金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)-亞太財(cái)_第1頁(yè)
金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)-亞太財(cái)_第2頁(yè)
金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)-亞太財(cái)_第3頁(yè)
金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)-亞太財(cái)_第4頁(yè)
金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)-亞太財(cái)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩48頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

Session1:SMEsFinancingintheAsia-PacificRegionamidtheFinancialCrisis:Status,ChallengesandTrends第一節(jié):金融危機(jī)下亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資:現(xiàn)狀、挑戰(zhàn)和趨勢(shì)

DrChrisHall

CEO,Comnami,PECCSMENetworkLeader

Chris.Workshopon“SMEsFinancingintheAsia-PacificRegion:CrisisandCountermeasures”(June8-12,2009,ShanghaiNationalAccountingInstitute)第一頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。BackgroundFrameworkProSMEs中小企業(yè)背景介紹2.Thecontextofthe2008FinancialTsunami2008金融海嘯情況介紹3.FinancingtrendsforSMEsinAPEC亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)的融資趨勢(shì)4.Theimpactofthe2008FinancialTsunamionSMEfinance2008金融海嘯對(duì)中小企業(yè)融資的影響Whathavegovernmentsdonetoaddressthechallenges?政府的應(yīng)對(duì)措施6.Avisionofwhatcouldbedonebettertoaddressthechallenges

如何更好地應(yīng)對(duì)挑戰(zhàn)?Conclusion結(jié)論第二頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。SMEsareimportant:theycontributeabouthalftheGDP,halftheemployment,andmostofthejobgrowthinAPEC中小企業(yè)作用重大:為APEC貢獻(xiàn)了大約一半的GDP、一半的就業(yè)和大多數(shù)的新增就業(yè)崗位。Thereisamajoreconomicandfinancialcrisisaboutevery6or7years.The2008crisisisunusualinthatitisaffectingsomanyeconomiesatthesametime.ThebigimpactonSMEsisprobablynotlikelytobefeltuntil2009/2010每隔六七年就會(huì)發(fā)生一次比較嚴(yán)重的經(jīng)濟(jì)和金融危機(jī)。2008年的危機(jī)的不尋常之處在于,它同時(shí)對(duì)眾多經(jīng)濟(jì)體產(chǎn)生影響。其對(duì)中小企業(yè)的巨大影響很可能直到2009/2010年才感受得到。SMEshaveprovedresilientinadaptingtopreviouscrises經(jīng)證明,中小企業(yè)在適應(yīng)危機(jī)方面頗具韌性。BanksarethelargestsourceoffinancetoSMEs,andsupplyoverhalfofSMEfinance銀行是中小企業(yè)最大的資金來(lái)源,為中小企業(yè)提供一半以上的融資。Thereisalongtermstructuralproblemthatrealgrowthinbankfinancehasbeenlowornegative.SMEshavebeenfindingithardertogetbankfinanceforthelastdecadeorso.長(zhǎng)期存在一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)性問題,即銀行融資實(shí)際上一直是低增長(zhǎng)或者負(fù)增長(zhǎng)。過去十年來(lái),中小企業(yè)獲得銀行融資的難度越來(lái)越大了。Intheshortterm(12-18months)thegovernmentandbankresponseisnotlikelytohavemuchdirecteffectonSMEFinance.短期來(lái)看(12-18個(gè)月),政府和銀行不可能給中小企業(yè)融資帶來(lái)很多直接影響。ThereisanowwindowofopportunitytoimprovethemanagementofriskbybanksinlendingtoSMEs,andimprovemanagementofSMEsbygettingbanks,ICTsuppliers,telcosandgovernmentstoworkcooperatively.通過銀行、信息技術(shù)提供商、電信運(yùn)營(yíng)商和政府的通力合作,現(xiàn)在有機(jī)會(huì)提高銀行給中小企業(yè)貸款的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理水平,并且改進(jìn)中小企業(yè)的自身管理水平。第三頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。1.BackgroundFrameworkProSMEs

中小企業(yè)背景介紹第四頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。WhatisanSME?中小企業(yè)的定義

nonemploying~55%1to4employees~30%5to19

~11%20to500

~2%to3%99.9%ofallbusinessesareSMEs,employinglessthan500people,

98%employlessthan100,

80%employlessthan5people99.9%的企業(yè)都是中小企業(yè),員工人數(shù)在500人以下。98%的企業(yè)員工人數(shù)不到100,80%的企業(yè)員工不到5人。ThereisnoconsistentdefinitionofSMEsacrossAPEC,butthegreatbulkofSMEsemploylessthan100,andmostlessthan20people.

在整個(gè)亞太地區(qū)尚不存在對(duì)中小企業(yè)一致的定義,但是大多數(shù)中小企業(yè)雇傭的員工數(shù)在100以下,絕大多數(shù)在20人以下。largefirmsmakeuplessthan0.1%ofbusinesses大公司占所有企業(yè)數(shù)的0.1%不到第五頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。HowmanySMEsarethereinAPEC?APEC的中小企業(yè)數(shù)量

Therearenowabout77millionSMEsinAPEC,about30millionoftheminChina,...butthereshouldbeabout100millioninAPEC,about60millioninChina亞太地區(qū)目前大約有7700萬(wàn)中小企業(yè),其中約3000萬(wàn)在中國(guó)…但是按常理看,亞太地區(qū)應(yīng)該有約1億的中小企業(yè),中國(guó)應(yīng)該有6000萬(wàn)。第六頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。TherearebigdifferencesacrosseconomiesinpropensitytostartanSME在創(chuàng)辦中小企業(yè)的傾向性上各經(jīng)濟(jì)體情況迥異

GEM2006data%ofadultpopulation占成年人口的百分比PeoplestartSMEsup(entrepreneurship)asaresultof:創(chuàng)辦中小企業(yè)是出于:a)necessity(nojob)1)必須創(chuàng)辦(沒有工作)b)opportunity(forimprovedincomeandwealth)2)出現(xiàn)機(jī)會(huì)(來(lái)提高收入水平)第七頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。necessitydrivenstartupswillbecomemoreimportantinthenextyears未來(lái)幾年由需求驅(qū)動(dòng)的初創(chuàng)企業(yè)會(huì)越來(lái)越重要

SourceGEM2008ExecutiveReport第八頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Forevery1millionpeople,thereareabout50,000SMEs.每100萬(wàn)人口之中,就有5萬(wàn)個(gè)中小企業(yè)。GEMsuggestsabout5%(50,000)peopletrytostartanewbusinesseachyear,每年約有5%的人(5萬(wàn))嘗試創(chuàng)辦新企業(yè),andofthat50,000,about45,000willnotsucceed...其中,約4.5萬(wàn)人不會(huì)成功…..but5,000willsucceed.但是5000人會(huì)成功Ifthesuccessfulstartuprateis10%ofthefirmpopulation(50,000firmsfor1millionpeople,or1SMEforevery20people),then5,000willstarteachyear,ofwhichabout1,000(20to25%)aregrowthorientedandwillneedequityfunds.如果初創(chuàng)企業(yè)的成功率是10%,那么每年將有5000個(gè)企業(yè)成功誕生,其中1000個(gè)是成長(zhǎng)型的,將需要權(quán)益資本的支持。Ifabout10%(5,000)exiteachyear,thentheSMEpopulationissteadyanditrenewsitselfaboutevery10years.

如果每年約有10%的企業(yè)退出,中小企業(yè)的數(shù)量則會(huì)趨于穩(wěn)定,并且每隔10年更新一次。notallwhotrytostart-up,actuallysucceed不是所有的創(chuàng)業(yè)者都會(huì)成功第九頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。WhatdotheseSMEscontribute?中小企業(yè)的貢獻(xiàn)Microlessthan5employees微型企業(yè):5人以下largefirmsmakeuplessthan0.1%ofbusinesses,contributebetween40%and60%ofemployment,andabout50%ofGDP.大公司占總公司數(shù)量的0.1%不到,提供40%-60%的就業(yè)和約50%的GDP。Largefirmsusuallydestroyjobs,i.e.arenetjobdestroyers大公司通常會(huì)削減就業(yè)崗位,可謂凈就業(yè)殺手。SMEscontributeabouthalfofGDP,andabouthalfofalljobs.About20%ofjobsarefrommedium,20%fromsmalland20%frommicro中小企業(yè)創(chuàng)造大約一半的GDP和一半的就業(yè)崗位。約20%的工作來(lái)自中型企業(yè),20%來(lái)自小企業(yè),20%來(lái)自微型企業(yè)。ButSMEs,especiallynewmicroandsmallenterprisescreatemostofthejobgrowth.

但是,絕大多數(shù)的新增就業(yè)崗位是由中小企業(yè),尤其是微型企業(yè)和小企業(yè)提供的。Small

5to19employees小企業(yè):5-19人Medium19to500orso中型企業(yè):19-500人第十頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。HowdoestheEntrepreneurialEnginework?創(chuàng)業(yè)引擎的工作原理大公司雇傭大約一半的勞動(dòng)力,但是很少添加新工作崗位大約70%的凈工作增長(zhǎng)是由快速成長(zhǎng)的公司提供的小公司產(chǎn)生同時(shí)也摧毀很多工作崗位,工作崗位的凈增長(zhǎng)隨企業(yè)的生命周期和宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況而變第十一頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。HowdoestheEntrepreneurialEngineworkandwhatfinanceisneeded?創(chuàng)業(yè)引擎的工作原理及融資需求Fastgrowthfirmsneedgrowthfinance,whichisusuallyequity(suchasVC)快速成長(zhǎng)的公司需要成長(zhǎng)資金,通常是權(quán)益融資(如風(fēng)投資金)ThevastbulkofSMEsneedworkingcapital,mostlydebtfunding.Alargerproportionthanusualtendtoexitiffinanceisnotavailable大多數(shù)中小企業(yè)需要營(yíng)運(yùn)資金,一般以債務(wù)融資為主。如果沒有融資的話,較大比例的公司會(huì)退出市場(chǎng)。第十二頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Thechallengesinadownturnorcrisisarethat:經(jīng)濟(jì)低迷期或危機(jī)下的挑戰(zhàn)有:morepeoplehavetostartanSMEoutofnecessity,notbecauseofchoiceoropportunity;更多的人得開始創(chuàng)業(yè),是出于生存的原因,而非主動(dòng)的選擇或者某種機(jī)遇;thesenecessityentrepreneursarelesslikelytohaveappropriatemanagementskillsforanSME,ortheappropriateattitude,tohelpthemsucceed;這些被迫創(chuàng)業(yè)的人很可能不具備適當(dāng)?shù)墓芾砑寄?,或者正確的態(tài)度來(lái)助其成功;Itismoredifficultforthemtogetfinance,especiallyfromriskaverselenders(egbanks)whomightactuallyhavethefunds,butarenotaseffectiveatmobilisingthem;他們將更難獲得融資,尤其是從厭惡風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的貸款人(如銀行)那,他們可能有資金,但是沒有動(dòng)員資金的效力eventhoughthereareentrepreneurialopportunitiesarisingfromrestructuringandbankruptcy/exits,agenerationofgrowthorientedfirmsmaynotbeabletoavailoftheseopportunitiesbecauseoflackoffinanceandsmartmoney;...and即便企業(yè)的重組和破產(chǎn)會(huì)產(chǎn)生創(chuàng)業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),一批成長(zhǎng)型企業(yè)由于缺乏融資可能無(wú)法把握這些機(jī)遇。thisleadstoaslowereconomicandsocialrecoverythanispotentiallypossible,oritshiftstherecoverytolocationswithmoreconduciveentrepreneurialenvironments(egtheJapanlostdecadebecomesChina'sdecadeofentrepreneurialgrowth).這將導(dǎo)致經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)復(fù)蘇變緩,或者使復(fù)蘇轉(zhuǎn)移至對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)有利的環(huán)境中。whataretheentrepreneurialchallengesoftheFinancialTsunami?金融海嘯下的創(chuàng)業(yè)挑戰(zhàn)

第十三頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。2.TheContextofthe

2008FinancialTsunamiCrisis2008金融海嘯情況介紹

第十四頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。PreviouseconomiccrisesandSMEimpact過去的經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)對(duì)中小企業(yè)的影響

The1990JapancrisisbubbleeconomycollapsedinJapan,risingYen.JapaneseSMEsadaptbymovingtoChinaandAsia,oftenfinancedbyLargeJapanesefirms泡沫破滅,日元升值。日本中小企業(yè)移至中國(guó)和其它亞洲地區(qū),一般由大型日本公司提供資金支持The1997AsiancrisisConstructionbubbleinThailand,supportedbycheapUSbankloanscollapsesasHedgeFundsforcedevaluationofBaht,andcontagionspreads.在美國(guó)廉價(jià)銀行貸款崩潰的助推下,泰國(guó)的房地產(chǎn)泡沫破滅,對(duì)沖基金迫使泰銖貶值,危機(jī)蔓延至其它亞洲國(guó)家The2001TechWreckTbubblecollapsesinUSA,VCmoneymovestoPRC.Economyslowedby911美國(guó)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)泡沫破滅,風(fēng)投資金轉(zhuǎn)而投向中國(guó)。911事件使經(jīng)濟(jì)放緩2003SARSMainimpactonHKGandSIN主要對(duì)香港和新加坡有影響2008financialTsunami?GDPnominalgrowth(WorldBankData)第十五頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Previouseconomiccrisis:96/7AsianCrisisinKoreaandChineseTaipei以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī):96/7年韓國(guó)和中國(guó)臺(tái)北的亞洲金融危機(jī)GDP(1995=100)KoreaandChineseTaipeiVolumeofbankfundstoSMEs,indexed,Korea1995,ChineseTaipei1993=100銀行給中小企業(yè)的貸款額第十六頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Previouseconomiccrisis:96/7AsianCrisisinKoreaandChineseTaipei以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī):96/7年韓國(guó)和中國(guó)臺(tái)北的亞洲金融危機(jī)PopulationofSMEs(index1991=100)intotalandmanufacturingEmploymentinSMEs(index1992=100)intotalandmanufacturing第十七頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Lessonsforthe2008FinancialCrisis:對(duì)2008金融危機(jī)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn):BothKoreaandChineseTaipeihaddevelopedgoodSMEpolicyframeworkspriortothecrisis韓國(guó)和中國(guó)臺(tái)北在危機(jī)發(fā)生前均已具備完善的中小企業(yè)政策框架ThemainimpactonSMEsislaggedbyabout12to18months;theworstisyettocomein2010對(duì)中小企業(yè)的主要影響將延后12-18個(gè)月發(fā)生;最糟糕的情形將在2010年出現(xiàn)EntrepreneursandSMEsareresilient.RestructuringopportunitiesasChaebolrestructuredallowedKoreanSMEstobouncebackandcatchuptoTaipeiwithin2years.企業(yè)家和中小企業(yè)都很有活力。重組機(jī)會(huì)使得韓國(guó)的中小企業(yè)反彈回來(lái),并在兩年內(nèi)趕上了臺(tái)北。Theabilitytodevelopaninternationallycompetitiveindustrialstructurewhichisabletoadaptquicklyandtakeadvantageofopportunitiesisveryimportantinthefaceofaturbulentglobalenvironment.

在動(dòng)蕩的全球環(huán)境下,培育能夠迅速適應(yīng)環(huán)境和把握機(jī)遇并具有國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),非常重要。From:Hall,C.andHarvie,C,AcomparisonoftheperformanceofSMEsinKoreaandTaiwan;policyimplicationsforturbulenttimes,(2003)JournalofKoreanEconomy,Vol4(2)225-260.Previouseconomiccrisis:96/7AsianCrisisinKoreaandChineseTaipei以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī):96/7年韓國(guó)和中國(guó)臺(tái)北的亞洲金融危機(jī)第十八頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。3.FinancingtrendsforSMEsinAPEC亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)的融資趨勢(shì)第十九頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。WheredoSMEsgetfinancetobeabletogrowandsurvive?中小企業(yè)得以生存和成長(zhǎng)的融資渠道

Debt債權(quán)Equity股權(quán)mainsources主要來(lái)源stagesofdevelopment發(fā)展階段seedmicrostartupoperations

(workingcap)growthFFF,ownerfunds,microfinanceFFF,Banks owner,FFFbanks,suppliers angelbanks VC,angel,IPOfinancestockfinanceflows第二十頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。WhatdoweknowofthepatternoffinancetoSMEsinAPEC?亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)的融資模式Datasourcesarelimited,onlyafeweconomieshaveregularupdatedreliableinformationonSMEfinanceneedsandsupply,andalloftheseare2010economies數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)源有限,僅少數(shù)幾個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)體對(duì)中小企業(yè)的融資需求和供給信息定期更新。Inmostcasesthedataarebasedonsizeofloan,notsizeoffirm.大多數(shù)情況下,數(shù)據(jù)是根據(jù)貸款規(guī)模,而不是公司規(guī)模得出的。InfactmostlendingtoSMEsisfromBanks.VCisatinyproportion.事實(shí)上,對(duì)中小企業(yè)的貸款大部分來(lái)自銀行。風(fēng)投僅占非常小的比例。Equityandtradefinanceprovidemostoftherest.余下部分主要為權(quán)益融資和貿(mào)易融資。note:theseareapproximatefiguresbasedonmodelling銀行是中小企業(yè)最大的資金來(lái)源,也是潛在的最大的信息、建議和指導(dǎo)來(lái)源備注:這些數(shù)據(jù)是在建模基礎(chǔ)上得出的近似數(shù)據(jù)第二十一頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。BenchmarkmodellingofSMEfinanceneedsinAPEC亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資需求的基準(zhǔn)模型Basedontherebeingabout75millionSMEsinAPEC,andthatfinanceisabletoflowfreely,soisavailabletoallSMEsinAPEC前提:亞太地區(qū)大約有7500萬(wàn)個(gè)中小企業(yè),資金可以自由流動(dòng),因此可用于地區(qū)內(nèi)的所有中小企業(yè)。10%SMEsaremicro $100each 50%debt50%equity10%startup $10,000each 30%debt70%equity60%operating $50,0000each 50%debt50%equity20%growth $100,000each 30%debt70%equity.01%VC $1,000,000each 30%debt70%equity.0001%IPO $10,000,000each 10%debt 90%equitythedistributionofSMEsbystageislikelytobe中小企業(yè)在不同的發(fā)展階段的分布第二十二頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。BenchmarkpatternofSMEfinanceneedsinAPEC亞太地區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資需求的基準(zhǔn)模式

equitydebtsuggeststhatthereisademandforastockofabout$4.5trillionforSMEfinanceinAPECin2010,about60%($2.7t)equity,and40%($1.8t)debt.模式表明,2010年,APEC中小企業(yè)的融資需求在4..5萬(wàn)億美元左右,其中60%為權(quán)益融資,40%為債務(wù)融資。

microlendingandstartupfinanceisatinyproportion,butimportanttogrowthandeconomicresilience小額貸款和啟動(dòng)融資占比很小,但是對(duì)企業(yè)的成長(zhǎng)和經(jīng)濟(jì)活力具有重要意義VCandIPOonlygotoatinyproportionoffirms,andonlyinafeweconomies,somostSMEsdontgetaccessbanksprovidethebulkofSMEfinanceforworkingcapitalandgrowth銀行為中小企業(yè)的營(yíng)運(yùn)資本和成長(zhǎng)提供大部分融資第二十三頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Stickinessinfinancing融資粘性Thereissomeevidenceofstickiness(financegaps)asgrowingfirmsmovethroughstages,andchangetheirfinanceneeds,eg隨著成長(zhǎng)型公司達(dá)到不同的發(fā)展階段,并更改其融資需求,有證據(jù)表明存在一定粘性(融資缺口)。goingfrommicrotostartuporoperatingrequiresformalfinancing從微型企業(yè)到初創(chuàng)企業(yè)或運(yùn)營(yíng)企業(yè),需要正規(guī)融資goingfromdebttoequityrequiresbettergovernance從債權(quán)到股權(quán),需要更好的公司治理goingtopublicequityrequiresinvestmentreadiness再到成為公眾股權(quán)公司,需要投資意愿equitydebt第二十四頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。TheproportionofbanklendingtoSMEsinmosteconomieshasdeclined

銀行對(duì)中小企業(yè)的借貸比例在多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)體均呈下降趨勢(shì)BanklendingonsmallloansortoSMEsasa%oftotallendinghasdeclinedinmosteconomiesforwhichdataareavailableoverthelast15orsoyears過去15年來(lái),大多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)體中,銀行對(duì)中小企業(yè)的貸款或小額貸款比例呈下降趨勢(shì)第二十五頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。TheproportionofbanklendingtoSMEsinmosteconomieshasdeclined銀行對(duì)中小企業(yè)的借貸比例在多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)體均呈下降趨勢(shì)....andthedecreaseisbiggerthancanbeexplainedbyinflation....…而且下降幅度比可用通脹解釋的幅度更大%changeinproportionofbanklendingtoSMEsrelativetolargefirms第二十六頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。RealgrowthofbanklendingtoSMEsisnegativeinmanyeconomies很多經(jīng)濟(jì)體對(duì)中小企業(yè)的銀行貸款實(shí)際上呈負(fù)增長(zhǎng)94toAsiancrisis

97totechwreck

2001tolatestAveragerealgrowthofbanklendingbysizeandperiod第二十七頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。RealgrowthofbanklendingtoSMEshasbeennegative,falling對(duì)中小企業(yè)的銀行貸款實(shí)際上呈負(fù)增長(zhǎng)Asiancrisistechwreck911第二十八頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Realgrowthofbanklendingtosmallfirmshasbeennegative,falling對(duì)小企業(yè)的銀行貸款實(shí)際上呈負(fù)增長(zhǎng)

Asiancrisis亞洲金融危機(jī)techwreck911網(wǎng)絡(luò)泡沫破滅和911事件第二十九頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。butrealgrowthinbanklendingtolargefirmshasbeenpositive,growing但是對(duì)大企業(yè)的銀行貸款呈正增長(zhǎng)

Asiancrisistechwreck911第三十頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。4.Theimpactofthe2008FinancialTsunamionSMEFinance

2008金融海嘯對(duì)中小企業(yè)融資的影響第三十一頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。thefactorsleadingtothe2008FinancialTsunami2008金融海嘯的形成因素第三十二頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。thefactorsleadingtothe2008FinancialTsunami2008金融海嘯的形成因素

美國(guó)聯(lián)邦基金利率第三十三頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。thefactorsleadingtothe2008FinancialTsunami2008金融海嘯的形成因素

followedbyasharpfallasthefinancialcrisissetin隨后,隨著金融危機(jī)的出現(xiàn),利率陡降steadyincreasesinofficialratestocombatinflation,官方利率穩(wěn)固上升以控制通脹第三十四頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Source:technologyallowedcomplexproductstobecreated(egsecuritised),traded,andleveraged科技的進(jìn)步使復(fù)雜的金融衍生產(chǎn)品被創(chuàng)造(如證券化)、交易和杠桿化。2.“deregulation”movesof1999torepealtheGlass-Steagallactallowedbanks(suchasCiti,andLehmans)toridethewaveofassetinflation.1999年的放松金融管制運(yùn)動(dòng)使銀行(如花旗、雷曼)經(jīng)受一波波的資產(chǎn)通脹。3.By2007thiswavewasshapedbyawaveofSIV(StructuredInvestmentVehicles)writedownsandSubPrimedefaults,andsomebankrunsfromdepositors(egNorthernRock).Byend2007,thewavethencamefromthefinancesuppliers,mostlybanks,whoceasedtotrusteachother,sotheinterbankrates(egLIBOR)rosesteeply2007年,結(jié)構(gòu)性投資工具減記和次貸違約加重了這一波行情,一些銀行(如北巖)發(fā)生擠兌事件。2007年底,銀行變得互不信任,同業(yè)拆借利率陡升,是為第三波海嘯浪潮。

4.ThisthenledtothesharpfallinthesharepricesofBanks(byAugust2008Citihadfallen58%,RBS15.2%,Merrill62%).Thiswaveledtocollapseand/orrestructuringofmanybanksornearbanks(Wachovia,MerrillLynch,UBS,IndyMac,WashingtonMutual),Investmentbanks(BearStearns,Lehmans)Insuranceproviders(AIG),MortgageProviders(FreddieMacandFannieMae),andprivateequityproviders(Allco,BabcockandBrown).隨后導(dǎo)致銀行股價(jià)大幅下跌,很多銀行、投行、保險(xiǎn)機(jī)構(gòu)、抵押機(jī)構(gòu)和私募機(jī)構(gòu)倒閉或者重組。5.Regulatorsandcentralbanksscrambledtoinjectliquiditytothemarkets,partlybytakingastakeinthebanks.Thishaschangedthewholepatternofcompetition.監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)和央行紛紛給市場(chǎng)注入流動(dòng)性,部分還收購(gòu)了銀行股份,使整個(gè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)格局變了樣。thefactorsleadingtothe2008FinancialTsunami2008金融海嘯的形成因素

第三十五頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。lendinggrowthtolargefirms對(duì)大公司的貸款增長(zhǎng)realannual%growthbanklendingloanstoSMEof<$500,000中小企業(yè)RealgrowthofbanklendingimpactofFinancialTsunamiAustralia金融海嘯對(duì)澳大利亞的影響:銀行借貸的實(shí)際增長(zhǎng)情況AustraliaBanklendingtoSMEsandLargefirms;RealgrowthannualnominalgrowthlessCPIatquarterlyintervalsbysizeofloan澳大利亞銀行對(duì)中小企業(yè)和大公司的借貸情況banklendingtoverysmall<$100,000小企業(yè)FinancialTsunamiof2008Australianbankswereslowingtheirlendingtolargefirmsbeforethecrisis(mostlybecauseofrisingcashratepressures),buttheyfurthercutlendingtoSMEsintolowornegativerealgrowthbyend2008.澳大利亞銀行在危機(jī)發(fā)生前就放緩了對(duì)大公司的貸款,但是到2008年底時(shí),也進(jìn)一步削減了對(duì)中小企業(yè)的貸款,至低增長(zhǎng)或負(fù)增長(zhǎng)的程度。sourceRBAtablesD1andG1第三十六頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。GrowthofearlystageandtotalVCinUSAhasslowedsince2001美國(guó)早期階段的風(fēng)投和總風(fēng)險(xiǎn)資本自2001年以來(lái)放緩增長(zhǎng)TotalVC(allstages)總風(fēng)投(所有階段)Earlystage+seedVCAsiancrisisTechwreck2008FinancialTsunamiUSAVentureCapitalPlacementsinnominal$US.......andithasslowedevenmorein2008/9……2008/9年更是進(jìn)一步放緩第三十七頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Anecdotally,financehasbeenhardertogetforSMEs中小企業(yè)面臨越來(lái)越大的融資難問題fallingdemand,confidence需求縮水,信心下降orderbooksweak訂單減少majorcustomerscutbackorcollapse主要客戶削減開支或倒閉higherinsolvencybankruptcyrates破產(chǎn)率更高foreclosuresbydebtproviders債權(quán)人止贖difficultyrollingoverloans,credit貸款和信貸難度更大liquidityproblems流動(dòng)性問題extendpaymentperiods延長(zhǎng)付款期限第三十八頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。WhyisitbecomingharderforSMEstogetfinancefromBanks?中小企業(yè)為何更難獲得銀行融資?

IncreasingintangibleassetsofSMEsandstartupsmakeSMElendingunattractivetobanks中小企業(yè)和初創(chuàng)企業(yè)越來(lái)越多的無(wú)形資產(chǎn)使得中小企業(yè)貸款這一業(yè)務(wù)沒有吸引力BISBasleIIrulesmakebanksrethinkSMElending,anddiscourageuncollateralisedlending新巴塞爾資本協(xié)議的規(guī)則讓銀行重新思考中小企業(yè)借貸,不鼓勵(lì)無(wú)抵押的貸款Bankspushcollateralloans,usuallyhousing,inlieuofSMEbusinessloans相對(duì)中小企業(yè)貸款業(yè)務(wù),銀行更愿意追求抵押貸款,一般是住房抵押貸款Bankspushpersonalandcreditcardloans銀行追求個(gè)人貸款和信用卡貸款業(yè)務(wù)BankschannelSMEstotradecredit,ortradecreditfromlargefirmsismoreaccessibletoSMEs銀行將中小企業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)向貿(mào)易信貸,或者中小企業(yè)更容易獲得大公司的貿(mào)易信貸ImprovedefficiencyofequitymarketsforSMEs針對(duì)中小企業(yè)的股票市場(chǎng)的效率有了提升SMEstapotherdebtsources(bonds,etc)中小企業(yè)尋求其他債務(wù)融資來(lái)源(債券等)第三十九頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。andwhatmightitmean?什么意思?IncreasingintangibleassetsofSMEsandstartupsmakeSMElendingunattractivetobanksBISBasleIIrulesmakebanksrethinkSMElending,anddiscourageuncollateralisedlendingBankspushcollateralloans,usuallyhousing,inlieuofSMEbusinessloansBankspushpersonalandcreditcardloansBankschannelSMEstotradecredit,ortradecreditfromlargefirmsismoreaccessibletoSMEsImprovedefficiencyofequitymarketsforSMEsSMEstapotherdebtsources(bonds,etc)Banksneedtofindbetterwaysoflendingonintangibles銀行需要尋求更好地給無(wú)形資產(chǎn)借貸的方式APECandBISneedtomonitortheeffectandreviseBasleIIifappropriateAPEC和國(guó)際結(jié)算銀行需要監(jiān)測(cè)貸款效果,如果恰當(dāng)?shù)脑?,?duì)BaselII進(jìn)行修訂SMElendinggetstiedevenmorecloselyandsusceptiblytohousingcycle中小企業(yè)借貸與房地產(chǎn)周期關(guān)系更加緊密HighercostsofborrowingforSMEs對(duì)中小企業(yè)的貸款成本更高DifficulttoborrowforSMEswhicharenotpartofsupplychain,orforSMEsindeveloping(2020)economies非供應(yīng)鏈環(huán)上的中小企業(yè),或者發(fā)展中經(jīng)濟(jì)體的中小企業(yè),更難獲得貸款A(yù)PECneedstolooktowaystoimproveequitymarkets.CurrentlySMEequitymarketsareveryinefficientinmosteconomiesAPEC需要尋求多種途徑來(lái)完善股票市場(chǎng)。目前,大多數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)體的中小企業(yè)股票市場(chǎng)效率低下。第四十頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。5.WhathavegovernmentsdonetoaddressSMEchallengesinthe2008FinancialTsunamiCrisis?

政府的應(yīng)對(duì)措施第四十一頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。IndirectimpactonSMEs間接影響:depositguarantees存款擔(dān)保liquidityinjections,printmoney注入流動(dòng)性,印刷紙幣reduceprimerates減少最優(yōu)惠利率bankrestructuring銀行重組stimulatoryfiscalspending刺激性財(cái)政支出grantstoconsumers,cashpayouts消費(fèi)者贈(zèng)款DirectimpactonSMEs直接影響:creditguarantee信用擔(dān)保targetedtaxrelief有目標(biāo)的減稅loanmoratoria暫停貸款whathavegovernmentsdonetoaddressSMEfinanceproblems?政府解決中小企業(yè)融資問題的舉措

第四十二頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。IndirectimpactonSMEsdepositguaranteesliquidityinjections,printmoneyreduceprimeratesbankrestructuringstimulatoryfiscalspendinggrantstoconsumers,cashpayoutsDirectimpactonSMEscreditguaranteetargetedtaxreliefloanmoratoriawhathavegovernmentsdonetoaddressSMEfinanceproblems?政府解決中小企業(yè)融資問題的舉措

Theproblemisthatmostoftheseareindirect,andaddresssymptoms,notfundamentals問題在于,大多數(shù)舉措都是間接措施,治標(biāo)不治本第四十三頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。6.AvisionofwhatcouldbedonebettertoaddressSMEfinancechallenges

如何更好地應(yīng)對(duì)挑戰(zhàn)?第四十四頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Banks

銀行Increasinguseofportfoliolendingandscoringmodelsforloanassessment進(jìn)行貸款評(píng)估時(shí),多運(yùn)用組合貸款和打分模型Lessuseofrelationalbankingandknowyourcustomer(KYC)少運(yùn)用關(guān)系銀行和了解客戶BasleIIputsSMElendingintodifferenthigherriskcategory...《新資本協(xié)議》將中小企業(yè)貸款劃入更高的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)類別…Riskaverseloanmanagement,anddecliningrealloanstoSMEs風(fēng)險(xiǎn)厭惡貸款管理,縮減對(duì)中小企業(yè)的真正貸款額度SMEs中小企業(yè)Lesscollateralasintangibleassets,knowledgebecomemoreimportant.要求以更少的抵押物充當(dāng)無(wú)形資產(chǎn),知識(shí)越發(fā)重要Hardertogetbankfinance,SMEsseenashigherrisk,andoftenhavehighdefaultrates,NPLs更難獲得銀行融資,因?yàn)橹行∑髽I(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更高,違約率高,不良資產(chǎn)高Reluctanttoimproveeducationandmanagementskillbecauseofcosts,time,relevance,andlackofincentive由于成本、時(shí)間、相關(guān)度和缺乏激勵(lì)等因素的考慮,中小企業(yè)一般不愿意提升知識(shí)水平和管理技能AlmostallSMEmanagershavemobilephoneswith3Gcapacity幾乎所有的中小企業(yè)經(jīng)理都有具備3G功能的手機(jī)TheProblem提出問題第四十五頁(yè),共五十三頁(yè)。Traditionalmodel:傳統(tǒng)模型:SMEclientSMEclientBankBankAlternativeICTmodel:ICT模型:Bankprovidesfunds,butlittleadviceorknowledge.

SMEonlyprovidesbankwithinformationonperiodicbasis銀行僅提供資金,不提供建議或信息。中小企業(yè)僅時(shí)不時(shí)地給銀行提供信息BankprovidesfundsconditionalonSMEusingknowledgeandeducationservicestostaycompetitive,usingmobiletechnology.

SMEprovidesbank,viacellphoneorcomputer,withinformationaregularbasis,ismatchedagainstdatabase,andadvisedonanexceptionprocess.Analternativeusi

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論