下載本文檔
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
2022年考研英語閱讀模擬試題(2)
Text2
Scientificpublishinghaslongbeenalicencetoprintmoney.Scientistsneed
journalsinwhichtopublishtheirresearch,sotheywillsupplythearticleswithout
monetaryreward.Otherscientistsperformthespecialisedworkofpeerreviewalso
forfree,becauseitisacentralelementintheacquisitionofstatusandthe
productionofscientificknowledge.
Withthecontentofpaperssecuredforfree,thepublisherneedsonlyfindamarket
foritsjournal.Untilthiscentury,universitylibrarieswerenotveryprice
sensitive.Scientificpublishersroutinelyreportprofitmarginsapproaching40%on
theiroperationsatatimewhentherestofthepublishingindustryisinan
existentialcrisis.
TheDutchgiantElsevier,whichclaimstopublish25%ofthescientificpapers
producedintheworld,madeprofitsofmorethan£900mlastyear,whileUKuniversities
alonespentmorethan£210min2022toenableresearcherstoaccesstheirownpublicly
fundedresearch;bothfiguresseemtoriseunstoppablydespiteincreasinglydesperate
effortstochangethem.
Themostdrastic,anthoroughlyillegal,reactionhasbeentheemergenceof
Sci-Hub,akindofglobalphotocopierforscientificpapers,setupin2022,which
nowclaimstoofferaccesstoeverypaywalledarticlepublishedsince2022.The
successofSci-Hub,whichreliesonresearcherspassingoncopiestheyhavethemselves
legallyaccessed,showsthelegalecosystemhaslostlegitimacyamongitsusersand
mustbetransformedsothatitworksforallparticipants.
InBritainthemovetowardsopenaccesspublishinghasbeendrivenbyfunding
bodies.Insomewaysithasbeenverysuccessful.MorethanhalfofallBritish
scientificresearchisnowpublishedunderopenaccessterms:eitherfreelyavailable
fromthemomentofpublication,orpaywalledforayearormoresothatthepublishers
canmakeaprofitbeforebeingplacedongeneralrelease.
Yetthenewsystemhasnotyetworkedoutanycheaperfortheuniversities.
Publishershaverespondedtothedemandthattheymaketheirproductfreetoreaders
bychargingtheirwritersfeestocoverthecostsofprepringanarticle.Theserange
2
fromaround£500to$5,000,andapparentlytheworkgetsmoreexpensivethemorethat
publishersdoit.Areportlastyearpointedoutthatthecostsbothofsubscriptions
andoftheseaarticlepreparationcosts“hadbeensteadilyrisingatarateabove
inflation.
Insomewaysthescientificpublishingmodelresemblestheeconomyofthesocial
internet:labourisprovidedfreeinexchangeforthehopeofstatus,whilehuge
profitsaremadebyafewbigfirmswhorunthemarketplaces.Inbothcases,weneed
arebalancingofpower.
26.Scientificpublishingisseenas“alicencetoprintmoney"partlybecause
[A]itsfundinghasenjoyedasteadyincrease.
[B]itsmarketingstrategyhasbeensuccessful.
[C]itspaymentforpeerreviewisreduced.
[D]itscontentacquisitioncostsnothing.
27.AccordingtoParagraphs2and3,scientificpublishersElsevierhave
[A]thrivedmainlyonuniversity1ibraries.
[B]gonethroughanexistentialcrisis.
[C]revivedthepublishingindustry.
[D]financedresearchersgenerously.
28.HowdoestheauthorfeelaboutthesuccessofSci-Hub
[A]Relieved.
[B]Puzzled.
[C]Concerned.
[D]Encouraged.
29.ItcanbelearnedfromParagraphs5and6thatopenaccessterms
[A]allowpublisherssomeroomtomakemoney.
[B]renderpublishingmucheasierforscientists.
[C]reducethecostofpublicationsubstantially.
[D]freeuniversitiesfromfinancialburdens.
30.Whichofthefollowingcharacterizesthescientificpublishingmodel
[A]Trialsubscriptionisoffered.
[B]Labourtriumphsoverstatus.
[C]Costsarewellcontrolled.
[D]Thefewfeedonthemany.
參考答案Text2
26.選D。解析:此題為細(xì)節(jié)題。題干問:^Scientificpublishingisseenasualicence
toprintmoney"partlybecause〃,意思是:科學(xué)出版行業(yè)被視為一本萬利,一局部原因
是定位到原文第一段第二句,“Scientistsneedjournalsinwhichtopublishtheir
research,sotheywillsupplythearticleswithoutmonetaryreward.Otherscientists
performthespecialisedworkofpeerreviewalsoforfree,becauseitisacentral
elementintheacquisitionofstatusandtheproductionofscientificknowledge.v
意思是:科學(xué)家需要在學(xué)術(shù)期刊上發(fā)表他們的研究,所以他們會(huì)無償提供文章。其他科學(xué)家
做專業(yè)的同行評(píng)議工作也是免費(fèi)的,因?yàn)檫@是獲取(學(xué)術(shù))地位和科學(xué)知識(shí)生產(chǎn)的核心元素。
這說明,科學(xué)家奉獻(xiàn)內(nèi)容是無償?shù)?,換言之,其內(nèi)容獲取是沒有代價(jià)的(itscontent
acquisitioncostsnothing),應(yīng)選D。
27.選A。解析:此題為細(xì)節(jié)題。題干問:^AccordingtoParagraphs2and3,scientific
publishersElsevierhave...〃意思是:“根庵第2段和第3段,科學(xué)期刊出版商Elsevier...〃
定位到文章第2段和第3段,“Withthecontentofpaperssecuredforfree,the
publisherneedsonlyfindamarketforitsjournal.Untilthiscentury,university
librarieswerenotverypricesensitive."意思是,”由于論文內(nèi)容是免費(fèi)獲取的,出
版商只需為自己的期刊找到市場(chǎng)即可。直到本世紀(jì),大學(xué)圖書館對(duì)價(jià)格都不敏感。〃而第三
段說,TheDutchgiantElsevier,whichclaimstopublish25%ofthescientificpapers
producedintheworld,madeprofitsofmorethan£900mlastyear,whileUKuniversities
alonespentmorethan£210min2022toenableresearcherstoaccesstheirownpublicly
fundedresearch.意思是,“荷蘭出版巨頭Elsevier聲稱發(fā)表了全球25%的科學(xué)論文,去年
利潤(rùn)超過9億英鎊,而僅英國(guó)的大學(xué)在2022年就花費(fèi)了2.1億英鎊,為了研究人員能用公費(fèi)進(jìn)
行自己的研究。從而看出,科學(xué)期刊出版商Elsevier的興盛,主要依賴于大學(xué)的圖書館。應(yīng)選
A,thrivedmainlyonuniversitylibrarieso
28.選D。解析:此題為作者態(tài)度題。題干問:“Howdoestheauthorfeelaboutthe
successofSci-Hub〃定位到原文第4段?!癟hemostdrastic,anthoroughlyillegal,
reactionhasbeentheemergenceofSci-Hub,akindofglobalphotocopierfor
scientificpapers,setupin2022,whichnowclaimstoofferaccesstoeverypaywalled
articlepublishedsince2022.ThesuccessofSci-Hub,whichreliesonresearchers
passingoncopiestheyhavethemselveslegallyaccessed,showsthelegalecosystem
haslostlegitimacyamongitsusersandmustbetransformedsothatitworksforall
participants.〃意思是“最劇烈的、也是徹底不合法的對(duì)抗,是Sci-Hub的出現(xiàn)。這是一種
全球性的科學(xué)論文復(fù)印機(jī),成立于2022年,聲稱可以訪問自2022年以來發(fā)表的每一篇付費(fèi)文
章。Sci-Hub的成功依賴于研究人員將自己合法獲取的副本傳遞出去,這說明合法生態(tài)體系在用
戶中已經(jīng)失去了合法性,必須進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)變,以使其為所有人效勞〃。
29.選A。解析:此題為細(xì)節(jié)題。題干問:“ItcanbelearnedfromParagraphs5and
6thatopenaccessterms'"意思是,"從第5和第6段可以得知,開源期刊條款...〃定位
至嫄文第5段,InBritainthemovetowardsopenaccesspublishinghasbeendrivenby
fundingbodies.Insomewaysithasbeenverysuccessful.Morethanhalfofall
Britishscientificresearchisnowpublishedunderopenaccessterms:eitherfreely
availablefromthemomentofpublication,orpaywalledforayearormoresothat
thepublisherscanmakeaprofitbeforebeingplacedongeneralrelease.意思是,
在英國(guó),開源出版是由資助機(jī)構(gòu)推動(dòng)的。在某些方面,它己經(jīng)非常成功。當(dāng)前英國(guó)超過一半
的科學(xué)研究都是在開放獲取條款下出版的:要么從出版之日起就可以免費(fèi)獲得,要么在一年
或更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間內(nèi)付費(fèi),這樣出版商在公開發(fā)行前就可以獲利。定位到原文第6段,Yetthenew
systemhasnotyetworkedoutanycheaperfortheuniversities.Publishershave
respondedtothedemandthattheymaketheirproductfreetoreadersbychargingtheir
writersfeestocoverthecostsofpreparinganarticle.Theserangefromaround£500
to$5,000,andapparentlytheworkgetsmoreexpensivethemorethatpublishersdo
it.Areportlastyearpointedoutthatthecostsbothofsubscriptionsandofthese
aarticlepreparationcosts"hadbeensteadilyrisingat
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024年日語外貿(mào)業(yè)務(wù)員勞動(dòng)協(xié)議
- 2024年電氣工程服務(wù)協(xié)議詳細(xì)模板
- 2023-2024學(xué)年中原名校高考數(shù)學(xué)試題仿真卷:數(shù)學(xué)試題試卷
- 2024年創(chuàng)意動(dòng)畫廣告制作協(xié)議示例
- 2024專業(yè)護(hù)士聘用協(xié)議細(xì)則
- 2024年度黨組織結(jié)對(duì)共建協(xié)議
- DB11∕T 1721-2020 水生生物調(diào)查技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 2024精制陶瓷購(gòu)銷協(xié)議樣本
- 二手車銷售協(xié)議范本(個(gè)性化)
- 2024年煤礦作業(yè)自卸運(yùn)輸車銷售協(xié)議
- 團(tuán)隊(duì)協(xié)作課件教學(xué)課件
- 相對(duì)濕度計(jì)算公式
- 7.1促進(jìn)民族團(tuán)結(jié) (課件) 2024-2025學(xué)年九年級(jí)道德與法治上冊(cè) (統(tǒng)編版)
- 2023-2024學(xué)年四年級(jí)上冊(cè)信息技術(shù)第一單元第1課《身邊的數(shù)據(jù)》教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)浙教版2023
- 福建省龍海市龍文區(qū)2022-2023學(xué)年五年級(jí)上學(xué)期期末英語試題
- 防范工貿(mào)行業(yè)典型事故三十條措施解讀
- 8安全記心上-交通安全(教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì))部編版道德與法治三年級(jí)上冊(cè)
- 提煉與抽象-順暢溝通世界 課件-2023-2024學(xué)年高中美術(shù)人教版(2019)選擇性必修4 設(shè)計(jì)
- 國(guó)開2024年秋季《形勢(shì)與政策》專題測(cè)驗(yàn)1-5答案
- 2024年高考英語時(shí)事熱點(diǎn):航天主題(附答案解析)
- 危貨運(yùn)輸車輛掛靠協(xié)議
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論