU-levelgovernancecanbedesignedappropriately,espe-ciallyinamulti-stakeholdermanner,formetricsdevelopmentandinrelationtokeyinformationintermediariesinthisspace.
KeywordsSustainablefnance·Sustainabletaxonomy·Doublemateriality·Sustainablebenchmark·Sustainableindex
1Introduction
Oneofthemeansforachievingsustainablepolicygoals
1
liesinmobilisingthefnanciallever,i.e.,torequirefnancierstomakeallocativedecisionsbasedonsustainableconsiderations,inordertosteereconomicactivitytowardssustain-ableoutcomes.Thefnancialleverisameaningfuloneasprivategovernance,oftenincentive-based,cansteerbehaviourinamannerthatisalsoalignedwith
1High-LevelExpertGrouponSustainableFinance(HLEG)(
2018
).
*IrisH-YChiu
hse-yu.chiu@ucl.ac.uk
1
ProfessorofCorporateLawandFinancialRegulation,UniversityCollegeLondon,London,UK
88I.H.-Y.Chiu
123
theachievementofcollectivegoals.
2
Thefnanciersofcorporatecapitalismplay
apartinsteeringtheirdebtor
3
orinvesteecompanies
4
towardsbehaviourthat
takesintoaccountsustainabilityconsiderations.
TheEU’ssustainablefnancereformsincludetheSustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019
5
andTaxonomyRegulation2020,
6
aswellasfollow-oninitiativesfortheregulationofinvestmentfrms,fundsandbenchmarks.
7
Thesereformscomprise(a)mandatorydutiesforregulatedinvestmentfrmsandfundmanagerstointegratesustainabilityrisks;
8
(b)mandatorysaleandongoingdisclosureobli-gationsformarketingsustainableproducts;
9
and(c)defningsustainabilityobjec-tivestopreventgreenwashing.
10
However,thefnancialleverrelieskeenlyonmar-ketforcestoafectmarketparticipants’actions.Keytothesuccessofthefnancialleverisarguablythemeasurementofsustainabilityimpactandachievementwhichwouldenableinvestmentintermediariesandtheirinvestorstomakerelevantdeci-sionsonthatbasis.
EUregulationshaveachievedmuchintermsofspecifyingandstandardisingthesustainableobjectivesandoutcomesforthefnanciallever.
11
Inparticular,pol-icy-makersembracedoublemateriality
12
inmeasuringinvestmentoutcomes.This
2Black(
2003
).
3Discussedinrelationtobanks’rolesinmonitoringsustainabilityimpactindebtfnancing,suchasinprojectfnance,bymeansofimplementingthevoluntaryEquatorPrinciples,see
https://equator-princ
/about/
(accessed15Nov2021);andHerbertsonandHunter(
2007
);critically,Sarro(
2012
).
4Sociallyresponsibleinvestorshavebeenadrivingforceforinfuencingcorporationsinrelationtosociallyresponsiblebehaviour,eitherthroughportfolioselectionprocessesoractivism,seegenerallyGibsonetal.(
2018
);Serafeim(
2018
);Kakeu(
2017
);Osthof(2015).Investortradebodiescanalsohelppromotebestpracticesonthepartofinvestorsinresponsibleinvestment,seeYamahaki(
2019
).However,seecriticaldiscussionsrelatingtopassiveinvestmentandgenerallyweakinvestmentinfuenceoncorpo-ratebehaviour,Glac(
2014
),Grewaletal.(
2016
);Amba(
2018
).
5Regulation(EU)2019/2088oftheEuropeanParliamentandoftheCouncilof27November2019onsus-tainability‐relateddisclosuresinthefnancialservicessector(SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019).
6Regulation(EU)2020/852oftheEuropeanParliamentandoftheCouncilof18June2020ontheestablishmentofaframeworktofacilitatesustainableinvestment,andamendingRegulation(EU)2019/2088(TaxonomyRegulation2020).Otherrelevantlegislationsuchasamendmentstocorporatereporting,regulationofinvestmentfrmsandfunds,aswellasbenchmarkregulationwillbediscussedinthearticle.
7CommunicationfromtheCommissiontotheEuropeanParliament,theCouncil,theEuropeanEco-nomicandSocialCommitteeandtheCommitteeoftheRegions:EUTaxonomy,CorporateSustaina-bilityReporting,SustainabilityPreferencesandFiduciaryDuties:DirectingfnancetowardstheEuro-peanGreenDeal(21April2021),
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021
DC0188
(accessed15Nov2021).
8Supran.5andinfran.21.
9Regulationsinnn.5and6supra.
10Art.2,SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019,aswellasenvironmentallysustainableobjectivesdefnedintheTaxonomyRegulation2020andtheforthcomingsocialtaxonomyenvisagedbytheCom-mission,
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/fles/business_economy_euro/banking_and_fnance/
documents/fnance-events-210226-presentation-social-taxonomy_en.pdf
(accessed15Nov2021).
11Suprann.5and6.SeealsoZetzscheandS?rensen(
2021
)inthisvolume.
12SeeESMA’semphasisondoublematerialityin‘ESMAsupportsIFRSFoundation’sefortsoninter-nationalstandardisationinsustainabilityreporting’,16Dec2020),
https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-
news/esma-news/esma-supports-ifrs-foundation%E2%80%99s-eforts-international-standardisation-in
TheEUSustainableFinanceAgenda:DevelopingGovernance…89
123
meansthatsustainableoutcomesmatternotonlyfortheirrelevancetofnancial
performanceofinvestments.Theuniverseofsustainabilityoutcomesislargeand
varied,withmanyaspectssusceptibletoqualitativeevaluation.Thereisunfnished
workinrelationtothedevelopmentofsustainabilitymetrics.Metricsrefernotonly
totheoutcomesorobjectivesbutalsototheselectionandidentifcationofsuitable
indicatorswhichprovidearubricformeasuringattainment.
13
Further,thedevelop-
mentofsustainabilitymetricsmustincludechoicesaboutthetolerancelevelofthe
extentofattainment.Metricsdevelopmentisimportanttofacilitatetheevaluations
thatneedtobecarriedoutbyinvestmentintermediariesinordertofulflthenewly
introducedregulatoryobligations.Further,metricsdevelopmentgoesbeyondsup-
portingthefnanciallever,asitprovidesforbroadervisibilityandaccountabilityfor
economicactivitymoregenerally,tostakeholdersandsociety.Hence,inthisarticle,
weidentifymetricsgovernanceascrucialtotheEU’ssustainablefnanceagendaand
discusshowitmaybefurtherdeveloped.Addressingsuchgovernanceneedswould
likelybethenextstepintheevolutionofthesustainablefnancepolicyagenda.
14
In
doingso,wedonotforgetthattherehavealreadybeenbottom-updevelopmentsin
theinvestmentindustryfocusedon‘ESG’(environmental,socialandgovernance)
indicatorsovertheyears,raisingthequestiontowhatextenttheEU’sattemptsat
redefningsustainabilitycoherewithorcontestagainstthosedevelopments.
However,thisarticleacknowledgestheobvious,whichisthatthefnanciallevercannotbethe‘wholeanswer’toachievingeconomicbehaviouralchangetowardssustainability.Financialmobilisationtowardssustainabilityisultimatelyincentive-based,andthecorporatesectorneedstotranslateintoactionsandconducteco-nomicactivitythatissustainable.Investmentinfuenceuponthecorporatesectorisonlyonepieceofthemosaicfortransformingcorporatebehaviour,
15
andinvestors’behaviourisitselfasubjectofcriticismanddebate.
16
Nevertheless,thedevelopmentofregulatorysteersforinvestorbehaviourcanplayavaluablepartinthepolicymosaictowardsmobilisingsustainablecorporatebehaviour.
Section2providesanoverviewofthesustainablefnancepolicyintheEU.Sec-tion3discussestheroleofregulatorygovernanceinredefningsustainabilityandwhatithasachieved.Itdiscussestheneedsformetricsdevelopmentandwhatgov-ernanceneedsremainunmet.Section4arguesthattheEUiswellplacedtoaddressthegovernanceneedsforsustainabilitymetricsdevelopmentandthenextstepspol-icy-makersshouldconsider.Section5concludes.
Footnote12(continued)
(accessed15Nov2021).
13TanzilandBelof(
2006
).
14Maijoor(
2020
).
15SeeMacNeilandEsser(
2021
)inthisvolume.
16GilsonandGordon(
2013
);BebchukandHirst(
2019
);FichtnerandHeemskerk(
2020
).
90I.H.-Y.Chiu
123
2TheEUSustainableFinanceAgendaasPolicyLever
Astheinvestmentsectorwieldssignifcantinfuence,withglobalassetsunderman-
agementgrowingyearonyear,estimatedtobeatUSD$145trillionby2025,
17
pol-
icy-makershavestartedlookingtothegatekeepingcapacitiesoftheinvestmentsec-
tor.Thisissothattheseintermediariesincapitalmarketscanplayausefulpartin
thegovernancelandscapeforshapingeconomicbehaviourtowardsalignmentwith
sustainablegoals.
18
TheEU’ssustainablefnancestrategyhasbroughtaboutreformsincapitalmar-ketsregulation.TheSustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019nowcompelsallfnancialmarketparticipantsengaginginportfoliomanagementorfundmanage-ment(whetherasmainstreampensionorcollectiveinvestmentschemes,orasalter-nativeinvestmentsfunds)
19
tomakemandatorydisclosureofhowtheyintegratesus-tainabilityrisksintheirinvestmentdecision-making.
20
Thisalsoincludesfnancialservicesprovidersthatsupplyinvestment-basedproductsaspartofaninsuranceproduct.Thismandatorydisclosureobligationistobeupgradedshortlytoadefni-tivedutytointegratesustainabilityrisksintoinvestmentstrategies,riskmanagementandgovernance.
21
Further,arangeofnewmandatorydisclosureobligationsapplytolargeinvestmentfrmsandtothemarketingandongoingreviewofsustainablylabelledinvestmentproducts.
22
Inaddition,andcrucially,theredefnitionof‘sus-tainability’hasbeenlegalised,proceedingfromenvironmentalsustainability
23
tosocialdevelopmentsustainability,inordertoprevent‘greenwashing’ininvestmentproducts,aproblemidentifedbycriticsofself-regulatingandself-labelledESGproducts.
24
TheEU’ssustainablefnanceagendahasbeenbuiltuponearlierpolicynudg-inginstitutionalinvestorstowardsbecomingengagedshareholdersintheirinves-teecompanies.TheEUShareholders’RightsDirective2017introducedaregimeofcomply-or-explainforinstitutionalinvestors
25
inordertonudge
26
themtowards
17PwC(
2017
).
18
/?menu=1300
(accessed15Nov2021).
19SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019,Art.2.
20Ibid.,Art.3.
21CommissionDelegatedRegulationtoamendtheAlternativeInvestmentFundManagersDirec-tive,
https://ec.europa.eu/fnance/docs/level-2-measures/aifmd-delegated-act-2021-2615_en.pdf
(dated
21April2021)(accessed15Nov2021);CommissionDelegatedDirectivetoamendtheUCITsDirec-tive,
https://ec.europa.eu/fnance/docs/level-2-measures/ucits-directive-delegated-act-2021-2617_en.pdf
(dated21April2021)(accessed15Nov2021);CommissionDelegatedDirectivetoamendtheMarketsinFinancialInstrumentsDirective,
https://ec.europa.eu/fnance/docs/level-2-measures/mifd-2-delegated-
act-2021-2612_en.pdf
(dated21April2021)(accessed15Nov2021).
22SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019,Arts.4,7,8-11.
23Arts.9-17,TaxonomyRegulation2020.
24‘Unregulated“greenwashing”?ESGinvestingisunderthemicroscopeasthemoneyrollsin’,CNBCNews,14Oct2020,
/2020/10/14/esg-investing-meaning-is-under-the-microscope-
as-the-money-rolls-in.html
(accessed15Nov2021).
25Art.3g.
26Madsen(
2021
).
TheEUSustainableFinanceAgenda:DevelopingGovernance…91
123
moreengagedbehaviour,intheoverallpromotionofthelong-terminterestsofben-
efciaries.
27
Suchshareholderengagementcantakeplaceinrelationtocompanies’
corporategovernanceaswellastheirfootprintinESGmatters.
28
Earlier,tosupport
investors’engagementrole,theEUintroducedregulationforlistedcompaniesto
makerelevant‘non-fnancialdisclosures’inrelationtoenvironmentalimpacts,and
impactsonemployees,humanrights,andanti-corruptionmatters.
29
However,itcanbearguedthattheshareholderengagementandcorporatenon-fnancialdisclosurereformssuferfromalackofconnectiontothepublicinterestgoalsofsustainability.Shareholderengagementinresponsetocorporatedisclo-sureisverymuchinthenatureofaddressingthe‘a(chǎn)gency’problem,ultimatelytosteercompaniestowardsbeingaccountabletoshareholders.Theseshareholdersarealsoacknowledgedtohavetheirownprivateinterestsandmandatesinrelationtoinvestmentmanagement.Thenatureofprivatecorporategovernanceandtheprivatenatureofinvestmentmanagementdutiesmaynotsufcientlyconnectwiththepub-licinterestgoalsofsustainability.
30
Thisisbecauseprivateincentivesareboundupintheneedtogeneratefnancialreturn,onthepartofcompaniesfortheirsharehold-ersandonthepartofinstitutionalshareholdersfortheirassetownersandbenef-ciaries.
31
Althoughprivateincentivescanbecompatiblewithpublicinterestgoals,asempiricalresearchhasshownthatinvestingin‘good’islargelycompatiblewithinvesting‘well’intermsoffnancialperformance,
32
trade-ofsbetweengeneratingfnancialreturnandcommittingtosustainablebehaviourhavealsobeenobserved.
33
Inthismanner,theEU’ssustainablefnancereformstakeastepfurtherbyintro-ducingregulatorysteersintheobjectivesofinvestmentmanagementsothatpublicinterestgoalsinsustainabilityhavetobeinternalised.However,theSustainableDis-closureandTaxonomyRegulationsintroducedin2019and2020cannotover-pre-scribeorover-intrudeintothefreedomtodesigninvestmentmandatesandcontinuetoco-optmarketforces,butinamannerthatnudgestowardsthepromotionof:(a)conventionalinvestmentthatinternalisessustainabilityconsiderations,and(b)spe-ciallydesignedsustainableinvestmentsthatdeliversustainableoutcomesalongsidefnancialones.Thelattermarketisgrowinginrelationtoinvestors’pro-socialpref-erences,onthepartofmanyinstitutionsandindividuals,
34
andwillbeattractiveforinvestmentfundintermediaries.
27Arts.3hand3i.
28Arts.3gand3hinrelationtonon-fnancialperformance.SeealsoPrinciples9-11,UKStewardshipCode,
.uk/getattachment/5aae591d-d9d3-4cf4-814a-d14e156a1d87/Stewardship-
Code_Dec-19-Final-Corrected.pdf
(accessed15Nov2021).
29Art.19a,Non-fnancialDisclosureDirective2014/95/EU.
30Sj?felletal.(
2017
).
31Thefduciarydutyowedbyfundstotheirbenefciariesisprivateinnatureandcentresongeneratingthenecessaryreturnsforthepurposeofinvestment,althoughtakingintoaccountresponsibilityandsus-tainabilityissuesisnotperseirrelevanttotheprimarymandate,seeUNEPFI(
2019
).
32Friedeetal.(
2015
);Durán-Santomiletal.(
2019
);butseescepticalevidenceinLaTorreetal.(
2020
).
33Chenetal.(
2017
).
34Seeinfrann.42-44.
92I.H.-Y.Chiu
123
2.1BaselineDutyofIntegratingSustainabilityRisks
UndertheSustainabilityDisclosureRegulation,investmentfundintermediariesare
underauniversalobligationtomakemandatorydisclosureofhowthey‘integrate
sustainabilityrisks’.‘Sustainabilityrisk’isdefnedasan‘environmental,socialor
governanceeventorconditionthat,ifitoccurs,couldcauseanactualorapotential
materialnegativeimpactonthevalueoftheinvestment’.
35
Suchadefnitionadoptsa
‘singlemateriality’approachoftreatingsustainabilityriskassalientonlyifitmate-
riallyafectsinvestmentperformance.Atabaseline,thisisnotnovelandisconsist-
entwiththeinterpretationoffduciarydutyinprivateinvestmentmanagement.
36
We
willreturntothispointshortlytodiscusswhetheranopportunityhasbeenmissed
toembeddoublematerialityinthebaselineregulationofinvestmentmanagement
conduct.
Next,investmentintermediariesofacertainscale,defnedashaving500employ-eesorabove,orbeingaparentcompanyofsuchanundertaking,
37
aremandatedtoaccountforprincipaladversesustainabilityimpacts(applyingfrom30June2021).Thisapplieswhetherornotsuchfnancialservicesprovidersengagewithsustaina-blylabelledproducts.Theymustaccountforanyadverseimpactoftheirinvestmentdecision-makingprocessesonsustainabilityobjectives,forhowadverseimpactsarediscoveredandfortheduediligencepoliciesthataredeployed.
38
Smallerpro-vidersmaydeclarethattheydonotconsideradversesustainabilityimpactsintheirinvestmentdecision-makingprocessbuttheymustclearlyexplainwhyandwhetherthispracticecutsacrossalltheirproducts.
39
Thismeansthatsmallerprovidersaresubjecttothebroaddutytointegratesustainabilityrisksasdiscussedabove,butnotspecifcallytotheprescribedmandatorydisclosureofduediligencepoliciesandmeasurementofadversesustainabilityimpactimposedonlargerinvestmentinter-mediaries.Inthismanner,largerinvestmentintermediariesareunderanobligationthatismoresocially-facinginnature,i.e.,toaccountforsustainabilitycostassuch.
Althoughthisapproachseemsproportionateinordertoreducecomplianceobli-gationsforsmallerfundintermediaries,thebifurcationadoptedsuggeststhatsmallerfrmscanelecttobeprincipally‘private-facing’andpotentially‘exempt’,subjecttotheirexplanation,fromthescopeofsocially-facingaccountabilityimposedonlargerfrms.Thereisalargesectorofinvestmentfrmsthataremedium-sizedandemployunder500employees.Hence,itisquestionedastowhethertheEU’slegalisationhasachievedmuchintermsofsteeringinvestmentmanagementconducttowardsdoublemateriality.
Itmaybearguedthatthemoreremarkablereformsarethosepertainingtoman-datorydisclosureandtransparency.These,however,cruciallyrelyonmarketdisci-plinetobeefective.
35Art.2(22),SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019.
36SeeFreshfeldsBruckhausDeringer(
2005
);UNEPFI(
2019
);Richardson(
2011
).
37Art.4(3)and(4),SustainabilityDisclosureRegulation2019.
38Art.4(1)(a),ibid.
39Art.4(1)(b),ibid.
TheEUSustainableFinanceAgenda:DevelopingGovernance…93
123
2.2MandatoryDisclosureObligations
Itmaybearguedthatmandatorydisclosureofsustainabilityriskintegrationbyall
investmentintermediariesisalreadyastepforward,as,lefttoaself-regulatorystate,
only‘sociallyresponsible’investmentfundswouldbeunderacontractualexpecta-
tiontohaveregardtosinglemateriality.Further,by30December2022,fnancial
servicesprovidersmandatedtodiscloseprincipaladversesustainabilityimpacts
mustalsomakethattransparencyavailableatthelevelofeachfnancialproduct.
40
Thesedisclosuresarealsoregardedaspre-contractualinnature,thereforeattracting
marketandlegaldisciplinefrominvestors.
41
However,mandatorydisclosureofmaterialsustainabilityrisksandprincipaladversesustainabilityimpactswillonlychangebehaviourifassetownersandbene-fciariescareaboutsuchinformation.Thereisincreasingevidencethatassetownerssuchaspensionfunds
42
andpro-socialindividualsvaluetheavoidanceofadversesustainableimpactintheirinvestmentallocations.
43
Thisisnotnecessarilythecasewithconventionalinstitutions,
44
andinvestmentbenefciarieshavehighlyhet-erogenouspreferences.
45
Ifmarketresponseisclearandefectivelydisciplinestheinvestmentmanagementindustry,suchdisciplinecanbemuchmoreefectivethananextractionofcomplianceimposedbyregulators.However,withthebifurcationinmandatorydisclosurerequirementsapplicabletolargerandsmallerinvestmentintermediaries,investorsarguablydonotenjoyalevelplayingfeldfordisciplineefectstobetransmitted.Therewouldlikelybemixednoiseinrelationtomarketdisciplinefocusedonmaterialsustainabilityrisksrelatingtoinvestmentperfor-manceandonadversesustainabilityimpactperse.Inthismanner,itmaybeprefer-ableforpolicy-makerstoconsiderwhethertoadoptdoublematerialityasauniversalstandard.Smallerfrmscanbesubjecttolessprescriptivegovernance,althoughtheycanbemadetodisclosehowtheymanagedoublemateriality,sothattheirprioritiesandprocessescanbesubjecttopublicscrutinyandaccountability.
46
Thisisarguablyproportionateforsmallerfrmsinviewofcompliancecosts.
Mandatorydisclosureobligationsformarketingsustainablylabelledproductshavebeenenhancedconsiderably.TheSustainabilityDisclosureRegulationclari-festhatsustainablylabelledfnancegoesbeyond‘harm-basedanalysis’,andshouldrefecttheachievementofpositivesustainabilityoutcomesandnotmerelytheavoid-anceofnegativeones.Indeed‘sustainableinvestment’isdefnedintwodimensions:itshouldpositivelyachievespecifedsustainableoutcomesanddo‘nosignifcantharm’toenvironmentalandsocialobjectivesasawhole.
47
Thedefnitionof‘sus-tainablylabelled’relatesto
40Art.7,Regulation2019/2088.
41Art.6,ibid.
42Apostolakisetal.(
2018
);Delsen
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 華三IT售前專家認(rèn)證GB10-125 H3CE考試通關(guān)試題庫(含答案)
- 2025年山西職教高考《職業(yè)適應(yīng)性測(cè)試》考前沖刺模擬試題庫(附答案)
- 專題05 名句名篇默寫
- 專題07 中國開始淪為半殖民地半封建社會(huì)(練習(xí))
- 質(zhì)押借款合同格式
- 融資擔(dān)保服務(wù)合同
- 航空貨運(yùn)物流運(yùn)輸合同
- 承包的合同范本
- 年互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)服務(wù)合同
- 房產(chǎn)銷售分銷合同模板
- 醫(yī)院消防安全培訓(xùn)課件
- 質(zhì)保管理制度
- 《00541語言學(xué)概論》自考復(fù)習(xí)題庫(含答案)
- 2025年機(jī)關(guān)工會(huì)個(gè)人工作計(jì)劃
- 江蘇省南京市、鹽城市2023-2024學(xué)年高三上學(xué)期期末調(diào)研測(cè)試+英語+ 含答案
- 2024護(hù)理不良事件分析
- 光伏項(xiàng)目的投資估算設(shè)計(jì)概算以及財(cái)務(wù)評(píng)價(jià)介紹
- 糧油廠食品安全培訓(xùn)
- 電力安全工作規(guī)程(完整版)
- 2024年湖南省公務(wù)員錄用考試《行測(cè)》試題及答案解析
- 借名買車的協(xié)議書范文范本
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論